SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

 

Filedby the Registrant [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [   ]

Check the appropriate box:

[   ]Preliminary Proxy Statement                     [   ] Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
[   ]Confidential, For Use of the
    Commission Only (as permitted by
    Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]Definitive Proxy Statement
[   ]Definitive Additional Materials

Capital One Financial Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]No fee required.

[   ]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange ActRule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5)Total fee paid:

[   ]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

[   ]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

1)Amount previously paid:

2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3)Filing Party:

4)Date Filed:


LOGO

NOTICE OF CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION’S

2015 ANNUAL STOCKHOLDER MEETING

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for

The Stockholder Meeting To Be Held On April 30, 2015

The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available atwww.proxyvote.com

The Annual Stockholder Meeting of Capital One Financial Corporation (“Capital One” or the “Company”) will be held at Capital One’s headquarters, 1680 Capital One Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102, on April 30, 2015, at 10:00 a.m.

 Items of Business

As a stockholder you will be asked to:

1.Elect ten nominated directors, who are listed in the proxy statement, as directors of Capital One;

2.Ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of Capital One for 2015;

3.Approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, Capital One’s 2014 Named Executive Officer compensation;

4.Approve amendments to Capital One’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow stockholders to request special meetings of the stockholders;

5.Consider a stockholder proposal regarding special meetings of the stockholders, if properly presented at the meeting; and

6.Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

 Record Date

You may vote if you held shares of Capital One common stock as of the close of business on March 5, 2015.

 Proxy Voting

Your vote is important. You may vote your shares in person at the Annual Stockholder Meeting, via the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please refer to the section “How do I vote?” for detailed voting instructions. If you choose to vote in person at the Annual Stockholder Meeting, via the Internet or by telephone, you do not need to mail in a proxy card.

 Annual Meeting Admission

Due to space limitations, attendance is limited to stockholders and one guest each. Admission to the meeting is on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration begins at 9:00 a.m. A valid government-issued picture identification and proof of stock ownership as of the record date must be presented in order to attend the meeting. If you hold Capital One stock through a broker, bank, trust or other nominee, you must bring a copy of a statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date. If you plan to attend as the proxy of a stockholder, you must present a legal proxy (described below). Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices are not permitted.

We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

On behalf of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

John G. Finneran, Jr.

Corporate Secretary

Capital One Financial Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]No fee required.

[   ]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange ActRule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5)Total fee paid:

[   ]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

[   ]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

1)Amount previously paid:

2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3)Filing Party:

4)Date Filed:


LOGO


LOGO

Notice of Capital One Financial Corporation’s

2017 Annual Stockholder Meeting

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for

The Stockholder Meeting To Be Held On May 4, 2017

The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available atwww.proxyvote.com

The Annual Stockholder Meeting of Capital One Financial Corporation (“Capital One” or “Company”) will be held at Capital One’s headquarters at 1680 Capital One Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102, on May 4, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. local time.

Items of Business

As a stockholder you will be asked to:

Elect ten nominated directors, who are listed in the proxy statement, as directors of Capital One;

Ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of Capital One for 2017;

Approve, on anon-binding advisory basis, Capital One’s 2016 Named Executive Officer compensation;

Approve, on anon-binding advisory basis, the frequency with which Capital One will hold a stockholder vote to approve Capital One’s Named Executive Officer compensation;

Approve and adopt Capital One’s Amended and Restated Associate Stock Purchase Plan; and

Consider a stockholder proposal requesting stockholders’ right to act by written consent, if properly presented at the meeting.

Stockholders also will transact other business that may properly come before the meeting.

Record Date

You may vote if you held shares of Capital One common stock as of the close of business on March 13, 2017 (“Record Date”).

Proxy Voting

Your vote is important. You may vote your shares via the Internet, by telephone, by mail or in person at the Annual Stockholder Meeting. Please refer to the section “How do I vote?” in the Proxy Statement for detailed voting instructions. If you vote via the Internet, by telephone or in person at the Annual Stockholder Meeting, you do not need to mail in a proxy card.

Annual Meeting Admission

Due to space limitations, attendance is limited to stockholders and one guest each. Admission to the meeting is on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration begins at 9:00 a.m. local time. A valid government-issued picture identification and proof of stock ownership as of the Record Date must be presented to attend the meeting. If you hold Capital One stock through a broker, bank, trust or other nominee, you must bring a copy of a statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the Record Date. If you plan to attend as the proxy of a stockholder, you must present a legal proxy from your bank, broker, trust or other nominee vote. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices are not permitted. If you require special assistance at the meeting because of a disability, please contact the Corporate Secretary at the address below.

We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

On behalf of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

John G. Finneran, Jr.

Corporate Secretary

Capital One Financial Corporation

1680 Capital One Drive

McLean, VA 22102

March 17, 201521, 2017


TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

 

Page

SECTIONSection I – ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENTAbout This Proxy Statement

  1

Section II – Corporate Governance at Capital One

6

Overview of Corporate Governance at Capital One

6

Our Board Of Directors

9

Director Nominees

13

Board Leadership Structure

19

Key Board Governance Practices

20

Board Committees

24

Executive Officers

28

Related Person Transactions

31

Stockholder Engagement Program

31

How To Contact Us

33

Section III – Security Ownership

34

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

34

Security Ownership of Directors and Named Executive Officers

34

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

36

Section IV – Director Compensation

37

Director Compensation Objectives

37

Director Compensation Procedures

37

Director Compensation Structure

37

Other Benefits

37

Stock Ownership Requirements

38

Compensation of Directors

38

Section V – Compensation Discussion and Analysis

40

Introduction

41

Our Compensation Objectives

41

Our Compensation Governance Cycle

42

Important Aspects of Our Executive Compensation Programs

43

Consideration of 2016 Say on Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement

44

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

45

NEO Compensation

54

Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions

60

Criteria and Process for Compensation Decisions

62

Other Compensation Arrangements

64

Other Aspects of Executive Compensation

65

Section VI – Named Executive Officer Compensation

68

2016 Summary Compensation Table

69

2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

70

2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

72

2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

73

2016 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End Table

74

Pension Benefits

77

2016 Pension Benefits Table

78

Capital One’s VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs

78

2016Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

79

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

80

2016 Potential Payments and Benefits Upon Termination or Change of Control Table

84 

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  i


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION IISection VIICORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONEEquity Compensation Plans

  86

Equity Compensation Plan Information

86

1999 Directors Plan

86

Section VIII – Compensation Committee Report

88

Section IX – Audit Committee Report

89

Section X – Election of Directors (Item 1 on Proxy Card)

90
Section XI – Ratification of Selection of Independent Auditors (Item 2 on Proxy Card)91
Section XII – Advisory Approval of Capital One’s 2016 Named Executive Officer Compensation (Item 3 on Proxy Card)93
Section XIII – Advisory Vote on Frequency of Holding an Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation (Item 4 on Proxy Card)94
Section XIV – Approval and Adoption of Capital One’s Amended and Restated Associate Stock Purchase Plan (Item 5 on Proxy Card)95
Section XV – Stockholder Proposal Requesting Stockholders’ Right to Act by Written Consent (Item 6 on Proxy Card)97

Section XVI – Other Business

99

Other Business

99

Annual Report to Stockholders

99

Stockholder Proposals for 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting

99
Appendix A – Amended and Restated Capital One Financial Corporation 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan100 

ii  

SECTION III – SECURITY OWNERSHIP

 25 

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


Section I – About This Proxy Statement

  MEETING INFORMATION  

  Date:

Thursday, May 4, 2017

  Time:

10:00 a.m. local time

  Location:

1680 Capital One Drive, McLean, Virginia, 22102

  HOW TO VOTE  

Your vote is important. You may vote your shares via the Internet, by telephone, by mail or in person at the Annual Meeting. Please refer to the section “How do I vote?” in the questions below for detailed voting instructions. If you vote via the Internet, by telephone or in person at the Annual Meeting, you do not need to mail in a proxy card.

SECTION IV – DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONINTERNET

 28

TELEPHONE

OR CELLPHONE

 MAILIN PERSON

SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

LOGO 31LOGO LOGOLOGO

SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATIONVisit www.proxyvote.com

You will need the16-digit number in your notice, proxy card or voting instruction form.

 52

SECTION VII – EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

Dial toll-free(1-800-690-6903) or the telephone number on your voting instruction form. You will need the16-digit number in your notice, proxy card or voting instruction form. 71

SECTION VIII – COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

If you received a paper copy of your proxy materials, send your completed and signed proxy card or voting instruction form using the enclosed postage-paid envelope. 73By following the instructions below under “Can I attend the Annual Meeting?” on page 2 and requesting a ballot when you arrive.

SECTION IX – AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

74

SECTION X – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (ITEM 1 ON PROXY CARD)

75

SECTION XI – RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS (ITEM 2 ON PROXY CARD)

76

SECTION XII – ADVISORY APPROVAL OF CAPITAL ONE’S 2014 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION (ITEM 3 ON PROXY CARD)

78

SECTION XIII – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO CAPITAL ONE’S RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ALLOW STOCKHOLDERS TO REQUEST SPECIAL MEETINGS OF THE STOCKHOLDERS (ITEM 4 ON PROXY CARD)

79

SECTION XIV – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL MEETINGS OF THE STOCKHOLDERS (ITEM 5 ON PROXY CARD)

83

SECTION XV – OTHER BUSINESS

85

APPENDIX A – PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION’S RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ALLOW STOCKHOLDERS TO REQUEST SPECIAL MEETINGS OF THE STOCKHOLDERS

A-1

APPENDIX B – PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CAPITAL ONE’S AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS TO ALLOW STOCKHOLDERS TO REQUEST SPECIAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS

B-1


SECTION I – ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT

 

Why did I receive a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?

In accordance withPursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), instead of mailing printed copies of our proxy materials, we are furnishing the proxy materials to our stockholders via the Internet.Internet instead of mailing printed copies. This process will saveallows us to expedite our stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the Company some of the costcosts of printing and mailing the proxy materials and will reduce the environmental impact of our annual stockholder meetings on the environment.Capital One’s 2017 Annual Stockholder Meeting (“Annual Meeting”). Accordingly, on or about March 17, 2015,21, 2017, we mailedfirst sent to our stockholders a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”(“Notice”). If you received a Notice, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. The Notice provides instructions on how to access the proxy materials for Capital One’s 2015the Annual Stockholder Meeting (the “Annual Meeting”) via the Internet, how to request a printed set of proxy materials and how to vote your shares.

What is the purpose of the proxy materials?

The Board of Directors of Capital One (“Board of Directors” or “Board”) is providing you these materials in connection with the solicitation by Capital One’sthe Board of Directors of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting. All stockholders who held shares of Capital One common stock as of the close of business on March 5, 2015 (the “record date”13, 2017 (“Record Date”),

are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting and to vote on the items of business outlined in this proxy statement. If you choose not to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you may vote your shares via the Internet, by telephone or by mail.

How do I access the proxy materials?

The Notice provides instructions regarding how to view our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting online. As explained in greater detail in the Notice, to view the proxy materials and to vote, you will need to visitwww.proxyvote.com and have available your16-digit control number(s) contained on your Notice.

How do I request paper copies of the proxy materials?

You may request paper copies of the 20152017 proxy materials by following the instructions listed atwww.proxyvote.com, by telephoning calling1-800-579-1639 or by sending ane-mail tosendmaterial@proxyvote.com.

What is the difference between a record holder and a holder of shares in street name?

You are a record holder if you hold shares of Capital One common stock directly in your name through Capital One’s transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (“Computershare”).

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  1


SECTION I – ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT

If you hold shares of Capital One common stock through a broker, bank, trust or other nominee, then you are a holder of shares in street name. As a result, you must instruct the broker, bank, trust or other nominee about how to vote your shares. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), if you do not provide such instructions, the firm that holds your shares will have discretionary authority to vote your shares only with respect to “routine” matters, as described below.

Can I attend the Annual Meeting?

If you held shares of Capital One common stock as of the close of business on March 5, 2015,Record Date, you may attend the Annual Meeting. Because seating is limited, only you and a guest may attend the meeting. Admission to the meeting is on a first-come, first-served basis. Registration begins at 9:00 a.m. You must present a valid government-issued picture identification and proof of Capital One stock ownership as of the record date.Record Date. If you hold Capital One stock in street name, you must also bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date.Record Date. If you plan to attend as the proxy of a stockholder, you must present a legal proxy (described below). Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices are not permitted.

If you require special assistance at the meeting because of a disability, please contact the Corporate Secretary at Capital One’s address in the Notice.

Am I entitled to vote?

You are entitled to vote if you were the record holder of shares of Capital One common stock as of the close of business on March 5, 2015.Record Date. All stockholders of record are entitled to one vote per share of common stock held for each matter submitted for a vote at the meeting.

If you hold your shares of Capital One common stock in street name, you may instruct your broker regarding voting your shares using the same methods described below under “How do I vote?”

On March 5, 2015, there were 549,458,166 sharesHow many votes can be cast by all stockholders?

A total of 482,707,391 votes, consisting of one vote for each share of Capital One’sOne common stock issued and outstanding.outstanding on the Record Date.

How do I vote?

In Person

If you are a record holder of shares of Capital One common stock, you may vote in person at the Annual

Meeting. A record holder must present a valid government-issued picture identification. If you are representing an entity that is a shareholder, you must provide evidence of your authority to represent that entity at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders of record also may be represented by another person at the Annual Meeting by executing a legal proxy designating that person as the proxy holder. Each stockholder may appoint only one proxy holder or representative to attend the Annual Meeting on his or her behalf. See “Can I attend the Annual Meeting?” above for more information regarding attending the Annual Meeting.

If you hold your shares of Capital One common stock in street name, you must bring a valid government-issued picture identification and a copy of a statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the Record Date to attend the meeting. You must also obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, trust or other nominee and present it to the inspector of elections with your ballot to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. To request a legal proxy, please follow the instructions atwww.proxyvote.com.

By Internet

You may vote via the Internet by going towww.proxyvote.com and following the instructions on the screen. Have your Notice, proxy card (for record holders) or voting instruction form (for holders of shares in street name) available when you access the web page.

By Telephone

You may vote by telephone by calling the toll-free telephone number on the proxy card(1-800-690-6903), which is available 24 hours a day, and following the prerecorded instructions. Have your Notice or proxy card available when you call. If you hold your shares in street name, your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee may provide additional instructions to you regarding voting your shares by telephone.

By Mail

If you received your proxy materials by mail, you may vote by mail by completing the enclosed proxy card, dating and signing it and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided or returning it to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), Vote Processing, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. If you hold your shares in street name, follow the voting instructions you receive from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee.

2  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION I – ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT

Time for Voting Your Shares By Internet, By Telephone or By Mail

You may vote via the Internet or by telephone up until 11:59 PMp.m. Eastern Daylight Time on April 29, 2015.May 3, 2017. If you vote by mail, your proxy card must be received by April 29, 2015.

In Person

May 3, 2017. If you are a record holder of shares ofparticipate in the Capital One common stock, you mayAssociate Savings Plan, see “How do I vote in person at the Annual Meeting. A record holder must present a valid government-issued picture identification and, if the shares are held in the name of an entity, evidence of valid authorization from that entity in order to attend the meeting. Stockholders of record also may be represented by another person at the Annual Meeting by executing a legal proxy designating that person as the proxy holder. Each stockholder may appoint only one proxy holder or representative to attend the Annual Meeting on his or her behalf. See “Can I attend the Annual Meeting?my 401(k) shares?abovebelow for more information regarding attending the Annual Meeting.information.

If you hold your shares of Capital One common stock in street name, you must bring a valid government-issued picture identification and a copy of a statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date in order to attend the meeting. You must also obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, trust or other nominee and present it to the inspector of elections with your ballot to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. To request a legal proxy, please follow the instructions atwww.proxyvote.com.

What if I hold my shares in street name and I do not provide my broker, bank, trustee or other nominee

with instructions about how to vote my shares?

You may instruct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee on how to vote your shares using the methods described above. If you do not vote via the Internet or by telephone and do not return your voting instructions to the firm that holds your shares prior to the Annual Meeting, the firm has discretion to vote your shares only with respect to Item 2 on the proxy card,(ratification of selection of independent auditors), which is considered a “routine” matter under NYSE rules. The electionItems 1 (election of

members of the Board of DirectorsDirectors), 3 (advisory approval of 2016 Named Executive Officer compensation), 4 (advisory vote on frequency of holding an advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation), 5 (approval and Items 3, 4adoption of amended and 5restated Associate Stock Purchase Plan) and 6 (stockholder proposal requesting stockholders’ right to act by written consent) are not considered “routine” matters, and the firm that holds your shares will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares for these Items if you do not provide instructions using one of the methods described above. Therefore, you are encouraged to return your voting instructions so that your shares are voted fornon-routine matters at the Annual Meeting. If you hold shares in several different accounts, you must provide voting instructions for each account in order to authorize all of your shares to be voted.

How do I vote my 401(k) shares?

If you participate in the Capital One Associate Savings Plan, you may vote the number of shares equivalent to your interest in the Capital One Pooled Stock Fund as credited to your account on the record date.Record Date. You will receive instructions on how to vote your shares viae-mail from Broadridge. The trustee of the Associate Savings Plan will vote your shares in accordance with your duly executed instructions if they are received by April 27, 2015.11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 1, 2017. If you do not send instructions, the trustee will not vote the share equivalents credited to your account.

Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote?

Yes, you may revoke any proxy that you previously granted or change your vote by:

 

submitting another timely vote via the Internet, by telephone or by mailing a new proxy card or voting instruction form;
attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person; or
if you are a record holder, giving written notice of revocation to the Corporate Secretary, Capital One Financial Corporation, 1680 Capital One Drive, McLean, VA 22102.
submitting another timely vote via the Internet, by telephone or by mailing a new proxy card or voting instruction form;
attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person, as indicated above under “How do I vote?”; or
if you are a record holder, giving written notice of revocation to the Corporate Secretary, Capital One Financial Corporation, 1680 Capital One Drive, McLean, VA 22102.

Your new vote or revocation must be submitted in accordance with the timeframes above under “Time for Voting Your Shares By Internet, By Telephone or By Mail.”

What constitutes a quorum?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to transact business at the Annual Meeting. A quorum exists if the holders of a majority of the voting power of Capital One’s outstanding shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors are present in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will be counted in determining if there is a quorum, but neither will be counted as votes cast.

What is a brokernon-vote?

As described above, underUnder NYSE rules, if you hold your shares in street name and you do not submit voting instructions to the firm that holds your shares, the firm has discretionary authority to vote your shares only with respect to “routine” matters. Fornon-routine matters, which include the election of directors and Items 3, 4, 5 and 5,6, if you do not submit voting instructions, the firm that holds your shares will not have discretion to vote your shares. This is called a “brokernon-vote.”

Who will count the vote?

Votes will be tabulated by Broadridge. The Board of Directors has appointed a representative of American ElectionsElection Services, LLC to serve as the Inspector of Elections.

Will a list of stockholders be made available?

Capital One will make a list of stockholders available at the Annual Meeting and, for ten days prior to the meeting, at our offices located at 1680 Capital One Drive in McLean, Virginia. Please contact Capital One’s Corporate Secretary at(703) 720-1000 if you wish to inspect the list of stockholders prior to the Annual Meeting.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  3


SECTION I – ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT

How much did the solicitation cost?

Capital One will pay the costs of the solicitation. We have retained Georgeson Inc.Morrow & Co., LLC to assist us in the solicitation of proxies for an aggregate fee of $12,500, plus reasonableout-of-pocket expenses. In addition to Capital One soliciting proxies via the Internet, by telephone and by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies on our behalf, without additional compensation.

What is “householding?”

Under SEC rules, a single package of Notices may be sent to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family unless contrary instructions have been received. Each stockholder continues to receive a separate Notice within the package. This procedure, referred to as householding,“householding,” reduces the volume of duplicate materials stockholders receive and reduces mailing expenses. Stockholders may revoke their

consent to future householding mailings or enroll in householding by contacting Broadridge toll free at 1-800-542-10611-866-540-7095 or by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Capital One will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the proxy materials to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy was delivered. Stockholders who wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials now should contact Broadridge at the same phone number or mailing address.

What vote is necessary to approve each item?item and what are the Board’s recommendations?

All stockholders of record are entitled to one vote per share of common stock held for each nominee for director and for each other matter presented for a vote at the meeting.

Item 1 requests your vote The following table sets forth the voting requirements for each proposal being voted at the election of ten candidates for director. Richard D. Fairbank, Patrick W. Gross, Ann Fritz Hackett, Lewis Hay, III, Benjamin P. Jenkins, III, Pierre E. Leroy, Peter E. Raskind, Mayo A. Shattuck III, Bradford H. Warnermeeting and Catherine G. West will each be elected as a director of Capital One if a majority of the votes cast in his or her election is voted in favor of such election. Capital One also maintains a “majority voting” policy, which requires that any director who fails to receive a majority of votes cast in favor of his or her election tender a resignation for the Board’s consideration. Cumulative voting for the election of directors is not permitted. For more information regarding Capital One’s director nomination process see page 15.recommendations.

Item 2, the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of the Company for 2015, will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on the proposal are voted in favor of the proposal.

Item 3, the advisory approval of Capital One’s 2014 Named Executive Officer compensation, will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on the proposal are voted in favor of the proposal.

Item 4, amending Capital One’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow stockholders to request special meetings of the stockholders, will be approved if a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding are voted in favor of the proposal;

Item 5, the stockholder proposal regarding special meetings of the stockholders,
ItemMatter to be Voted On        Board
Recommendation
Voting Requirement
1.Election of ten candidates for director:
Richard D. Fairbank, Ann Fritz Hackett,
Lewis Hay, III, Benjamin P. Jenkins, III,
Peter Thomas Killalea, Pierre E. Leroy,
Peter E. Raskind, Mayo A. Shattuck III, Bradford H. Warner and Catherine G. West
FOREach candidate will be elected as a director of Capital One if a majority of the votes cast in his or her election is voted in favor of such election. Capital One also maintains a “resignation” policy, which requires that any director who fails to receive a majority of votes cast in favor of his or her election tender a resignation for the Board of Directors’ consideration. Cumulative voting for the election of directors is not permitted. For more information regarding Capital One’s director nomination process see page 11.
2.Ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of the Company for 2017FORThis item will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on the proposal are voted in favor of the proposal.
3.Advisory approval of Capital One’s 2016 Named Executive Officer compensationFORThis item will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on the proposal are voted in favor of the proposal.
4.Advisory vote to determine the frequency
with which Capital One will hold a stockholder vote to approve its Named Executive Officer compensation
EVERY YEARThis item will be determined based on which option (every year, every two years, or every three years) receives a majority of the votes cast.
5.Approval and adoption of Capital One’s Amended and Restated Associate Stock Purchase PlanFORThis item will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on the proposal are voted in favor of the proposal.
6.Stockholder proposal requesting stockholders’ right to act by written consentAGAINSTThis item will be approved if a majority of votes cast on the proposal are voted in favor of the proposal.

4  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION I – ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT

As described under “How“What if I hold my shares in street name and I do I vote?not provide my broker, bank, trustee or other nominee with instructions about how to vote my shares?” on page 2,3, under NYSE rules, if you hold your shares in street name and you do not submit voting instructions to the broker, bank, trust or other nominee that holds your shares, the firm will only have discretionary authority to vote your shares with respect to Item 2. If you do not submit voting instructions, the firm that holds your shares will not have discretion to vote your shares with respect to Items 1, 3, 4, 5 and 5.6. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are not considered “votes cast” and thus do not have an effect on the outcome of the vote as to Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 5. With respect to Item 4, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

6.

 What are the Board of Directors’ recommendations?

If you properly submit a proxy without giving specific voting instructions, the individuals named as proxy holders will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors as follows:

FOR the election of Richard D. Fairbank, Patrick W. Gross, Ann Fritz Hackett, Lewis Hay, III, Benjamin P. Jenkins, III, Pierre E. Leroy, Peter E. Raskind, Mayo A. Shattuck III, Bradford H. Warner and Catherine G. West, as directors of Capital One (see page 75);

FOR the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of the Company for 2015 (see page 76);

FOR the advisory approval of Capital One’s 2014 Named Executive Officer compensation (see page 78);

FOR the approval of the amendment to Capital One’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow stockholders to request special meetings of the stockholders (see page 79); and

AGAINST the stockholder proposal regarding special meetings of the stockholders (see page 83).

Although the proposed amendment to Capital One’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation on page 79 and the stockholder proposal on page 83 concern the same subject matter, the terms and effects of each proposal differ. You should carefully read the descriptions of each proposal, and Capital One’s statement in opposition to the stockholder proposal. Stockholders may vote on both the proposed amendment to Capital One’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the stockholder proposal, and approval of the proposed amendment to Capital One’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation is not conditioned on approval or disapproval of the stockholder proposal.

The Board of Directors is not aware of any other matter that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the persons named on the accompanying proxy card will, in the absence ofabsent stockholder instructions to the contrary, vote such proxy at their discretion.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  5


SECTIONSection II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONECorporate Governance at Capital One

  Overview of Corporate Governance at Capital One

 

Board of Directors

   Nine of our ten director nominees are independent

   CEO and founder is the only member of management who serves as a director

   Active and empowered Lead Independent Director is elected annually by independent directors

   Active and empowered Committee Chairs, all of whom are independent

   Board consists of a mix of newer directors with fresh perspectives and directors who have a longer horizon of experience with the Company through various business cycles

   Directors reflect a variety of experiences and skills that match the Company’s complexity and strategic direction and give the Board the collective capability to provide appropriate oversight of the Company’s activities

Stockholder Engagement

   Regular outreach and engagement with governance representatives of large stockholders at least two times per year

   Feedback from investors regularly shared with our Board and its committees to ensure that our Board has insight on investor views

   Board and Governance and Nominating Committee receive extensive briefings and benchmarking reports on corporate governance practices and emerging corporate governance issues

Board Governance Best Practices

   Frequent executive sessions ofnon-management directors

   All directors attended at least 97% of Board and committee meetings during the year

   Annual self-assessments of the Board and each of its committees

   Annual evaluations of directors and Lead Independent Director

   Regular discussions regarding Board recruiting, succession and refreshment as well as director skills and qualifications in connection with the Company’s long-term strategic objectives

   Active risk oversight by the Board and committees

   Oversight of the Company’s political activities and contributions conducted by the Governance and Nominating Committee

   Direct access by Board to key members of management at discretion of independent directors; executive sessions regularly include separate meetings with Chief Financial Officer, Head of Finance and Corporate Development, General Counsel, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Auditor, Chief Credit Review Officer and Chief Compliance Officer

   Annual CEO evaluation process led by our Lead Independent Director

   Regular talent and succession planning discussions regarding the CEO and other key executives

Alignment with Stockholders

   Annual elections of directors

   Majority voting with resignation policy for directors in uncontested elections

   Stockholders holding at least 25% of outstanding common stock may call a special meeting

   Proxy access

   No super majority vote provisions for future amendments to Bylaws and Certificate of Incorporation or removing a director from office

   No “poison pill”

6  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Information About Our Director Nominees

  Name   Age   Occupation   Independent   

Other Public

Boards

Richard D. Fairbank

  66  Chair, CEO and President, Capital One Financial Corporation  No  0

Ann Fritz Hackett

  63  Partner andCo-Founder, Personal Pathways, LLC    1

Lewis Hay, III

  61  Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, NextEra Energy, Inc.    2

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

  72  Former Senior Advisor, Managing Director and Vice Chairman for Retail Banking, Morgan Stanley & Co.    0

Peter Thomas Killalea

  49  Owner and President, Aoinle, LLC    0

Pierre E. Leroy

  68  Managing Partner, Aspiture, LLC    0

Peter E. Raskind

  60  Owner, JMB Consulting, LLC    0

Mayo A. Shattuck III

  62  Chairman, Exelon Corporation    3

Bradford H. Warner

  65  Former President of Premier and Small Business Banking, Bank of America Corporation    0

Catherine G. West

  57  Former Special Advisor, Promontory Financial Group    0

Board Meetings and Attendance

 Each director attended at least 97% of the aggregate number of the meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees occurring during the year while they were members

 The Board of Directors held eighteen meetings in 2016

 All 11 members of the Board at the time of Capital One’s 2016 Annual Meeting attended such meeting and Capital One expects all of its continuing directors to attend the Annual Meeting

A Word of Appreciation

We would like to offer a word of thanks to director Patrick W. Gross, who will retire from our Board of Directors effective May 4, 2017 in accordance with our Corporate Governance GuidelinesGuidelines. Mr. Gross has been a director of Capital One since 1995, guiding Capital One into becoming one of the largest financial institutions in the nation. We thank Mr. Gross for his many valuable contributions to Capital One, and Code of Business Conductwe wish him well in his future endeavors.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  7


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Information About Our Current Board Committee Membership and Ethics2016 Committee Meetings

  Director    Audit    

Governance &

Nominating

    Compensation    Risk
  

Richard D. Fairbank

                
  

Patrick W. Gross

       LOGO   LOGO   LOGO
  

Ann Fritz Hackett

       LOGO   LOGO   LOGO
  

Lewis Hay, III

       LOGO   LOGO   LOGO
  

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

   LOGO       LOGO   LOGO
  

Peter Thomas Killalea

           LOGO   LOGO
  

Pierre E. Leroy

   LOGO       LOGO   LOGO
  

Peter E. Raskind

   LOGO           LOGO
  

Mayo A. Shattuck III

       LOGO   LOGO   LOGO
  

Bradford H. Warner

   LOGO           LOGO
  

Catherine G. West

   LOGO           LOGO
  

# TOTAL MEETINGS HELD IN 2016

   13   6   7   8

LOGO Chair    LOGO Member

Information About Our Corporate Governance Policies and Principles

Capital One is dedicated to strong and effective corporate governance principlesthat creates an appropriate framework for the Board to provide ongoing oversight of the Company’s activities, and practices. for management to operate in an ethical environment that fosters strong risk management.

The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to formalize the Board’s governance practices and to provide its view of effective governance. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines embody many of our long-standing practices, policies and procedures, which collectively form a corporate governance framework that promotes the long-term interests of our stockholders, ensures responsible decision-making and accountability, and fosters a culture that allows our Board and management to pursue Capital One’s strategic objectives. The Board reviews and periodically updates these principles and practices as legal, regulatory, and best practice developments evolve.

The Board has also adopted Capital One’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code(“Code of Conduct”), which applies to Capital OneOne’s directors and associates, including Capital One’s Chief Executive Officer, (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and other persons performing similar functions. The Code of Conduct reflects Capital One’s commitment to honesty, fair dealing and integrity and guides the ethical actions and working relationships of Capital One’s directors, officers and associates in their interactions with investors, current and potential customers, fellow associates, competitors, governmental entities, the media and other third parties with whom Capital One has contact.

The Board of Directors believes that these policies, principles and practices are vital to the future success and growth of Capital One and create a foundation for the ethical and effective functioning of the Board of Directors, its committees and Capital One as a whole. They are also critical to preserving the trust of our stakeholders, including stockholders, associates, customers, suppliers, governmental entities and the general public.

8  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

We encourage you to visit the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.capitalone.com under “About Us/Investors” where you can find our:

   Corporate Governance Guidelines

   Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

   Committee Charters

   Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

  Our Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors, acting through the Governance and Nominating Committee, seeks a Board that, as a whole, possesses the mix of experiences, skills, expertise and qualifications appropriate to support the success of the Company and that functions effectively in light of the Company’s current and evolving business circumstances. The Board believes that the collective combination of backgrounds, skills and experiences of its members has produced a Board that is well-equipped to exercise oversight responsibilities for Capital One’s stockholders and other stakeholders and to help guide the Company to achieve its long-term strategic objectives.

All of our director nominees have:

Demonstrated business acumen

The ability to exercise sound judgment

A high degree of engagement

A commitment of service to Capital One, the Board of Directors and the long-term interests of stockholders

A reputation for integrity, honesty, professionalism, and adherence to high ethical standards

In addition, our director nominees have specific experiences that, in the aggregate, meet an articulated set of director skills established by the Governance and Nominating Committee that align with the Company’s long-term strategy and operational objectives, including:

Strategy

  Experience setting a long-term corporate vision or direction, developing desirable products and customer segments, assessing geographies in which to operate, and evaluating competitive positioning

Digital/Technology

  Leadership and understanding of technology, digital platforms and new media, cybersecurity risk, and data analytics

Retail/Commercial Banking

  Retail and/or commercial banking industry experience at an executive level

Risk Management/Compliance

  Significant understanding with respect to the identification, assessment and oversight of risk management programs and practices

Senior Executive Management

  Experience as a chief executive officer or other senior executive at a public company

Public Accounting/Financial Reporting

  Experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with respect to the preparation, auditing or evaluation of financial statements

Financial Services

  Leadership experience as an executive or board member in the financial services industry

Compensation/Human Resources

  Understanding of the issues involved with executive compensation, succession planning, human resource management, and talent management and development

Public Company Board Service

  Experience serving as a director on a large public company board

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  9


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Our Board has significant experience in strategy development, risk management and the financial services industry through executive leadership positions, consulting engagements, and/or extended service on Capital One’s Board of Directors and its committees.

Eight of our director nominees have significant understanding of technology platforms and systems and their associated risks, six of our director nominees have held senior executive responsibilities at large banks, and five of our director nominees serve or have served as chief executive officers. In addition, our director nominees have public company board experience and broad financial expertise, including experience with financial statements and the financial reporting required of large public companies.

The Board of Directors is composed of directors with a variety of tenures, reflecting a diversity of perspectives that creates an effective balance between directors who have longer experience with Capital One’s operations, history and business cycles and directors who bring fresh perspectives. Accordingly, we believe our director nominees collectively possess the appropriate combination of skills and qualifications, independence, knowledge of Capital One and its industry, and business acumen that enables it to operate as an engaged and effective Board.

Criteria for Director Candidates

The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors consider each nominee in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of assembling a Board that meets the criteria set forth below and, through its collective skills and experience, promotes the success of Capital One’s business. The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board regularly review the Board’s membership in light of Capital One’s business model and strategic objectives and consider whether the Board as a whole continues to possess the skills and experience necessary to oversee the Company in achieving these goals, and may seek additional directors from time to time as a result of its considerations.

All director candidates, including incumbent directors and those recommended by stockholders, are evaluated based upon the following criteria:

Experience

  Diversity of experience

  Strong educational background

  Substantial tenure and breadth of experience in leadership capacities

  Business and financial acumen

  Background relevant to Capital One’s business strategy

  Understanding of the intricacies of a public company

  Experience in risk management

Personal Characteristics

  Reputation for high personal and professional ethics, integrity and honesty, good character and judgment

  The ability to be an independent thinker

  Diversity along a variety of dimensions, including the candidate’s professional and personal experience, background, perspective and viewpoint, as well as the candidate’s gender, race, and ethnicity

10  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Commitment to the Company

   A willingness to commit the time and energy necessary to satisfy the requirements of board and committee membership, including the ability to attend and participate in all or almost all of the board meetings and committee meetings in which they are a member and the annual meeting of stockholders

   A willingness to rigorously prepare prior to each meeting and actively participate in the meeting

   A willingness to make himself or herself available to management upon request to provide advice and counsel

   Possess, or be willing to develop, a broad knowledge of both critical issues affecting the Company and a director’s roles and responsibilities

   A willingness to comply with Capital One’s Director Stock Ownership Requirements, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct

Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that anon-management director shall not be eligible for election to the Board upon reaching the age of 72. The Board may waive this requirement if it deems that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. For details of a waiver of this requirement for Mr. Jenkins, see “Election of Directors” on page 90.

How We Select Our Director Nominees

The Governance and Nominating Committee considers and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regardingre-nominations of current directors for election at our Annual Meeting. For incumbent directors, the committee considers the criteria described above under “Criteria for Director Candidates,” as well as:

The value derived from each nominee’s skills, qualifications, experience and ability to impact our long-term strategic objectives;

Feedback on performance from fellow Board members and annual director evaluations;

Attendance, preparation for, and participation in meetings;

Independence and any actual or perceived conflicts of interest; and

Willingness to serve for an additional term.

Although we do not have a specific policy on diversity of the Board, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that director candidates should have diversity along a variety of dimensions, including each candidate’s professional and personal experience, background and perspective. The Governance and Nominating Committee considers the diversity of directors in the context of the Board’s overall needs. The Committee evaluates diversity in a broad sense, including the breadth of diverse backgrounds, skills, and experiences that directors may bring to our Board as well as recognizing the benefits of gender, race, ethnic, and other demographic diversity. We believe the composition of our Board reflects diversity in all of these dimensions.

The Governance and Nominating Committee also considers and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning nominees to create or fill open positions within the Board. Director candidates, other than current directors, may be interviewed by the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee, other directors, the CEO and/or other members of senior management. In making its recommendation to the Board of Directors, the Committee considers the criteria described above, as well as the results of interviews and any background checks the Committee deems appropriate. In 2016, Capital One continued its engagement with Spencer Stuart, a third-party director search firm, to identify and evaluate potential director candidates.

Stockholders may propose nominees for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee by submitting the names and other relevant information as required by Capital One’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”) and further described in Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, to the Corporate Secretary at Capital One’s address set forth in the Notice. Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines require the Corporate Secretary to deliver a copy of the submitted information to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider potential nominees proposed by stockholders on the same basis as it considers other potential nominees.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  11


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

In addition, an eligible stockholder or group of stockholders may use Capital One’s “proxy access” bylaws to include stockholder-nominated director candidates in the Company’s proxy materials for annual meetings of stockholders. Capital One’s Bylaws permit up to 20 stockholders owning 3% or more of the Company’s outstanding common shares of voting stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director candidates constituting up to two (2) individuals or 20% of the Board (whichever is greater) provided that the stockholder(s) and the Codenominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the Bylaws.

Director Independence

With the exception of Conduct, eachour CEO, who is the Company’s founder, the Board has affirmatively determined that all of the other members of our Board are independent under Capital One’s Director Independence Standards, which have been adopted by the Board of Directors as amended from time to time, are available free of charge on the Corporate Governance pagepart of Capital One’s Internet site atwww.capitalone.com under “About Us/Investors.” Capital One will disclose on its website any amendment to the Corporate Governance Guidelines or the Code of Conduct, or any waiver under the Code of Conduct granted to any of its directors or executive officers.

 Board Structure and Committee Composition

Guidelines. The Board of Directors oversees Capital One’s businesshas reached this conclusion based on a thorough assessment of whether each of itsnon-management members is “independent” under these standards. These standards reflect, among other things, the director independence requirements set forth in the listing standards of the NYSE and directs its management.other applicable legal and regulatory rules, and describe certain relationships that the Board has determined to be immaterial for purposes of determining director independence. The Board of Directors does not involve itself with the day-to-day operationshas determined that each of Mr. Gross, Ms. Hackett, Mr. Hay, Mr. Jenkins, Mr. Killalea, Mr. Leroy, Mr. Raskind, Mr. Shattuck, Mr. Warner and implementation of Capital One’s business. Instead,Ms. West is independent under these standards.

12  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

  Director Nominees

LOGO

Richard D. Fairbank

Chair, Chief Executive Officer and President, Capital One Financial Corporation

Director Since:  1994

Age:  66

Capital One Committees:

    None

Capital One Companies:

    Capital One Bank (USA), National Association (Chair)

    Capital One, National Association (Chair)

Additional Public Directorships (current):

    None

Mr. Fairbank is founder, Chair, Chief Executive Officer and President of Capital One Financial Corporation. Mr. Fairbank has been Chair of Capital One since February 1995. Mr. Fairbank was appointed and served as the Fifth Federal Reserve District’s representative on the Federal Advisory Council from January 2010 until December 2012. As a member of the Council, he conferred periodically with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on business conditions and issues related to the banking industry. Mr. Fairbank also served on MasterCard International’s Global Board of Directors from February 2004 until May 2006 and, prior to that, as Chairman of MasterCard’s U.S. Region Board.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Fairbank’s experience in leading the business as founder and Chief Executive Officer of Capital One, his responsibilities for the strategic direction and management of Capital One’sday-to-day operations and his former roles with the Federal Advisory Council and MasterCard International bring broad industry and specific institutional knowledge and experience to the Board of Directors.

LOGO

Ann Fritz Hackett

Partner andCo-Founder, Personal Pathways, LLC

Lead Independent Director

Director Since:  2004

Age:  63

Capital One Committees:

    Compensation Committee

    Governance and Nominating Committee (Chair)

    Risk Committee

Capital One Companies:

    Capital One, National Association

Additional Public Directorships (current):

    Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc.

Ms. Hackett is a partner andco-founder of Personal Pathways, LLC. The company’s flagship product is aweb-based enterprise collaboration insights platform. Prior to her role at Personal Pathways, Ms. Hackett had been President of Horizon Consulting Group, LLC since she founded the company in 1996. Horizon Consulting Group provides strategic, organizational and human resources advice to clients worldwide. She has worked with boards of directors, chief executive officers and senior executives to identify strategic opportunities and execute solutions during periods of business and financial challenges and transformation. Prior to Horizon Consulting, Ms. Hackett was Vice President and Partner of a leading national strategy consulting firm where she served on the Management Committee and, among other strategy consulting assignments, led Human Resources and developed her expertise in managing cultural change, creating performance management processes and a performance-based culture, nurturing leadership talent and planning for executive succession. Ms. Hackett is also a member of the Tapestry Networks’ Lead Director Network, a select group of lead directors who collaborate on matters regarding board leadership. She also served as a director of Beam, Inc. (formerly Fortune Brands, Inc.) from December 2007 until April 2014.

Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. Hackett has experience in strategy, technology development, leading change initiatives, talent management and succession planning and in creating performance management processes and performance-based compensation programs. She also has experience in corporate governance and risk matters as a result of her participation with public company boards of directors and related governance committees,non-profit boards and consulting engagements. This combination of skills provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight on these and other matters.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  13


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

LOGO

Lewis Hay, III

Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, NextEra Energy, Inc.

Director Since:  2003

Age:  61

Capital One Committees:

    Compensation Committee

    Governance and Nominating Committee

    Risk Committee

Capital One Companies:

    Capital One, National Association

Additional Public Directorships (current):

    Harris Corporation

    Anthem, Inc. (formerly WellPoint, Inc.)

Mr. Hay served in a variety of executive positions at NextEra Energy, Inc. (“NextEra”) (formerly FPL Group, Inc.), including Chief Executive Officer (2001-2012), Chairman (2002-2012) and President (2001-2006). NextEra is one of the nation’s leading electricity-related services companies and the largest renewable energy generator in North America. Mr. Hay served as Executive Chairman of NextEra from July 2012 until he retired in December 2013 and as a director of NextEra from June 2001 through December 2013. While at NextEra, he also served as Chief Executive Officer of Florida Power & Light Company from January 2002 to July 2008. He joined NextEra Energy in 1999 as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer and served as President of NextEra Energy Resources, LLC (formerly FPL Energy, LLC) from March 2000 until December 2001. He currently acts as an Operating Advisor for Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC, a private equity investment firm. Mr. Hay serves on the Board of Business Advisors for the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University, and on the Advisory Council of Carnegie Mellon University’s Scott Institute for Energy Innovation. He is a former chairman of both the Edison Electric Institute, the association of U.S. shareholder-owned electric companies, and the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. Mr. Hay also served as Chair of the Electricity Subsector Coordinating Council, an organization that coordinated government and electricity industry cyber security initiatives, as well as on President Obama’s President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Hay has extensive knowledge of the complex strategic, operational, management, regulatory, financial and governance issues faced by a large public company. His background in leading finance and accounting, treasury, credit, investor relations, mergers and acquisitions and information systems functions, as well as his understanding of enterprise risk management, executive compensation and public company governance, provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight on these and other matters.

14  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

LOGO

Benjamin P.

Jenkins, III

Former Senior Advisor, Managing Director and Vice Chairman for Retail Banking, Morgan Stanley & Co.

Director Since:  2013

Age:  72

Capital One Committees:

    Audit Committee

    Compensation Committee

    Risk Committee

Capital One Companies:

    Capital One, National Association

Additional Public Directorships (current):

    None

Mr. Jenkins served as Senior Advisor, Managing Director, and Vice Chairman for Retail Banking at Morgan Stanley & Co., a financial services firm, from January 2009 to January 2011. Prior to that, he had a38-year career with Wachovia Corporation (now Wells Fargo & Company), a financial services company, where he was Vice Chairman and President of the General Banking Group. He is credited with advancing the profitability of the General Bank through improvements in customer service and the reduction of customer attrition to industry-leading levels. He and his team were instrumental in the integration of the First Union/Wachovia and Wachovia/SouthTrust mergers, and Mr. Jenkins led the successful expansion of Wachovia’s banking network. He also previously served on the boards of Visa USA and Visa International.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Jenkins’ experience in corporate banking, banking operations, investment banking, and management of customer relationships brings valuable insight to the Board of Directors in overseeing, among other areas, matters critical to Capital One’s banking business.

LOGO

Peter Thomas Killalea

Owner and President, Aoinle, LLC

Director Since:  2016

Age:  49

Capital One Committees:

    Compensation Committee

    Risk Committee

Capital One Companies:

    Capital One, National Association

Additional Public Directorships (current):

    None

Mr. Killalea has been an advisor to private technology-driven companies since November 2014 and is the Owner and President of Aoinle, LLC, a consulting firm. From May 1998 to November 2014, Mr. Killalea served in various leadership roles at Amazon.com, Inc., most recently as its Vice President of Technology for the Kindle Content Ecosystem from 2008 to November 2014. He served as its Vice President of Infrastructure and Distributed Systems from 2003 to 2008 and prior to that as Chief Information Security Officer and Vice President of Security. He led the infrastructure and distributed systems team, which later became a key part of the Amazon Web Services platform. He also led the product development and engineering teams for the Kindle Content Ecosystem, where he advanced the Kindle reading experience by creating innovative features such asX-Ray and Popular Highlights, and built the Amazon Publishing technology platform. Mr. Killalea previously served on the board of Xoom Corporation (acquired by PayPal Inc.) from March 2015 to November 2015.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Killalea’s product, technology, and security experience in the technology industry, including his experience advising technology companies in various stages of growth and his various leadership roles, including as Chief Information Security Officer, at Amazon.com, Inc., bring valuable insight to the Board of Directors on these and other matters.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  15


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

LOGO

Pierre E. Leroy

Managing Partner, Aspiture, LLC

Director Since:  2005

Age:  68

Capital One Committees:

    Audit Committee

    Compensation Committee

    Risk Committee

Capital One Companies:

    Capital One Bank (USA), National Association

Additional Public Directorships (current):

    None

Mr. Leroy established an advisory and private equity firm in April 2015, Aspiture, LLC (“Aspiture”) which invests primarily in digital companies offering unique customer solutions. Mr. Leroy served as Executive Chairman from March 2012 and Chief Executive Officer from July 2012 until June 2013 of Vigilant Solutions, Inc. (formerly Vigilant Video, Inc.), an industry-leading pioneer of innovative intelligence solutions that help law enforcement protect officers, families and communities. Mr. Leroy retired in 2005 from Deere & Company as President of both the Worldwide Construction & Forestry Division and the Global Parts Division. Deere & Company is a world leader in providing advanced products and services for agriculture, forestry, construction, lawn and turf care, landscaping and irrigation, and also provides financial services worldwide and manufactures and markets engines used in heavy equipment. During his professional career with Deere & Company, Mr. Leroy served in a number of positions in Finance, including Treasurer, Vice-President and Treasurer, and Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Leroy also served as a director of United Rentals, Inc. from April 2012 to May 2015, RSC Holdings Inc. and RSC Equipment Rental from May 2008 to April 2012 (when RSC was acquired by United Rentals), and Beam, Inc. (formerly Fortune Brands, Inc.) from September 2003 to February 2012.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Leroy’s experience in capital markets and asset-liability management, as well as CEO and Executive Chairman of a digital analytic software company and managing partner of an advisory and consulting business in addition to his experience in leading and managing large complex international marketing, engineering and manufacturing organizations and serving on other public company boards, provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight on these and other matters.

16  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

LOGO

Peter E. Raskind

Owner, JMB Consulting, LLC

Director Since:  2012

Age:  60

Capital One Committees:

    Audit Committee

    Risk Committee (Chair)

Capital One Companies:

    Capital One Bank (USA), National Association

Additional Public Directorships (current):

    None

Mr. Raskind is the owner of JMB Consulting, LLC, which he established in February 2009 to provide consulting services to financial services firms and investors. In 2011, he served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Cleveland Metropolitan School District, and in 2010, he served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority. Until its merger with PNC Financial Services Group in December 2008, Mr. Raskind served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of National City Corporation, one of the largest banks in the United States. Through an extensive banking career, Mr. Raskind has served in a number of leadership roles and held positions of successively greater responsibility in a broad range of consumer and commercial banking disciplines, including cash management services, corporate finance, international banking, corporate trust, retail and small business banking, operations and strategic planning.

Mr. Raskind served as a director of United Community Banks, Inc. from May 2011 to January 2012 and Visa USA and Visa International. He also served on the board of directors of the Consumer Bankers Association, was a member of the Financial Services Roundtable, and served on the executive committee of the National Automated Clearing House Association.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Raskind is experienced in corporate banking, retail banking, wealth management/trust, mortgage, operations, technology, strategy, product management, asset/liability management, risk management and acquisition integration from his extensive career in banking. He provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight on these and other matters.

LOGO

Mayo A. Shattuck III

Chairman, Exelon Corporation

Director Since:  2003

Age:  62

Capital One Committees:

    Compensation Committee (Chair)

    Governance and Nominating Committee

    Risk Committee

Capital One Companies:

    Capital One, National Association

Additional Public Directorships (current):

    Gap, Inc.

    Alarm.com

    Exelon Corporation

Mr. Shattuck is Chairman of the Board of Chicago-based Exelon Corporation (“Exelon”), the nation’s largest competitive energy provider and commercial nuclear plant operator. From March 2012 through February 2013, he served as Executive Chairman of the Board of Exelon. Prior to joining Exelon, he was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Constellation Energy Group, a leading supplier of electricity to large commercial and industrial customers, a position he held from 2001 to 2012. Mr. Shattuck was previously at Deutsche Bank, where he served as Chairman of the Board of Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown and, during his tenure, served as Global Head of Investment Banking and Global Head of Private Banking. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Shattuck served as Vice Chairman of Bankers Trust Corporation, which merged with Deutsche Bank in 1999. From 1991 to 1997, Mr. Shattuck was President and Chief Operating Officer and a director of Alex. Brown & Sons, a major investment bank, which merged with Bankers Trust in 1997.

Mr. Shattuck is also Vice Chairman of Johns Hopkins Medicine, Trustee of Johns Hopkins University and former Chairman of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operators.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Shattuck’s experience in global corporate finance and lending, corporate strategy, capital markets, risk management, executive compensation and private banking, as well as his experience in leading two large, publicly-held companies and serving on other public company boards, provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight on these and other matters.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  17


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

LOGO

Bradford H. Warner

Former President of Premier and Small Business Banking, Bank of America Corporation

Director Since:  2008

Age:  65

Capital One Committees:

    Audit Committee (Chair)

    Risk Committee

Capital One Companies:

    Capital One Bank (USA), National Association

Additional Public Directorships (current):

    None

Mr. Warner served in a variety of executive positions at BankBoston, FleetBoston and Bank of America from 1975 until his retirement in 2004. These positions included President of Premier and Small Business Banking, Executive Vice President of Personal Financial Services, and Vice Chairman of Regional Bank.

Throughout his banking career, Mr. Warner served in leadership roles for many of the major business lines and functional disciplines that constitute commercial banking, including leadership of retail and branch banking, consumer lending (credit cards, mortgage and home equity), student lending and small business; various corporate banking functions, including community banking and capital markets businesses, such as underwriting, trading and sales of domestic and international fixed income securities, foreign exchange and derivatives; international banking businesses in Asia, northern Latin America and Mexico; and several investment related businesses, including private banking, asset management and brokerage. He also served on the most senior management policy and governance committees at BankBoston, FleetBoston and Bank of America.

Skills and Qualifications:

Mr. Warner’s experience in a broad range of commercial, consumer, investment and international banking leadership roles, as well as his experience in corporate banking functions, customer relationships, corporate culture change management, enterprise risk management and technology, brings valuable insight to the Board of Directors in overseeing, among other matters, a broad range of matters critical to Capital One’s banking business.

LOGO

Catherine G. West

Former Special Advisor, Promontory Financial Group

Director Since:  2013

Age:  57

Capital One Committees:

    Audit Committee

    Risk Committee

Capital One Companies:

    Capital One Bank (USA), National Association

Additional Public Directorships (current):

    None

Ms. West served as a Special Advisor to Promontory Financial Group, a financial services consulting firm, from May 2013 until her departure in October 2013, and as Managing Director from April 2012 until April 2013. From March 2011 to April 2012, Ms. West was the Associate Director and Chief Operating Officer of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), a federal agency tasked with regulating U.S. consumer protection with regard to financial services and products, where she led thestart-up of the agency’s infrastructure. While at the CFPB, Ms. West also played an integral part in implementing a Consumer Response unit designed to solicit views from consumers regarding their experiences with financial institutions and leveraged those views to effect policy change. She was previously the Chief Operating Officer of J.C. Penney from August 2006 to December 2006. From March 2000 to July 2006, Ms. West was an executive officer at Capital One Financial Corporation where she served in roles that included President of the U.S. Card business and Executive Vice President of U.S. Consumer Operations.

Skills and Qualifications:

Ms. West has a multifaceted background in financial services with more than 25 years of experience in financial services operations, regulatory matters, technology platform conversions, process automation and innovation, and strategy development. She has experience in leveraged buyouts, initial public offerings, and mergers and acquisitions, and has a keen understanding of both business strategy and the regulatory perspective. Ms. West provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight on these and other matters.

18  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

  Board of Directors meets periodically with management to review Capital One’s performance, risks and business strategy. Directors also regularly consult with management outside of formal meetings to keep themselves informed about Capital One’s progress.

The Board of Directors met thirteen times during 2014. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees occurring during the year while they were members. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and New York Stock Exchange Listing requirements, the Board has executive sessions of non-management directors without senior management on a regularly scheduled basis and no less than two times per year. In addition, at least one executive session of only independent directors without senior management is held annually. In 2014, the Board met these requirements and the number of times non-management directors held executive sessions without senior management present exceeded the standard set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. During these executive sessions, the non-management directors or independent directors, as the case may be, have complete access to such members of the Company’s senior executive management as they may request, including the Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Internal Auditor, Chief Credit Review Officer and Chief Compliance Officer.

Capital One expects all of its directors to attend the Annual Meeting. In 2014, all ten directors were present at the meeting.

Leadership Structure of the Board of Directors

Our Board has carefully considered the critical issue of Board leadership and believes that the leadership structure must be considered in the context of Capital One’s specific circumstances, culture, strategic objectives and challenges. The diverse backgrounds and experiences of our directors provide the Board with broad perspectives from which to determine the leadership structure that is best for Capital One and the long-term interests of Capital One’s stockholders and other stakeholders. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines allow the roles of Chair and CEO to be filled by the same or different individuals, a policy which appropriately provides the Board with the flexibility to determine Capital One’s current leadership structure.

Mr. Fairbank founded Capital One and has served as CEO since shortly before Capital One’s initial public offering in late 1994 and Chair since early 1995. Given Mr. Fairbank’s role in the formation and growth of Capital One, the Board strongly believes that it is in the Company’s best interest to have him serve as the Chair and CEO, particularly given the Board’s recognition and implementation of strong independent leadership on the Board through an active and empowered Lead Independent Director and independent Board committee structure. Importantly, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for a Lead Independent Director who supports the Board in assuring effective governance in managing the affairs of the Board and Capital One. The Lead Independent Director is elected annually by the independent directors and is currently Ms. Hackett. The Lead Independent Director performs the following responsibilities:

With respect to executive sessions:

organizes and presides over executive sessions;
sets the agendas for and leads executive sessions; and
is responsible for soliciting feedback for and engaging the CEO on executive sessions;

With respect to Board meetings and agendas:

presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chair of the Board is not present;
has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors;
approves meeting agendas for the Board;
approves information sent to the Board; and
approves meeting schedules and works with the Chair of the Board and committee chairpersons to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;

With respect to other responsibilities related to the independent directors:

facilitates discussion among the independent directors on key issues and concerns outside of Board meetings;
serves as liaison between the Chair of the Board and the independent directors;
facilitates teamwork and communication among the independent directors; and
in a crisis, calls together the independent directors to establish appropriate Board leadership responsibility; and

With respect to performance assessments:

leads the performance assessment of the CEO;
facilitates the Board’s engagement with the CEO and CEO succession planning; and
leads the Board’s self-assessment and recommendations for improvement, if any.

In addition, if requested by major stockholders, the Lead Independent Director ensures that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication.

The Board of Directors has four standing committees: Audit, Risk, Compensation, and Governance and Nominating. Each of the Audit, Compensation, and Governance and Nominating Committees is composed solely of independent directors, and all four standing committees are led by a separate, independent chair. Detailed information on each committee is contained below under “Committees of the Board of Directors.”

We believe that our existing Board leadership structure, with Mr. Fairbank acting as Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board, provides the most effective governance framework thatand allows our companyCompany to benefit from Mr. Fairbank’s talent, knowledge and leadership whileas the founder of Capital One and allows him to use thein-depth focus and perspective gained in running the Company to effectively and efficiently guide our Board. Capital One appropriately maintainingmaintains strong independent and effective oversight of our business and affairs as demonstrated bythrough our empowered Lead

Independent Director,Director; independent keyCommittee Chairs; independent committees that oversee the Company’s operations, risks, performance and business strategy,strategy; experienced and committed directors,directors; and frequent executive sessions without management in attendance. This structure demonstrates for

Lead Independent Director

The selection of a strong and empowered Lead Independent Director is a critical element of our associates, customers, stockholders, investors, regulatorscorporate governance. Upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, our Lead Independent Director is elected annually by the independent directors. Our Lead Independent Director is currently Ms. Hackett. Under Ms. Hackett’s leadership, the Board has developed a culture of collaboration, diligence and mutual respect that allows it to work effectively to provide the necessary oversight and effective challenge to management. The Lead Independent Director performs the following responsibilities:

Board Culture

   Serves as liaison between the Chair of the Board and the independent directors

   Facilitates discussion among the independent directors on key issues and concerns outside of Board meetings

   Ensures Board discussions demonstrate effective challenge of management

   Facilitates teamwork and communication among the independent directors

   In the event of a crisis, calls together the independent directors to establish appropriate Board leadership responsibility

Board Leadership

   Organizes and presides over executive sessions

   Sets the agendas for and leads executive sessions

   Is responsible for soliciting feedback for and engaging the CEO on executive sessions

   Acts as a key advisor to the CEO on a wide variety of Company matters

Board Performance & Development

   Leads the annual performance assessment of the CEO

   Facilitates the Board’s engagement with the CEO and CEO succession planning

   Leads the Board’s annual self-assessment and recommendations for improvement, if any

Board Meetings

   Has authority to call meetings of the independent directors

   Approves meeting agendas for the Board

   Approves information sent to the Board

   Approves meeting schedules and works with the Chair of the Board and Committee Chairs to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items

   Presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chair of the Board is not present

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  19


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Stockholder Engagement

   If requested by larger stockholders, the Lead Independent Director ensures that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication

  Key Board Governance Practices

Executive Sessions

Executive sessions ofnon-management directors of the Board are led by the Lead Independent Director and are an important governance practice because they enable the Board to discuss matters, such as strategy, CEO and senior management performance and compensation, succession planning and board effectiveness without management present. Ournon-management directors generally meet in executive session at each quarterly board meeting and all of the independent directors meet in executive session without management at least once annually. In 2016, thenon-management directors met four times in executive session. During these executive sessions, thenon-management directors or independent directors, as the case may be, have complete access to such members of the Company’s senior executive management as they may request, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Auditor, Chief Credit Review Officer and Chief Compliance Officer. The Lead Independent Director and/or any director may request additional executive sessions ofnon-management or independent directors at any time.

Directors Are Actively Engaged Outside of Board Meetings

Engagement outside of Board meetings provides our directors with additional insight into our business and our industry, as well as valuable perspective on the performance of our Company, the Board, our CEO and other stakeholders that Capital One’smembers of senior management.

Our individual directors have discussions with each other and with our CEO, members of our senior management team and other key employees, as well as with our federal regulators

Our Committee Chairs and Lead Independent Director meet and speak regularly with each other and with members of our management

Annual Board and Committee Self-Assessments

Our Board annually evaluates the performance of Directorsthe Board and its committees. The Board believes it is committedimportant to engaged, independent leadershipassess the Board and the performance of its responsibilities. committees, and to solicit and act upon feedback received. As part of the Board’s self-assessment process, directors consider various topics related to Board composition, structure, effectiveness and responsibilities, as well as the overall mix of director skills, experience and backgrounds. While the Board and each of its committees conducts a formal self-assessment annually, the Board considers its performance as well as that of its committees from time to time throughout the year and shares relevant feedback with management.

Initiation of

Process

The Lead Independent Director develops and circulates a list of potential topics to directors for consideration in advance of the Board’s self-assessment discussion. Committee chairs follow a similar process for their respective committees.
DiscussionThe Lead Independent Director meets with the Board to gather views and feedback. Committee Chairs lead their respective committee discussions during executive session.
Follow-UpThe Lead Independent Director shares a summary of the Board results with management to address any requests or enhancements in practices that may be warranted. Committee Chairs report on their respective self-assessments to the full Board.

20  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Topics considered during the Board and committee self-assessments include:

Board and Committee OperationsBoard and Committee Performance

  Board and committee membership, including director skills, background, expertise and diversity

  Materials and information, including quality and quantity of information received from management

  Access to Company executives and employees

  Conduct of meetings, including time allocated for, and encouragement of, candid dialogue and effective challenge

  Strategy oversight including short-term and long-term strategic objectives

  Oversight of risk management, including risk appetites

  Executive talent management and succession planning

  Assessment of CEO performance

  Setting corporate culture and “tone at the top”

  Effectiveness of outside advisors

  Identification of topics that warrant additional attention and discussion

  Performance of committee duties under committee charters

Annual Assessment of the Lead Independent Director

The performance of Capital One’s Lead Independent Director is assessed annually by the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee designates one independent member of the Board to conduct the assessment each year, which includes feedback provided by each independent director. The facilitator shares the input and feedback received on the performance and effectiveness of Directors believes that combiningthe Lead Independent Director with the Governance and Nominating Committee and, as appropriate, the Board, without the Lead Independent Director present. The independent directors of the Board take into account the results of such assessment during its annual appointment of the Lead Independent Director.

Annual Assessment of Director Nominees

On an annual basis, the Chair and CEO positions takes advantage of the talentGovernance and knowledgeNominating Committee conducts an individual director assessment process. This process includes candid,one-on-one discussions between the Committee Chair and each director regarding the individual performance and effectiveness of directors forre-election. With respect to the performance of the Governance and Nominating Committee Chair, another member of the Governance and Nominating Committee conducts such discussions. The Governance and Nominating Committee Chair shares the input and feedback received from such discussions with the Chair of the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee, and ultimately the Board, as appropriate. During discussions, each director eligible for nomination leaves the meeting during the discussion of his or her candidacy. Following this assessment as well as other considerations such as related party transactions, conflicts of interest, and director independence, the Governance and Nominating Committee recommends to the Board the nomination of one or more directors forre-election by Capital One’s stockholders.

Annual Performance Assessment of the Chief Executive Officer

Under the direction of our Lead Independent Director, the independent directors of the Board annually assess the performance of Mr. Fairbank as the founder of Capital OneOne’s CEO and effectively combines the responsibilities for strategy development and execution with management of day-to-day operations. It also reduces the potential for confusion or duplication of efforts and provides clear leadership for Capital One. The Board of Directors believes that the combinationChair of the ChairBoard. The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for developing and overseeing the CEO roles, together with its strong governance practices, including its supermajority of independent directors and its clearly definedprocess, facilitated by the Lead Independent Director responsibilities, providesand involving all directors, for conducting the CEO’s annual performance evaluation. This process includes an appropriate balancein-depth discussion of performance by the independent directors in executive session during which directors consider a variety of factors to evaluate Mr. Fairbank’s performance. Such factors include, among strategy development, operational executionother things, financial and independent oversightoperating performance, governance and risk management, strategic performance, and winning with our customers and associates as described in “Section V – Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Chief Executive Officer Compensation,” as well as feedback raised through Board discussion and self-assessment

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  21


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

materials provided by Mr. Fairbank to the Board regarding his performance and achievements in connection with various subjective and objective metrics.

The annual CEO performance assessment is completed as part of Capital One.theend-of-year compensation process. The Compensation Committee managesend-of-year compensation decisions within the context of such assessment, and the Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Compensation Committee jointly share the input and feedback of the CEO performance assessment with Mr. Fairbank in a closed session.

The Board’s Role in Succession Planning

TheUnder the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board is responsible for ensuring that a succession plan for the CEO exists. The Board of Directors has in place an effective planning process to select successors to the CEO and annually reviews the CEO succession plan is reviewed annually byplan. Our Board believes that the Board.directors and the CEO should work together on succession planning and that the entire Board should be involved. Each year, as part of its succession planning process, our CEO provides the Board with recommendations on, and evaluations of, potential CEO successors. The Board reviews the senior executive team’s experience, skills, competencies and potential to assess which executives possess or have the ability to develop the attributes that the Board believes are necessary to lead and achieve the Company’s goals. Among other steps taken to promote this process, the two levels of executives below the CEO, which include all of the CEO’s direct reports, often attend Board meetings and present to the Board, providing the Board with numerous opportunities to interact with our senior management and assess their leadership capabilities.

Our Board also has established steps to address emergency CEO succession planning for an unplanned CEO succession event. Our emergency CEO succession planning is intended to enable our Company to respond to an unexpected CEO transition by continuing our Company’s safe and sound operation and minimizing potential disruption or loss of continuity to our Company’s operations and strategy. There is also available, on a continuing basis as a result of the process described above, the CEO’s recommendation as to a successor should the CEO become unexpectedly unable to serve. The Board also reviews the CEO’s successor recommendations on an annual basis.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors believes that effective risk management and control processes are critical to Capital One’s safety and soundness, our ability to predict and manage the challenges that Capital One and the financial services industry face and, ultimately, Capital One’s long-term corporate success. Management is responsible for implementing Capital One’s risk assessment and management functions and for reporting to the Board of Directors with respect to the management of risk. The Board of Directors, in turn, both directly and through its committees, is responsible for overseeing management’s risk functions. The Board approves the Company’s strategic direction and overall risk appetite.

The enterprise-wide risk management framework defines the Board’s appetite for risk taking and enables senior management to understand, manage and report on risk. The risk management framework is implemented enterprise wideenterprise-wide and includes all eight risk categories: Strategic, Legal, Market, Liquidity, Operational, Reputation, Compliancecompliance, credit, legal, liquidity, market, operational, reputational and Credit.strategic. Management has worked to developdeveloped risk appetite statements with accompanying metrics which are meaningful to the organization and reflect the aggregate level and types of risk Capital One is willing to accept in order to achieve its business objectives, clarifying both risks the Company is actively taking and risks that are purposely avoided.

The Risk Committee oversees Capital One’s enterprise-wide risk management framework, including policies and practices established by management to identify, assess, measure and manage key risks facing Capital One across the eight risk categories identified above, as set forth in its charter. In addition, the Risk Committee oversees management’s specific responsibilities with respect to identification and management of, and planning for, Capital One’s market, liquidity, operational and credit risks. The Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of enterprise risk oversight with respectmanagement for the Company, and is responsible for reviewing and recommending to compliance by Capital One with legalthe Board for approval certain risk tolerances taking into account the Company’s structure, risk profile, complexity, activities, and regulatory requirements. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews and discussessize. Within management, enterprise risk management is generally the policies and practices that govern the processes by which key risk exposures are identified, assessed, managed and controlled on an enterprise-wide basis and meets jointly with the Risk Committee to assess Capital One’s enterprise-wide risk management framework. The Risk Committee oversees thatresponsibility of the Chief Risk Officer, who has accountability for proposing risk tolerance and other members of management, as applicable, review with the Compensation Committee the risks that Capital One’s incentive compensation programs, such as its senior executive, corporate incentive and other material incentive compensation programs, may pose as more fully described below under “Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices.”

reporting levels related to all eight risk categories. The Chief Risk Officer Chief Financial Officer, Chief Internal Auditor, Chief Credit Review Officer and General Counsel each meet with, or provide reports to, Capital One’s Risk Committee at least once per quarter as well as separately withis also responsible for ensuring that the Risk Committee throughout the year on a periodic basis without other members of management present. The Risk Committee also meets on a periodic basis with the Chief Compliance Officer without other members of management present. The Chief Risk Officer also meets at least annually with the full Board of Directors to review the Company’sCompany has an overall enterprise risk profile. In addition, the Audit Committee meets on a periodic basis with the Chief Compliance Officerframework and meets at least quarterly with the Chief Financial Officer to discuss Capital One’s financial resultsthat it routinely assesses and financial forecasts. Throughout the year, strategic presentations and line of business updates to the Board of Directors or its committees typically include reports on risk management.

Corporate Audit Services provides independent and objective assurance services and advice and guidance regarding risk management and control practices to provide that risk management, internal controls and governance systems are adequate and functioning on a consistent and reliable basis. The Chief Internal Auditor reports organizationally to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which has the authority to hire and compensate the Chief Internal Auditor and to terminate his or her employment. The Chief Credit Review Officer reports organizationally to the Risk Committee of the Board of Directors, which has the authority to hire and compensate the Chief Credit Review Officer and to terminate his or her employment.enterprise level risks. The Chief Risk Officer reports directlyboth to boththe CEO and to the Risk Committee. The Audit Committee also plays an important risk management function, and oversees elements of compliance and legal risk. Each committee of the CEO.Board oversees reputation risk matters within the scope of their respective

22  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

responsibilities. Finally the Board as a whole oversees the entire enterprise risk framework for the Company, including the oversight of strategic risk.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices

The Compensation Committee actively oversees all of our compensation policies and practices, including our incentive compensation policies and practices, to monitor that such policies and practices encourage balanced risk-taking, are compatible with effective controls and risk management and align with our business strategy. In 2014, the Company continued to participate in the horizontal review of incentive compensation practices that the Federal Reserve Board began in late 2009 with respect to the incentive compensation practices at 25 large banking organizations. The purpose of the review has been to assess the incentive compensation practices at these organizations and their compliance with the interagency guidance on sound incentive compensation practices issued by the Federal Reserve Board and other bank regulators in June 2010. We believe that the Compensation Committee’s active oversight, together with the Company’s interactions and discussions with its regulators, has further enhanced the Company’s risk management and control processes with respect to incentive compensation at the Company. In January 2012, the Compensation Committee adopted an Incentive Compensation Governance Policy applicable to all Company employees that governs incentive compensation decisions and provides the framework for oversight of the design of incentive compensation programs, which it reviews andre-approves annually. In the context of setting executive compensation, the Compensation Committee assessed each of the named executive officers against one or more performance objectives specifically designed to evaluate the degree to which the executive balanced risks inherent in his or her role and also implemented additional risk-balancing features for certain equity awards, as described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 31.40.

The Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s named executive officer and other senior executive compensation programs as well as any other material incentive compensation programs. During the course of these reviews, the Compensation Committee discusses the Company’s most significant risks, including the Company’s status with respect to managing those risks and the relationship of those risks to applicable compensation programs. The review includes discussion and analysis of risk-balancing features embedded in these incentive compensation programs and other actions taken by the Company designed to appropriately balance risk and achieve conformance with regulatory guidance and appropriately balance risk.guidance. The Compensation Committee also discusses these programs with the Company’s Chief Risk Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer and the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, as appropriate. Based on these discussions, the Compensation Committee believes that these compensation programs are consistent with safety and soundness and operate in a manner that appropriately balances risk.

 Director Independence

The Board of DirectorsCompensation Committee’s active oversight, together with the Company’s interactions and discussions with its regulators, has assessed whether each of its non-management members is “independent” under Capital One’s Director Independence Standards. These standards, which have been adoptedfurther enhanced the Company’s risk management and control processes with respect to incentive compensation at the Company and supported our continued compliance with the interagency guidance on sound incentive compensation practices issued by the Federal Reserve Board of Directors as part of Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, reflect, among other things, the director independence requirements set forth in the listing standards of the NYSE and other applicable legal and regulatory rules, and describe certain relationships that the Board has determined to be immaterial for purposes of determining director independence. As noted above, Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, including the Director Independence Standards, are available on the Corporate Governance page of Capital One’s Internet site atwww.capitalone.com under “About Us/Investors.” The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Gross, Ms. Hackett, Mr. Hay, Mr. Jenkins, Mr. Raskind, Mr. Shattuck, Mr. Warner and Ms. West is independent under these standards.bank regulators in June 2010.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  23


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

 

 Related Person Transactions  Board Committees

Capital One’s policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of related person transactions are set forth in the charter of the

Our Board has four standing committees: Audit, Risk, Governance and Nominating, Committee, Capital One’s Codeand Compensation. Each of Conduct and internal written procedures. The charter of the Governance and Nominating Committee requires the Committee to review on an annual basis any transactions involving Capital One and any of its directors, executive officers or their immediate family members and, as appropriate, to consider potential conflicts of interest or the appearance of potential conflicts of interest, as well as issues relating to director independence. The Governance and Nominating Committee performs this review each year based on the information provided by each director and executive officer on an annual questionnaire and through a review of Capital One’s internal systems for payments or other transactions that could indicate the presence of a related person transaction. In developing its assessment and recommendation regarding related person transactions to the Board of Directors, the Governance and Nominating Committee relies upon criteria set forth in the Code of Conduct to evaluate activities or relationships that may create a conflict of interest, including potential related person transactions. In addition to specific prohibitions, these criteria include the extent to which the proposed relationship would be authorized and permitted (or prohibited) by Capital One policies, as well as the potential perspective of third parties regarding such relationships.our committees:

Internal written procedures require that any potential conflict of interest, including related person transactions involving any of Capital One’s directors or executive officers, be reviewed by the General Counsel (in the case of a director) and by either the General Counsel or Chief Human Resources Officer (in the case of an executive officer). If the reviewer believes that such relationship could create a conflict of interest or require disclosure as a related person transaction, a second review is conducted by the disinterested members of the Governance and Nominating Committee (in the case of a director) or by the CEO (in the case of other executive officers).

Is led by active and empowered Committee Chairs, all of whom are independent

From time to time in the ordinary course of its business, Capital One issues loans to directors, executive officers and/or nominees for director, or to a director’s, executive officer’s or director nominee’s immediate family member, including persons sharing the household of such director, executive officer or director nominee (other than a tenant or employee). Such loans are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the Company and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Is comprised of all independent members

Mr. Leroy is the former Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a company in which Mr. Leroy continues to hold a significant financial interest. Such company, through a majority owned subsidiary, receives payments from other companies that provide and are expected to continue to provide certain services to Capital One, which payments are based on the extent of Capital One’s dealings with such other companies. In 2014, the amount of payments received by such companies that were attributable to Capital One’s business was approximately $1.19 million. These dealings are continuing in 2015, although Capital One does not have information on the amounts to date that are attributable to its business.

Operates in accordance with a written charter (available on our website atwww.capitalone.com under “About Us/Investors”), which is reviewed annually

Assesses its performance annually

Has authority to retain independent advisors, as desired

Committees of the Board of Directors

In order to assist it in fulfilling its functions, the Board of Directors conducts business through four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Risk Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee. Pursuant to Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable law, the Audit, Compensation, and Governance and Nominating Committees are comprised solely of independent directors, the Audit and Compensation Committees are comprised solely of directors who satisfy the NYSE’s heightened independence requirements for audit and compensation committee members, respectively, and all four standing committees are led by a separate, independent chair. The Chair of each committee determines the frequency, length and agenda of meetings for his or her committee in accordance with such committee’s charter, in consultation with other members of the committee and with appropriate members of management, and establishes an annual calendar of topics for consideration by the committee. The Chair of each committee also seeks comments on key issues from other directors who are not part of the committee and reports committee activities to the full Board of Directors. In January 2015, each of the Audit, Risk, Compensation, and Governance and Nominating Committees and the Board of Directors approved the respective committee’s charter. Copies of the charter of each committee are available free of charge on the Corporate Governance page of Capital One’s Internet site atwww.capitalone.com under “About Us/Investors.” Below is a description of each committee.

Audit Committee

Description

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors with overseeing Capital One’s accounting, financial reporting and internal controls, including the responsibilities set forth below.

Key Responsibilities

 

Monitor the integrity of Capital One’s financial statements and internal controls;
Review both the acceptability and quality of major changes to the Company’s accounting principles and practices as suggested by the independent auditor, Chief Internal Auditor or management, and be responsible for the resolution of any disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting issues;
Monitor Capital One’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
Review and discuss generally the policies and practices that govern the processes by which key risk exposures are identified, assessed, managed and controlled on an enterprise-wide basis;
Review and discuss with management their assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and whether any changes are necessary in light of such assessment;
Oversee the establishment of and monitor procedures for: (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting control or auditing matters; and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by the employees of the Company of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters;
Recommend to the Board whether to include the audited financial statements in the Company’s Form 10-K;
Review and recommend to the Board the Company’s policy that addresses its approach for determining market risk disclosures and the associated internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures, and review market risk disclosures made pursuant to such policy, in accordance with applicable law and regulatory requirements implementing the Basel III capital accord.
Review the qualifications, independence and performance of Capital One’s independent auditor;
Appoint, compensate, retain and oversee Capital One’s independent auditor; and
Assess the performance of Capital One’s Chief Internal Auditor.

The Committee may delegate authority for certain responsibilities to subcommittees or members of management as the Committee deems appropriate and as permitted by law.

LOGO

Bradford H. Warner

Committee Chair

Additional Committee Members:

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III, Pierre E. Leroy, Peter E. Raskind, Catherine G. West

Meetings Held in 2016:13

Primary Responsibilities:

  Assist our Board with the oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, including matters related to internal controls

  Review and discuss with management their assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and whether any changes are necessary in light of such assessment

  Review and discuss generally the policies and practices that govern the processes by which key risk exposures are identified, assessed, managed and controlled on an enterprise-wide basis

  Oversight of the qualifications, independence and performance of the Company’s independent auditor

  Oversight of the appointment, compensation, retention and work of the Company’s independent auditor

  Approves the appointment and compensation of the Company’s Chief Auditor and oversees the performance of the Chief Auditor and the internal audit function

  Oversight of the compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements

  Performs the audit committee and fiduciary audit committee functions on behalf of our bank subsidiaries in accordance with federal banking regulations

  Review and recommend to the Board (or disinterested members of the Board, as appropriate) for approval (i) the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and any material changes thereto; and (ii) any waiver of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for directors and certain executive officers

Qualifications:

  Each of the members of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” within the listing standards of the NYSE

  No member of the Audit Committee simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies, including that of Capital One

  The Board has identified both Mr. Raskind and Mr. Warner as “audit committee financial experts” under the applicable SEC rules based on their experience and qualifications

24  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Financial Expert

Although other members of the Audit Committee may qualify as “audit committee financial experts” under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the SEC and the NYSE promulgated thereunder, the Board of Directors has designated Mr. Raskind and Mr. Warner as its “audit committee financial experts.”

Service

No member of the Audit Committee simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies, including that of Capital One.

2014 Meetings

During 2014, the Audit Committee met twelve times.

Risk Committee

Description

The Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors with overseeing Capital One’s risk assessment and management processes, including the responsibilities set forth below.

Key Responsibilities

 

Monitor the processes by which management assesses and manages risk;
Monitor Capital One’s enterprise-wide risk management framework, including policies established by management to identify, assess, measure and manage key risks facing Capital One across all of Capital One’s eight risk categories: strategic, compliance, operational, reputation, legal, credit, market, and liquidity risk;
Review Capital One’s capital adequacy, including compliance with legal, regulatory and supervisory requirements;
Discuss with management the enterprise’s risk appetite and tolerance and, and at least annually, recommend to the Board the statement of risk appetite and tolerance to be communicated throughout the Company;
Review and approve annually the credit review plans and policies, and any significant changes to such plans, as appropriate;
Review and recommend to the Board the Company’s liquidity risk tolerance at least annually, taking into account the Company’s capital structure, risk profile, complexity, activities and size, and review management reports regarding the Company’s liquidity risk profile and liquidity risk tolerance at least quarterly;
Review reports from Capital One’s Chief Risk Officer at least quarterly;
Assess the performance of Capital One’s Chief Credit Review Officer; and
Oversee management’s specific responsibilities with respect to identification and management of, and planning for, the Company’s market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk and credit risk.

The Committee may delegate authority for certain responsibilities to subcommittees or members of management as the Committee deems appropriate and as permitted by law. The Audit Committee is responsible for risk oversight with respect to compliance by Capital One with legal and regulatory requirements. In furtherance of its responsibility for oversight of Capital One’s enterprise-wide risk management framework, the Risk Committee coordinates with the Audit Committee to provide risk oversight with respect to compliance by Capital One with legal and regulatory requirements.

LOGO

Peter E. Raskind

Committee Chair

Additional Committee Members:

Patrick W. Gross, Ann Fritz Hackett,
Lewis Hay, III, Benjamin P. Jenkins, III, Peter Thomas Killalea, Pierre E. Leroy, Mayo A. Shattuck III, Bradford H. Warner, Catherine G. West

Meetings Held in 2016:8

Primary Responsibilities:

  Assist our Board with oversight of the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management framework, including policies established by management to identify, assess, measure and manage key risks facing the Company across all of the Company’s eight risk categories: compliance, credit, legal, liquidity, market, operational, reputational and strategic risk

  Discuss with management the enterprise’s risk appetite and tolerance and at least annually, recommend to the Board the statement of risk appetite and tolerance to be communicated throughout the Company

  Review and approve annually the credit review plans and policies, and any significant changes to such plans, as appropriate

  Review and recommend to the Board the Company’s liquidity risk tolerance at least annually, taking into account the Company’s capital structure, risk profile, complexity, activities and size, and review management reports regarding the Company’s liquidity risk profile and liquidity risk tolerance at least quarterly

2014 Meetings

During 2014, the Risk Committee met eleven times.

Governance and Nominating Committee

Description

The Governance and Nominating Committee assists the Board of Directors with respect to a variety of corporate governance matters and practices, including the responsibilities set forth below.

Key Responsibilities

 

LOGO

Ann Fritz Hackett

Committee Chair

Additional Committee Members:

Patrick W. Gross, Lewis Hay, III,

Mayo A. Shattuck III

Meetings Held in 2016:6

Primary Responsibilities:

  Assist our Board by identifying and recommending nominees for election to our Board and review the qualifications of potential Board members

  Annually review and recommend committee membership

  Lead the Company’s corporate governance policies and practices, including recommending to the Board the Corporate Governance Guidelines

  Oversight of the Board and CEO’s annual evaluation processes and periodic discussions to plan for the CEO’s succession

  Director succession planning and recruitment of new director candidates

  Oversight of management’s stockholder engagement program and practices

  Evaluate stockholder proposals and other correspondence

  Establish and oversee processes for individual director and Board assessments and oversee that Committee Chairs perform committee self-assessments

  Keep informed regarding external governance trends, including reviewing benchmarking research conducted by management

Advise the Board of Directors on its organization, membership and function;
Identify and recommend director nominees and the structure and membership of each Committee of the Board;
Advise and recommend action on corporate governance matters applicable to Capital One;
Develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company and periodically review and reassess the adequacy of such corporate governance guidelines and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval;
Review on an annual basis any transactions involving the Company and any director or executive officer or immediate family member thereof and, as appropriate, consider potential conflicts of interest or the appearance thereof and issues relating to director independence;
Advise the Board of Directors on the frequency of the Company’s advisory vote on executive compensation; and
Oversee the Board’s and the CEO’s annual evaluation processes and provide that the directors engage in periodic discussions to plan for the CEO’s succession, as described in more detail in Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  25

The Committee may delegate authority for certain responsibilities to subcommittees or members of management as the Committee deems appropriate and as permitted by law.


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

2014 Meetings

During 2014, the Governance and Nominating Committee met five times.

Compensation Committee

Description

The Compensation Committee assists the Board of Directors with respect to the compensation programs and benefit plans for the directors, the Chief Executive Officer, the other executive officers and other employees; the annual Committee report and Capital One’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis; the election of officers and the hiring or promotion of senior executives; and such other responsibilities and activities as may be required by law or regulation, including the responsibilities set forth below.

Key Responsibilities

 

Recommend to the Board annually officers for election or re-election or the manner in which such officers will be chosen;
Evaluate, approve and recommend to the independent directors the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, including any salary, incentive awards, perquisites and termination arrangements, in light of the Committee’s assessment of his performance and anticipated contributions with respect to the Company’s strategy and objectives;
Review, approve and recommend the salary levels, incentive awards, perquisites and termination arrangements for executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, to the independent directors and the hiring or promotion of such executive officers to the Board;
Review and approve the Company’s goals and objectives relevant to compensation, oversee the Company’s policies and programs relating to compensation and benefits available to executive officers to ensure that they align with such goals and objectives, and review relevant market data in establishing compensation and benefits programs;

LOGO

Mayo A. Shattuck III

Committee Chair

Additional Committee Members:

Patrick W. Gross, Ann Fritz Hackett,

Lewis Hay, III, Benjamin P. Jenkins, III, Peter Thomas Killalea, Pierre E. Leroy

Meetings Held in 2016:7

Primary Responsibilities:

  Recommend to the Board annually officers for election orre-election or the manner in which such officers will be chosen

  Evaluate, approve and recommend to the independent directors the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, including any salary, incentive awards, perquisites and termination arrangements, in light of the Committee’s assessment of his performance and anticipated contributions with respect to the Company’s strategy and objectives

  Review, approve and recommend the salary levels, incentive awards, perquisites and termination arrangements for executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, to the independent directors and the hiring or promotion of such executive officers to the Board

  Review and approve the Company’s goals and objectives relevant to compensation, oversee the Company’s policies and programs relating to compensation and benefits available to executive officers to ensure that they align with such goals and objectives, and review relevant market data in establishing compensation and benefits programs

  Oversee incentive compensation programs for executive officers and others who can expose the Company to material risk to ensure such programs are designed and operated in a manner that achieves balance and is consistent with safety and soundness

  Review data and analyses to allow an assessment of whether the design and operation of incentive compensation programs is consistent with the Company’s safety and soundness as provided under applicable regulatory guidance

  Administer Capital One’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan and other employee benefit plans

  Review periodically and recommend director compensation to the Board

  Recommend the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in our annual proxy statement or our Annual Report on Form10-K

The independent directors of the Board may meet concurrently with the Compensation Committee, as appropriate, to review and approve compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers.

Oversee incentive compensation programs for executive officers and others who can expose the Company to material risk to ensure such programs are designed and operated in a manner that achieves balance and is consistent with safety and soundness;
Review data and analyses to allow an assessment of whether the design and operation of incentive compensation programs is consistent with the Company’s safety and soundness as provided under applicable regulatory guidance;
Administer Capital One’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan and other employee benefit plans;
Review periodically and recommend director compensation to the Board; and
Recommend the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in our annual proxy statement or our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The independent directors of the Board may meet concurrently with the Compensation Committee, as appropriate, to review and approve compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers.

The Committee may also delegate authority for certain responsibilities to subcommittees or members of management as the Committee deems appropriate and as permitted by law and applicable plan documents.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The members of the Compensation Committee are Ms. Hackett and Messrs. Shattuck, Gross, Hay and Jenkins. No interlocking relationship exists between any member of Capital One’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee and anyOne executive officer served as a member of the board of directors or the compensation committee of any other company,entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past. No director who served on the Compensation Committee during 20142016 is or was formerly an officer or an employee of Capital One.

26  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Compensation Committee Consultant

The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and terminate legal counsel and other consultants and to approve such consultants’ fees and other retention terms. The Compensation Committee has retained the services of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”), an independent executive compensation consulting firm (“F.W. Cook”). F.W.firm. FW Cook reports to the Chair of the Compensation Committee, and its engagement may be terminated by the Compensation Committee at any time.

The Compensation Committee determines the scope and nature of F.W.FW Cook’s assignments. In 2014, F.W.2016, FW Cook:

 

Provided to the Committee independent competitive market data and advice related to the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, the other executive officers and the directors, including the development of a group of comparator companies for purposes of competitive analysis;
Reviewed for the Committee management-provided market data and recommendations on the design of compensation programs for senior executives other than the Chief Executive Officer;
Reviewed for the Committee Capital One’s executive compensation levels, performance and the design of incentive programs;
Reviewed the compensation program for Capital One’s directors and provided competitive compensation data and director compensation program recommendations to the Committee for review; and
Provided information to the Committee on executive and director compensation trends and analyses of the implications of such trends for Capital One.
Provided to the Compensation Committee independent competitive market data and advice related to the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, the other executive officers and the directors, including the development of a group of comparator companies for purposes of competitive analysis;

Reviewed for the Compensation Committee management-provided market data and recommendations on the design of compensation programs for senior executives other than the Chief Executive Officer;

Reviewed for the Compensation Committee Capital One’s executive compensation levels, performance and the design of incentive programs;

Reviewed the compensation program for Capital One’s directors and provided competitive compensation data and director compensation program recommendations to the Compensation Committee for review; and

Provided information to the Compensation Committee on executive and director compensation trends and analyses of the implications of such trends for Capital One.

Consultants from F.W.FW Cook generally attend Compensation Committee meetings and executive sessions upon the Chair of the Committee’sCompensation Committee Chair’s request, including meetings held jointly with the independent directors to review or approve the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers and to provide an independent perspective regarding such compensation practices.

The services provided by F.W.FW Cook are limited in scope as described above. F.W.FW Cook does not provide any services to the Company or its management other than the services provided to the Compensation Committee as described above.Committee. The Compensation Committee has considered factors relevant to F.W.FW Cook’s independence from management under SEC rules and has determined that F.W.FW Cook is independent from management.

2014 Meetings

During 2014, the Compensation Committee met six times.

Committee Membership Determinations

The table below provides a summaryOn an annual basis, the Governance and Nominating Committee assesses and considers membership for each of the Board’s currentregular committees. This review takes into account, among other factors, committee structure,needs, director experience, committee succession planning and the desire to balance membership continuity with new insights.

The Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee facilitates discussions with management, committee chairs, the Chair of the Board, and individual directors, as needed and shares that feedback with the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee makes recommendations for committee membership and related information. As a management director, Richard D. Fairbank is not a member of any Board committee.Chairs to the full Board.

 

ChairLOGOMemberLOGOAudit Committee Financial Expert LOGO

Audit
Committee

Compensation
Committee

Risk
Committee

Governance and
Nominating
Committee

Patrick W. GrossCAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

LOGOLOGOLOGO  27


Ann Fritz Hackett

LOGOLOGOLOGO

Lewis Hay, III

LOGOLOGOLOGO

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

LOGOLOGOLOGO

Pierre E. Leroy

LOGO

Peter E. Raskind

LOGOLOGOLOGO

Mayo A. Shattuck III

LOGOLOGOLOGO

Bradford H. Warner

LOGOLOGOLOGO

Catherine G. West

LOGOLOGOSECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

 

 How to Contact the Board of Directors and the Lead Independent Director

Interested parties may make their concerns known to the Board of Directors or independent directors as a group by contacting the Lead Independent Director, Ms. Ann Fritz Hackett, care of the Corporate Secretary, at the address below:

Lead Independent Director

c/o Corporate Secretary’s Office

Capital One Financial Corporation

1680 Capital One Drive

McLean, Virginia 22102

Communications may also be sent to individual directors at the same address.

The Corporate Secretary reviews all communications sent to the Board of Directors, committees or individual directors and forwards all substantive communications to the appropriate parties. Communications to the Board of Directors, the independent directors or any individual director that relate to Capital One’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters are referred to the Chair of the Audit Committee and Capital One’s Chief Internal Auditor. Other communications are referred to the Lead Independent Director, the Chair of the appropriate committee and/or the specified director, as applicable.

 

 Director Nomination Process

The Governance and Nominating Committee considers and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning nominees to create or fill open positions within the Board. Stockholders may propose nominees for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee by submitting the names and other relevant information as required by Capital One’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) and further described in Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, to the Corporate Secretary at the address set forth on the Notice

of Annual Stockholder Meeting. Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines also require that a copy of the information provided to the Corporate Secretary relating to the proposed nominee must be delivered to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee.

Director candidates, other than current directors, may be interviewed by the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee, other directors, the CEO and/or other members of senior management. The Committee considers the criteria described below, as well as the results of interviews and any background checks the Committee deems appropriate, in making its recommendation to the Board of Directors. The Committee also considers current directors for re-nomination in light of the criteria described below and their past and potential contributions to the Board of Directors.

Consideration of Director Nominees

All director candidates, including incumbent directors and those recommended by stockholders, are evaluated using the same criteria. These criteria are as follows:

Candidates will represent diversity of experience and should possess a strong educational background, substantial tenure and breadth of experience in leadership capacities, and business and financial acumen;
Candidates may also be selected for their background relevant to Capital One’s business strategy, their understanding of the intricacies of a public company, their international business background and their experience in risk management; and
Other relevant criteria may include a reputation for high personal and professional ethics, integrity and honesty, good character and judgment, the ability to be an independent thinker and diversity along a variety of dimensions, including the candidate’s professional and personal experience, background, perspective and viewpoint.

The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors believe that diversity along multiple dimensions, including opinions, skills, perspectives, personal and professional experiences and other differentiating characteristics, is an important element of its nomination recommendations. The Board of Directors considers each nominee in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of assembling a Board that can best maintain the success of Capital One’s business. Although the Board of Directors does not have a formal diversity policy, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board periodically review the Board’s membership in light of Capital One’s business model and strategic objectives, consider whether the directors possess the requisite skills, experience and perspectives to oversee the Company in achieving those goals, and may seek additional directors from time to time as a result of its considerations.

Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a director shall not be eligible for election to the Board upon reaching the age of 72. The Board may waive this requirement if it deems that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to issue a waiver.

In 2014, Capital One contracted with a third-party director search firm to identify, evaluate and verify references for potential director candidates and with a third-party to perform various background verification services for director candidates, including those related to federal and state criminal background checks, employment and education verification and credit reporting.

 Information about our Directors and Executive Officers

Each director who is nominated for election at the Annual Meeting and each of Capital One’s executive officers is listed below with a brief description of his or her business experience.

 Directors

Our Board of Directors, acting through the Governance and Nominating Committee, seeks a board that, as a whole, possesses the mix of experiences, skills, expertise and qualifications appropriate to support the success of the Company and that functions effectively in light of the Company’s current and evolving business circumstances. The Board believes that the collective combination of backgrounds, skills and experiences of its members has produced a Board that is well-equipped to exercise oversight responsibilities for Capital One’s

stockholders and other stakeholders. All of our directors have demonstrated business acumen, the ability to exercise sound judgment, a high degree of engagement, and a commitment of service to Capital One, the Board of Directors and the long-term interests of stockholders. The Board also believes that all of our directors have a reputation for integrity, honesty, professionalism, and adherence to high ethical standards. In addition, members of the Board have specific experiences that, in the aggregate, meet an articulated set of director skills established in 2014 by the Governance and Nominating Committee that align with the Company’s long-term strategy and operational objectives, including:

 

StrategyExperience setting a long-term corporate vision or direction, developing desirable products and customer segments, assessing geographies in which to operate, and competitive positioning
Digital/TechnologyLeadership and understanding of technology, digital platforms and new media, cybersecurity risk, and data analytics

Retail/Commercial

Banking

Retail and/or commercial banking industry experience at an executive level

RiskRobert M. Alexander

Management/Compliance

Significant understanding with respect to the identification, assessment and oversight of risk management programs and practices

Senior Executive

Management

Experience as a chief executive officer or other senior executive at a public company

Public

Accounting/Financial

Reporting

Experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with respect to the preparation, auditing or evaluation of financial statements
Financial ServicesLeadership experience as an executive or board member in the financial services industry

Compensation/Human

Resources

Understanding of the issues involved with executive compensation, human resource management, and talent management and development

Public Company Board

Service

Experience serving as a director on a large public company board

All of our Board members have significant experience in strategy development, risk management and the financial services industry through executive leadership positions, consulting engagements, and/or extended service on the Board of Directors and its committees. Eight of our directors have significant understanding of technology platforms and systems and their associated risks, six of our directors have held senior executive responsibilities at large banks, and six of our directors serve or have served as chief executive officers. In addition, all of our directors have public company board experience and broad financial expertise, including experience with financial statements and the financial reporting required of large public companies.

In addition, the Board of Directors is composed of directors with a variety of tenures, ranging from one independent director who has served on the Board from the time Capital One became a public company to two independent directors added in 2013, reflecting a diversity of perspectives that creates an effective balance between directors who have direct experience with Capital One’s operations, history and business cycles and directors who bring fresh perspectives. Accordingly, we believe the Board possesses the appropriate combination of skills and qualifications, independence, knowledge of Capital One and its industry, and business acumen that enables it to operate as an engaged and effective Board.

Richard D. Fairbank, 64

Chair, Chief Executive Officer and President

Mr. Fairbank is founder, Chair, Chief Executive Officer and President of Capital One Financial Corporation. Mr. Fairbank also serves as Chair of Capital One Bank (USA), National Association and Capital One, National Association.

Mr. Fairbank has been Chair of Capital One since February 1995. Mr. Fairbank was appointed and served as the Fifth Federal Reserve District’s representative on the Federal Advisory Council from January 2010 until December 2012. As a member of the Council, he conferred periodically with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on business conditions and issues related to the banking industry. Mr. Fairbank also served on MasterCard International’s Global Board of Directors from February 2004 until May 2006 and, prior to that, as Chairman of MasterCard’s U.S. Region Board.

Mr. Fairbank’s experience in leading the business as founder and Chief Executive Officer of Capital One, his responsibilities for the strategic direction and management of Capital One’s day-to-day operations and his former roles with the Federal Advisory Council and MasterCard International bring broad industry and specific institutional knowledge and experience to the Board of Directors.

Patrick W. Gross, 70

Director

Mr. Gross is Chairman of The Lovell Group, a private business and technology advisory and investment firm he founded in 2002 to work with private venture-funded technology companies on a range of business, management and financial strategies. Prior to his role with Lovell, he was a founder, and served as a principal executive officer from 1970 to 2002, of American Management Systems, Inc. (“AMS”), an information technology, consulting, software development and systems integration firm. During his time at AMS, Mr. Gross built and supervised the AMS financial services business which provided IT-based applications to major banks in the U.S., Canada and Europe.

He has been a director of Capital One Financial Corporation since February 1995 and is also a director of Capital One Bank (USA), National Association. He served on the Audit and Risk Committee from March 1995 until the Committee’s restructuring in May 2013, the Risk Committee since May 2013, the Compensation Committee since April 2005 and the Governance and Nominating Committee since September 2002. He served as Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee from September 2002 until April 2007, and as presiding director from September 2003 until April 2007.

Mr. Gross is currently a director of the following publicly-held companies: Career Education Corporation, Liquidity Services, Inc., Rosetta Stone, Inc., and Waste Management, Inc. Mr. Gross also served on the board of Taleo Corporation from 2006 to 2012.

Mr. Gross’s experience in applying information technology, advanced data analytics and risk management analytics within global financial services firms, as well as his roles in founding and leading AMS and with other public company boards, assists the Board of Directors in overseeing, among other matters, Capital One’s entrepreneurial innovations, digital initiatives, cyber security and information systems.

Ann Fritz Hackett, 61

Director

Ms. Hackett has been President of Horizon Consulting Group, LLC since she founded the company in 1996. Horizon Consulting Group provides strategic, organizational and human resources advice to clients worldwide. She has worked with boards of directors, chief executive officers and senior executives to identify strategic opportunities and execute solutions during periods of business and financial challenges and transformation. Prior to Horizon Consulting, Ms. Hackett was Vice President and Partner of a leading national strategy consulting firm where she served on the Management Committee and, among other strategy consulting assignments, led Human Resources and developed her expertise in managing cultural change, creating performance management processes and a performance-based culture, nurturing leadership talent and planning for executive succession.

Ms. Hackett has been a director of Capital One Financial Corporation since October 27, 2004, and is also a director of Capital One, National Association. She served on the Audit and Risk Committee from October 2004 until the Committee’s restructuring in May 2013, the Risk Committee since May 2013, the Governance and Nominating Committee since October 2004 and on the Compensation Committee since April 2005. Ms. Hackett became the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Lead Independent Director in April 2007. She is also a director of Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. She served on the board of Beam, Inc. (formerly Fortune Brands, Inc.) from December 2007 until April 2014. In 2012, Ms. Hackett joined the Tapestry Networks’ Lead Director Network, a select group of lead directors who collaborate on matters regarding board leadership.

Ms. Hackett has experience in strategy, technology development, leading change initiatives, talent management and succession planning and in creating performance management processes and performance-based compensation. She also has experience in corporate governance and risk matters as a result of her participation with public company boards of directors and related governance committees, non-profit boards and consulting engagements. This combination of skills assists the Board of Directors in its discussions on these and other matters.

Lewis Hay, III, 59

Director

Mr. Hay currently acts as an Operating Advisor for Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC, a private equity investment firm. Mr. Hay served as Executive Chairman of NextEra Energy, Inc. (formerly FPL Group, Inc.), one of the nation’s leading electricity-related services companies and the largest renewable energy generator in North America from July 2012 until he retired in December 2013. At NextEra Energy, he served as Chief Executive Officer from June 2001 to July 2012, Chairman from January 2002 to July 2012 and President from June 2001 to December 2006. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of Florida Power & Light Company from January 2002 to July 2008. He joined NextEra Energy in 1999 as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer and served as President of NextEra Energy Resources, LLC (formerly FPL Energy, LLC) from March 2000 until December 2001.

Mr. Hay has been a director of Capital One Financial Corporation since October 31, 2003, and is also a director of Capital One, National Association. He has served on the Compensation Committee since April 2004, the Risk Committee since May 2013, and the Governance and Nominating Committee since April 2007. He also served on the Finance and Trust Oversight Committee, of which he has served as Chair, from April 2005 until the Committee was disbanded in May 2013. He is also a director of Harris Corporation and of Anthem, Inc. (formerly WellPoint, Inc.). Mr. Hay serves on the Board of Business Advisors for the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University, and on the Advisory Council of Carnegie Mellon University’s Scott Institute for Energy Innovation. He is a former chairman of both the Edison Electric Institute, the association of U.S. shareholder-owned electric companies, and the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. Mr. Hay also served as Chair of the Electricity Subsector Coordinating Council, an organization that coordinated government and electricity industry cyber security initiatives, as well as on President Obama’s President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.

Mr. Hay has extensive knowledge of complex strategic, operational, management, regulatory, financial and governance issues faced by a large public company. His background in leading finance and accounting, treasury, credit, investor relations, mergers and acquisitions and information systems functions, as well as his understanding of enterprise risk management, executive compensation and public company governance, provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight on these and other matters.

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III, 70

Director

Mr. Jenkins served as Senior Advisor, Managing Director, and Vice Chairman for Retail Banking at Morgan Stanley & Co., a financial services firm, from January 2009 to January 2011. Prior to that, he had a 38-year career with Wachovia Corporation (now Wells Fargo & Company), a financial services company, where he was Vice Chairman and President of the General Banking Group. He is credited with advancing the profitability of

the General Bank through improvements in customer service and the reduction of customer attrition to industry-leading levels. He and his team were instrumental in the integration of the First Union/Wachovia and Wachovia/SouthTrust mergers, and Mr. Jenkins led the successful expansion of Wachovia’s banking network. He also previously served on the boards of Visa USA and Visa International.

Mr. Jenkins has been a director of Capital One Financial Corporation since February 2013 and is also a director of Capital One, National Association. He has served on the Audit Committee since May 2013, the Compensation Committee since May 2013, and the Risk Committee since May 2014.

Mr. Jenkins’ experience in corporate banking, banking operations, investment banking, and management of customer relationships brings valuable insight to the Board of Directors in overseeing, among other areas, matters critical to Capital One’s banking business.

Pierre E. Leroy, 66

Director

Mr. Leroy served as Executive Chairman from March 2012 and Chief Executive Officer from July 2012 until June 2013 of Vigilant Solutions (formerly Vigilant Video, Inc.), a leading provider of video analytics software and systems. Mr. Leroy retired in 2005 from Deere & Company as President of both the Worldwide Construction & Forestry Division and the Global Parts Division. Deere & Company is a world leader in providing advanced products and services for agriculture, forestry, construction, lawn and turf care, landscaping and irrigation, and also provides financial services worldwide and manufactures and markets engines used in heavy equipment. During his professional career with Deere, Mr. Leroy served in a number of positions in Finance, including Treasurer, Vice-President and Treasurer, and Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer.

Mr. Leroy has been a director of Capital One Financial Corporation since September 1, 2005, and is also a director of Capital One Bank (USA), National Association. Mr. Leroy has served on the Risk Committee since May 2013.

Mr. Leroy has been a director of United Rentals, Inc. since April 2012. He previously served on the boards of directors of RSC Holdings Inc. and RSC Equipment Rental from 2008 to April 2012 (when RSC was acquired by United Rentals), Beam, Inc. (formerly Fortune Brands, Inc.) from September 2003 to February 2012 and ACCO Brands from August 2005 to April 2009.

Mr. Leroy’s experience in capital markets and asset-liability management, as well as leading and managing large complex international marketing, engineering and manufacturing organizations and serving on other public company boards, provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight on these and other matters.

Peter E. Raskind, 58

Director

Mr. Raskind is the owner of JMB Consulting, LLC, which he established in February 2009 to provide consulting services to financial services firms and investors. In 2011, he served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Cleveland Metropolitan School District, and in 2010, he served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority. Until its merger with PNC Financial Services Group in December 2008, Mr. Raskind served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of National City Corporation, one of the largest banks in the United States. Through an extensive banking career, Mr. Raskind has served in a number of leadership roles and held positions of successively greater responsibility in a broad range of consumer and commercial banking disciplines, including cash management services, corporate finance, international banking, corporate trust, retail and small business banking, operations and strategic planning.

Mr. Raskind has been a director of Capital One Financial Corporation since January 31, 2012, and is also a director of Capital One Bank (USA), National Association. He served on the Audit and Risk Committee from January 2013 until the Committee’s restructuring in May 2013, and has served on the Audit Committee since May 2013 and as the Chair of the Risk Committee since May 2013. He qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC guidelines and has been designated an “audit committee financial expert” for Capital One since 2014.

Mr. Raskind served as a director of United Community Banks, Inc. from May 2011 to January 2012. Mr. Raskind previously served as a director of Visa USA and Visa International, served on the board of directors of the Consumer Bankers Association, was a member of the Financial Services Roundtable, and served on the executive committee of the National Automated Clearing House Association.

Mr. Raskind is experienced in corporate banking, retail banking, wealth management/trust, mortgage, operations, technology, strategy, product management, asset/liability management, risk management and acquisition integration from his extensive career in banking. He provides the Board with valuable insight on these and other matters.

Mayo A. Shattuck III, 60

Director

Mr. Shattuck is Chairman of the Board of Chicago-based Exelon Corporation, the nation’s largest competitive energy provider and commercial nuclear plant operator. From March 2012 through February 2013, he served as Executive Chairman of the Board of Exelon. Prior to joining Exelon, he was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Constellation Energy, a leading supplier of electricity to large commercial and industrial customers, a position he held from 2001 to 2012. Mr. Shattuck was previously at Deutsche Bank, where he served as Chairman of the Board of Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown and, during his tenure, served as Global Head of Investment Banking and Global Head of Private Banking.

From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Shattuck served as Vice Chairman of Bankers Trust Corporation, which merged with Deutsche Bank in 1999. From 1991 to 1997, Mr. Shattuck was President and Chief Operating Officer and a director of Alex. Brown & Sons, a major investment bank, which merged with Bankers Trust in 1997.

Mr. Shattuck has been a director of Capital One Financial Corporation since October 31, 2003, and also serves as a director of Capital One, National Association. He has served on the Compensation Committee since April 2004 and became its Chairman in April 2005. He also served as Chairman of the Finance and Trust Oversight Committee from April 2004 to April 2005. Mr. Shattuck has served on the Governance and Nominating Committee since May 2013 and the Risk Committee since May 2014. Mr. Shattuck is also a director of Gap, Inc. and Chairman of its Audit and Finance Committee, Vice Chairman of Johns Hopkins Medicine, and former Chairman of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operators.

Mr. Shattuck’s experience in global corporate finance and lending, corporate strategy, capital markets, risk management and private banking, as well as his experience in leading two large, publicly-held companies and serving on other public company boards, provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight on these and other matters.

Bradford H. Warner, 63

Director

Mr. Warner served in a variety of executive positions at BankBoston, FleetBoston and Bank of America from 1975 until his retirement in 2004. These positions included President of Premier and Small Business Banking, Executive Vice President of Personal Financial Services, and Vice Chairman of Regional Bank.

Throughout his banking career, Mr. Warner served in leadership roles for many of the major business lines and functional disciplines that constitute commercial banking, including leadership of retail and branch banking, consumer lending (credit cards, mortgage and home equity), student lending and small business; various corporate banking functions, including community banking and capital markets businesses, such as underwriting, trading and sales of domestic and international fixed income securities, foreign exchange and derivatives; international banking businesses in Asia, northern Latin America and Mexico; and several investment related businesses, including private banking, asset management and brokerage. He also served on the senior most management policy and governance committees at BankBoston, FleetBoston and Bank of America.

Mr. Warner has been a director of Capital One Financial Corporation since April 24, 2008, and also serves as a director of Capital One Bank (USA), National Association. He was a member of the Audit and Risk and Finance and Trust Oversight Committees from April 2008 until the Committees were restructured in May 2013.

Mr. Warner has been a member of the Risk Committee since May 2013 and has served as Chair of the Audit Committee since May 2013. He qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC guidelines and has been designated an “audit committee financial expert” for Capital One since 2012.

Mr. Warner’s experience in a broad range of commercial, consumer, investment and international banking leadership roles, as well as his experience in corporate banking functions, customer relationships, corporate culture change management, enterprise risk management and technology, brings valuable insight to the Board of Directors in overseeing, among other matters, a broad range of matters critical to Capital One’s banking business.

Catherine G. West, 55

Director

Ms. West joined Promontory Financial Group, a financial services consulting firm, in April 2012 as a Managing Director and then served as a Special Advisor from May 2013 to October 2013, where she focused on internal administrative activities. From March 2011 to April 2012, Ms. West was the Associate Director and Chief Operating Officer of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), a federal agency tasked with regulating U.S. consumer protection with regard to financial services and products, where she led the start-up of the agency’s infrastructure. While at the CFPB, Ms. West also played an integral part in implementing a Consumer Response unit designed to solicit views from consumers regarding their experiences with financial institutions and leverage those views to effect policy change. She was previously the Chief Operating Officer of J.C. Penney from August 2006 to December 2006. From March 2000 to July 2006, Ms. West was an executive officer at Capital One Financial Corporation where she served in roles that included President of the U.S. Card business and Executive Vice President of U.S. Consumer Operations.

Ms. West has been a director of Capital One Financial Corporation since February 2013 and is also a director of Capital One Bank (USA), National Association. She has served on the Audit Committee since May 2013 and the Risk Committee since May 2013.

Ms. West has a multifaceted background in financial services with more than 25 years of experience in financial services operations, regulatory matters, technology platform conversions, process automation and innovation, and strategy. She has experience in leveraged buyouts, initial public offerings, and mergers and acquisitions, and has a keen understanding of both business strategy and the regulatory perspective. Ms. West provides the Board with valuable insight on these and other matters.

 Executive Officers

Robert M. Alexander, 50

Chief Information Officer

Age: 52

Mr. Alexander joined Capital One in April 1998. From April 1998 to May 2007, Mr. Alexander had responsibility at various times for a number of Capital One’s lending businesses, including the U.S. consumer credit card and installment loan businesses. Mr. Alexander became Chief Information Officer in May 2007, and in this role he is responsible for overseeing all technology activities for Capital One.

Jory A. Berson 44

Chief Human Resources Officer

Age: 46

Mr. Berson joined Capital One in July 1992. From July 1992 to June 2009, Mr. Berson held a variety of roles at Capital One, including President, Financial Services and President, U.S. Card. In June 2009, Mr. Berson became Chief Human Resources Officer, and in this role Mr. Berson is responsible for overseeing Capital One’s Human Resources strategy, recruitment efforts and development programs.

R. Scott Blackley

Chief Financial Officer

Age: 48

Mr. Blackley joined Capital One in March 2011. Mr. Blackley became the Company’s Chief Financial Officer in May 2016 and has served as the Company’s Principal Accounting Officer and Controller since July 2011 and March 2011, respectively. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Blackley held various executive positions at Fannie Mae, most recently as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Capital Markets Group. Mr. Blackley has more than 20 years of experience in consulting and public accounting, including an appointment to the US Securities and Exchange Commission as a Professional Accounting Fellow and as a Partner with KPMG, LLP.

Kevin S. Borgmann 43

Chief Risk Officer

Age: 45

Mr. Borgmann joined Capital One in August 2001. Since that time he has served in a variety of roles in Capital One’s Corporate Strategy, Partnership Finance, Upmarket Acquisitions, Credit Card, Auto Finance and Risk departments, including serving as Senior Vice President with the Credit Card Division from March 2008 until

September 2010, President of Capital One Auto Finance from September 2010 until October 2012 and Deputy Chief Risk Officer from October 2012 untilto January 31, 2013. OnIn January 31, 2013, Mr. Borgmann became Chief Risk Officer, and in this role he is responsible for overseeing Capital One’s credit, compliance, operational, market and liquidity, and enterprise risk management functions.

Stephen S. Crawford 50

Chief Financial OfficerHead of Finance and Corporate Development

Age: 52

Mr. Crawford joined Capital One in February 2013 as Chief Financial Officer Designate and served as Capital One’s Chief Financial Officer beginningfrom May 24, 2013.2013 to May 2016. Mr. Crawford became Head of Finance and Business Development in May 2016. Prior to joining Capital One, Mr. Crawfordco-founded Centerview Partners, an investment banking and advisory firm, in 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Crawford served in various leadership roles at Morgan Stanley & Co., a financial services firm, including as theCo-President of the firm during 2005, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer from 2004 to 2005, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2004, and Executive Vice President and Chief Strategic Officer from 2000 to 2001.

28  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Noelle K. Eder

Chief Card Customer Experience Officer

Age: 47

Ms. Eder joined Capital One in September 2014 as Executive Vice President, Card Operations. From September 2014 to November 2016, Ms. Eder was responsible for leading Card operations which included customer experience, digital channels, loss mitigation, brand marketing, and horizontal functions like data analytics. Ms. Eder became Chief Card Customer Experience Officer of Capital One in November 2016, where she is responsible for the customer experience across all channels and operations for the Card business. Prior to joining Capital One, Ms. Eder served in several leadership roles at Intuit for nine years, most recently as Senior Vice President and Chief Customer Care Officer, where she was responsible for Intuit’s worldwide customer experience strategy.

John G. Finneran, Jr., 65

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Age: 67

Mr. Finneran joined Capital One in September 1994. Since that time, he has served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and is responsible for managing Capital One’s legal, governmental affairs, corporate governance, regulatory relations and corporate affairs departments. He also manages Capital One’s internal audit department for administrative purposes.

Frank G. LaPrade, III 48

Chief Enterprise Services Officer

Chief of Staff to the CEO

Age: 50

Mr. LaPrade joined Capital One in January 1996. Since that time he has served in various positions, including as Capital One’s Deputy General Counsel responsible for managing the company’s litigation, employment, intellectual property and transactional practice areas. In 2004, Mr. LaPrade became Chief of Staff to the Chief Executive Officer. In 2010, Mr. LaPrade added responsibilities as Chief Enterprise Services Officer. In that capacity, Mr. LaPrade manages Information Technology, Brand Marketing, Corporate Development, Corporate Real Estate, Digital Banking and Procurement for the company.Company.

Ryan M. Schneider, 45Christopher T. Newkirk

President, International and Small Business Card

Age: 46

Mr. SchneiderNewkirk joined Capital One in December 2001.September 2008. From December 2001Sept 2008 to December 2007,January 2010, Mr. SchneiderNewkirk led U.S. Card Partnership Analytics, where he was responsible for strategy, and cobrand, private label and portfolio acquisition valuations in our Partnerships business. From February 2010 to June 2013, Mr. Newkirk led U.S. Card Customer Management, where he was responsible for the risk adjusted returns, growth, loyalty and retention of the portfolio. From July 2013 to February 2015, Mr. Newkirk held a varietyroles of positions within Capital One includingincreasing responsibility in the Company’s International Card business, most recently as Executive Vice President, Auto FinanceHead of International Card, where he was responsible for all aspects of Capital One’s International Card business, including strategy, credit, marketing, product, customer experience, operations, talent, technology, risk management and Executive Vice President, US Card.financial decisions. In November 2016, Mr. SchneiderNewkirk became President, International and Small Business Card, in December 2007, and in this rolewhere he is responsible for all ofleading Capital One’s consumer credit card business in Canada and the United Kingdom and Capital One’s small business credit card lines of business including those in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. Mr. Schneider also serves as a director of Capital One Bank (USA), National Association.States.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  29


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Michael C. Slocum 58

President, Commercial Banking

Age: 60

Mr. Slocum joined Capital One in August 2007. From August 2007 to September 2011, Mr. Slocum was Executive Vice President of Capital One’s Banking Business, leading the company’s Commercial Banking business including asset-based lending, leasing and private banking. Mr. Slocum became President, Commercial Banking in September 2011 and in this role he is responsible for leading multiple broad linesall aspects of business,Commercial Banking including Corporate and Commercial Real Estate Middle Market Banking, Commercial & Specialty FinanceCapital Markets, Treasury Services and Treasury Services.all related operations. Before joining Capital One, Mr. Slocum served in various leadership roles at Wachovia Bank (now Wells Fargo & Company), a provider of consumer and commercial financial services, including as the Regional Chief Executive Officer for Northeastern US.

Michael J. Wassmer

President, U.S. Card

Age: 47

Mr. Wassmer joined Capital One in July 1994. Since that time, Mr. Wassmer has served in roles of increasing responsibility across the Company, expanding his leadership scope and experience driving strategy and analysis, finance, operations and risk management. From 2013 to November 2016, Mr. Wassmer has served as Executive Vice President of the Company’s Domestic Card business (other thanCo-Branded Card) where he was responsible for leading all credit, marketing and strategy for the domestic Branded Consumer and Small Business Card businesses. In November 2016, Mr. Wassmer became President, Domestic Card and is currently responsible for leading the Company’s consumer credit card business in the United States. In his over 20 years of leadership in the Company’s Card business, Mr. Wassmer has been responsible for leading the launch of the Company’s flagship consumer and small business products including the Venture, Quicksilver and Spark product lines.

Jonathan W. Witter 45

President, Retail and Direct Banking

Age: 47

Mr. Witter joined Capital One in December 2010 as an Executive Vice President in Retail Banking. From September 2011 until February 2012, Mr. Witter served as President, Retail and Small Business Banking. In February 2012, he became President, Retail and Direct Banking and in this role, he provides strategic direction and leadership for the Retail and Direct Banking organization and is responsible for more than 14,000 associates, nearly 1,000 branch and office locations, and 2,200 ATMs in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Washington, D.C. In February 2012, Mr. Witter also becamewas a director of ING Bank, fsb. from February 2012 to November 2012. Prior to joining Capital One, Mr. Witter held various positions, including executive vice president and head of general Bank Distribution at Wachovia (now Wells Fargo & Company), managing director and president of Morgan Stanley Private Bank NA, a global financial services firm, and Chief Operating Officer of Morgan Stanley’s Retail Banking Group.

Sanjiv Yajnik 58

President, Financial Services

Age: 60

Mr. Yajnik joined Capital One in July 1998. From July 1998 to June 2009, Mr. Yajnik held a number of positionsled several businesses within Capital One’s European credit card business, Canadian credit card businessOne, including Capital One Europe, Capital One Canada, and small business services organization.Capital One Small Business Services. Mr. Yajnik became President, Financial Services in June 2009, and in2009. In this role he is responsible for overseeing Capital One’s auto financeAuto Finance and home loansHome Loans businesses. Mr. Yajnik also serves as a director of Capital One, National Association. Prior to joining Capital One, Mr. Yajnik held a broad range of positions, including General Manager at Circuit City Stores (USA), Market Manager at PepsiCo (Canada), and Chief Engineer at Mobil Oil (International).

30  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION IIIIISECURITY OWNERSHIPCORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

Related Person Transactions

Capital One’s policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of related person transactions are set forth in the charter of the Governance and Nominating Committee, Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Capital One’s Code of Conduct and internal written procedures. The charter of the Governance and Nominating Committee requires the committee to review at least on an annual basis any material transactions involving Capital One and any of its directors, executive officers or their immediate family members and, as appropriate, to consider potential conflicts of interest or the appearance of potential conflicts of interest, as well as issues relating to director independence. The Governance and Nominating Committee performs this review each year based on the information provided by each director and executive officer on an annual questionnaire and through a review of Capital One’s internal systems for payments or other transactions that could indicate the presence of a related person transaction. In developing its assessment regarding related person transactions for the Board of Directors, the Governance and Nominating Committee relies upon criteria set forth in Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and its Code of Conduct to evaluate activities or relationships that may create a conflict of interest, including potential related person transactions. In addition to specific prohibitions, these criteria include the extent to which the proposed relationship would be authorized and permitted (or prohibited) by Capital One policies, as well as the potential perspective of third parties regarding such relationships.

Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and internal written procedures require that any potential conflict of interest, including related person transactions involving any of Capital One’s directors or executive officers, be reviewed by the General Counsel (in the case of a director) and by either the General Counsel or Chief Human Resources Officer (in the case of an executive officer). If the reviewer believes that such relationship could create a conflict of interest or require disclosure as a related person transaction, a second review is conducted by the disinterested members of the Governance and Nominating Committee (in the case of a director) or by the CEO (in the case of other executive officers).

From time to time in the ordinary course of its business, Capital One issues loans and provides other financial services and products to directors, executive officers and/or nominees for director, or to a director’s, executive officer’s or director nominee’s immediate family member, including persons sharing the household of such director, executive officer or director nominee (other than a tenant or employee). Such loans and other financial services and products are made in the ordinary course of business; are on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans and financial services and products with persons not related to the Company; and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Capital One has had no reportable related person transactions since the beginning of 2016.

Stockholder Engagement Program

Capital One values the input and insights of its stockholders and is committed to continued engagement with investors. Our goal is to engage in a manner that is characterized by both transparency and respect, and that helps management and the Board gain useful feedback on a wide variety of topics that are important to investors, including Company performance and operations, strategic direction, corporate governance, executive compensation, risk and operational oversight and Board leadership, operation and composition, among other matters. As has been true over our history as a public company, our senior management, including our CEO and CFO, routinely provide information to and receive feedback from our investors in a wide variety of formats, including in our quarterly SEC filings (which can be found at www.capitalone.com), quarterly earnings conference calls, our Annual Report and proxy statement, regular investor conferences and road-shows, and meetings with individual investors. We have a staff of professionals in our Investor Relations department who are dedicated full time to respond to questions from stockholders about the Company, its performance and other issues of investor interest. To that end, in 2016 we continued direct engagement and discussions with stockholders representing approximately 60% of our outstanding shares in over 300 interactions with investors.

 

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

 Security Ownership

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  31


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

We have a program to engage proactively with the corporate governance representatives of our larger investors, to ensure that we are receiving feedback focused on important corporate governance matters and issues. Under this program, members of management, including our Investor Relations, Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation and frequently our General Counsel and CFO, meet with key governance contacts at our larger stockholders two times per year. In addition, we contact or respond to other stockholders to engage on specific issues that may arise either before or after our annual meeting. In 2016, discussion topics with our larger investors included Board composition and refreshment, proxy access, other current governance issues, and our executive compensation program. Feedback received from these collaborative and mutually-beneficial discussions is regularly summarized and discussed with our Governance and Nominating Committee, Compensation Committee and full Board. In addition, if during any of these investor meetings, questions or concerns arise that are best addressed through a conversation with one of our directors, management works with the stockholder to arrange for that conversation. Typically, such meetings will be attended by the Lead Independent Director, the Chair of the Compensation Committee and/or the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee, depending on the topics the investor wishes to discuss.

In addition, our stockholders have a variety of other channels for expressing their views, including:

Voting

   Our stockholders have the opportunity to vote for the election of Certain Beneficial Ownersall of our directors on an annual basis using a majority voting standard, and, through our annual vote on executive compensation, to regularly express their opinion on our compensation programs

Annual Stockholder Meeting

   Our senior management and our directors are expected to, and do, attend the annual meeting of stockholders, where all of our stockholders are invited to attend, ask questions and express their views

Written Correspondence

   A stockholder who would be more comfortable or who might find it more convenient to address the Board in writing can address correspondence to the Board through the Corporate Secretary (at the address provided below); the Board receives and carefully reviews any such correspondence that is related to governance, executive compensation, or other Board related matters

Special Meetings

   In 2015 our stockholders approved management’s proposal to amend our Articles of Incorporation to allow for stockholders who represent a significant, long-term financial stake in our Company to call a special meeting of stockholders; this change gives additional means for investors to communicate with our Board and management and engage in the governance of our Company

Proxy Access

   In 2015 the Board amended our bylaws to provide for proxy access, which permits a stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders who have owned at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding common shares of voting stock continuously for at least 3 years to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy statement a number of director candidates equal to the greater of 2 or 20% of the total Board

This wide breadth of stockholder engagement activities give our stockholders a variety of methods for communicating with management and the Board, and ensures that management and our Board understand and consider the issues that matter most to our stockholders.

32  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION II – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT CAPITAL ONE

How to Contact Us

Contact Us

Our Directors

Communicate with our directors,

including our Lead Independent

Director, Committee Chairs or

Independent Directors as a Group

Mail correspondence to:

Board of Directors / Lead Independent Director

c/o Corporate Secretary’s Office

Capital One Financial Corporation

1680 Capital One Drive

McLean, Virginia 22102

Contact Us

Investor

Relations

Reach out to our Investor Relations team at any time

Email:

Investor.relations@capitalone.com

The Corporate Secretary will review all communications sent to the Board, the Lead Independent Director, committee chairs, or individual directors and forwards all substantive communications to the appropriate parties. Communications to the Board of Directors, the independent directors or any individual director that relate to Capital One’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters are referred to the Chair of the Audit Committee and Capital One’s Chief Auditor. Other communications are referred to the Lead Independent Director, the Chair of the appropriate committee and/or the specified director, as applicable.

Please continue to share your thoughts or concerns with us. We value your input and your investment.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  33


Section III – Security Ownership

  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

Based on Schedule 13D and 13G filings submitted to the SEC, Capital One is aware of the following beneficial owners of more than 5% of Capital One’s outstanding common stock. All percentage calculations are based on the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on December 31, 2016, which was 480,218,547.

  Name and Address   

 Number of Shares of Common Stock 

Beneficially Owned

    Percent of 
Class

Dodge & Cox(1)

555 California Street, 40th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

  45,234,252   9.42%

Capital World Investors (2)

333 South Hope Street

Los Angeles, CA 90071

  37,559,107   7.82%

BlackRock, Inc. (3)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

  33,949,154   7.07%

The Vanguard Group (4)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

  30,491,073   6.35%

FMR LLC (5)

245 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02210

  29,667,528   6.18%

(1)Based on a Schedule 13D and 13G filings submitted to the SEC, Capital One is aware13G/A (Amendment No. 14) filed on February 14, 2017. As of the following beneficial owners of more than 5% of Capital One’s outstanding common stock. All percentage calculations are based on the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on December 31, 2014, which was 553,391,311.

2016, Dodge & Cox reported sole voting power with respect to 42,569,702 shares and sole dispositive power over all shares beneficially owned.

 

Name and AddressAmount and Nature of Beneficial OwnershipPercent of
Class

Dodge & Cox(1)

555 California Street, 40th floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

46,449,3618.39%
  

BlackRock, Inc.(2)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

34,667,0406.26%
  

Capital World Investors(3)

333 South Hope Street

Los Angeles, CA 90071

31,440,0005.68%
  

The Vanguard Group(4)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

28,857,6295.21%
  

FMR LLC(5)

245 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02210

28,417,6895.14%

(1)On a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 11) filed on February 13, 2015, Dodge & Cox reported beneficial ownership of 46,449,361 shares of Capital One’s common stock as of December 31, 2014 with sole voting power with respect to 43,782,464
(2)Based on a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 2) filed on February 13, 2017. As of December 30, 2016, Capital World Investors reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power over all shares beneficially owned.

(3)Based on a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 4) filed on January 23, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, BlackRock, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 29,633,046 shares and sole dispositive power over all shares beneficially owned.

(4)Based on a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 2) filed on February 10, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, The Vanguard Group reported sole voting power with respect to 777,021 shares, shared voting power with respect to 95,086 shares, sole dispositive power over 29,644,830 shares and shared dispositive power over 846,243 shares.

(5)Based on a Schedule 13G/A (Amendment No. 4) filed on February 14, 2017. As of December 30, 2016, FMR LLC reported sole voting power with respect to 2,265,972 shares and sole dispositive power over all shares beneficially owned.

 

(2)On a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 2) filed on January 12, 2015, BlackRock, Inc. reported beneficial ownership of 34,667,040 shares of Capital One’s common stock as of December 31, 2014 with sole voting power with respect to 29,744,521 shares and sole dispositive power over all shares beneficially owned.

  Security Ownership of Directors and Named Executive Officers

(3)On a Schedule 13G filed on February 13, 2015, Capital World Investors reported beneficial ownership of 31,440,000 shares of Capital One’s common stock as of December 31, 2014 with sole voting power and sole dispositive power over all shares beneficially owned.

(4)On a Schedule 13G filed on February 9, 2015, The Vanguard Group reported beneficial ownership of 28,857,629 shares of Capital One’s common stock as of December 31, 2014 with sole voting power with respect to 966,424 shares and sole dispositive power over 27,945,110 shares.

(5)On a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 2) filed on February 13, 2015, FMR LLC reported beneficial ownership of 28,417,689 shares of Capital One’s common stock as of December 31, 2014 with sole voting power with respect to 3,595,430 shares and sole dispositive power over all shares beneficially owned.

 Security Ownership of Directors and Named Executive Officers

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of Capital One’s common stock as of January 31, 2015,

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of Capital One’s common stock as of February 28, 2017, by our directors, the named executive officers in this proxy statement and all directors and executive officers as a group. All percentage calculations are based on the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on February 28, 2017, which was 482,365,855.

Except as otherwise indicated below, each director or executive officer had sole voting and investment power for the shares of common stock in the table.

  Name   Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership   Stock
Settled
RSUs (3)
   Total (4)
   

Common and

Restricted Stock (1)

   

Stock that
May Be
Acquired
Within

60 days(2)

   Total
Beneficial
Ownership
   Percent of
Class
      

Richard D. Fairbank

  2,262,593  3,542,139  5,804,732  1.19%  74,644  5,879,376

R. Scott Blackley

  11,497  0  11,497  *  34,983  46,480

Stephen S. Crawford

  86,846  105,038  191,884  *  79,864  271,748

John G. Finneran, Jr.

  113,213  194,885  308,098  *  50,428  358,526

34  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION III – SECURITY OWNERSHIP

  Name   Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership   Stock
Settled
RSUs (3)
   Total (4)
   

Common and

Restricted Stock (1)

   

Stock that
May Be
Acquired
Within

60 days(2)

   Total
Beneficial
Ownership
   Percent of
Class
      

Frank G. LaPrade, III

  10,687  159,945  170,632  *  49,104  219,736

Sanjiv Yajnik

  111,973  165,432  277,405  *  48,716  326,121

Ryan M. Schneider

  127,228  119,121  246,349  *  63,948  310,297

Patrick W. Gross

  7,539  40,300  47,839  *  0  47,839

Ann Fritz Hackett

  20,656  71,716  92,372  *  0  92,372

Lewis Hay, III

  2,728  81,046  83,774  *  0  83,774

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

  2,192  10,547  12,739  *  0  12,739

Peter Thomas Killalea

  0  3,090  3,090  *  0  3,090

Pierre E. Leroy

  0  39,300  39,300  *  0  39,300

Peter E. Raskind

  2,000  24,556  26,556  *  0  26,556

Mayo A. Shattuck III

  1,589  86,622  88,211  *  0  88,211

Bradford H. Warner

  14,640  75,053  89,693  *  0  89,693

Catherine G. West

  0  10,547  10,547  *  0  10,547

All directors and executive officers as a group (25 persons)

  3,011,971  5,449,170  8,461,141  1.73%  721,548  9,182,689

*Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.

(1)Includes shares of unvested restricted stock that have voting rights but are not transferable until the end of the period of restriction.

(2)This amount includes shares underlying stock options that are exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2017, and restricted stock units for which delivery of the shares of common stock underlying the stock units is deferred until the director’s service with the Board of Directors, or for Mr. Fairbank, his employment with the Company, ends.

(3)Restricted stock units held by our officers and which are settled in equivalent number of shares of our common stock issuedupon vesting. Represents unvested stock-settled RSUs as of February 28, 2017.

(4)The amount includes the aggregate total of the “Total Beneficial Ownership” column and outstanding on January 31, 2015, which was 551,590,891.

Except as otherwise indicated below, each director or executive officer had sole voting and investment power for the applicable shares of common stock shown in the table.“Stock Settled RSUs” column.

Some of the shares shown in the preceding table are subject to restrictions or not held directly by the director or executive officer. Below is a table showing the number of shares subject to restrictions or not held directly by the director or executive officer.

  Name   

Restricted Stock

Units For Which Delivery

of Stock is Deferred

   

Stock Held by, or Tenant in

Common With, Family Member,

Trust or Partnership

Richard D. Fairbank

  241,680  0

R. Scott Blackley

  0  0

Stephen S. Crawford

  0  0

John G. Finneran, Jr.

  0  117,411

Frank G. LaPrade, III

  0  0

Sanjiv Yajnik

  0  0

Ryan M. Schneider

  0  0

Patrick W. Gross

  

40,300

  0

Ann Fritz Hackett

  

40,300

  5,006

Lewis Hay, III

  

40,300

  1,806

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

  

10,547

  0

Peter Thomas Killalea

  

3,090

  0

Pierre E. Leroy

  

39,300

  0

Peter E. Raskind

  

14,131

  0

Mayo A. Shattuck III

  40,300  0

Bradford H. Warner

  33,524  140

Catherine G. West

  10,547  0

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

 

   

 

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership

 

      

Name

 

 

Common and
 Restricted Stock (1) 

 

 

 

Stock that
May Be
Acquired
Within

60 days (2)

 

Total
Beneficial
Ownership

 

 

Percent of  
Class

 

 

Stock
Settled
 RSUs (3) 

 

 

Total (4)

 

 Richard D. Fairbank

 1,946,154 5,569,422 7,515,576 1.35% 47,728 7,563,304

 Stephen S. Crawford

 158,056 15,681 173,737 * 51,477 225,214

 Ryan M. Schneider

 160,487 208,324 368,811 * 40,355 409,166

 John G. Finneran, Jr.

 146,236 492,113 638,349 * 32,811 671,160

 Sanjiv Yajnik

 108,143 141,891 250,034 * 30,767 280,801

 Patrick W. Gross

 7,539 85,217 92,756 * 0 92,756

 Ann Fritz Hackett

 20,656 67,173 87,829 * 0 87,829

 Lewis Hay, III

 2,728 92,418 95,146 * 0 95,146

 Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

 2,192 6,004 8,196 * 0 8,196

 Pierre E. Leroy

 4,900 63,944 68,844 * 0 68,844

 Peter E. Raskind

 2,000 20,013 22,013 * 0 22,013

 Mayo A. Shattuck

 1,589 89,094 90,683 * 0 90,683

 Bradford H. Warner

 14,640 70,510 85,150 * 0 85,150

 Catherine G. West

 0 6,004 6,004 * 0 6,004

 All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons)

 2,843,026 7,794,668 10,637,694 1.90% 367,255 11,004,949

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

 

*Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.  35


SECTION III – SECURITY OWNERSHIP

 

  Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) requires that Capital One’s executive officers and directors, and persons that beneficially own more than 10% of Capital One’s common stock, file certain reports of beneficial ownership of the common stock and changes in such ownership with the SEC and provide copies of these reports to Capital One. As a matter of practice, members of our staff assist our executive officers and directors in preparing initial ownership reports and reporting ownership changes and typically file these reports on their behalf. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms in our possession and written representations furnished to us, we believe that in 2016 each reporting person complied with these filing requirements, except for Mr. LaPrade, who filed a Form 4 to report a stock option exercise andsame-day open market sale of 20,000 shares of Capital One common stock one day late due to an administrative error by the Company.

36  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


(1)Includes shares of unvested restricted stock that have voting rights but are not transferable until the end of the period of restriction.

 

(2)This amount includes shares underlying stock options that are exercisable within 60 days after January 31, 2015, and restricted stock units for which delivery of the shares of common stock underlying the stock units is deferred until the director’s service with the Board of Directors, or for Mr. Fairbank, his employment with the Company, ends.

 

(3)Restricted stock units held by our officers and which are settled in equivalent number of shares of our common stock.

Section IV – Director Compensation

 

(4)The amount includes the aggregate total of the “Total Beneficial Ownership” column and the “Stock Settled RSUs” column.

Some of the shares shown in the preceding table are either subject to restrictions or not held directly by the director or executive officer. Below is a table showing the number of shares subject to restrictions or not held directly by the director or executive officer.

Name

Restricted Stock

Units For Which Delivery

of Stock is Deferred

Stock Held by, or Tenant in

Common With, Family Member,

Trust or Partnership

 Richard D. Fairbank

241,6800

 Stephen S. Crawford

00

 Ryan M. Schneider

00

 John G. Finneran, Jr.

064,904

 Sanjiv Yajnik

00

 Patrick W. Gross

35,7570

 Ann Fritz Hackett

35,7575,006

 Lewis Hay, III

35,7571,806

 Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

6,0040

 Pierre E. Leroy

34,7570

 Peter E. Raskind

9,5880

 Mayo A. Shattuck III

35,7570

 Bradford H. Warner

28,981140

 Catherine G. West

6,0040

 Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that Capital One’s executive officers and directors, and persons that beneficially own more than 10% of Capital One’s common stock, file certain reports of beneficial ownership of the common stock and changes in such ownership with the SEC and provide copies of these reports to Capital One. As a matter of practice, members of our staff assist our executive officers and directors in preparing initial ownership reports and reporting ownership changes and typically file these reports on their behalf. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms in our possession and written representations furnished to us, we believe that in 2014 each of the reporting persons complied with these filing requirements except the Company discovered that a timely report filed in 2008 for Robert M. Alexander, the Company’s Chief Information Officer, underreported one of his equity award holdings as a result of an administrative error by the Company, which was subsequently corrected on a Form 5 filed in 2015.

SECTION IV – DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 Director Compensation Objectives

The Board of Directors approves the compensation for

  Director Compensation Objectives

The Board of Directors approves the compensation fornon-management directors based on recommendations made by the Compensation Committee. The Board of Directors has designed the director compensation program to achieve four primary objectives:

 

Attract and retain talented directors with the skills and capabilities to perpetuate Capital One’s success;
Fairly compensate directors for the work required in a company of Capital One’s size and scope;
Recognize the individual roles and responsibilities of the directors; and
Align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of Capital One stockholders.

Management directors do not receive compensation for their service on the Board of Directors. In 2016, Mr. Fairbank was Capital One’s only management director.

  Director Compensation Procedures

The Compensation Committee annually reviews the compensation program for Capital One’snon-management directors. FW Cook provides competitive compensation data and program recommendations to the Compensation Committee for review. See the discussion under “Compensation Committee – Compensation Committee Consultant” in the “Corporate Governance at Capital One” section on page 27 for further information on the role and responsibilities of FW Cook. The competitive compensation data includes the compensation (cash, equity and other benefits) ofnon-management directors within Capital One’s peer comparator group. See the discussion under “Market Data” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 63 for further information on the selection of the peer comparator group. The Compensation Committee considers this information, and FW Cook’s recommendations, and finalizes a proposed compensation structure. The proposed structure is then reviewed and approved by the full Board of Directors, typically in April or May of each year.

Based on their review of competitive market data and guidance from FW Cook in the second quarter of 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that the director compensation program described below meets the objectives listed above.

  Director Compensation Structure

On May 5, 2016, the Board of Directors approved a compensation program for Capital One’snon-management directors for the period from May 5, 2016 until Capital One’s 2017 Annual Meeting that is similar to the program for the preceding year. The compensation program consists of an annual cash retainer of $90,000 for service on the Board of Directors. In addition, directors receive cash retainers for committee service and for service as committee chairs and the Lead Independent Director as detailed under “Compensation of Directors” beginning on page 38. Eachnon-management director serving on May 4, 2016 received an annual award of restricted stock units of Capital One common stock (“RSUs”) on such date, valued at $170,019. Lastly, the Lead Independent Director cash retainer was increased from $30,000 to $50,000 in 2016. This increase was implemented upon consideration of analysis and data provided by FW Cook, and ensures a compensation level commensurate with the market and to appropriately reward the contributions required of this role. Ms. Hackett was the Lead Independent Director in 2016.

  Other Benefits

Under the Capital One Financial CorporationNon-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan,non-management directors may voluntarily defer all or a portion of their cash compensation and receive deferred income benefits. Participants in the plan can direct their individual deferrals among nineteen investments available through the plan. Directors that elected a deferral receive their deferred income benefits in cash when they cease serving as directors, upon certain other distribution events specified in the plan, or at such earlier time as

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  37


SECTION IV – DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

authorized by the Compensation Committee. Upon a change of control, Capital One will pay to each director within thirty days of the change of control a lump sum cash payment equal to such director’s account balance as of the date of the change of control. In 2016, Mr. Jenkins elected to defer his cash compensation under this plan. A list of the investments available can be found under “Capital One’s VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs” on page 78.

Capital One offerednon-management directors the opportunity to direct a contribution of up to $10,000 annually from Capital One to charitable organization(s) of their choice. Eachnon-management director serving on May 5, 2016 elected to make such a charitable contribution in 2016. In addition, all directors serving on May 5, 2016 were eligible and nine directors elected to participate in a charitable contribution program available to Capital One employees under which Capital One made a contribution of $5,000 to a charitable organization of their choice.

Directors also receive reimbursements for certain board-related expenses including external educational seminars and travel-related costs incurred to attend Board meetings. Such reimbursements are not included as compensation for the directors in the table below.

  Stock Ownership Requirements

Capital One requiresnon-management directors to retain all shares underlying RSUs granted to them by Capital One until their service with the Board of Directors ends, under the terms of their respective grant agreements. The Board of Directors may grant an exception for any case where this requirement would impose a financial hardship on a director. No directors have been granted an exception to this requirement for any outstanding awards of RSUs.

  Compensation of Directors

Directors of Capital One received the following compensation in 2016:

  Director Name   

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash (3)

    

Stock

Awards

    Option Awards    

Change in Pension Value

and Nonqualified Deferred

Compensation Earnings

    

All Other

Compensation (4)

    Total 
 

Richard D. Fairbank (1)

                        
 

Patrick W. Gross

  $150,000   $170,019           $15,000   $335,019 
 

Ann Fritz Hackett

  $205,000   $170,019           $15,000   $390,019 
 

Lewis Hay, III

  $150,000   $170,019           $10,000   $330,019 
 

Peter T. Killalea (2)

  $90,000   $212,536           $15,000   $317,536 
 

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

  $150,000   $170,019           $15,000   $335,019 
 

Pierre E. Leroy

  $135,000   $170,019           $15,000   $320,019 
 

Peter E. Raskind

  $150,000   $170,019           $15,000   $335,019 
 

Mayo A. Shattuck III

  $165,000   $170,019           $15,000   $350,019 
 

Bradford H. Warner

  $150,000   $170,019           $15,000   $335,019 
 

Catherine G. West

  $135,000   $170,019           $15,000   $320,019 

(1)Management directors do not receive compensation for their service on the Board of Directors. In 2014,2016, Mr. Fairbank was Capital One’s only management director.

 

 Director Compensation Procedures

The Compensation Committee reviews the compensation program for Capital One’s non-management directors on an annual basis. F.W. Cook provides competitive compensation data and program recommendations to the Compensation Committee for review. Please see the discussion under “Compensation Committee – Compensation Committee Consultant” in the “Corporate Governance at Capital One” section on page 14 for further information on the role and responsibilities of F.W. Cook. The competitive compensation data includes the compensation (cash, equity and other benefits) of non-management directors within Capital One’s peer comparator group. Please see the discussion under “Market Data” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 46 for further information on the selection of the peer comparator group. The Compensation Committee considers this information,
(2)Mr. Killalea was appointed as well as F.W. Cook’s recommendations, and finalizes a proposed compensation structure. The proposed structure is then reviewed and approveddirector by the full Board of Directors, typically in April or May of each year.

Based on their review of competitive market dataFebruary 24, 2016, and guidance from F.W. Cook inelected by our stockholders at the second quarter of 2014, the Compensation Committee determined that the director compensation program described below meets the objectives listed above.

 Director Compensation Structure

On May 1, 2014, the2016 Annual Stockholder Meeting. The Board of Directors approved apro-rated compensation programpackage for Capital One’s non-management directors for the periodMr. Killalea from May 1, 2014February 24, 2016 until Capital One’s 2015our 2016 Annual Meeting, that is similar to the program for the preceding year. The compensation program consistsconsisting of an annual casha $22,500 retainer and a grant of $90,000 as well as cash retainers for committee service detailed in the notes to the table below. Each non-management director serving on May 1, 2014 also received an annual award650 RSUs with a grant date fair value of restricted stock units of Capital One common stock (“RSUs”) on such date,$42,517, valued at $170,003. Lastly, the Lead Independent Director received a cash retainer of $25,000. Ms. Hackett was the Lead Independent Director in 2014.

 Other Benefits

Under the Capital One Financial Corporation Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, non-management directors may voluntarily defer all or a portion of their cash compensation and receive deferred income benefits. Participants in the plan have the opportunity to direct their individual deferrals among seventeen different investments available through the plan. Directors that elected a deferral will begin to receive their deferred income benefits in cash when they cease serving as directors, upon certain other distribution events specified in the plan, or at such earlier time as is authorized by the Compensation Committee. Upon a change of control, Capital One will pay to each director within thirty days of the change of control a lump sum cash payment equal to such director’s account balance as of$65.41 per share. The RSUs vest one year from the date of the change of control. In 2014, Messrs. Jenkinsgrant and Hay elected to defer their cash compensation under this plan. A listdelivery of the different investments available can be found under “Capital One’s Voluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs” on page 63.

Capital One offered non-management directors the opportunity to direct a contribution of up to $10,000 annually from Capital One to a charitable organization of their choice. Each non-management director serving on May 1, 2014 elected to make such a charitable contribution in 2014.

Directors also receive reimbursements for certain board-related expenses including, among other things, external educational seminars and travel-related costs incurred to attend Board meetings. Such reimbursements are not included as compensation for the directors in the table below.

 Stock Ownership Requirements

Capital One requires non-management directors to retain allunderlying shares underlying RSUs granted to them by Capital Oneis deferred until theirMr. Killalea’s service with the Board of Directors ends, pursuantends. Mr. Killalea did not serve on any Board committees prior to the terms2016 Annual Stockholder Meeting.

(3)Represents cash payments during 2016, which include half of their respective grant agreements. The Boardthe payments under the compensation program for the period from May 5, 2016, until Capital One’s 2017 Annual Meeting and half of Directors may grantthe payments under the compensation program for the period from April 30, 2015, until Capital One’s 2016 Annual Meeting.

(4)Eachnon-management director serving on May 5, 2016 elected to direct contributions from Capital One in an exception for any case where this requirement would impose a financial hardship on a director. No directors have been granted an exceptionaggregate amount of up to this requirement for any outstanding awards$15,000 to charitable organization(s) of RSUs.his or her choice.

38  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

 

 Compensation of Directors

Directors of Capital One received the following compensation in 2014:  2017 PROXY STATEMENT

 

Name

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash
(2)

Stock Awards
(3)

Option
Awards

(4)

Change in Pension Value
and Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings
All Other
Compensation
(5)
     Total     

 Richard D. Fairbank (1)

 Patrick W. Gross

$150,000$170,003$10,000$330,003

 Ann Fritz Hackett

$190,000$170,003$10,000$370,003

 Lewis Hay, III

$150,000$170,003$10,000$330,003

 Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

$135,000$170,003$10,000$315,003

 Pierre E. Leroy

$120,000$170,003$10,000$300,003

 Peter E. Raskind

$150,000$170,003$10,000$330,003

 Mayo A. Shattuck III

$150,000$170,003$10,000$330,003

 Bradford H. Warner

$150,000$170,003$10,000$330,003

 Catherine G. West

$135,000$170,003$10,000$315,003

(1)In 2014, Mr. Fairbank was Capital One’s only management director.


SECTION IV – DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

(2)Figures above represent cash payments during 2014, which include half of the payments under the compensation program for the period from May 1, 2014, until Capital One’s 2015 Annual Meeting and half of the payments under the compensation program for the period from May 2, 2013, until Capital One’s 2014 Annual Meeting.

Compensation for committee service includes retainers for service as chairperson or as a member of a committee as described under the heading “Committee Membership” in the “Corporate Governance at Capital One” section of this proxy statement. Under the most recently approved compensation program, retainers are as follows:

 

¡Lead Independent Director Retainer: $25,000

Compensation for committee service includes retainers for service as chairperson or as a member of a committee as described under the heading “Information About Our Current Board Committee Membership and 2016 Committee Meetings” in the “Corporate Governance at Capital One” section on page 8. Under the most recently approved compensation program, retainers are as follows:

Lead Independent Director Retainer: $50,000
Chair of the Risk Committee: $45,000
Chair of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Governance and Nominating Committee: $30,000
Member of the Risk Committee (other than the chair): $30,000
Member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Governance and Nominating Committee (other than the chair): $15,000
¡Chair of the Risk Committee: $45,000

Eachnon-management director serving on May 4, 2016, received a grant of 2,440 RSUs with a grant date fair value of $170,019 valued at $69.68 per share. All RSUs were granted under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and were valued at the fair market value of a share of Capital One common stock on the date of grant. The RSUs vest one year from the date of grant and delivery of the underlying shares is deferred until the director’s service with the Board of Directors ends. In addition, prior to 2013, directors were offered the opportunity to elect to forego their cash retainers for a grant ofnon-qualified stock options under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. In 2013, the Compensation Committee determined not to include stock options as part of the director compensation program. The options expire ten years from the date of grant. Upon termination from Board service (other than by removal for cause), a director will have the remainder of the full option term to exercise the vested stock options.

The following table shows the number of RSUs outstanding, including dividends, and the total number of stock options outstanding for each director as of December 31, 2016:

  Director Name   

 Number of Outstanding 

Restricted Stock Units

   

 Number of Outstanding 

Stock Options

Patrick W. Gross

  40,300  41,060

Ann Fritz Hackett

  40,300  31,416

Lewis Hay, III

  40,300  40,746

Peter T. Killalea

  3,090  0

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

  10,547  0

Pierre E. Leroy

  39,300  4,098

Peter E. Raskind

  14,131  10,425

Mayo A. Shattuck III

  40,300  49,737

Bradford H. Warner

  33,524  41,529

Catherine G. West

  10,547  0

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  39


¡Chair of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Governance and Nominating Committee: $30,000
¡Member of the Risk Committee (other than the chair): $30,000
¡Member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Governance and Nominating Committee (other than the chair): $15,000

(3)Each non-management director serving on May 1, 2014, received a grant of 2,281 RSUs with a grant date fair value of $170,003 valued at $74.53 per share. All RSUs were granted under the terms of the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and were valued at the fair market value of a share of Capital One common stock on the date of grant. RSUs vest one year from the date of grant. Delivery of the underlying shares is deferred until the director’s service with the Board of Directors ends. The following table shows the number of RSUs outstanding for each director as of December 31, 2014:

 

Director NameNumber of Outstanding
Restricted Stock Units

 Patrick W. Gross

35,757

 Ann Fritz Hackett

35,757

 Lewis Hay, III

35,757

 Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

6,004

 Pierre E. Leroy

34,757

 Peter E. Raskind

9,588

 Mayo A. Shattuck III

35,757

 Bradford H. Warner

28,981

 Catherine G. West

6,004

(4)Prior to 2013, directors were offered the opportunity to elect to forego their cash retainers in exchange for a grant of non-qualified stock options under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. In 2013, the Compensation Committee determined not to include stock options as part of the director compensation program.

The following table sets forth the total number of stock options outstanding for each director as of December 31, 2014. The options expire ten years from the date of grant. Upon termination from Board service (other than by removal for cause), a director will have the remainder of the full option term to exercise the vested stock options.

 

Director Name

Number of Outstanding

Stock Options

 Patrick W. Gross

49,460

 Ann Fritz Hackett

31,416

 Lewis Hay, III

56,661

 Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

0

 Pierre E. Leroy

29,187

 Peter E. Raskind

10,425

 Mayo A. Shattuck III

53,337

 Bradford H. Warner

41,529

 Catherine G. West

0

(5)Each non-management director serving on May 1, 2014, elected to direct a contribution from Capital One of $10,000 to a charitable organization of his or her choice.

Section V – Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Key Topics Covered in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis:

Introduction

41

Our Compensation Objectives

41

Our Compensation Governance Cycle

42

Important Aspects of Our Executive Compensation Programs

43

Highlights of our Compensation Program

43

Use of Discretion

44

Consideration of 2016 Say on Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement

44

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

45

Goals and Principles

45

CEO Compensation Components

45

2016 CEO Compensation Program

46

CEO Compensation by Performance Year

51

Additional Pay Elements

51

2017 CEO Compensation Program

52

NEO Compensation

54

Goals and Principles

54

NEO Compensation Components

54

2016 NEO Compensation Program

55

NEO Compensation by Performance Year

59

Additional Pay Elements

60

2017 NEO Compensation Program

60

Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions

60

Performance-Based Vesting Provisions

60

Performance Share Reduction

61

Misconduct Clawback Provisions

62

Financial Restatement Clawbacks

62

Criteria and Process for Compensation Decisions

62

Use of Outside Consultants for CEO Compensation

62

Use of Outside Consultants for NEO Compensation

62

Market Data

63

Tally Sheets

64

Other Compensation Arrangements

64

Pension andNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

64

Employment Agreements

64

Change of Control Agreements

64

Post-Employment Compensation Practices

65

Other Aspects of Executive Compensation

65

Stock Ownership and Retention Requirements

65

Prohibition of Hedging and Speculative Trading Activities

66

Equity Grant Practices

66

Tax Considerations

66

40  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 Introduction

Capital One’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate leaders who have the ability to foster strong business results and promote the long-term success of the Company. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) is responsible for, among other matters, developing, approving, monitoring and managing the compensation of all of our executive officers, including the named executive officers defined below. Final decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, are made by our independent directors. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis will review the compensation of the CEO, Richard D. Fairbank, and the following executive officers for 2014:

 

  Introduction

Capital One’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate leaders who have the ability to foster strong business results and promote the long-term success of the Company. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (“Committee”) is responsible for, among other matters, developing, approving, monitoring and managing the compensation of all of our executive officers, including the named executive officers defined below. Final decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, are made by the Compensation Committee and the other independent directors. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis will review the compensation of the CEO, Richard D. Fairbank, and the following executive officers for 2016:

R. Scott Blackley, Chief Financial Officer (effective May 9, 2016)

Stephen S. Crawford, Head of Finance and Corporate Development (effective May 9, 2016); Chief Financial Officer
Ryan M. Schneider, President, Card
(prior to May 9, 2016)

John G. Finneran, Jr., General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Frank G. LaPrade, III, Chief Enterprise Services Officer, Chief of Staff to the CEO

Sanjiv Yajnik, President, Financial Services

As

Ryan M. Schneider, President, Card (prior to November 28, 2016)

Except as otherwise indicated, as used throughout this proxy statement, the “named executive officers” or “NEOs” means the six executive officers listed above and the CEO, collectively.

  Our Compensation Objectives

Capital One’s executive compensation program has four primary objectives.

Strongly link rewards with both business and individual performance while appropriately balancing risk

Capital One emphasizespay-for-performance at all organizational levels. Typically, as an executive’s level of responsibility increases, so does the proportion of the executive’s pay that is subject to performance criteria. Therefore, the named executive officers have the highest relative portion of their pay directly linked to Company and individual performance, as compared to other associates. Awards made to the named executive officers in February 2017 for the 2016 performance year were based on Company and individual performance, and on demonstrating specific leadership competencies assessed through a comprehensive performance management process that included an individual assessment specifically designed to evaluate the degree to which the executive balanced risks inherent in his or her role. The Chief Risk Officer compiled the assessments and the Chief Human Resources Officer reviewed the assessments for the NEOs. Separately, the Chief Auditor compiled and reviewed the risk assessment for the Chief Risk Officer. The Committee considered the assessments in making its determinations regarding individual performance and compensation levels.

Ensure that total compensation rewards performance over multiple time horizons

Our compensation programs are structured to encourage our executives to deliver strong results over the short-term while making decisions that create sustained value for our stockholders over the long-term. For 2016, approximately 84% of the CEO’s total compensation is equity-based and allat-risk to the performance of the Company’s stock price, and 100% of his compensation is deferred for a three-year period. For 2016, approximately 80% of total target compensation for NEOs other than the CEO was provided through equity-based vehicles which were allat-risk to the performance of the Company’s stock price and subject to vesting over multiple time horizons. The use of deferred, equity-based compensation vehicles with multi-year vesting terms advances our goal of aligning the ultimate value realized by the named executive officers with the performance of the Company’s stock over time because the value of these compensation vehicles increases and decreases based on the performance of the Company’s stock price.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  41


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Attract, retain and motivate top executive talent

To attract, retain and motivate exceptional leaders, we believe that compensation opportunities at Capital One must be competitive with the marketplace for talent. The Committee and the independent directors strive to preserve a competitive pay mix and total target compensation values in the executive compensation program, as well as provide competitive total rewards based on our selected peer group.

Align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders

The Committee and the independent directors remain committed to designing incentive compensation programs that reward individual and Company performance and that are aligned with the creation of stockholder value over the long-term. Because named executive officer compensation is primarily delivered through deferred, equity-based vehicles that vest over multiple time horizons, the named executive officers have a significant stake in the success of the Company. In addition, we established specific stock ownership policies that the named executive officers must meet and stock retention provisions applicable to certain equity awards.

  OurCompensation Governance Cycle

The Committee is actively engaged throughout the year. The Committee met seven times in 2016, with each meeting concluding with an executive session without management present. While specific topics may vary from meeting to meeting, the following graph describes the typical annual cycle of the Committee’s activities. For additional detail regarding the Committee’s processes for compensation decisions, see “Criteria and Process for Compensation Decisions” beginning on page 62.

LOGO

42  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

  Important Aspects of Our Executive Compensation Programs

Highlights of Our Compensation Program

The Committee believes that our named executive officer compensation programs balance risk and financial results, reward named executive officers for their achievements, promote our overall compensation objectives and encourage appropriate, but not excessive, risk-taking. The following are some highlights of our compensation program:

What We DoWhat We Don’t Do
We provide primarilylong-term, equity-based compensation to our NEOsûWe do not provide forexcise taxgross-up payments
We provide our CEO with compensation consistingentirely ofequity awards anddeferred payoutsûWedo not reprice stock options
We pay our NEOsequity-based awards based on Company and individual performance rather than cash bonusesûWedo not guarantee incentive awards
We applyrisk balancing so as not to jeopardize the “NEOs” meanssafety and soundness of Capital OneûWedo not provide compensation or awards to our NEOs on terms and conditions that aremore favorable than compensation and awards granted to all other executive officers
We applyperformance thresholds to determine the fouramount of equity delivered at vesting of grants to our NEOsûWe do not permit our NEOs to engage inshort sales, hedging transactions, orspeculative trading in derivatives of our securities
We reduce performance share award values at vesting if the Company does not achievepositive Adjusted ROAûWe do not permit our NEOs to place their Company securities in amargin account or topledge their Company securities as collateral for a loan
We haveclawback provisions in our award agreements to ensure accountabilityûGenerally we do not utilizeemployment agreements
We require a change of control event and a termination to accelerate the vesting of equity awards (double trigger)ûWe do not pay a cash salary to our CEO
We have anindependent compensation consultant advising the Compensation Committee

In addition, the awards granted to our named executive officers include the following performance and recovery provisions that are designed to further enhance alignment between pay and performance and to balance risks:

Performance-

Based Vesting

Provisions

We include performance-based vesting provisions as part of each stock option and stock-settled RSU award to named executive officers listed above,and each cash-settled RSU award to the CEO. These provisions will reduce the total value delivered to the executive at vesting if the Company does not meet certain performance thresholds during the three-year vesting period. The total value can be reduced to zero if the performance threshold is not met in any of the three years in the performance period.

Performance

Share Reduction

Each performance share award to the named executive officers provides that the total value delivered at vesting will be reduced if for any year in the three-year performance period the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROA (as defined on page 62 under “Performance Share Reduction”). The total value can be reduced to zero if positive Adjusted ROA is not achieved in any of the three years in the performance period. This reduction can occur regardless of where the Adjusted ROA ranks relative to a comparator group.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  43


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Misconduct

Clawback

Each incentive award to the named executive officers is subject to clawback provisions that allow the Committee to seek recovery of all unvested portions of the awards in the event there has been misconduct resulting in a violation of law or Company policy and the “namednamed executive officers” meansofficer committed the misconduct or failed in his or her responsibility to manage or monitor the applicable conduct or risks.

Financial

Restatement

Clawback

Each performance share award to the named executive officers includes clawback provisions that allow the Company to recover shares under the award following a financial restatement.

See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” on page 60 for more details.

All of the terms and features described above, including the performance-based vesting and clawback provisions, apply to awards granted to all executive officers and not just the named executive officers.

Use of Discretion

The Committee believes that exercising discretion is an important element in reaching balanced compensation decisions and supplements other aspects of Capital One’spay-for-performance philosophy. By applying discretion, the Committee seeks to mitigate the risks associated with a rigid and strictly formulaic compensation program, which could unintentionally create incentives for our executives to focus only on certain performance metrics, encourage imprudent risk taking, and not provide the best results for stockholders. In addition, the use of discretion allows the Committee to respond to changes in economic conditions, our operating environment, and other significant factors that may affect the long-term performance of Capital One or our lines of business. The use of discretion also allows the Committee to adjust compensation based on factors that would not be appropriately reflected by a strictly formulaic approach, such as the discrepancies between absolute and relative performance levels or recognition of individual performance levels. There are certain performance conditions for which the Committee would not exercise discretion, for example where the minimum performance metric is not met in the award of Performance Share Units or if the performance-based vesting requirements applicable to certain other stock-settled awards are not met.

  Consideration of 2016 Say on Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement

The Committee and the Board of Directors value the input of our stockholders and strive to foster a constructive dialogue with stockholders on matters of executive compensation and corporate governance. At our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders supported our executive compensation program by approving ournon-binding advisory vote on executive compensation (“2016 Say on Pay”). Recognizing that the 2016 Say on Pay vote reflected some level of investor concern for the Company’s executive compensation programs, we continued to strengthen our outreach to stockholders to ensure that we maintain strong lines of communication with our stockholders and that the perspectives of our stockholders are shared with the Committee and the Board of Directors. In 2016, management directly engaged with stockholders representing approximately 60% of our outstanding shares in over 300 interactions with investors, as noted above under “Corporate Governance at Capital One—Stockholder Engagement Program.” From these interactions, the Committee and the Board of Directors gained valuable insight into our investors’ views about the Company, including our executive compensation programs. As a result of the feedback received from investors during 2016, the Committee made the following enhancements to our executive compensation programs and disclosure:

Increased alignment of CEO compensation and Company performance by increasing the percentage of the CEO’s total target compensation that is tied to ayear-end evaluation of CEO and Company performance from 30% to 40%, providing a more direct link between the NEOs, collectively.CEO’s compensation and the Committee’s and independent directors’ assessment of such performance.

Increased the rigor of relative Company performance governing payouts applicable to performance share awards, which represent 50% of CEO total target compensation and approximately 12.5% of total target compensation of the other NEOs. See “Performance Share Awards” on page 52 for more information.

44  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Provided greater transparency regarding the Committee’s use of discretion, particularly regarding the year end incentive awards granted to the named executive officers. See “Use of Discretion” on page 44 for more information.

Provided detail regarding the Committee’s process for assessing and determining executive compensation program structures and pay decisions. See “Our Compensation Governance Cycle” on page 42 for more information.

The Committee continues to actively monitor our stockholder engagement with respect to executive compensation matters and has considered stockholder feedback in approvingyear-end incentive awards for 2016 and structuring and approving the 2017 compensation programs for the named executive officers.

  Chief Executive Officer Compensation

Goals and Principles

The Committee’s top priority is to align the interests of the CEO with the interests of our stockholders by directly linking his compensation with the Company’s performance and his contributions to that performance over appropriate time horizons. The Committee believes that all of the CEO’s compensation should beat-risk based on his and the Company’s performance. Each year the Committee approves the form, timing and amount of CEO compensation and makes recommendations to the independent directors for final approval. The Committee considers the CEO’s historical performance and seeks to effectively align the CEO’s interests with the interests of our stockholders over the appropriate time horizons, support safety and soundness and appropriately balance risk. The Committee and the independent directors have the flexibility to adjust compensation decisions from year to year to take into account the Company’s performance and evolving market practices. For example, between performance year 2014 and performance year 2016, the CEO’s total performance year compensation has ranged from $19.6 to $16.7 million.

CEO Compensation Components

The CEO’s compensation for the performance year 2016 was composed of equity awards designed to provide the CEO with an incentive to focus on long-term performance during the year and the opportunity for a year end incentive award based on the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s performance and the CEO’s contributions to that performance throughout the year. The equity awards granted to the CEO in February 2016 consisted of: stock options; performance shares; and stock-settled restricted stock units. The year end incentive award granted to the CEO in February 2017 consisted of deferred cash and cash-settled restricted stock units. All of the CEO’s equity awards are subject to a three-year deferred vesting or payout schedule.

The chart below shows these elements of CEO compensation as an approximate percentage of the CEO’s total target compensation.

2016 CEO Target Compensation

LOGO

 

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

 2014

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  45


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2016 CEO Compensation Program

The Committee annually reviews and approves the compensation structure of the CEO and makes recommendations to the independent directors for final approval. In February 2016, the Committee and the independent directors reviewed the compensation structure utilized since 2009 for Mr. Fairbank and determined that for 2016 the compensation program would continue to consist of equity awards granted at the beginning of the year plus an opportunity for an additionalyear-end incentive award based on the Company’s actual performance for 2016. In this manner, the CEO’s compensation continues to be completelyat-risk based on the Company’s and Mr. Fairbank’s performance. The Committee and independent directors determined that the compensation program structured in this manner remained appropriate for Mr. Fairbank in 2016 given that the compensation program aligns Mr. Fairbank’s compensation with the Company’s performance over the appropriate time horizons and supports the Company’s executive compensation goals and principles.

The table below summarizes the CEO compensation program that the Committee and the independent directors approved for the 2016 performance year.

Compensation

Element

Timing of Award

Determination

Basis for Award

Vesting

Schedule

Performance and Recovery

Provisions

Base SalaryNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Stock OptionsFebruary 2016Incentive for Future Company Performance3-year cliff vesting; expires in 10 years

 Performance-based vesting provisions

In 2014, Misconduct clawback

Performance SharesFebruary 2016

Incentive for Future

Company Performance

Vest at the end of the3-year performance period; the number of shares vesting depends on achievement of performance factors

 Performance share reduction

 Misconduct clawback

 Financial restatement clawbacks

Stock-Settled RSUsFebruary 2016Incentive for Future Company Performance3-year cliff vesting; settles in Company stock

 Performance-based vesting provisions

 Misconduct clawback

Year-End Incentive

Opportunity

February 2017Reward for 2016 CEO and Company PerformanceDelivered as combination of cash-settled RSUs and deferred cash bonus; payout after 3 years

 Performance-based vesting provisions (RSUs only)

 Misconduct Clawback

See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” on page 60 for more details regarding the performance and recovery provisions applicable to each of the elements of compensation that the Committee approved for the 2016 performance year for the named executive officers.

After considering various factors as described below, without giving particular weight to any specific factor, the Committee and the independent directors determined that a total target compensation amount of $17.5 million was appropriate for Mr. Fairbank’s 2016 compensation program.

When determining the structure and total target compensation opportunity for Mr. Fairbank’s 2016 compensation program, as well as the value for each component of the award, the Committee and the independent directors considered Mr. Fairbank’s and the Company’s performance during 2015 relative to certain financial, operating, safety and soundness and strategic performance factors. In addition, the Committee and the independent directors considered the Company’s performance in 2015 relative to the peer comparator companies’ performance in 2015, the structure and amount of compensation awarded to the chief executive officers of the peer comparator companies and the structure and amount of Mr. Fairbank’s compensation awards in prior years. The Committee and the independent directors also considered the Company’s risk profile and the time horizon over which the deferred, equity-based vehicles will vest, as well as the fact that the ultimate value of Mr. Fairbank’s deferred, equity-based awards will depend on the Company and Mr. Fairbank’s performance over time.

46  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The chart below shows the pay mix of the CEO’s actual compensation for the 2016 performance year, including theyear-end incentive opportunity which consisted of 60% deferred cash and 40% cash-settled RSUs.

2016 CEO Pay Mix

LOGO

Stock Option Award

In February 2016, Mr. Fairbank received a grant of 106,973non-statutory stock options at an exercise price of $63.73 per share (which was the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant). The benefits to Mr. Fairbank of the stock options are deferred, as the options cannot be exercised until February 15, 2019 and will expire ten years after the date of grant. The option grant had a grant date value of $1,750,003; however, the ultimate value Mr. Fairbank realizes, if any, depends solely on the long-term appreciation in the Company’s stock price. Mr. Fairbank can only realize value from the stock options if and to the extent the Company’s stock price increases after the date of grant and the market value of the stock exceeds the exercise price at some point after the three-year vesting period when the options are exercised. The stock option award is also subject to performance-based vesting conditions and clawback provisions, each as described in more detail under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 60.

Performance Share Award

In February 2016, based on the above determination by the Committee and the independent directors, Mr. Fairbank was granted an award of performance shares under which he may receive from 0% to 150% of a target number of 137,298 shares of the Company’s common stock based on the Company’s performance over the three-year period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018.

The Company’s performance will be assessed on the basis of Adjusted ROA relative to a comparator group consisting of companies in the KBW Bank Index, excluding threenon-traditional banks that do not focus on lending to consumers and businesses (“KBW Index”). The Committee believes that the KBW Index is an appropriate index against which to assess the Company’s performance because it reflects institutions of a comparable size and business mix to the Company. In addition, the Committee believes that relative Adjusted ROA is an appropriate metric for the Company and its stockholders because it achieves a balance of incentivizing and rewarding management to pursue business strategies that reward stockholders over the long term, while discouraging excessive risk-taking or balance sheet leverage in pursuit of those goals.

Under the performance share reduction feature of this award, the number of shares issued at settlement will be reduced if the Company’s Adjusted ROA for one or more fiscal years completed during the performance period is not positive, no matter how well the Company compares to the peer group. If the Company’s Adjusted ROA is not positive in any of the three fiscal years in the performance period, the executive will forfeit the entire award of performance shares. As a result, although Mr. Fairbank’s award had a grant date value of $8,750,002, the number of shares that he ultimately receives, if any, will be solely dependent on the Company’s performance over the performance period. The performance share award also is subject to certain clawback provisions. See “Performance Share Reduction” on page 61 and “Financial Restatement Clawbacks” on page 62 for more information.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  47


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

After the end of the three-year performance period, the Committee will certify the Company’s performance and issue the corresponding number of shares of the Company’s common stock, if any, in accordance with the table below. The table below shows potential payouts based on specific Company performance results. Payouts will range between the values shown below for performance that falls between the performance results in the table.

     Relative Metric: Adjusted ROA
     

 

³75th

Percentile

  

 

50th

Percentile

  

 

20th

Percentile

  

 

< 20th

Percentile

Number of

years with

positive

Adjusted ROA:

     Three      150%  100%  40%  0%
       Two        125%  83%  33%  0%
       One        100%  67%  27%  0%
     None    0%  0%  0%  0%

Stock-Settled RSU Award

In February 2016, Mr. Fairbank also received a grant of 27,460 stock-settled RSUs. The stock-settled RSU grant had a grant date value of $1,750,026. The stock-settled RSU award vests in full on February 15, 2019 and is subject to performance-based vesting conditions and clawback provisions, each as described in more detail under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 60.

Year-End Incentive Opportunity

A portion of Mr. Fairbank’s 2016 compensation consisted of an opportunity for ayear-end incentive award based on the Company’s performance in 2016. The award had a target value of $5,250,000, but the ultimate value of the award was determined based on the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s performance during 2016 and Mr. Fairbank’s contributions to that performance relative to the factors shown below related to: financial and operating performance, governance and risk management, strategic performance and winning with our customers and associates. These factors were evaluated on a qualitative and quantitative basis without any specificpre-established targets or weights. The Committee believes that these factors appropriately reflect and balance near term performance and long-term success for the Company’s customers, associates and stockholders.

In 2016, Capital One delivered solid financial performance, improved operating efficiency, resilient growth, and capital distribution to our shareholders. We had industry-leading growth in our Credit Card business and continued the disciplined growth of our Auto and Commercial Banking businesses. The Company continued to make transformational investments in growth and technology to create value today and over the long term. In addition, management continued to build risk management capabilities and is committed to effective, proactive, and sustainable operation of these capabilities. The Committee believes that the actions taken by the named executive officers throughout the year contributed greatly to the Company’s 2016 results and have positioned the Company to deliver on long-term strategic goals and achieve strong, sustainable financial performance over the long term.

48  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

In February 2017, the Committee considered the Company’s performance on both a quantitative and qualitative basis. In particular, the Committee considered:

Performance Factor2016 Performance
LOGO

   Revenue

   Expense management

   Earnings and  Earnings per share

   ROA and ROTCE

   Capital One delivered strong financial performance and distributedmanagement

   Total shareholder return

   Revenue of $25.5 billion

   Pre-provision earnings of $11.9 billion

   Efficiency ratio of 53.2%, or 52.7% net of adjustments,(1) demonstrating prudent expense management

   Net Income of $3.8 billion

   Earnings per share (“EPS”) of $6.89 per common share, fully diluted

   Return on Assets (“ROA”) of 1.11%

   Return on average common equity of 7.82%; return on average tangible common equity (“ROTCE”) of 11.93%,(2) above bank average

   Returned significant capital to our shareholders. We returned toshareholders by completing $3.7 billion of share repurchases and paying a quarterly common stock dividend of $.40 per share

   Industry-leading growth in our Credit Card business and continued to prudently grow our Auto and Commercial Banking businesses. We improved the quality of our franchise and laid a solid foundation to position Capital One as a digital leader. We continued to generate capital on a strong trajectory, maintaining our common stock dividend in 2014 and positioning ourselves to complete our announced $2.5 billion share repurchase program by the end of the first quarter 2015. Key financial results for 2014 included:

$4.4 billion in net income, or $7.59 per common share (fully diluted), with return on tangible common equity ranking fourth among our peer comparator group;
Pre-provision earnings of $10.1 billion;
Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio as calculated under the Basel III Standardized Approach of 12.46% as of December 31, 2014;
Strong credit risk performance, with a net charge-off rate of 1.72% for 2014;
Credit Card net income of $2.5 billion; Domestic Card$2.2 billion and loan growth of 6.1% from the end of 2013;
Solid10.0%

   Strong financial and operating results in the Auto business, with new loan originations of $20.9 billion;$25.7 billion, and

Solid solid loan growth of 13.1%6% in ourthe Commercial Banking business from the end

   One, three and five-year Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) of 2013.

23.8%, 20.7% and 122.7%, respectively

The Committee believes that the actions taken

LOGO

   Credit performance and underwriting quality

   Risk management and compliance

   Balance sheet strength

   Board and executive governance

   Strong credit performance including a netcharge-off rate of 2.17%, 4.16% for Domestic Card, as management continues to focus on underwriting quality

   Higher provision for loan losses primarily driven by the named executive officers throughout 2014 contributed greatly to the Company’s results and have positioned the Company well to deliverfront-loaded credit costs of strong sustainable financial performance over the long-term.loan growth, particularly in Domestic Card

 

 Important Aspects of Our Executive Compensation Programs

The Committee believes that our named executive officer compensation programs balance risk   Continued progress enhancing the soundness and financial results, reward named executive officers for their achievements, promote our overall compensation objectives and encourage appropriate, but not excessive, risk-taking. The following are some of the highlights of our compensation program:

Capital One’s executive compensation programs consist primarily of a variety of long-term, equity-based compensation vehicles. See “Compensation Components” on page 34 for more details on the specific components of the CEO and NEO compensation programs.
Since 1997, the CEO’s compensation program has consisted entirely of equity awards and other incentive awards with payouts deferred for three years in lieu of any salary, retirement plan contributions or other traditional forms of compensation.

We do not pay cash bonuses to the NEOs. Instead, we grant equity-based awards following the end of the year based on Company and individual performance during the year.
Beginning in January 2015, vesting for all equity awards granted to named executive officers will not automatically accelerate upon a change of control but instead will require a so-called “double trigger” for accelerated vesting. The vesting of such awards will accelerate only in the event of a qualifying termination of the named executive officer within the two years following a change of control. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control – Change of Control” on page 67 for more information.
We have eliminated excise tax gross-up provisions from our executive officer change of control agreements. All executive officer change of control agreements containing an excise tax gross-up that previously were entered into have expired as of the date of this proxy statement and have been replaced with new agreements that do not provide for an excise tax gross-up. See “Change of Control Agreements” on page 48 for more information.
We have designed our incentive compensation programs such that they continue to appropriately balance risk and do not jeopardize the safety and soundness of Capital One. See “Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices” in the “Corporate Governance at Capital One” section on page 9 for more information.

The awards granted to our named executive officers include the following provisions that are designed to further enhance alignment between pay and performance and balance risks:

Performance-

Based Vesting

Provisions

Since January 2012, we have included performance-based vesting provisions as part of each stock option, restricted stock and stock-settled RSU award to the named executive officers and each cash-settled RSU award to the CEO. These provisions will reduce the total value delivered to the executive at vesting if the Company does not meet certain performance thresholds during the three-year vesting period. The total value can be reduced to zero if the performance metric is not met for all three years in the performance period.

Performance

   Share Reduction   

Each performance share award to the named executive officers since January 2012 provides that the total value delivered at vesting will be reduced if for any year in the three-year performance period the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROA. The total value can be reduced to zero if the metric is not met for all three years in the performance period. These terms are in addition to the performance metric relative to a comparator group.

Clawback

Provisions

Each incentive award to the named executive officers since January 2013 is subject to clawback provisions that allow the Committee to seek recovery of all unvested portions of the awards in the event there has been misconduct resulting in a violation of law or Company policy and the named executive officer committed the misconduct or failed in his or her responsibility to manage or monitor the applicable conduct or risks.

Financial

Restatement

Clawback

Since January 2011, each performance share award to the named executive officers has included clawback provisions that allow the Company to recover shares under the award following a financial restatement.

See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” on page 44 for more details.

Capital One does not distinguish the terms and conditions of compensation and awards between the NEOs and all other executive officers. All of the terms and features described above, including the clawback and performance-based vesting provisions, apply to awards granted to all executive officers and not just the named executive officers.

 Our Compensation Objectives

Capital One’s executive compensation program has four primary objectives.

Strongly link rewards with both business and individual performance while appropriately balancing risk

Capital One emphasizes pay-for-performance at all organizational levels. Typically, as an executive’s level of responsibility increases, so does the proportion of the executive’s pay that is subject to performance criteria. Therefore, the named executive officers have the highest relative portion of their pay directly linked to Company and individual performance, as compared to other associates. Awards made in January 2015 for the 2014 performance year were based on Company and individual performance, as well as on the demonstration of specific leadership competencies assessed through a comprehensive performance management process that included an individual assessment against one or more performance objectives specifically designed to evaluate the degree to which the executive balanced risks inherent in his or her role. The Chief Human Resources Officer and the Chief Risk Officer reviewed these assessments, with the Chief Auditor also reviewing the risk assessment for the Chief Risk Officer, and the Committee considered the assessments in making its determinations regarding individual performance and compensation levels.

Ensure that total compensation rewards performance over multiple time horizons

Our compensation programs are structured to encourage our executives to deliver strong results over the short-term while making decisions that create sustained value for our stockholders over the long-term. For 2014, approximately 78% of the CEO’s total compensation is equity-based and at-risk to the performancesustainability of the Company’s stock price,compliance and 100%risk management programs, including sound management of his compensation is deferred for a three-year period. Formarket and liquidity risk

   Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 10.1%, calculated under the NEOsBasel Pillar III Standardized Approach, as of December 31, 2016

   Open and active Board governance model, including access to management, embrace of effective challenge, and proactive stockholder outreach

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  49


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Performance Factor2016 Performance
LOGO

   Progress toward achievement of long-term strategy

   Execution against corporate imperatives

   Disciplined investments in 2014, approximately 80% of total target compensation was provided through equity-based vehicles which were all at-risk to theinfrastructure, technology and growth initiatives

   CEO leadership and performance of executive team

   Significant progress on building the Company’s stock pricecapabilities of a leading information-based technology company

   Balanced investments in market opportunities and subject to vestinglong-term capabilities, including talent, infrastructure, and process reinvention

   Successful integration of GE Healthcare acquisition, enhancing the capabilities and scale in commercial healthcare finance

LOGO

   Recruitment and development of world class talent

   Associate engagement and retention

   Customer advocacy

   Brand

   Corporate reputation and community engagement

   Live our values and champion our culture

   Achieved strong Net Promotor Scores including record-high levels in both Consumer and Small Business Card

   Continued focus on attracting top talent and welcomed over multiple time horizons. The use9,500 new associates, including over 500 military recruits, while maintaining high bar for talent and diversity

   Recorded strong associate engagement scores and low voluntary attrition rates

   Increased focus on enhancing and developing our executive leadership

   Accelerated the development and release of deferred, equity-based compensation vehicles with multi-year vesting terms advances our goal of aligning the ultimate value realized by the named executive officers with the performance of the Company’s stock over time because the value of these compensation vehicles increasesbrand-defining software applications and decreasesfeatures

(1)Efficiency ratio is calculated based on total non-interest expense divided by total net revenue for the performanceperiod and reflects as-reported results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The efficiency ratio net of the Company’s stock price.

Attract, retain and motivate top executive talent

To attract, retain and motivate exceptional leaders, we believe that compensation opportunities at Capital One must be competitive with the marketplace for talent. The Committee and the independent directors strive to preserveadjustments is a competitive pay mix and total target compensation values in the executive compensation program, as well as provide competitive total rewards based on our selected peer group.

Align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders

The Committee and the independent directors remain committed to designing incentive compensation programs that reward individual and corporate performance and that are aligned with the creation of stockholder value over the long-term. Because the majority of named executive officer compensation is delivered through deferred, equity-based vehicles that vest over multiple time horizons, the named executive officers have a significant stake in the success of the Company. In addition, we established specific stock ownership policiesnon-GAAP measure that the named executive officers must meet on an annual basis and stock retention provisions applicable to certain equity awards.

 ConsiderationCommittee reviews as part of 2014 Say on Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement

The Committee and the Board of Directors value the input of our stockholders and strive to foster a constructive dialogue with stockholders on matters of executive compensation and corporate governance. At our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders supported our executive compensation program by approving our non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation (“2014 Say on Pay”) with a higher percentage of votes cast than at any prior meeting. Though the Committee recognized the 2014 Say on Pay vote reflected strong support for the Company’s executive compensation programs, the Committee remains committed to stockholder engagement. In 2014, we continued to strengthen our outreach to stockholders to ensure that we maintain strong lines of communication with our stockholders and that the perspectives of our stockholders are shared with the Committee and the Board of Directors. To that end, since the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we continued direct engagement and discussions with stockholders representing approximately 50% of our

outstanding shares. The Committee continues to actively oversee our stockholder engagement with respect to executive compensation matters and has considered stockholder feedback in approving year-end incentive awards for 2014 and structuring and approving the 2015 compensation programs for the named executive officers.

 Compensation Components

CEO Compensation

In 2014, as in past years, the Committee granted equity awards to the CEO at the beginning of the year that are designed to provide an incentive to focus on longer term performance. The Committee also established the opportunity for the CEO to receive an additional year-end incentive award based on the Committee’s evaluationits assessment of the Company’s performance and reflects adjustments to exclude $161 million from builds in the CEO’s contributions overU.K. Payment Protection Insurance customer refund reserve, a $28 million impairment charge associated with certain acquired intangible and software assets and a $24 million gain related to the year. Allexchange of our ownership interest in Visa Europe with Visa Inc. See Exhibit 99.2 to the CEO’s awards are subjectForm 8-K filed with the SEC on January 24, 2017 for supplemental financial data and corresponding reconciliation of this financial metric to U.S. GAAP.

(2)ROTCE is a three-year deferred vesting or payout.

The table below summarizesnon-GAAP financial measure calculated based on the elementssum of compensation that the Committee approved(i) income from continuing operations, net of tax; (ii) less dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities; and (iii) less preferred stock dividends, for the 2014 performance yearperiod, divided by average tangible common equity. See “MD&A-Table F-Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures and Calculation of Regulatory Capital Measures” on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the CEO.fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 for supplemental financial data and corresponding reconciliation of this financial metric to U.S. GAAP.

The Committee also took into account peer comparator group CEO compensation levels, the tenures of each of the peer companies’ CEOs, the varying degrees of success those CEOs have had in leading their respective companies, and Mr. Fairbank’s strategic role as the founder of Capital One.

After considering all of the above factors, in February 2017 the Committee and the independent directors approvedyear-end incentive awards for Mr. Fairbank totaling $4,462,580. For a second consecutive year, Mr. Fairbank’syear-end incentive awards represent a payout of 85% of the target award value established by the Committee in February 2016. Between performance year 2014 and performance year 2016, Mr. Fairbank’syear-end incentive award has ranged from $4.5 million to $7.4 million. In particular, in determining the 2016year-end incentive awards the Committee rewarded Mr. Fairbank’s leadership contributions that accelerated the momentum toward the achievement of the Company’s long-term strategic goals and value creation, while recognizing that the rapid loan growth in Domestic Card and strategic investments made to support the Company’s growth opportunities and digital transformation affected certain of the Company’s financial performance metrics listed above, including EPS. The Committee also recognized that the Company’s one and three-year TSR lagged its peers’. While growth and investments may dampen short-term returns to shareholders, the Committee and the independent directors believe that the Company is striking the right balance between investing for the future and delivering attractive returns over the short, medium and long term.

The Committee and the independent directors determined to award Mr. Fairbank’syear-end incentive award using two vehicles: (i) an award of 20,675 RSUs, which had a total grant date value of approximately $1,785,080,

50  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

 

Compensation
Element

Timing of Award 

Determination 

Basis for Award

Approximate % of 

CEO Total Target 

Compensation 

                  Vesting Schedule                     

Base Salary

Not applicable

Not applicable

0%

Not applicable

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT

 


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Stock Options

January 2014

Incentive for Future

Company Performance

 

10%3-year cliff vesting; expires in 10 years
Performance SharesJanuary 2014

Incentive for Future

Company Performance

50%

Vest at the end of the 3-year performance period; the number of shares vesting depends on achievement of performance factors

Stock-Settled RSUs

January 2014

Incentive for Future Company Performance

10%

3-year cliff vesting; settles in Company stock

Year-End Incentive

Opportunity

January 2015Reward for 2014 Company Performance30%

Delivered as combination of cash-settled RSUs and deferred cash bonus; payout after 3 years

NEO Compensation

The NEOs traditionally receive a mix of cash and equity-based compensation. As noted above, we do not pay cash bonuses to the NEOs for annual performance. Instead, following the end of the year the Committee may grant a variety of equity-based awards based on the Committee’s evaluation of Company and individual performance during the past year. All of these equity-based awards are subject to deferred vesting over a three-year period.

The table below summarizes the elements of compensation that the Committee approved for the 2014 performance year for the NEOs.

 

Compensation

Element

Timing of Award
Determination

Basis for Award

Approximate % of
NEO Total Target
Compensation
                  Vesting Schedule                     

Base Salary -

Cash

January 2014

Overall experience, skills, performance, and knowledge

20%Paid in cash throughout the performance year

Base Salary -

RSUs

January 2014

Portion of base salary Delivered in RSUs

15%

Awarded as RSUs which settle in cash on February 15 following the performance year

Cash Bonus

Not applicable

Not applicable

0%Not applicable

Cash-Settled RSUs

January 2015

Reward for 2014

Company Performance

15%3-year ratable vesting

Stock Options

January 2015

Reward for 2014 Individual

Performance and
Incentive for Long-Term Performance

50%3-year ratable vesting; expires in 10 years

Performance Shares

Vest at the end of the 3-year performance period; the number of shares vesting depends on achivement of performance factors

Stock-Settled RSUs

3-year ratable vesting

Performance and Recovery Provisions

The table below summarizes the performance and recovery provisions applicable to the elements of compensation that the Committee approved for the 2014 performance year for the named executive officers. See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” on page 44 for more details.

and (ii) a deferred cash bonus in the amount of approximately $2,677,500. Including theyear-end incentive opportunity, Mr. Fairbank’s total compensation for the 2016 performance year consisted of 84% equity-based awards and 16% deferred cash. The award of RSUs will vest in full on February 15, 2020, will settle in cash based on the Company’s average stock price over the 15 trading days preceding the vesting date, and is subject to performance-based vesting provisions. The cash bonus is mandatorily deferred for three years into the Company’s VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan and will pay out in the first calendar quarter of 2020. Both the award of RSUs and the deferred cash bonus are subject to clawback provisions. The performance-based vesting provisions applicable to the RSUs and the clawback provisions applicable to both awards are described in more detail under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 60.

CEO Compensation by Performance Year

Below is a table showing Mr. Fairbank’s compensation awards as they are attributable to the performance years indicated. For the years shown in the table, Mr. Fairbank’s total target compensation was $17.5 million. Mr. Fairbank’s compensation for performance year 2015 was $16,712,536, a decrease of $2,887,492 or 14.7% compared to his compensation for performance year 2014. Mr. Fairbank’s compensation for performance year 2016 was $16,712,611, which is substantially similar to his 2015 performance year compensation due to a second consecutive year of Mr. Fairbank receiving 85% of his target value of theyear-end incentive opportunity. See“Year-End Incentive Opportunity” on page 48 for additional information regarding theyear-end incentive granted to Mr. Fairbank for performance year 2016.

 

            Compensation Element                   Performance and Recovery Provisions        

Cash-Settled RSUs

•  Clawback provisions

Stock Options

•  Performance-based vesting provisions

•  Clawback provisions

Performance Shares

•  Performance share reduction

•  Clawback provisions

•  Financial restatement clawbacks

Stock-Settled RSUs

•  Performance-based vesting provisions

•  Clawback provisions

CEO Year-End

Incentive Opportunity

•  Performance-based vesting provisions (RSUs)

•  Clawback provisions

 Chief Executive Officer Compensation

Goals and Principles

The Committee’s top priority is to align the interests of the CEO with the interests of our stockholders by directly linking his awards with the Company’s performance and his contributions to that performance over appropriate

time horizons. The Committee believes that the CEO’s compensation should be at-risk based on his and the Company’s performance. Each year the Committee approves the form, timing and amount of CEO compensation and makes recommendations to the independent directors for final approval. The Committee takes into account the CEO’s historical performance and how to most effectively align the CEO’s interests with the interests of our stockholders over the appropriate time horizons, support safety and soundness and appropriately balance risk. The Committee and the independent directors have the flexibility to adjust compensation decisions from year to year to take into account the Company’s performance and evolving market practices.

2014 CEO Compensation Decisions

In January 2014, the Committee and the independent directors reviewed the compensation structure utilized since 2009 for Mr. Fairbank and determined that for 2014 the compensation program would continue to consist of equity awards granted at the beginning of the year plus an opportunity for an additional year-end incentive award based on the Company’s actual performance for 2014. In this manner, the CEO’s compensation continues to be completely at-risk based on the Company’s and Mr. Fairbank’s performance. The Committee and independent directors determined that the compensation program structured in this manner remained appropriate for Mr. Fairbank in 2014 given that the compensation program aligns Mr. Fairbank’s compensation with the Company’s performance over the appropriate time horizons and supports the Company’s executive compensation goals and principles. The Committee and the independent directors determined, however, to change the mix of the vehicles for the 2014 CEO compensation program, reducing the proportion of total target compensation represented by stock options, increasing the year-end incentive opportunity to 30% of the CEO’s total target compensation program and introducing a stock-settled RSU award. In addition, the Committee and the independent directors determined to reduce the maximum value of Mr. Fairbank’s year-end incentive opportunity to one and a half times the target value from two times the target value for prior year-end incentive opportunities. The Committee and the independent directors made these decisions after taking into account the perspectives of stockholders, proxy advisory firms, the Federal Reserve and other federal banking regulators. After considering various factors as described below, without giving particular weight to any specific factor, the Committee and the independent directors determined that a total target compensation amount of $17.5 million was appropriate for Mr. Fairbank’s 2014 compensation program.

When determining the structure and total target compensation amount for Mr. Fairbank’s 2014 compensation program, as well as the value for each component of the award, the Committee considered Mr. Fairbank’s and the Company’s performance during 2013 relative to the financial, operating, safety and soundness and strategic performance factors described below under “Year-End Incentive Opportunity.” In addition, the Committee and the independent directors considered the Company’s performance in 2013 relative to the peer comparator companies’ performance in 2013, the structure and amount of compensation awarded to the chief executive officers of the peer comparator companies and the structure and amount of Mr. Fairbank’s compensation awards in prior years. The Committee and the independent directors also considered the Company’s risk profile and the time horizon over which the deferred, equity-based vehicles will vest, as well as the fact that the ultimate value of Mr. Fairbank’s deferred, equity-based awards will depend on the Company and Mr. Fairbank’s performance over time.

Performance Share Award

In January 2014, based on the above determination by the Committee and the independent directors, Mr. Fairbank was granted an award of performance shares under which he may receive from 0% to 150% of a target number of 123,309 shares of the Company’s common stock based on the Company’s performance over the three-year period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016. The Company’s performance will be assessed on the basis of Adjusted ROA relative to a comparator group consisting of companies in the KBW Bank Index, excluding custody banks (the “KBW Index”). The Committee believes that the KBW Index is an appropriate index against which to assess the Company’s performance because its members are principally lending businesses similar to the Company. Moreover, under the performance share reduction feature of this award, the number of shares issued at settlement will be reduced if the Company’s Adjusted ROA for one or more fiscal years completed during the performance period is not positive, no matter how well it compares to the peer group. If the Company’s Adjusted ROA is not positive for all three fiscal years in the performance period,

Mr. Fairbank will forfeit the entire award of performance shares. Thus, although the award had a grant date value of $8,750,007, the number of shares that Mr. Fairbank ultimately receives, if any, will be solely dependent on the Company’s performance over the performance period. The performance share award also is subject to certain clawback provisions. See “Performance Share Reduction” and “Financial Restatement Clawbacks” on page 45 for more information.

After the end of the three-year performance period, the Committee will certify the Company’s performance and issue the corresponding number of shares of the Company’s common stock, if any, in accordance with the table below.

 Relative Metric: Adjusted ROA
  

³ 75th

Percentile

50th

Percentile

< 20th

Percentile

Number of years with
positive Adjusted

ROA:

    Three    150%100%0%
Two125%83%0%
One100%67%0%
None0%0%0%

The table above shows potential payouts based on specific Company performance results. Payouts will range between the values shown above for performance that falls between the performance results shown in the table.

Stock Option Award

In January 2014, Mr. Fairbank also received a grant of 108,944 non-statutory stock options at an exercise price of $70.96 per share (which was the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant). The benefits to Mr. Fairbank of the stock options are deferred, as the options cannot be exercised until February 15, 2017 and will expire ten years after the date of grant. The option grant had a fixed grant date value of $1,750,000; however, the ultimate value Mr. Fairbank realizes, if any, is solely dependent on the long-term appreciation in the Company’s stock price. Mr. Fairbank can only realize value from the stock options if and to the extent the Company’s stock price increases after the date of grant and the market value of the stock exceeds the exercise price at some point after the three-year vesting period when the options are exercised. The stock option award is also subject to performance-based vesting conditions and clawback provisions, each as described in more detail under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 44.

Stock-Settled RSU Award

In January 2014, Mr. Fairbank also received a grant of 24,662 stock-settled RSUs. The stock-settled RSU grant had a fixed grant date value of $1,750,016. The stock-settled RSU award vests in full on February 15, 2017 and is subject to performance-based vesting conditions and clawback provisions, each as described in more detail under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 44.

Year-End Incentive Opportunity

A portion of Mr. Fairbank’s 2014 compensation award consisted of an opportunity for a year-end incentive award based on the Company’s actual performance in 2014. The award had a target value of $5,250,000, but the ultimate value of the award was determined based on the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s performance during 2014 and Mr. Fairbank’s contributions to that performance relative to the financial, operating, safety and soundness and strategic factors shown below (which were evaluated on a qualitative basis without any specific pre-established targets).

 Financial Performance

Operating Performance

Safety and Soundness

Strategic Performance

•  Operating earnings

•  Revenue generation

•  Capital adequacy

•  CEO leadership and performance

•  Earnings per share

•  Expense management

•  Risk management and

of executive team

•  Return on tangible capital

•  Operating effectiveness

compliance

•  Capital management

•  Customer satisfaction

•  Credit loss management

•  Progress toward achievement

•  Underwriting quality

of long-term strategy

•  Balance sheet management

•  Execution against corporate

imperatives

•  Recruitment and development of world class talent

•  Disciplined investment in infrastructure

•  Corporate reputation and community engagement

•  Preservation of corporate culture and values

In January 2015, the Committee considered the Company’s performance on both a quantitative and qualitative basis, including the results described under “2014 Company Performance” on page 31. In particular, the Committee considered:

Capital One’s strong financial results in 2014, particularly the solid growth in earnings per share and the Company’s return on tangible common equity relative to the peer comparator group;

Management’s success in delivering $10.1 billion in pre-provision earnings, tightly managing costs while investing in growth and positioning the Company for future earnings growth potential;

The return to growth in Domestic Card and continued prudent growth in the Auto and Commercial Banking businesses, all while maintaining focus on resiliency and managing credit losses across the Company;

The Company’s return of substantial capital to stockholders in 2014, maintaining the common stock dividend from the end of 2013 and significantly increasing share repurchases coming out of the 2014 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) cycle;

Ending 2014 with a Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio of 12.46%, even with increased capital distribution and growth in Card and other loan portfolios;

The Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) of 9.5% in 2014, outperforming the KBW Bank Index;

The Company’s continued progress enhancing its compliance and risk management programs across the enterprise, reflecting investments in talent and infrastructure;

The significant progress on positioning Capital One as a digital leader, including recruiting great digital talent, building foundational infrastructure, simplifying our core systems and applications, introducing new products and features, enhancing design and data capabilities, and re-inventing processes, operations and governance designed to ensure the Company has the agility to get to market quickly and securely; and

The CEO’s leadership in building Capital One’s powerful national brand, with a strategic focus on products and services designed to build an enduring customer franchise.

The Committee considered these factors in light of the challenges still facing management to position Capital One to deliver superior and sustainable returns, including the Company’s ongoing work to meet rising regulatory expectations across the financial services industry. The Committee also considered the Company’s one-year TSR of 9.5% and noted that it ranked at the median for the peer comparator group in 2014. The Committee also considered the Company’s three- and five-year TSR of 102.0% and 124.9%, respectively.

The Committee also took into account peer comparator group CEO compensation levels, the different tenures of each of the peer companies’ CEOs as compared to Mr. Fairbank’s tenure as the CEO of Capital One, and the varying degrees of success those CEOs have had in leading their respective companies.

After considering all of the above factors together, in January 2015 the Committee and the independent directors approved awards for Mr. Fairbank totaling $7,350,006. The Committee and the independent directors determined to award that amount using two vehicles: (i) an award of 39,221 restricted stock units (“RSUs”), which had a total grant date value of $2,940,006, and (ii) a deferred cash bonus in the amount of $4,410,000. The award of RSUs will vest in full on February 15, 2018, will settle in cash based on the Company’s average stock price over the fifteen trading days preceding the vesting date, and is subject to performance-based vesting provisions. The cash bonus is mandatorily deferred for three years into the Company’s Voluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan and will pay out in the first calendar quarter of 2018. Both the award of RSUs and the deferred cash bonus are subject to clawback provisions. The performance-based vesting provisions applicable to the RSUs and the clawback provisions applicable to both awards are described in more detail under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” beginning on page 44.

CEO Compensation by Performance Year

Below is a table showing Mr. Fairbank’s compensation awards as they are attributable to the performance years indicated.

Performance

Year

Cash
Salary
Deferred Cash
Bonus
Cash-Settled
RSUs
Stock-Settled
Awards
Option AwardsTotal

2014

$0$4,410,000$2,940,006$10,500,022$1,750,000$19,600,028

2013

$0$2,843,750$2,843,793$8,750,044$4,375,012$18,812,599

2012

$0$2,187,500$2,187,525$8,750,008$4,375,009$17,500,042

The table above is presented to show how the Committee views compensation actions and to which year the compensation awards relate. This table differs substantially from the Summary Compensation Table on page 53
  

Performance

Year

   

Cash

Salary

   

Deferred Cash

Bonus

   

Cash-Settled

RSUs

   

Stock-Settled

Awards

   Option Awards   Total
  2016  $0  $2,677,500  $1,785,080  $10,500,028  $1,750,003  $16,712,611
  2015  $0  $2,677,500  $1,785,014  $10,500,022  $1,750,000  $16,712,536
  2014  $0  $4,410,000  $2,940,006  $10,500,022  $1,750,000  $19,600,028

The table above is presented to show how the Committee views compensation actions and to which year the compensation awards relate. This table differs substantially from the Summary Compensation Table on page 69 required for purposes of this proxy statement and is therefore not a substitute for the information required in that table. There are two principal differences between the Summary Compensation Table and the table above:

 

The table above reports equity-based awards as compensation for the performance year for which they were awarded, even if the award was granted in one year based on performance for the prior year. As a result, the cash-settled RSU award granted to the CEO in January 2015February 2017 for the 20142016 performance year, for example, is shown in the table above as 20142016 compensation. The Summary Compensation Table reports equity-based awards only in the year in which they were granted.

The Summary Compensation Table reports the change in pension value andnon-qualified deferred compensation earnings and all other compensation. These amounts are not a result of current year compensation determinations and are not shown above.

Additional Pay Elements

As part of the CEO compensation program, the Committee and the independent directors also approved certain other programs intended to support Mr. Fairbank’s productivity and well-being. These include:

 

Executive term life insurance with a benefit level of $5 million;

The ability to participate in a comprehensive voluntary annual health screening;
Office supplies and other maintenance

Maintenance for Mr. Fairbank’s home office;

The use of a driver who also provides for Mr. Fairbank’s personal security; and

The monitoring and maintenance of an electronic home security system.

Additional details on these programs can be found in the “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section beginning on page 68.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

Additional details on these programs can be found in the “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section beginning on page 52.  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

2015 CEO Compensation Decisions  51


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2017 CEO Compensation Program

The Committee and the independent directors continue to believe that the CEO compensation program aligns Mr. Fairbank’s compensation with the Company’s performance over the appropriate time horizons and supports the Company’s executive compensation goals and principles. In February 2017, the Committee and the independent directors reviewed the compensation structure utilized in 2016 for Mr. Fairbank and determined that for 2017, the CEO compensation program would continue to consist of equity awards granted at the beginning of the year plus an opportunity for an additionalyear-end incentive award based on CEO and Company performance for 2017. In this manner, the CEO’s compensation will continue to be completelyat-risk based on the Company’s and Mr. Fairbank’s performance and all CEO compensation continues to be subject to a three year deferred vesting or payout. The Committee and the independent directors also determined that for Mr. Fairbank’s 2017 compensation program, a total target compensation amount of $17.5 million, the same total target compensation for 2016, was appropriate.

In response to feedback received from stockholders, the Committee and the independent directors made changes to the year end incentive and performance share elements of the CEO compensation program. The terms of all other compensation granted to Mr. Fairbank in February 2017 are substantially similar to the terms described earlier under “2016 CEO Compensation Program,” including the application of performance-based vesting and clawback provisions.

CEOYear-End Incentive Opportunity

In response to stockholder feedback the Committee and the independent directors modified the structure of the CEO compensation program to eliminate the grant of stock-settled RSUs that were previously granted at the beginning of the performance year and accounted for approximately 10% of the CEO’s total target compensation to increase the percentage of the CEO’s total target compensation that is granted based on CEO and Company performance as theyear-end incentive opportunity from 30% to 40%. This change increases the alignment of CEO compensation and Company performance by directly linking a greater portion of the CEO’s compensation to the performance of the CEO and the Company during the performance year which allows the Committee and the independent directors the ability to adjust or eliminate that portion of the CEO’s compensation as appropriate to reflect the performance.

The chart below illustrates the elements of the CEO’s 2017 compensation program as an approximate percentage of his total target compensation:

2017 CEO Target Compensation

LOGO

Performance Share Awards

During 2016, we received feedback from our stockholders regarding the rigor of our performance share program. Based on this feedback, the Committee and the independent directors revised the performance metrics applicable to performance shares granted in 2017 to require a more rigorous set of relative Company performance hurdles related to the potential payouts made in connection with the awards. The performance share awards represent 50% of CEO total target compensation and approximately 12.5% of total target compensation of the other NEOs. As with previous years, the compensation paid in connection with the performance shares will be based on the

52  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

In January 2015, the Committee and the independent directors reviewed the compensation structure utilized in 2014 for Mr. Fairbank and determined that the structure for the 2015 CEO compensation program would be the same, consisting of equity awards granted at the beginning of the year plus an opportunity for an additional year-end incentive award based on the Company’s actual performance for 2015. In this manner, the CEO’s compensation will continue to be completely at-risk based on the Company’s and Mr. Fairbank’s performance. The Committee and the independent directors continue to believe that the compensation program aligns Mr. Fairbank’s compensation with the Company’s performance over the appropriate time horizons and supports the Company’s executive compensation goals and principles. The Committee and the independent directors determined that for Mr. Fairbank’s 2015 compensation program a total target compensation amount of $17.5 million, the same total target compensation for 2014, was appropriate.

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Based on this framework, in January 2015


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Company’s performance assessed on the basis of Adjusted ROA relative to the KBW Index, and the number of shares issued at settlement will be reduced if the Company’s Adjusted ROA for one or more fiscal years completed during the performance period is not positive, no matter how well the Company performs relative to the peer group. After the end of the three-year performance period, the Committee will certify the Company’s performance and issue the corresponding number of shares of the Company’s common stock, if any, in accordance with the revised metrics set forth in the table below. The table below shows the revised potential payouts based on specific Company performance results. Payouts will range between the values shown below for performance that falls between the performance results shown in the table. For example, Adjusted ROA performance at the 50th percentile of peers will earn 90% of target payout, rather than 100% as in previous years.

     Relative Metric: Adjusted ROA
     

 

³80th

Percentile

  

 

55th

Percentile

  

 

25th

Percentile

  

 

< 25th

Percentile

Number of

years with

positive

Adjusted ROA:

 Three  150%  100%  40%  0%
 Two  125%  83%  33%  0%
 One  100%  67%  27%  0%
 None  0%  0%  0%  0%

Beginning with performance share awards granted in 2017, the Company’s positive Adjusted ROA must be at least at the 25th percentile of peers, rather than the 20th percentile, for any performance shares to vest. Similarly, target payout will be achieved at the 55th percentile of peers instead of the 50th percentile, and the maximum payout can only be achieved if the Company performs at the 80th percentile of peers, instead of the 75th percentile. The graph below illustrates the revised performance metrics:

LOGO

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  53


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2017 CEO Compensation Decisions

Based on the revised CEO compensation program, in February 2017 the Committee and the independent directors granted to Mr. Fairbank the following compensation:

a performance share award under which he may receive from 0% to 150% of a target number of 116,729101,344 shares of the Company’s common stock based on the Company’s performance over the three-year period from January 1, 2015,2017, through December 31, 2017. Mr. Fairbank also received 2019; and

a grant of 115,812 81,486non-statutory stock options at an exercise price of $74.96$86.34 per share (which was the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date) and a grant of 23,346 stock-settled RSUs. The Committee also determined that Mr. Fairbank will have an opportunity to receive an award in late 2015 or early 2016..

The Committee also determined that Mr. Fairbank will have an opportunity to receive an incentive award in late 2017 or early 2018. Any such award will consist of deferred cash, an equity-based award or both and will pay out or vest after a three-year deferral period. The Committee and the independent directors will have absolute discretion to determine whether to make the award, the form of the award and the value of the award relative to the target amount of $7 million, and will base these determinations on the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s performance in 2017 relative to the same factors described earlier under “2016 CEO Compensation Program –Year-End Incentive Opportunity” related to financial and operating performance, governance and risk management, strategic performance and winning with our customers and associates. The maximum value of the award, if granted, will not exceed one and a half times the target value. The Company expects that any such award will be subject to performance-based vesting and clawback provisions similar to provisions applicable to the 2016year-end incentive opportunity.

  NEO Compensation

Goals and Principles

As with the CEO, the Committee seeks to align the interests of the other named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders by linking compensation to Company performance and the NEOs’ contribution to that performance over the appropriate time horizons, while supporting safety and soundness and appropriately balancing risk. The Committee takes into account each NEO’s historical performance, individual roles and responsibilities and contributions expected from each NEO in the future as well as the recommendations of the CEO, including his assessment of each NEO’s performance. In determining 2016 NEO compensation, the Committee also considered the specific factors discussed below under “Equity Incentive Awards” beginning on page 58. Final decisions regarding NEO compensation are made by the independent directors.

In this section, “NEO Compensation,” the term “NEO” refers to the named executive officers other than the CEO.

NEO Compensation Components

The NEOs traditionally receive a mix of approximately 20% cash and 80% equity-based compensation, consisting of: cash salary, RSU salary, and cash-settled RSUs, which are determined at the beginning of each performance year; and long-term incentive awards, which are determined following the end of each performance year based on the Committee’s evaluation of Company and individual performance during the past year. The long-term incentive awards are equity-based and may consist of performance shares, stock-settled RSUs, and stock options. All of these equity-based awards are subject to deferred vesting over a three-year period. The NEOs do not receive cash bonuses.

54  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The chart below shows these elements of NEO compensation as an approximate percentage of NEO total target compensation:(1)

LOGO

(1)Due to hismid-year appointment to the target amountposition of $5,250,000, and will base these determinations onChief Financial Officer, Mr. Blackley’s 2016 compensation varied slightly from the Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s performance in 2015 relative to the same financial, operating, safety and soundness and strategic factors described earlier under “2014 CEO Compensation Decisions – Year-End Incentive Opportunity.” The maximum value of the award, if granted, will not exceed one and a half times the target value. The Company expects that any such award will be subject to performance-based vesting and clawback provisions similar to provisions applicable to the 2014 year-end incentive opportunity.

The terms of the performance share, stock option and stock-settled RSU awards granted to Mr. Fairbank in January 2015 are substantially similar to the terms described earlier under “2014 CEO Compensation Decisions,” including the application of performance-based vesting and clawback provisions.chart above. See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” on page 44below for more details.

 NEO Compensation

Goals and Principles

As with the CEO, the Committee seeks to align the interests of the NEOs with the interests of our stockholders by directly linkinginformation regarding Mr. Blackley’s 2016 compensation to performance over the appropriate time horizons while supporting safety and soundness and appropriately balancing risk. The Committee annually reviews and approves theprogram. For 2017, Mr. Blackley’s compensation structure for all of our executive officers, including those who are ultimately reported as NEOs, and makes recommendations to the independent directors for final approval. The Committee takes into account each NEO’s historical performance, individual roles and responsibilities and contributions expected from each NEO in the future as well as the recommendations of the CEO, including his assessment of each NEO’s performance. In determining 2014 NEO compensation, the Committee also considered the specific factors discussed below. Final decisions regarding NEO compensation are made by the independent directors.

2014 NEO Compensation Decisions

The 2014 NEO compensation program approved by the Committee and the independent directors was designed to beis consistent with the Company’s other NEOs.

See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” on page 60 for more details regarding the performance and recovery provisions applicable to each element of compensation that the Committee approved for the 2015 performance year for the named executive officers.

2016 NEO Compensation Program

The Committee annually reviews and approves the compensation structure for all of our executive officers, including those who are ultimately reported as NEOs, and makes recommendations to the independent directors for final approval. In February, 2016 the Committee and the independent directors approved the 2016 compensation program which is designed to be consistent with the Company’spay-for-performance philosophy and is generally consistent with the 2015 compensation program. The Committee believes that this pay mix balances stockholder interests while effectively rewarding and motivating key talent.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  55


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The table below summarizes the NEO compensation program that the Committee and the independent directors approved for the 2016 performance year.

Compensation

Element(1)

Timing of Award
Determination
Basis for Award

Vesting

Schedule

Performance and
Recovery Provisions

Base Salary – Cash

January 2016Overall experience, skills, performance, and knowledgePaid in cash throughout the performance yearNot applicable

Base Salary – RSUs

��January 2016Portion of base salary delivered in RSUsAwarded as RSUs which settle in cash on February 15 following the performance yearNot applicable

Cash Bonus

Not applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable

Cash-Settled RSUs

February 2017

Reward for 2016

Company

performance

3-year ratable vesting

   Misconduct Clawback

Stock Options

February 2017

Reward for 2016 Individual

Performance and
Incentive for Long-Term Performance

3-year ratable vesting; expires in 10 years

   Performance-based vesting provisions

   Misconduct clawback

Performance Shares

Vest at the end of the 3-year performance period; the number of shares vesting depends on achievement of performance factors

   Performance share reduction

   Misconduct clawback

   Financial restatement clawbacks

Stock-Settled RSUs

3-year ratable vesting

   Performance-based vesting provisions

   Misconduct clawback

(1)Mr. Blackley was appointed to the position of Chief Financial Officer in May 2016. As a result, his 2016 compensation reflects his pay in his prior role as Executive Vice President and Controller of the Company. See below for more information regarding Mr. Blackley’s 2016 compensation program. Beginning with performance year 2017, Mr. Blackley’s compensation program is consistent with the 2013

compensation program. Base salary remains a smaller portion of total target compensation than equity based vehicles, and cash bonuses are not included in the 2014 NEO compensation program. The Committee believes that this pay mix serves to balance stockholder interests while effectively rewarding and motivating key talent.

Based on the above framework, the Committee and the independent directors then determined the 2014other NEOs.

Based on the above framework, the Committee and the independent directors determined the 2016 total target compensation for each NEO by considering the following factors:

 

Each NEO’s performance relative to the Company’s strategic objectives;

Capital One’s historical performance;

The role and qualifications of each NEO (for example, the NEO’s scope of responsibility, experience and tenure and the demonstration of competencies consistent with the Company’s values and the ability to deliver strong, sustainable business results);

Appropriate internal pay differentials and the desire to foster teamwork and collaboration;

Historical pay levels;

56  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Available role-specific market compensation data from peer comparator companies;

Available information on the structure of compensation packages for senior executives at peer comparator companies;

Market trends in executive compensation (for example, current rates of pay and the prevalence and types of incentive vehicles); and

The overall structure of the compensation program.

Base Salaries

For the 2014 performance year, the Committee chose to defer a significant portion of each NEO’s base salary until the end of the year. Rather than award each NEO a base salary entirely in cash, the 2014 base salary for NEOs was delivered in a mix of cash (approximately 20% of total target compensation) and RSUs that settled in cash on February 15, 2015 (approximately 15% of total target compensation). In this way, the 2014

Mr. Blackley was appointed as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer effective May 9, 2016; prior to this appointment, he served as Executive Vice President and Controller of the Company. As a result, his compensation for the 2016 performance year reflects a compensation program applicable to Executive Vice Presidents of the Company. Mr. Blackley’s 2016 compensation program was substantially similar to the compensation program for the other NEOs, except that: (1) he received a slightly higher percentage of his compensation as salary (23% instead of 20% of total target compensation); (2) he received a slightly lower percentage of his compensation as long-term incentive opportunity (47% instead of 50% of total target compensation); and (3) he did not receive stock options. Beginning with the 2017 performance year, Mr. Blackley’s compensation program is consistent with the other NEOs.

Base Salaries

For the 2016 performance year, the Committee chose to defer a significant portion of each NEO’s base salary until the end of the year. Rather than award each NEO a base salary entirely in cash, the 2016 base salary for NEOs was delivered in a mix of cash (approximately20-30% of total target compensation) and RSUs that settled in cash on February 15, 2017 (approximately 15% of total target compensation). In this way, the 2016 compensation program further deferred cash compensation for each NEO and placed it at risk to the performance of the Company’s stock price for the entire performance year.

In January 2014, the Committee and the independent directors approved 2014 base salaries for the NEOs, including the portion of base salary delivered as RSUs, ranging from $1,588,056 to $2,655,071. Individual details for each NEO are provided in the table below showing compensation by performance year.

Year-End Incentive Awards

In addition to base salary, in January 2015 the Committee determined to award each NEO various equity-based incentive awards as a reward for Company and individual performance in 2014.

Cash-Settled RSU Awards

In January 2015, the Committee and the independent directors approved awards of cash-settled RSUs for the NEOs ranging from $942,247 to $1,575,060, representing a payout at 140% of the target award values established by the Committee in January 2014. Individual details for each NEO are provided in the table below showing compensation by performance year. The Committee and the independent directors determined that these awards were appropriate in light of the Company’s performance as described under “Year-End Incentive Opportunity” on page 38 in connection with the determinations by the Committee and the independent directors relating to the CEO’s year-end incentive awards.

Equity Incentive Awards

In January 2015, the Committee and the independent directors awarded various equity incentive awards to the NEOs for the 2014 performance year.

In January 2016, the Committee and the independent directors approved 2016 base salaries for the NEOs, ranging from $1,040,039 to $2,797,016, which consisted of a cash portion ranging from $630,000 to $1,598,000 and a cash-settled RSU portion ranging from $410,039 to $1,199,016. Individual details for each NEO are provided in the table below showing compensation by performance year.

Year-End Incentive Awards

A portion of the NEO’s 2016 compensation consisted of an opportunity for ayear-end incentive award based on the individual NEO and Company performance in 2016. This award, if granted, may consist of stock options, performance shares, and/or RSUs. In February 2017 the Committee and the independent directors determined to award each NEO various equity-based incentive awards as recognition of Company and individual performance in 2016.

Cash-Settled RSU Awards

In February 2017, the Committee and the independent directors approved awards of cash-settled RSUs for the NEOs ranging from $574,075 to $1,199,004, representing a payout at 100% of the target award values established by the Committee in February 2016 based on actual Company performance in 2016. Individual details for each NEO are provided in the table below showing compensation by performance year. The assessment of Company performance for the NEOs is consistent with the assessment performed in connection with the CEOyear-end incentive award. The Committee and the independent directors determined that these awards were appropriate in light of the Company’s performance as described under“Year-End Incentive Opportunity” on page 48 in connection with the determinations by the Committee and the independent directors relating to the CEO’syear-end incentive awards.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  57


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Equity Incentive Awards

In February 2017, the Committee and the independent directors awarded various equity incentive awards to the NEOs for the 2016 performance year as recognition for individual NEO performance in 2016 and to drive further performance over the long term. At Capital One, equity incentive awards are linked to performance in two ways:

 

The size of the award is based on each NEO’s individual performance assessment for the year just completed; and

The ultimate value of the award is dependent on Capital One’s performance over time.

Equity incentive awards are designed to emphasize elements that are of particular importance to Capital One given the Company’s unique goals and continually evolving business strategies and objectives. In determining the actual amounts to be awarded to each NEO, the Committee considered each NEO’s contribution to the Company’s performance for 2014 as well as the individual performance of each NEO. The Committee also received input from the CEO on his assessment of each NEO’s individual performance and his recommendations for compensation of the NEOs. The CEO also assessed each NEO’s performance against one or more specific objectives designed to evaluate the degree to which the NEO balanced risks inherent in the NEO’s role. These assessments included the use of both quantitative and qualitative risk measures and were reviewed by the Chief Human Resources Officer and the Chief Risk Officer before being presented to the Committee and the independent directors for their consideration.

The equity incentive awards consisted of stock-settled RSUs, performance share awards and stock options. The terms of the performance share awards are substantially similar to the terms of the performance share awards granted to our CEO, as described earlier under “2015 CEO Compensation Decisions.” The NEO stock options and stock-settled RSUs vest ratably in one-third increments starting on the first anniversary of the grant date and are subject to performance-based vesting and clawback provisions as discussed below under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” on page 44. The stock options have an exercise price of $74.96 per share, which was the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

Mr. Crawford, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, was awarded 60,664 non-statutory stock options, 27,515 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 16,509 performance shares with a total grant date value for all three awards of $4,216,715. The Committee and the independent directors determined to grant these awards based upon Mr. Crawford’s leadership in managing the Company’s balance sheet in 2014, particularly the Company’s capital generation and distribution. The Committee and the independent directors also considered Mr. Crawford’s continued leadership in driving well-managed processes within the Company’s finance operations and across the enterprise and his positioning of Capital One for Basel-related and other regulatory initiatives, as well as his contributions providing strategic market advice and enhancing transparency and communication to investors.

Mr. Schneider, President, Card, was awarded 46,374 non-statutory stock options, 21,034 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 12,620 performance shares with a total grant date value for all three awards of $3,223,447. The Committee and the independent directors determined to grant these awards based upon the strong performance of the Credit Card business in 2014, particularly the year-over-year growth driving increased net income for Domestic Card with strong return on assets while maintaining focus on resiliency, as well as his leadership positioning the Domestic Card business for future strong performance and managing the partnership business. The Committee and the independent directors also considered Mr. Schneider’s leadership implementing the Company’s digital agenda while continuing to enhance the compliance and risk management programs within the business.

Mr. Finneran, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, was awarded 31,660 non-statutory stock options, 15,956 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 9,574 performance shares with a total grant date value for all three awards of $2,392,134. The Committee and the independent directors determined to grant these awards based upon Mr. Finneran’s management of the Company’s engagement with a broad range of regulators and other stakeholders in an environment of heightened regulatory scrutiny and examination. In addition, the Committee and the independent directors considered his leadership enhancing the Corporation’s governance framework in 2014, his success in managing the Company’s litigation portfolio and his implementation of well-managed processes across his organization.

Mr. Yajnik, the Company’s President, Financial Services, was awarded 29,688 non-statutory stock options, 14,962 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 8,977 performance shares with a total grant date value for all three awards of $2,243,074. The Committee and the independent directors determined to grant these awards based upon the strong performance of the Auto business in 2014, including growth in originations, as well as his leadership managing credit risk in Auto and Home Loans. The Committee and the independent directors also considered Mr. Yajnik’s success implementing a comprehensive process improvement program and enhanced technological solutions across both businesses.

NEO Compensation by Performance Year

The table below shows actual NEO compensation as it is attributable to the performance year indicated.

Equity incentive awards are designed to emphasize elements that are of particular importance to Capital One given the Company’s unique goals and continually evolving business strategies and objectives. In determining the actual amounts to be awarded to each NEO, the Committee considered each NEO’s contribution to the Company’s performance for 2016 as well as the individual performance of each NEO. The Committee also received input from the CEO on his assessment of each NEO’s individual performance and his recommendations for compensation of the NEOs. The CEO also assessed the degree to which the NEO balanced risks inherent in the NEO’s role. These assessments included the use of both quantitative and qualitative risk measures and were compiled by the Chief Risk Officer and reviewed by the Chief Human Resources Officer, and separately the Chief Auditor compiled and reviewed the assessment for the Chief Risk Officer, before being presented to the Committee and the independent directors for their consideration.

The equity incentive awards consisted of stock-settled RSUs, performance share awards and stock options. The terms of the performance share awards are substantially similar to the terms of the performance share awards granted to our CEO, as described earlier under “2016 CEO Compensation Program—Performance Share Award” and “2016 CEO Compensation Program.” The NEO stock options and stock-settled RSUs vest ratably inone-third increments starting on the first anniversary of the grant date and are subject to performance-based vesting and clawback provisions as discussed below under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” on page 60. The stock options have an exercise price of $86.34 per share, which was the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

Mr. Blackley, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, was awarded 16,939 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 5,647 performance shares with a total grant date value for both awards of $1,950,075. The Committee and the independent directors determined to grant these awards based upon Mr. Blackley’s leadership of the Company’s financial reporting, disclosure and related controls, as well as a successful transition into his new role as the Company’s CFO managing investor relations, tax, accounting, and Global Finance business risk.

Mr. Crawford, the Company’s Head of Finance and Corporate Development (effective May 9, 2016) and Chief Financial Officer (prior to May 9, 2016), was awarded 41,317non-statutory stock options, 23,124 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 13,875 performance shares with a total grant date value for all three awards of $4,081,830. The Committee and the independent directors determined to grant these awards based upon Mr. Crawford’s successes in integrative thinking and problem solving, driving the Company’s financial discipline and process improvement, and strengthening the effectiveness of the Finance leadership team, including the successful transition of Mr. Blackley to the role of CFO.

Mr. Finneran, the Company’s General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, was awarded 23,738non-statutory stock options, 14,762 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 8,857 performance shares with a total grant date value for all three awards of $2,549,068. The Committee and the independent directors determined to grant these awards based upon Mr. Finneran’s continued guidance and influence across the enterprise, sound judgment, and strategic leadership. In addition, the Committee and the independent directors considered Mr. Finneran’s ability to deliver advantageous results across regulatory, contractual, negotiation, investigation, and litigation matters.

Mr. LaPrade, the Company’s Chief Enterprise Services Officer and Chief of Staff to the CEO, was awarded 27,955non-statutory stock options, 15,646 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 9,388 performance shares with a total grant date value for all three awards of $2,761,806. The Committee and the independent directors determined to grant these awards based upon the strong performance of the Company’s information technology, brand marketing, and digital banking functions in 2016. The Committee and the independent directors also considered Mr. LaPrade’s dedication to the Company’s mission, his empowering, collaborative, and inspirational leadership, and his ability to drive transformational change.

 

Name Performance
Year
 Cash Salary Cash
Bonus
 Cash-Settled
RSUs (1)
 Stock-Settled
Awards (2)
  Option
Awards
  Total

Stephen S. Crawford

 2014 $1,530,000 $0 $2,700,130 $3,300,039  $916,676  $8,446,845
 2013 $1,326,923 $0 $2,550,531 $2,720,606  $755,714  $7,353,774
       
  2014 $1,119,000 $0 $1,975,275 $2,522,704  $700,744  $6,317,723

Ryan M. Schneider

 2013 $1,097,000 $0 $2,057,566 $2,193,657  $609,345  $5,957,568
  2012 $1,065,000 $0 $1,677,443 $1,704,018  $473,342  $4,919,803
       
  2014 $977,000 $0 $1,723,258 $1,913,729  $478,405  $5,092,392

John G. Finneran, Jr.

 2013 $957,000 $0 $1,795,055 $1,913,649  $478,413  $5,144,117
  2012 $929,000 $0 $1,463,232 $1,858,053  $464,511  $4,714,796
       

Sanjiv Yajnik

 2014 $915,000 $0 $1,615,303 $1,794,467  $448,606  $4,773,376
58  

 

(1)For 2014, includes cash-settled restricted stock units (restricted stock unit portion of base salary granted in January 2014 and restricted stock units granted in January 2015).

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

(2)For 2014, includes stock-settled restricted stock units and performance share award granted in January 2015.

This table is presented to show how the Committee views compensation actions

Mr. Yajnik, the Company’s President, Financial Services, was awarded 22,462non-statutory stock options, 13,969 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 8,381 performance shares with a total grant date value for all three awards of $2,412,100. The Committee and the independent directors determined to grant these awards based upon the solid performance of the Auto business in 2016, including continued disciplined growth in originations, as well as his leadership in driving digital innovation, process improvement, and customer satisfaction across operational, staff and technology functions in Financial Services.

Mr. Schneider, the Company’s President, Card until November 28, 2016, and Senior Advisor (anon-executive advisory role) thereafter, was awarded 31,560non-statutory stock options, 17,663 stock-settled RSUs and a target amount of 10,598 performance shares with a total grant date value for all three awards of $3,117,846. The Committee and the independent directors determined to grant these awards in recognition of the strong performance of the Credit Card business in 2016, particularly the year-over-year growth for Domestic Card, as well as Mr. Schneider’s leadership in enhancing compliance and risk management programs within the business. The Committee and the independent directors also considered Mr. Schneider’s leadership in furthering the Company’s digital agenda while enhancing the customer experience and increasing customer satisfaction.

NEO Compensation by Performance Year

The table below shows actual NEO compensation as it is attributable to the performance year indicated.

  Name   

Performance

Year

   Cash Salary   

Cash

Bonus

   

Cash-Settled

RSUs(1)

   

Stock-Settled

Awards(2)

   

Option

Awards

   Total
  

R. Scott Blackley

  2016  $630,000  $0  $984,114  $1,950,075  $0  $3,564,189
 

Stephen S. Crawford

  2016  $1,598,000  $0  $2,398,020  $3,194,494  $887,336  $8,077,850
   2015  $1,552,000  $0  $2,328,082  $3,100,847  $861,334  $7,842,263
     2014  $1,530,000  $0  $2,700,130  $3,300,039  $916,676  $8,446,845
 

John G. Finneran, Jr.

  2016  $1,020,000  $0  $1,530,074  $2,039,264  $509,804  $5,099,142
   2015  $990,000  $0  $1,486,032  $1,979,326  $494,803  $4,950,161
     2014  $977,000  $0  $1,723,258  $1,913,729  $478,405  $5,092,392
  

Frank G. LaPrade, III

  2016  $983,000  $0  $1,474,122  $2,161,436  $600,370  $5,218,928
 

Sanjiv Yajnik

  2016  $966,000  $0  $1,448,084  $1,929,699  $482,401  $4,826,184
   2015  $937,000  $0  $1,406,056  $1,873,662  $468,416  $4,685,134
     2014  $915,000  $0  $1,615,303  $1,794,467  $448,606  $4,773,376
 

Ryan M. Schneider

  2016  $1,220,000  $0  $1,830,066  $2,440,054  $677,792  $6,167,912
   2015  $1,146,000  $0  $1,720,052  $2,633,133  $731,408  $6,230,593
     2014  $1,119,000  $0  $1,975,275  $2,522,704  $700,744  $6,317,723

(1)For 2016, includes cash-settled restricted stock units (restricted stock unit portion of base salary granted in February 2016 and to which year the compensation awards relate, but it differs substantially from the Summary Compensation Table on page 53restricted stock units granted in February 2017).

(2)For 2016, includes stock-settled restricted stock units and performance share award granted in February 2017.

This table is presented to show how the Committee views compensation actions and to which year the compensation awards relate, but it differs substantially from the Summary Compensation Table on page 69 required for purposes of this proxy statement and is therefore not a substitute for the information required in that table. There are two principal differences between the Summary Compensation Table and the above table:

 

The table above reports equity-based awards as compensation for the performance year for which they were awarded, even if the award was granted in one year based on performance for the prior year. As a result, the cash-settled RSU, stock option, stock-settled RSU and performance share awards granted in January 2015February 2016 for the 20142016 performance year, for example, are shown in the above table as 20142015 compensation. The Summary Compensation Table reports equity-based awards only in the year in which they were granted.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  59


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Summary Compensation Table reports the change in pension value andnon-qualified deferred compensation earnings and all other compensation. These amounts are not a result of current year compensation determinations and are not shown above.

Additional Pay Elements

The Committee provides certain other programs intended to support the NEOs’ productivity, well-being and security. These programs provide some level of personal benefit and are not generally available to all employees for 2016, and security. These programs provide some level of personal benefit and are not generally available to all associates. For 2014, these included the following:

 

The ability to participate in a comprehensive voluntary annual health screening;
Executive term life insurance with a benefit level of approximately $5 million;

The ability to participate in a comprehensive voluntary annual health screening;

An automobile lease;lease or the use of a driver who also provides personal security; and

The monitoring and maintenance of an electronic home security system.

The Committee has determined that the nature and value of these programs are comparable to those offered to similarly situated executives at our peers. Additional details on these programs can be found in the “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section beginning on page 52.

2015 NEO Compensation Decisions

For 2015, the Committee and the independent directors approved an NEO compensation program that is substantially similar to the 2015 program. The plan consists of multiple compensation vehicles that directly link the NEOs’ compensation with the Company’s performance over multiple time horizons, align the NEOs’ interests with the interests of the Company’s stockholders, support safety and soundness and encourage appropriate risk-taking.

Additional details on these programs can be found in the “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section beginning on page 68.

2017 NEO Compensation Program

Each year, the Committee reviews the NEO compensation program in light of Company performance data, peer comparator group performance data, historical pay information, data on specific market practices and trends, stockholder feedback, and other relevant points of information. The plan consists of multiple compensation vehicles that directly link the NEOs’ compensation with the Company’s performance over multiple time horizons, align the NEOs’ interests with the interests of the Company’s stockholders, support safety and soundness and encourage appropriate risk-taking. Based on feedback received from stockholders, the Committee and the independent directors revised the performance metrics applicable to performance shares granted in 2017, to require a more rigorous set of relative Company performance hurdles related to the potential payouts made in connection with the awards. For a detailed description of these changes, see “Chief Executive Officer Compensation – 2017 CEO Compensation Program.” The 2017 NEO compensation program is otherwise substantially similar to the 2016 program.

  Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions

The awards granted to our named executive officers include the following provisions that are designed to further enhance alignment between pay and performance and balance the risks that our incentive compensation programs might otherwise encourage:

 

Performance-based vesting provisions;

Performance share reduction;
Clawback

Misconduct clawback provisions; and

Financial restatement clawbacks.

These terms and conditions apply to incentive awards granted to every executive officer and not just to the named executive officers.

Performance-Based Vesting Provisions

The ultimate value that our named executive officers receive from equity-based incentive awards is tied to our stock price performance over the vesting period. The Committee nevertheless determined that these awards should be subject to additional performance conditions so that the value received by the executives is also conditioned upon the Company continuing to meet certain operating performance thresholds. The vesting of

60  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

Performance-Based Vesting Provisions

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT

The ultimate value that our named executive officers receive from equity-based incentive awards is tied to our stock price performance over the vesting period. The Committee nevertheless determined that these awards should be subject to additional performance conditions so that the value received by the executives is also conditioned upon the Company continuing to meet certain operating performance thresholds. The vesting of awards subject to performance-based vesting provisions is conditioned upon the Company meeting specific performance thresholds for each and every fiscal year ending in the three-year vesting period. Any forfeitures will be cumulative over the three-year vesting period. In this manner, regardless of our executives’ past performance and of our stock price performance, the awards subject to performance-based vesting remain at risk of complete forfeiture over the three-year vesting period.

Since January 2012, performance-based vesting provisions have applied


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

awards subject to performance-based vesting provisions is conditioned upon the Company meeting specific performance thresholds for each and every fiscal year ending in the three-year vesting period. Any forfeitures will be cumulative over the three-year vesting period. In this manner, regardless of our executives’ past performance and of our stock price performance, the awards subject to performance-based vesting remain at risk of complete forfeiture over the three-year vesting period.

Performance-based vesting provisions apply to the following awards:

 

All named executive officer stock option awards;

All named executive officer restricted stock and stock-settled RSUs; and

All CEO cash-settled RSUs.

In setting the threshold operating performance conditions, the Company took into account discussions with federal bank regulators. These performance conditions do not present any upside potential for the named executive officers’ compensation but instead create an additional

In setting the threshold operating performance conditions, the Company took into account discussions with federal bank regulators. These performance conditions do not present any upside potential for the named executive officers’ compensation but instead create an additionalat-risk element to the compensation that has been awarded to them. Imposing these additional performance conditions is designed to further reflect our approach of balancing risk and performance over the long-term.

For awards granted since January 2014, vesting is conditioned on the Company achieving positive Core Earnings (as defined below). If Core Earnings are not positive for any fiscal year in the vesting period, the named executive officer will automatically forfeit 50% ofone-years’ worth of vesting (i.e.,one-sixth of the total award). In addition, the Committee will determine the extent to which any named executive officer was accountable for the outcome and, based on such determination, the Committee will decide whether any or all of the remaining 50% ofone-years’ worth of vesting will also be forfeited. The Committee may also decide to delay the vesting of the applicable portion of the award not so forfeited. For the NEOs, these determinations will be made each year prior to the scheduled vesting date, based on the Core Earnings for the fiscal year ended prior to such vesting date. For the CEO, these determinations will be made prior to the scheduled vesting date at the end of the three-year vesting period, taking into account Core Earnings for each fiscal year within the period.

Core Earnings focuses on whether profits are being generated by our basic business, as opposed to other factors that may not reflect business fundamentals. The terms of the applicable award agreements define “Core Earnings” to mean the Company’s net income available to common stockholders, excluding, on atax-adjusted basis, the impact of (i) impairment or amortization of intangible assets, (ii) the build or release of the allowance for loan and lease losses, calculated as the difference between the provision for loan and lease losses and charge-offs, net of recoveries, and (iii) the change in the combined uncollectible finance charge and fee reserve. The Committee believes that Core Earnings is an appropriate performance metric to employ for these performance-based vesting provisions because the metric captures major operational costs and risks to the Company’s business, including charge-offs, operating expenses, market and competitive risks and costs to maintain adequate levels of capital and liquidity. Because the metric is based on net income available to common stockholders, it also includes the impact of discontinued operations.

Performance Share Reduction

As described above, the performance share awards granted to the named executive officers employ Adjusted ROA as the performance metric, with the Company’s performance assessed on the basis of Adjusted ROA relative to a comparator group consisting of companies in the KBW Index. Each of these performance share awards is subject to reduction in the event that the Company’s Adjusted ROA for any fiscal year in the three-year performance period is not positive. These reductions will occur regardless of how well the Company’s Adjusted ROA compares to its peers in the KBW Index. If the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROA for one year in the performance period, the total number of shares issued on the vesting date will be reduced byone-sixth. If the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROA for two years in the performance period, the total number of shares issued on the vesting date will be reduced byone-third. If the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROA for any of the three years in the performance period, the named executive officers will forfeit the entire award. In this manner, even if we outperform compared to the comparator group, the performance share awards are at risk of complete forfeiture if we do not achieve a threshold level of performance on an absolute basis.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

For awards granted in January 2014 and 2015, vesting is conditioned on the Company achieving positive Core Earnings. If Core Earnings are not positive for any fiscal year in the vesting period, the named executive officer will automatically forfeit 50% of one-years’ worth of vesting (i.e., one-sixth of the total award). In addition, the Committee will determine the extent to which any named executive officer was accountable for the outcome and, based on such determination, the Committee will decide whether any or all of the remaining 50% of one-years’ worth of vesting will also be forfeited. The Committee may also decide to delay the vesting of the applicable portion of the award not so forfeited. For the NEOs, these determinations will be made each year prior to the scheduled vesting date, based on the Core Earnings for the fiscal year ended prior to such vesting date. For the CEO, these determinations will be made prior to the scheduled vesting date at the end of the three-year vesting period, taking into account Core Earnings for each fiscal year within the period.

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

Core Earnings focuses on whether profits are being generated by our basic business, as opposed to other factors that may not reflect business fundamentals. The terms of the applicable award agreements define “Core Earnings” to mean the Company’s net income available to common stockholders, excluding, on a tax-adjusted basis, the impact of (i) impairment or amortization of intangible assets, (ii) the build or release of the allowance for loan and lease losses, calculated as the difference between the provision for loan and lease losses and charge-offs, net of recoveries, and (iii) the change in the combined uncollectible finance charge and fee reserve. The Committee believes that Core Earnings is an appropriate performance metric to employ for these performance-based vesting provisions because the metric captures major operational costs and risks to the Company’s

  61


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

“Adjusted ROA” means the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (a) the Company’s net income available to common stockholders, excluding, on atax-adjusted basis, the impact of impairment or amortization of intangible assets to (b) the Company’s average tangible assets for the period. This metric is intended to reflect our earnings capacity by focusing on a component of our net income relative to our tangible assets.

Misconduct Clawback Provisions

Beginning with awards granted in January 2013, every incentive award granted to our executive officers includes a clawback provision designed to provide the Committee the authority to recover previously awarded compensation in the event that the Committee determines (i) there has been misconduct resulting in either a violation of law or of Company policy that has caused significant financial or reputational harm to the Company and (ii) either the executive committed the misconduct or failed in his or her responsibility to manage or monitor the applicable conduct or risks.

These clawback provisions have been designed to apply broadly, to a range of potential manifestations of misconduct at any level of the executive’s organization. The unvested portions of all applicable incentive awards will be subject to recovery and at risk of complete forfeiture. In each case, the Committee will determine the amount of compensation to recover, allowing the Committee to calibrate each recovery to the facts and circumstances giving rise to the need for such recovery.

In the event the Committee exercises the clawback provisions in the future, the Company intends to disclose the aggregate amount that the Committee has determined to recover, so long as the underlying event has already been publicly disclosed in the Company’s filings with the SEC.

Financial Restatement Clawbacks

All performance share awards to our executive officers include a clawback that is triggered in the event that the Company issues a restatement of its financial statements, or announces that it expects to issue a restatement within three years after the vesting of an award. If an executive would have been entitled to fewer shares on the vesting date under the restated financial statements, the executive may be required to return to the Company the excess shares awarded to him or her or, in the event he or she has sold or otherwise transferred the shares, he or she may be required to return the net proceeds from the sale or transfer.

  Criteria and Process for Compensation Decisions

The Committee considers a number of factors in making compensation decisions with respect to the named executive officers. The Committee relies on a range of objective data including Company performance data, peer comparator group performance data, historical pay information, data on specific market practices and trends, stockholder feedback, and other relevant points of information to inform its business judgment. See “Our Compensation Governance Cycle” on page 42 for details regarding the Committee’s annual activities.

Use of Outside Consultants for CEO Compensation

The Committee engages FW Cook to assist in the design of the CEO compensation program. FW Cook assists the Committee in a number of ways, including proposing and evaluating a peer comparator group, gathering relevant compensation data from the peer comparator companies, discussing relevant market trends and context and developing recommendations on possible plan designs. See the discussion under “Compensation Committee – Compensation Committee Consultant” in the “Corporate Governance at Capital One” section on page 27 for additional information about FW Cook.

Use of Outside Consultants for NEO Compensation

The Chief Human Resources Officer and other members of the Company’s Human Resources department assist the CEO in developing compensation recommendations to the Committee for the NEOs. The Human Resources department typically uses multiple surveys as sources of market compensation data. FW Cook also provides

62  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

business, including charge-offs, operating expenses, market and competitive risks and costs to maintain adequate levels of capital and liquidity. Because the metric is based on net income available to common stockholders, it also includes the impact of discontinued operations.  2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Performance Share Reduction

As described above, the performance share awards granted to the named executive officers since January 2012 employ Adjusted ROA as the performance metric, with the Company’s performance assessed on the basis of Adjusted ROA relative to a comparator group consisting of companies in the KBW Index. Each of these performance share awards is subject to reduction in the event that the Company’s Adjusted ROA for any fiscal year in the three-year performance period is not positive. These reductions will occur regardless of how well the Company’s Adjusted ROA compares to its peers in the KBW Index. If the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROA for one year in the performance period, the total number of shares issued on the vesting date will be reduced by one-sixth. If the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROA for two years in the performance period, the total number of shares issued on the vesting date will be reduced by one-third. If the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROA for any of the three years in the performance period, the named executive officers will forfeit the entire award. In this manner, even if we outperform compared to the comparator group, the performance share awards are at risk of complete forfeiture if we do not achieve a threshold level of performance on an absolute basis.

“Adjusted ROA” means the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (a) the Company’s net income available to common stockholders, excluding, on a tax-adjusted basis, the impact of impairment or amortization of intangible assets to (b) the Company’s average tangible assets for the period. This metric is intended to reflect our earnings capacity by focusing on a component of our net income relative to our tangible assets. For the January 2014 awards, the credit portion of other than temporary impairment of the securities portfolio is also excluded, on a tax-adjusted basis, from the Company’s net income available to common stockholders for purposes of determining Adjusted ROA.

Clawback Provisions

Capital One has included clawback provisions in certain equity awards since 2011. Beginning with awards granted in January 2013, every incentive award granted to our executive officers, including our named executive officers, includes a clawback provision designed to provide the Committee the opportunity to recover compensation previously awarded in the event the clawback is triggered. Under these clawback provisions, the Committee will determine the amount of compensation to recover in the event that the Committee determines (i) there has been misconduct resulting in either a violation of law or of Company policy that in either case causes significant financial or reputational harm to the Company and (ii) either the executive committed the misconduct or failed in his or her responsibility to manage or monitor the applicable conduct or risks. The portions of all applicable incentive awards that are unvested at the time the Committee makes a determination to exercise the clawback provisions will be subject to recovery and at risk of complete forfeiture.

In the event the Committee exercises the clawback provisions in the future, the Company intends to disclose the aggregate amount that the Committee has determined to recover, so long as the underlying event has already been publicly disclosed in the Company’s filings with the SEC. This disclosure would appear in the proxy following any such determination by the Committee and would provide the aggregate amount of recovery for each event if there is more than one applicable event.

Financial Restatement Clawbacks

All performance share awards to our executive officers beginning in January 2011 include a clawback that is triggered in the event of a financial restatement by the Company within three years of the vesting of the award if the executive would have been entitled to fewer shares on the vesting date as a result of the restatement. This restatement clawback is designed to recoup the shares awarded to the executive or, in the event the executive has sold or otherwise transferred the shares, the net proceeds from that sale or transfer.

 Criteria and Process for Compensation Decisions

The Committee considers a number of factors in making compensation decisions with respect to the named executive officers. The Committee relies on a range of objective data including Company performance data, peer comparator group performance data, historical pay information, data on specific market practices and trends and other relevant points of information to inform its business judgment.

Use of Outside Consultants for CEO Compensation

The Committee engages F.W. Cook to assist in the design of the CEO compensation program. F.W. Cook assists the Committee in a number of ways, including proposing and evaluating a peer comparator group, gathering relevant compensation data from the peer comparator companies, discussing relevant market trends and context and developing recommendations on possible plan designs. Please see the discussion under “Compensation Committee


SECTION VCompensation Committee Consultant” in the “Corporate Governance at Capital One” section beginning on page 14 for additional information about F.W. Cook.

Use of Outside Consultants for NEO Compensation

The Chief Human Resources Officer and other members of the Company’s Human Resources department assist the CEO in developing compensation recommendations to the Committee for the NEOs. The Human Resources department typically uses multiple surveys as sources of market compensation data. F.W. Cook also provides additional market reference points that the Committee and the independent directors use when evaluating NEO compensation. Other outside consultants provide information to the Human Resources department regarding market practices and trends and research reports and provide subject matter expertise on specific concepts and technical issues related to executive compensation. However, these outside consultants do not recommend either the form or amount of compensation that is to be paid to the NEOs. The Human Resources department is responsible for analyzing the information obtained from the outside consultants and presenting it to the CEO. The CEO then considers all of the information provided by the Human Resources department and the Chief Human Resources Officer and makes his compensation recommendations for the NEOs to the Committee and the independent directors.

Management does not have a contractual arrangement with any compensation consultant to determine or recommend compensation programs for the NEOs. A consultant from F.W. Cook is present at Committee meetings during which CEO and NEO compensation is discussed and provides market data as well as an outsider’s perspective regarding CEO and NEO compensation practices. F.W. Cook has no other engagement with, and performs no other services for, Capital One besides the services described above.

Market Data

The Committee reviews pertinent data from a group of peer comparator companies within the financial services industry. These organizations are intended to represent the marketplace of companies with whom Capital One competes for business and for executive talent.

F.W. Cook plays a lead role in evaluating the peer comparator group on an annual basis. Each year, a consultant from F.W.COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

additional market reference points that the Committee and the independent directors use when evaluating NEO compensation. Other outside consultants provide information to the Human Resources department regarding market practices and trends and research reports and provide subject matter expertise on specific concepts and technical issues related to executive compensation. However, these outside consultants do not recommend either the form or amount of compensation that is to be paid to the NEOs. The Human Resources department is responsible for analyzing the information obtained from the outside consultants and presenting it to the CEO. The CEO then considers all of the information provided by the Human Resources department and the Chief Human Resources Officer and makes his compensation recommendations for the NEOs to the Committee and the independent directors.

Management does not have a contractual arrangement with any compensation consultant to determine or recommend compensation programs for the NEOs. A consultant from FW Cook is present at Committee meetings during which CEO and NEO compensation is discussed and provides market data as well as an independent perspective regarding CEO and NEO compensation practices. FW Cook has no other engagement with, and performs no other services for, Capital One besides the services described above.

Market Data

The Committee reviews data from a group of peer comparator companies within the financial services industry. These organizations are intended to represent the marketplace of companies with whom Capital One competes for business and for executive talent.

FW Cook plays a lead role in evaluating the peer comparator group on an annual basis. Each year, a consultant from FW Cook presents a comprehensive report to the Committee that highlights size, scope and performance information from the peer comparator companies across a variety of metrics. The Committee specifically considers the Company’s percentile rank versus peer comparator companies across the following financial metrics:

 

Revenue;
Assets;
Revenue

Assets

Market value;
value

Net income available to common stockholders;
stockholders

U.S. deposits;
deposits

Loans held for investment;
investment

Diluted earnings per share growth;growth
Return on average tangible common equity;equity

Adjusted ROA;
ROA

Tier 1 common capital ratio;
ratio

Charge-off rate;
rate

Ratio of stock price to tangible book value;
value

Ratio of stock price to earnings; and
earnings

Total stockholder return.

After reviewing this information, the Committee recommends a final peer comparator group to the independent directors for approval. The peer comparator group is adjustedreturn

After reviewing this information, the Committee recommends a final peer comparator group to the independent directors for approval. The peer comparator group is reviewed each year and adjusted, as appropriate, so that the size, scope, performance and business focus of the peer comparator companies reflect Capital One’s competitive environment. For 2016, the peer comparator group included the following companies:

American Express

Discover Financial ServicesRegions Financial

Bank of the peer comparator companies reflect Capital One’s competitive environment. After the peer comparator group was significantly adjusted in 2009 due to considerable consolidation within the peer comparator group caused by the turmoil in the financial sector, the same peer group has been used for competitive analysis when the Committee approved the 2010 through 2014 compensation programs and target award values.America Corporation

Fifth Third BancorpSunTrust Banks

BB&T Corporation

J.P. Morgan ChaseU.S. Bancorp

Citigroup

PNC Financial ServicesWells Fargo & Company

The Committee believes that the peer comparator group reflects the competitive environment for the Company, particularly the performance and business focus of the companies in the peer comparator group and the competition for talent, and made this determination after considering, among other things, stockholder feedback as described earlier under “Consideration of 2016 Say on Pay Vote.” The Committee determined to maintain the same peer comparator group for purposes of designing the 2017 compensation programs, and approved the comparator group in July 2016.

 

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  63


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

American Express

Fifth Third BancorpRegions Financial

Bank of America Corporation

J.P. Morgan ChaseSunTrust Banks

BB&T Corporation

KeyCorpU.S. Bancorp

Citigroup

PNC Financial ServicesWells Fargo & Company

Typically, compensation data from the peer comparator group is used to inform the Committee’s determination of the total compensation target values for the named executive officers. As of December 31, 2014, Capital One was positioned at or near the median of the peer comparator group in terms of total assets, revenues, net income, market value and ratio of price to tangible book value.

For purposes of designing the 2015 compensation programs, however, the Committee determined to adjust the peer comparator group by removing KeyCorp and including Discover Financial Services. The Committee believes that the revised peer comparator group better reflects the competitive environment for the Company, particularly the performance and business focus of the companies in the peer comparator group and the competition for talent, and made this determination after considering, among other things, stockholder feedback as described earlier under “Consideration of 2014 Say on Pay Vote.”

Typically, compensation data from the peer comparator group is used to inform the Committee’s determination of the total compensation target values for the named executive officers. As of December 31, 2016, Capital One was positioned at or near the median of the peer comparator group in terms of total assets, loans, deposits, revenues, net income, and market value.

Tally Sheets

In addition to considering market data from our peer comparator group (when available), the Committee also considers information contained on total compensation tally sheets for the CEO and each NEO. The tally sheets summarize multiple components of current and historical compensation, as well as the potential value of post-termination arrangements. The tally sheets are just one point of information used by the Committee in the process of determining CEO and NEO compensation. They help the Committee understand the historical context that is relevant to current compensation decisions, such as the CEO and each NEO’s accumulated equity value. The tally sheets also help the Committee assess the potential downstream consequences of its decisions, such as the potential value to be received by the CEO and each NEO upon separation due to a change of control, retirement or other termination scenarios.

  Other Compensation Arrangements

Pension andNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Capital One does not have any active pension plans for the NEOs. We offer a voluntary,non-qualified deferred compensation plan that restores participating NEOs, excluding the CEO, to the level of savings they would have achieved if they had not been impacted by IRS limits governing our qualified 401(k) plan. It also allows the NEOs, excluding the CEO to defer additionalpre-tax compensation in order to save for retirement.

Capital One annually reviews programs and practices at our peer comparator companies and across the financial services industry. We also review changes in the legal and regulatory environment pertaining to retirement programs. Each of our named executive officers participated in Capital One’s VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“Plan”) in 2016. Details of the Plan can be found under “Capital One’s VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs” on page 78.

Employment Agreements

Capital One typically does not enter into defined term employment agreements with the named executive officers in order to maintain maximum flexibility in establishing separation terms at the appropriate time and considering their current circumstances. The Committee retains full discretion to approve employment agreements on an exception basis and has done so for exceptional circumstances in the past.

Change of Control Agreements

Each named executive officer is a party to an agreement providing certain benefits if his employment terminates in connection with a change of control as well as compensation and benefits protections during the two year period following the change of control. The Committee determined that such agreements were appropriate based on their prevalence within the banking and financial services industry and given the dynamic nature of merger and acquisition activity among these institutions.

The change of control agreements define compensation and benefits payable to named executive officers in certain merger and acquisition scenarios, giving them some degree of certainty regarding their individual outcomes in these circumstances. The Committee believes these agreements allow the named executive officers to remain neutral and consider a full range of decisions that are focused on maximizing stockholder value. The change of control agreements are also intended to allow Capital One’s businesses to operate with minimal disruption in the event of a change of control by providing each named executive officer with an incentive to remain in his or her leadership role up to and beyond the transaction date. In addition to compensation and benefits protections during atwo-year protection period after a change of control, the named executive officers are entitled to severance-type benefits under the agreements if their employment is actually terminated as a result of (or in anticipation of) certain merger and acquisition scenarios.

 

64  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Both eligibility for participation and the structure of payments under these agreements are designed to be aligned with market practice in the banking and financial services industry. Our program is designed so that our stockholders are not faced with disproportionate severance costs that may impair potential merger opportunities. In addition, our change of control agreements for executive officers do not provide for excise tax“gross-up” payments. The program also supports our ability to attract and retain talented executives by providing them with a competitive level of benefits.

Projections of potential payouts to the named executive officers under these agreements are included in the total compensation tally sheets reviewed by the Committee on an annual basis. Although the potential change of control payouts do not necessarily impact annual decisions on NEO pay, reviewing this information allows the Committee to fully understand the downstream implications of its decisions and the resulting impact to the Company and its stockholders.

Post-Employment Compensation Practices

The CEO has no employment or severance arrangement with the Company other than the change of control agreement as described above. If an NEO, excluding the CEO, separates from Capital One, he or she is entitled to receive the amounts set forth in the Company’s Executive Severance Plan, which provides for a payment of up to 30% of the NEO’s current target total compensation plus partially subsidized health, dental and vision benefits through COBRA, term life continuation and outplacement services. The Committee may exercise its business judgment in approving additional amounts in light of all relevant circumstances, including the NEO’s term of employment, past accomplishments, reasons for separation from the Company, potential risks and the NEO’s willingness to restrict his or her future action(s), such as through an agreement not to compete or solicit the Company’s customers or employees. Capital One has asked certain NEOs to enter into various agreements that contain restrictive covenants related to confidentiality,non-competition,non-solicitation and ownership of work product. For additional information, see “Restrictive Covenants” in the “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section beginning on page 80. Upon retiring from the Company, employees are generally entitled to receive certain retiree medical benefits, including subsidized medical benefits for qualified individuals.

  Other Aspects of Executive Compensation

Stock Ownership and Retention Requirements

Consistent with their responsibilities to our stockholders, the executive officers are required to maintain a significant financial stake in the Company. To this end, the CEO and the NEOs must own shares of Capital One stock with a fair market value of at least the following annual cash salary multiples:

 RoleSalary Multiple

 CEO

5X

 Other Compensation Arrangements

PensionNEOs and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Capital One does not currently have any active pension plans for the CEO or the NEOs. We offer a voluntary, non-qualified deferred compensation plan that restores participating NEOs to the level of savings they would have achieved if they had not been impacted by IRS limits governing our qualified 401(k) plan. It also allows the NEOs to defer additional pre-tax compensation in order to save for retirement.

Capital One annually reviews programs and practices at our peer comparator companies and across the financial services industry. We also review changes in the legal and regulatory environment pertaining to retirement

programs. Each of our named executive officers participated in Capital One’s Voluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) in 2014. Details of the Plan can be found under “Capital One’s Voluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs” on page 63.

Employment Agreements

Capital One typically does not enter into defined term employment agreements with the named executive officers in order to maintain maximum flexibility in establishing separation terms at the appropriate time and considering then current circumstances. The Committee retains full discretion to approve employment agreements on an exception basis and has done so for exceptional circumstances in the past.

Change of Control Agreements

Each named executive officer is a party to an agreement providing certain benefits if their employment terminates in connection with a change of control. The Committee determined that such agreements were appropriate based on their prevalence within the banking and financial services industry and given the dynamic nature of merger and acquisition activity among these institutions.

The change of control agreements define compensation and benefits payable to named executive officers in certain merger and acquisition scenarios, giving them some degree of certainty regarding their individual outcomes in these circumstances. The Committee believes these agreements allow the named executive officers to remain neutral and consider a full range of decisions that are focused on maximizing stockholder value. The change of control agreements are also intended to allow Capital One’s businesses to operate with minimal disruption in the event of a change of control by providing each named executive officer with an incentive to remain in his leadership roles up to and beyond the transaction date. The named executive officers are only entitled to benefits under the agreements if their employment is actually terminated as a result of (or in anticipation of) certain merger and acquisition scenarios.

Both eligibility for participation and the structure of payments under these agreements are designed to be aligned with market practice in the banking and financial services industry. This is designed so that our stockholders are not faced with disproportionate severance costs that may impair potential merger opportunities. It also supports our ability to attract and retain talented executives by providing them with a competitive level of benefit.

Projections of potential payouts to the named executive officers under these agreements are included in the total compensation tally sheets reviewed by the Committee on an annual basis. Although the potential change of control payouts do not necessarily impact annual decisions on CEO and NEO pay, reviewing this information allows the Committee to fully understand the downstream implications of its decisions and the resulting impact to the Company and its stockholders.

Our change of control agreements for executive officers no longer provide for excise tax “gross-up” payments. On March 1, 2011, Capital One delivered notice to all executive officers that their change of control agreements, which included excise tax gross-up provisions, would not be renewed. The Committee and the independent directors also approved a new form of change of control agreement to be used after March 1, 2011 for new hires, promotions and renewals which does not provide for an excise tax gross-up. Accordingly, all executive officer change of control agreements providing for a potential excise tax gross-up after a change of control have expired and been replaced with the new form of agreement that does not provide for an excise tax gross-up.

Post-Employment Compensation Practices

The CEO has no employment or severance arrangement with the Company other than the change of control agreement as described above. If an NEO separates from Capital One, he or she is entitled to receive the amounts set forth in the Company’s Executive Severance Plan, which provides for a payment of upOfficers

3X

Given that the CEO’s compensation program does not include a base salary, his ownership requirement is based on a notional salary established by the Committee and the independent directors, which is currently $1,000,000.

Ownership requirements may be fulfilled using the following shares:

Shares owned without restriction;

Unvested restricted stock;

Unvested stock-settled RSUs;

Shares acquired through the Associate Stock Purchase Plan; and

Shares owned through Capital One’s 401(k) Plan.

The Committee reviews the guidelines and monitors the named executive officers’ compliance with them. New executive officers are given two years from the date of promotion to or appointment as an executive officer to 30% of the NEO’s current target total compensation plus partially subsidized health, dental and vision benefits through COBRA and outplacement services. The Committee may exercise its business judgment in approving additional amounts in light of all relevant circumstances, including the NEO’s term of employment, past accomplishments, reasons for separation from the Company, potential risks and the NEO’s willingness to restrict his or her future action(s),

such as through an agreement not to compete or solicit the Company’s customers or employees. Capital One has asked certain NEOs to enter into various agreements that contain restrictive covenants related to confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation and ownership of work product. For additional information, please see “Restrictive Covenants” in the “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section beginning on page 65. Each of the NEOs also has a change of control agreement as described above. Upon retiring from the Company, employees are generally entitled to receive certain retiree medical benefits.

 

 Other Aspects of Executive Compensation

Stock Ownership and Retention Requirements

Consistent with their responsibilities to our stockholders, the executive officers are required to maintain a significant financial stake in the Company. To this end, the CEO and the NEOs must own shares of Capital One stock with a fair market value of at least the following annual cash salary multiples:CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

 

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  65

RoleSalary Multiple


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

comply with these requirements. In the event that an executive officer is not in compliance with these requirements, the Committee has the right to take action, including reducing the executive officer’s compensation. The named executive officers are currently in compliance with this requirement.

In addition, the Company has stock retention requirements for certain equity awards made to the named executive officers. Each executive must hold 50% of theafter-tax net shares acquired upon the vesting of performance share awards, restricted stock, and stock-settled RSUs (i) during the executive’s term of employment with Capital One, or (ii) prior to the first anniversary of the executive’s separation from Capital One, for one year after the vesting of such award. These stock ownership and retention requirements apply to all of our executive officers.

Prohibition of Hedging and Speculative Trading Activities

All of Capital One’s executive officers and directors are prohibited from engaging in short sales, hedging transactions or speculative trading in derivative securities of Capital One stock and from using their Capital One stock in a margin account or pledging Capital One stock as collateral for a loan.

Equity Grant Practices

Capital One strives to maintain equity grant practices that demonstrate high standards of corporate governance. Annual incentive awards are approved by the Committee and the independent directors (or by delegated authority to the Chief Human Resources Officer for certain employees who are not executive officers) at regularly scheduled meetings in the first quarter of each year. The date of grant is the actual date on which the Committee approves the awards. The Committee may grant awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options or other equity awards outside of the annual incentive cycle. The Committee has delegated authority to the CEO to award restricted stock and to the Chief Human Resources Officer to award stock-settled and cash-settled RSUs (but not options or other equity awards) to employees who are not executive officers, subject to a maximum amount of $2 million for any employee in any one year. These awards are designed to be used for new hires and for special programs designed by management to incentivize and reward current employees of the Company. The Committee reviews all grants made by delegation at least once per year.

With respect to awards of stock options, the exercise price is always the Fair Market Value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Under the terms of our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, “Fair Market Value” is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

The Company does not seek to time equity grants to take advantage of materialnon-public information and in no event is the grant date set to a date that is prior to the date of approval.

Tax Considerations

The Committee carefully considers the tax impacts of its compensation programs on the Company, as well as on its executives. To maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers, the Committee does not require all compensation to be paid or awarded in atax-deductible manner. However, it is the Committee’s intent to maximize tax deductibility to the extent reasonable, provided the Company’s programs remain consistent with the Company’s overall executive compensation objectives.

With respect to the named executive officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer), Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the federal tax deduction for compensation paid to the executive to $1 million. Amounts in excess of $1 million are also eligible for the deduction if the compensation qualifies as “performance-based.” The Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan provides for the establishment of specific performance thresholds to be tied to equity-based awards that may allow these awards to qualify as “performance-based” for the purposes of 162(m).

The following awards were granted in February 2016 for the 2015 performance year to executive officers of the Company, including the named executive officers: performance share awards, RSUs (other than the RSUs representing a portion of base salary) and the deferred cash bonus to the CEO. These grants were made following a determination by the Committee and the independent directors that a performance threshold was met.

66  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT

 CEO

5X


SECTION V – COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 Other NEOs and

 Executive Officers

3X

Given that the CEO’s compensation program does not include a base salary, his ownership requirement is based on a notional salary established by the Committee and the independent directors, which is currently $1,000,000.

Ownership requirements may be fulfilled using the following shares:

Under this performance threshold, which had been established in January 2015, the CEO and NEOs would receive these awards only if the Company achieved positive Core Earnings ROA from Continuing Operations for the 2015 fiscal year. For purposes of this performance metric, “Core Earnings ROA from Continuing Operations” means the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (A) the Company’s Core Earnings from Continuing Operations for the 2015 fiscal year to (B) the Company’s average total assets for the period. Core Earnings from Continuing Operations means the Company’s net income from continuing operations, excluding, on atax-adjusted basis, the impact of (i) impairment or amortization of intangible assets, (ii) the build or release of the allowance for loan and lease losses, calculated as the difference between the provision for loan and lease losses and charge-offs, net of recoveries, and (iii) the change in the combined uncollectible finance charge and fee reserve. The Company’s Core Earnings ROA from Continuing Operations for fiscal year 2015 was positive. Therefore, the Company expects the awards made in February 2016 to betax-deductible as “performance-based” compensation.

In February 2016, the Committee and the independent directors again established a performance threshold that the Company had to meet in order for the following awards to be granted for the 2016 performance year to executive officers of the Company, including the named executive officers: performance share awards, RSUs (other than the RSUs representing a portion of base salary) and the deferred cash bonus to the CEO. Under this performance threshold, the CEO and NEOs would receive these awards only if the Company achieved positive Core Earnings ROA from Continuing Operations for the 2016 fiscal year. For purposes of this performance metric, Core Earnings ROA from Continuing Operations means the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (A) the Company’s Core Earnings from Continuing Operations for the 2016 fiscal year to (B) the Company’s average total assets for the period. Core Earnings from Continuing Operations has the same meaning as described in the preceding paragraph. The Company’s Core Earnings ROA from Continuing Operations for fiscal year 2016 was positive. Therefore, the Company expects the awards made in February 2017 to betax-deductible as “performance-based” compensation.

The Company also expects that all stock options awarded in 2016 or for the 2016 performance year to the CEO and NEOs will be deductible as “performance-based” compensation.

 

Shares owned without restriction;
Unvested restricted stock;
Unvested stock-settled RSUs;
Shares acquired through the Associate Stock Purchase Plan; and
Shares owned through Capital One’s 401(k) Plan.

The Committee annually reviews the guidelines and monitors the named executive officers’ compliance with them. New executive officers are given two years from the date of promotion to or appointment as an executive officer to comply with these requirements. In the event that an executive officer is not in compliance with these requirements, the Committee has the right to take action, including reducing the executive officer’s compensation. The named executive officers are currently in compliance with this requirement.CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

In addition, beginning in January 2011, the Company implemented stock retention requirements for certain equity awards made to the named executive officers. For equity awards granted in January 2015, throughout each executive’s term of employment with Capital One, and for all shares that are acquired during the one-year period following termination of employment, each executive must hold 50% of the after-tax net shares acquired under performance share and stock-settled RSU awards for one year. These stock ownership and retention requirements apply to all of our executive officers.

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

Prohibition of Hedging and Speculative Trading Activities  67

All of Capital One’s executive officers are prohibited from engaging in short sales, hedging transactions or speculative trading in derivative securities of Capital One stock and from using their Capital One stock in a margin account or pledging Capital One stock as collateral for a loan.


Section VI – Named Executive Officer Compensation

The Summary Compensation Table below provides information about compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 for the named executive officers. As discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 40, our executive compensation program is heavily weighted towards equity-based andat-risk elements of compensation. Under SEC rules, equity-based compensation is reported below in the year in which it is awarded, which may not correlate to the year for which it is paid.

With respect to the compensation reported below for our Chief Executive Officer:

Equity Grant Practices

Capital One strives to maintain equity grant practices that demonstrate high standards of corporate governance. Annual incentive awards are approved by the Committee and the independent directors (or by delegated authority to the Chief Human Resources Officer for certain employees who are not executive officers) at regularly scheduled meetings in the first quarter of each year. The date of grant is the actual date on which the Committee approves the awards. The Committee may grant awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options or other equity awards outside of the annual incentive cycle. The Committee has delegated

authority to the CEO to award restricted stock and to the Chief Human Resources Officer to award stock-settled and cash-settled RSUs (but not options or other equity awards) to employees who are not executive officers, subject to a maximum amount of $2 million for any employee in any one year. These awards are designed to be used for new hires and for special programs designed by management to incentivize and reward current employees of the Company. The Committee reviews all grants made by delegation at least once per year.

With respect to awards of stock options, the exercise price is always the Fair Market Value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Under the terms of our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, “Fair Market Value” is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

The Company does not seek to time equity grants to take advantage of material non-public information and in no event is the grant date set to a date that is prior to the date of approval.

Tax Considerations

The Committee carefully considers the tax impacts of its compensation programs on the Company, as well as on its executives. To maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers, the Committee does not require all compensation to be paid or awarded in a tax-deductible manner. However, it is the Committee’s intent to maximize tax deductibility to the extent reasonable, provided the Company’s programs remain consistent with the Company’s overall executive compensation objectives.

With respect to the named executive officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer), Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the federal tax deduction for compensation paid to the executive to $1 million. Amounts in excess of $1 million are also eligible for the deduction if the compensation qualifies as “performance-based.” The Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan provides for the establishment of specific performance thresholds to be tied to equity-based awards that may allow these awards to qualify as “performance-based” for the purposes of 162(m).

The Company expects that the award of stock options and performance shares to the CEO and NEOs in 2014 will be deductible as “performance-based” compensation. The vesting of restricted stock units granted to the CEO and stock-settled RSUs granted to the NEOs in January 2014 is contingent upon the achievement of performance-based vesting conditions. Specifically, the CEO and NEOs would receive these awards as long as the Company achieves a Core Earnings ROA of better than or equal to negative two percent (-2%) for the applicable fiscal year. As further described in “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions – Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” beginning on page 44, additional vesting conditions also apply that could further limit the vesting of these awards.

For purposes of the above performance metric, Core Earnings ROA means the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (A) the Company’s Core Earnings for the 2014 fiscal year to (B) the Company’s average total assets for the period. Core Earnings has the same meaning as described earlier under “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions – Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” beginning on page 44.

In February 2014, the Committee and the independent directors established a performance threshold that the Company had to meet in order for the following awards to executive officers of the Company, including the named executive officers, for the 2014 performance year to be granted: performance share awards, RSUs (other than the RSUs representing a portion of base salary) and the deferred cash bonus to the CEO. Under the threshold, the CEO and NEOs would receive these awards only if the Company achieved positive Core Earnings ROA from Continuing Operations for the 2014 fiscal year. For purposes of this performance metric, Core Earnings ROA from Continuing Operations means the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (A) the Company’s Core Earnings from Continuing Operations for the 2014 fiscal year to (B) the Company’s average total assets for the period. Core Earnings from Continuing Operations means the Company’s net income from continuing operations, excluding, on a tax-adjusted basis, the impact of (i) impairment or amortization of intangible assets, (ii) the build or release of the allowance for loan and lease losses, calculated as the difference between the provision for loan and lease losses and charge-offs, net of recoveries, and (iii) the change in the combined uncollectible finance charge and fee reserve.

The Company’s Core Earnings ROA from Continuing Operations for fiscal year 2014 was positive. Therefore, the Company expects the awards made in January 2015 to be tax-deductible as “performance-based” compensation.

SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The Summary Compensation Table below provides information concerning compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 for the named executive officers.

As discussed under “Chief Executive Officer Compensation” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 35, 78%
84% of the CEO’s total compensation is equity-based andat-risk to the performance of the Company’s stock price, with 100% of his compensation deferred for a three-year period.

Amounts shown in the table below for the CEO for 20142016 represent stock options, performance shares, and stock-settled RSUs granted in January 2014February 2016 and a deferred cash bonus awarded in January 2015February 2017 for 20142016 performance. The CEO also was granted cash-settled RSUs in January 2015February 2017 for the 20142016 performance year, which are not shown in the table below.

Amounts shown in the “Stock Awards” column for 20142016 also include cash-settled RSUs granted to the CEO in January 2014February 2016 for the 20132015 performance year.

With respect to the compensation reported below for the NEOs other than the CEO:

As discussed under “NEO Compensation” beginning on page 40, under the NEOs’ 2014 compensation program, base
Base salary comprised approximatelybetween 35% and 45% of NEO total target compensation.

Each NEO other than the CEO received a portion of his or her 20142016 base salary in cash that was paid throughout the year and a portion in cash-settled RSUs that were granted in January 2014February 2016 and settled in cash in February 2015.2017. These cash-settled RSUs are included in the table below in the “Stock Awards” column for 2014. For the NEOs, amounts2016.

Amounts shown for 20142016 in the table below also include stock options, performance shares, stock-settled RSUs, and cash-settled RSUs granted in January 2014February 2016 for the 20132015 performance year. The NEOs other than the CEO also were granted equity awards in January 2015February 2017 for the 20142016 performance year, which are not shown in the table below. The NEOs were not eligible for cash bonuses for 2014.

2016.

Amounts paid to the CEO and the other NEOs in 2016 for other compensation and benefit programs are listed under the “Change in Pension Value andNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” and “All Other Compensation” columns. The details of these program amounts are provided in the footnotes.

68  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The footnotes to the table below provide additional explanation regarding compensation attributable to each performance year. Further information on the timing of awards under the 2016 compensation programs for the CEO and the other NEOs can be found under “CEO Compensation Components” and “NEO Compensation Components” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on pages 45 and 54, respectively.

  2016 Summary Compensation Table

  Name and Principal

  Position

   Year   Salary(6)   Bonus(7)   

Stock

Awards(8)

   

Option

Awards (9)

   

Change in

Pension Value

and Non-

Qualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings (10)

   

All Other

Compensation  (11)

   Total

Richard D. Fairbank

Chair, CEO and
President(1)

  2016  $0  $2,677,500  $12,285,042  $1,750,003  $3,407  $205,185  $16,921,137
  2015  $0  $2,677,500  $13,440,028  $1,750,000  $3,357  $144,289  $18,015,174
  2014  $0  $4,410,000  $13,343,815  $1,750,000  $3,195  $129,464  $19,636,474

R. Scott Blackley

Chief Financial Officer(2)(3)

  2016  $617,769  $0  $2,597,024  $0    $132,046  $3,346,839
                
                        

Stephen S. Crawford

Former CFO,
Head of Finance and
Corporate Development (2)(4)

  2016  $1,592,692  $0  $5,463,891  $861,334    $280,676  $8,198,593
  2015  $1,549,462  $0  $6,039,153  $916,676    $272,031  $8,777,322
  2014  $1,526,538  $0  $5,376,001  $755,714    $282,002  $7,940,255

John G. Finneran, Jr.

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary(2)

  2016  $1,016,538  $0  $3,487,369  $494,803  $778  $219,255  $5,218,743
  2015  $988,500  $0  $3,661,947  $478,405  $785  $199,231  $5,328,868
  2014  $974,692  $0  $3,708,724  $478,413  $842  $200,481  $5,363,152

Frank G. LaPrade, III
Chief Enterprise Services Officer(2)

  2016  $974,577  $0  $3,329,446  $530,369    $193,202  $5,027,594
                
                        

Sanjiv Yajnik
President, Financial Services (2)

  2016  $962,654  $0  $3,300,705  $468,416    $203,132  $4,934,907
  2015  $934,462  $0  $3,439,765  $448,606    $219,681  $5,042,514
  2014  $912,923  $0  $3,477,040  $448,616    $191,306  $5,029,885

Ryan M. Schneider
Former President, Card(2)(5)

  2016  $1,211,462  $0  $4,408,204  $731,408    $229,563  $6,580,637
  2015  $1,142,885  $0  $4,534,930  $700,744    $227,635  $6,606,194
  2014  $1,116,462  $0  $4,251,285  $609,345    $212,210  $6,189,302

(1)Mr. Fairbank’s compensation for 2016 consisted of stock options, performance shares, stock-settled RSUs, and ayear-end incentive opportunity (payable in deferred cash bonus and cash-settled RSUs), in addition to certain perquisites. Mr. Fairbank received a portion of his total compensation for 2016 in February 2016 (stock options, performance shares, and stock-settled RSUs), which is reflected in the table above for 2016. Mr. Fairbank received the remainder of his compensation for 2016 in February 2017 (theyear-end incentive opportunity delivered partially in cash-settled RSUs and the NEOsremainder in 2014 for other compensation and benefit programs are listed underdeferred cash bonus). The portion of the “Changeyear-end incentive opportunity delivered as deferred cash bonus to Mr. Fairbank in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” and “All Other Compensation” columns. The details of these program amounts are providedFebruary 2017 is included in the footnotes.

Please seetable above, while the footnotes toportion delivered as cash-settled RSUs is not. His compensation for 2015 included cash-settled RSUs granted in February 2016 (a portion of his 2015year-end incentive opportunity), which are included in the table belowabove for an additional explanation regarding compensation attributable to each performance year. Further information on the timing of awards under the 2014 compensation programs for the CEO and the NEOs can be found under “Compensation Components”2016. See “CEO Compensation by Performance Year” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 34.

 2014 Summary51 for more information on how the Compensation Table

Committee views compensation actions and to which year the compensation awards relate.

 

Name and Principal
Position
 Year Salary (3)Bonus (4)Stock
Awards (5)
Option
Awards (6)

Change in
Pension Value and

Non-Qualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings (7)

All Other

Compensation (8)

Total
Richard D. Fairbank(1)
Chairman, CEO and
President
2014$0$4,410,000$13,343,815$1,750,000$3,195$99,464$19,606,474
2013$0$2,843,750$10,937,569$4,375,012$2,177$136,017$18,294,525
2012$0$2,187,500$15,950,051$4,375,009$3,550$89,264$22,605,374
Stephen S. Crawford(2)
Chief Financial Officer
2014$1,526,538$0$5,376,001$755,714$277,002$7,935,255
2013$1,326,923$0$10,832,068$0$223,225$12,382,216
Ryan M. Schneider(2)
President, Card
2014$1,116,462$0$4,251,285$609,345$207,210$6,184,302
2013$1,093,308$0$3,405,670$473,342$204,084$5,176,404
2012$1,032,394$0$4,235,215$591,559$204,151$6,063,319
John G. Finneran, Jr.(2)
General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
2014$974,692$0$3,708,724$478,413$842$195,481$5,358,152
2013$953,769$0$3,342,536$464,511$293$203,963$4,965,072
2012$907,760$0$3,989,126$518,657$1,113$198,199$5,614,855
Sanjiv Yajnik(2)
President, Financial
Services
2014$912,923$0$3,477,040$448,616$186,306$5,024,885

(1)Mr. Fairbank’s compensation for 2014 consisted of stock options, performance shares, stock-settled RSUs, and a year-end incentive opportunity (payable in deferred cash bonus and cash-settled RSUs), in addition to certain perquisites. Mr. Fairbank received a portion of his total compensation for 2014 in January 2014 (stock options, performance shares, and stock-settled RSUs), which is reflected in the table above for 2014. Mr. Fairbank received the rest of his compensation for 2014 in January 2015 (the year-end incentive opportunity delivered partially in cash-settled RSUs and the remainder in deferred cash bonus). The portion of the year-end incentive opportunity delivered as deferred cash bonus to Mr. Fairbank in January 2015 is included in the table above, while the portion delivered as cash-settled RSUs is not. His compensation for 2013 included cash-settled RSUs granted in January 2014 (a portion of his 2013 year-end incentive opportunity), which are included in the table above for 2014. See “CEO Compensation by Performance Year” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 39 for more information on how the Compensation Committee views compensation actions and to which year the compensation awards relate.

(2)NEO compensation for 2014 consisted of cash base salary, stock options, performance shares and three grants of RSUs (one representing a portion of base salary which settles in cash), in addition to certain perquisites. The cash-settled RSUs attributable to base salary are included in the table above for 2014, however the other equity-based awards for 2014 performance were granted in January 2015 and are not included in the table above. The stock options, performance shares, stock-settled RSUs and cash-settled RSUs granted in January 2014 for 2013 performance are included in the table above for 2014.
(2)For NEOs other than the CEO, compensation for 2016 consisted of cash base salary, stock options (other than Mr. Blackley), performance shares and three grants of RSUs (one representing a portion of base salary which settles in cash), in addition to certain perquisites. The cash-settled RSUs representing base salary are included in the table above for 2016, however the other equity-based awards for 2016 performance were granted in February 2017 and are not included in the table above. The stock options, performance shares, stock-settled RSUs and cash-settled RSUs granted in February 2016 for 2015 performance are included in the table above for 2016. See “NEO Compensation by Performance Year” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 43 for more information on how the Compensation Committee views compensation actions and to which year the compensation awards relate.

(3)The amounts shown in this column represent the cash portion of base salary for NEOs. The remaining portion of base salary for 2014 was delivered in cash-settled RSUs, as described under “Base Salaries” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 41, and is included in the “Stock Awards” column in the table above.

(4)The amount shown in this column reflects Mr. Fairbank’s deferred cash bonus for 2014 performance awarded in January 2015 as described under “Year-End Incentive Opportunity” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 38.

(5)

The amounts shown in this column for 2014 represent the grant date fair value of performance shares, stock-settled RSUs and cash-settled RSUs granted to the named executive officers in 2014, calculated in

accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of performance shares included in this column assumes a payout at the target performance level. For additional information, including performance share awards at target and maximum performance on a per executive basis, refer to footnote 3 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below.

(6)The amounts shown in this column for 2014 represent the grant date fair value of stock options granted to the named executive officers in 2014, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For information on the valuation assumptions of these awards, refer to footnote 3 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below.

(7)The amounts shown in this column represent the change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated pension benefits for Messrs. Fairbank and Finneran under the Cash Balance Pension Plan and the Excess Cash Balance Plan. The interest crediting rate for the Cash Balance Pension Plan changes annually based on the average yield of 5-year Treasury Securities for the preceding 12 months. For the Excess Cash Balance Plan, the interest crediting rate changes monthly based on the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate.

(8)All other compensation consists of the following on a per executive basis:

Named Executive
Officer
Auto
(a)
Travel
and
Aircraft

Health

Screening

Driver and
Security
Company
Contributions to
Defined Contribution
Plans (b)
Insurance
(c)
    Other    
(d)

Richard D. Fairbank

$645$0$1,655$79,596 (e)$0$16,740$828
        

Stephen S. Crawford

$31,124$0$0$0$237,600$7,450$828
        

Ryan M. Schneider

$18,745$0$3,636$3,314 (f)$176,750$4,650$115
        

John G. Finneran, Jr.

$16,210$0$1,900$4,589 (f)$155,850$16,740$192
        

Sanjiv Yajnik

$16,999$0$3,211$5,204 (f)$146,820$12,480$1,592

(a)Represents the value attributable to personal use of Company-provided automobile benefits. The cost of automobile benefits is determined on an annual basis and includes, as applicable, annual car lease, automobile service fees, and other related miscellaneous expenses (such as fuel and maintenance).

(b)Represents Company contributions under qualified and non-qualified deferred compensation programs and other supplemental executive retirement benefits.

(c)Represents life insurance premiums paid on behalf of the executives.

(d)Represents incidental expenses incurred in connection with corporate events.

(e)Includes cost attributable to personal use of a driver who also provides for Mr. Fairbank’s personal security ($70,752) and aggregate cost to the Company for home security services ($8,844) for Mr. Fairbank. The percent of personal use of the automobile is tracked throughout the calendar year and then applied to the full expense amount for personal security.

(f)Includes aggregate cost to the Company for home security services.

 2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The Grants of Plan-Based Awards table provides details on equity incentive plan awards granted in 2014 including stock options, performance shares, cash-settled RSUs and stock-settled RSUs.

The columns reporting “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards,” “All Other Stock Awards” and “All Other Option Awards” relate to Capital One’s equity-based incentive awards to the named executive officers.

For the CEO in 2014, the awards are comprised of stock options, performance shares, and stock-settled RSUs granted in January 2014 as part of the CEO’s 2014 compensation program and cash-settled RSUs granted in January 2014 for 2013 performance.

The stock options become exercisable on February 15, 2017 and expire in ten years.
The performance shares will be issued based on the Company’s Adjusted ROA over the three-year period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016, relative to the KBW Bank Sector index, excluding custody banks. The total value delivered at vesting will be reduced if for any of the years in the three-year performance period the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROA, regardless of how well the Company compares to its peers in the KBW Bank Sector index over the performance period. See “2014 CEO Compensation Decisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 3659 for more detailsinformation on how the performance share awards. Dividend equivalents are accrued onCompensation Committee views compensation actions and to which year the performance sharescompensation awards relate.

(3)Mr. Blackley was appointed to the position of Chief Financial Officer in May 2016. As a result, his 2016 compensation reflects the position he held at the same timebeginning of 2016: Executive Vice President and Controller of the Company. See below for more information regarding Mr. Blackley’s 2016 compensation. Beginning with performance year 2017, Mr. Blackley’s compensation program is consistent with the othernon-CEO named executive officers.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  69


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

(4)Mr. Crawford served as dividends are paid out to the Company’s other stockholdersChief Financial Officer from May 2013 until May 2016, when he became Head of Finance and are paid outBusiness Development.

(5)In November 2016, Mr. Schneider ceased to be an executive officer of the Company. He served as additional shares only onPresident, Card, from December 2007 to November 2016.

(6)The amounts shown in this column represent the performance shares that actually vest based oncash portion of base salary for the results certified by the Compensation Committee.
NEOs. The remaining portion of base salary for 2016 was delivered in cash-settled RSUs, and stock-settled RSUs vest in full on February 15, 2017. The cash-settled RSUs settle in cash based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 15 trading days preceding the vesting date. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the cash-settled and stock-settled RSUs at the same time as dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholders and are paid at the time of vesting, adjusted for performance-based vesting results.

For the NEOs in 2014, the awards are comprised of stock options, performance shares, cash-settled RSUs, and stock-settled RSUs granted in January 2014 for the 2013 performance year and cash-settled RSUs granted in January 2014 as a portion of 2014 base salary (as described under “Base Salaries” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 41).

57, and is included in the “Stock Awards” column in the table above.

 

(7)The stock options become exercisableamount shown in three equal annual installments, beginning onthis column for 2016 reflects Mr. Fairbank’s deferred cash bonus for 2016 performance awarded in February 15 of the year after the date of grant, and expire in ten years.
The terms of the performance shares for the NEOs are substantially the same2017 as the terms of the CEO’s performance shares described above. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the performance shares at the same time as dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholders and are paid out as additional shares only on the performance shares that actually vest based on the results certified by the Compensation Committee.
The stock-settled RSUs vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 15 of the year after the date of grant. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the stock-settled RSUs at the same time as dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholders and are paid at the time of vesting, adjusted for performance-based vesting results.
The cash-settled RSUs representing a portion of base salary vested in full on January 1, 2015 and settled in cash on February 15, 2015 (the “Payment Date”) based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 15 trading days preceding the payment date. The other cash-settled RSUs vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 15 of the year after the date of grant and settle in cash based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 15 trading days preceding the vesting date. Dividend equivalents are paid on the cash-settled RSUs at the same rate and at approximately the same time as dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholders.

Each award of stock-settled RSUs (as well as cash-settled RSUs for the CEO) and stock options reported below is also subject to performance-based vesting provisions tied to core earnings that will reduce the total number of shares delivered at vesting if the Company does not achieve certain performance thresholds during the three-year vesting period. See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions”under“Year-End Incentive Opportunity” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 4448.

(8)The amounts shown in this column for more details2016 represent the grant date fair value of performance shares, stock-settled RSUs and cash-settled RSUs granted to the named executive officers in 2016, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of performance shares included in this column assumes a payout at the target performance level. For additional information, including performance share awards at maximum performance on a per executive basis, refer to footnote 3 to the performance-based vesting provisions.

 2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

below.

 

Name and Principal
Position
 Award Type Date of
Grant (1)
 

Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards

 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
 Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards (2)
($/Sh)
 Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
and Option
Awards (3)
   

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

    

Richard D. Fairbank

Chairman, CEO and President

 

Performance Shares (3)

 1/30/2014 123,309 184,964    $8,750,007
 Stock Options 1/30/2014    108,944 $70.96 $1,750,000
 Cash-Settled RSUs (4) 1/30/2014   40,076   $2,843,793
 Stock-Settled RSUs (5) 1/30/2014   24,662   $1,750,016
                 

Stephen S. Crawford

Chief Financial Officer

 

Performance Shares(3)

 1/30/2014 14,378 21,567    $1,020,263
 

Stock Options

 1/30/2014    47,046 $70.96 $755,714
 

Cash-Settled RSUs

 1/30/2014   21,566   $1,530,323
 Cash-Settled RSUs (6) 1/30/2014   15,855   $1,125,071
 

Stock-Settled RSUs

 1/30/2014   23,962   $1,700,344
                 
Ryan M. Schneider
President, Card
 

Performance Shares(3)

 1/30/2014 11,593 17,390    $822,639
 

Stock Options

 1/30/2014    37,934 $70.96 $609,345
 Cash-Settled RSUs 1/30/2014   17,398   $1,234,562
 

Cash-Settled RSUs(6)

 1/30/2014   11,599   $823,065
 

Stock-Settled RSUs

 1/30/2014   19,321   $1,371,018
                 

John G. Finneran, Jr.

General Counsel and

Corporate Secretary

 

Performance Shares(3)

 1/30/2014 10,113 15,170    $717,618
 Stock Options 1/30/2014    29,783 $70.96 $478,413
 Cash-Settled RSUs 1/30/2014   15,178   $1,077,031
 Cash-Settled RSUs(6) 1/30/2014   10,119   $718,044
 

Stock-Settled RSUs

 1/30/2014   16,855   $1,196,031
                 

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial

Services

 

Performance Shares(3)

 1/30/2014 9,483 14,225    $672,914
 Stock Options 1/30/2014    27,928 $70.96 $448,616
 Cash-Settled RSUs 1/30/2014   14,227   $1,009,548
 Cash-Settled RSUs(6) 1/30/2014   9,485   $673,056
 

Stock-Settled RSUs

 1/30/2014   15,805   $1,121,523

(1)Date on which awards were approved by the Compensation Committee and independent directors and granted to the individuals.
(9)The amounts shown in this column for 2016 represent the grant date fair value of stock options granted to the named executive officers in 2016, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For information on the valuation assumptions of these awards, refer to footnote 4 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below.

(10)The amounts shown in this column represent the change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated pension benefits for Messrs. Fairbank and Finneran under the Cash Balance Pension Plan and the Excess Cash Balance Plan. The interest crediting rate for the Cash Balance Pension Plan changes annually based on the average yield of5-year Treasury Securities for the preceding 12 months. For the Excess Cash Balance Plan, the interest crediting rate changes monthly based on the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate. Earnings under the VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan were not above-market and therefore are not reported above.

(11)All other compensation consists of the following on a per executive basis:

 

(2)Equal to the fair market value of a share of Capital One’s common stock on the date of grant determined on the basis of the closing price as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape.

  Named Executive

  Officer

   Auto (a)   

Travel

and

Aircraft

   

Health

Screening

   

Driver and

Security

   

Company

Contributions to

Defined Contribution

Plans(b)

   Insurance (c)   Other (d)

Richard D. Fairbank

  $—  $—  $1,654  $153,465(e)  $—  $19,320  $30,746

R. Scott Blackley

  $22,756  $—  $—  $—  $100,638  $3,652  $5,000

Stephen S. Crawford

  $15,955  $—  $—  $—  $251,595  $7,080  $6,046

John G. Finneran, Jr.

  $17,107  $—  $1,900  $10,987(f)  $164,895  $19,320  $5,046

Frank G. LaPrade, III

  $19,557  $—  $—  $6,908(f)  $159,315  $5,855  $1,567

Sanjiv Yajnik

  $25,772  $—  $3,106  $265(f)  $156,705  $11,280  $6,004

Ryan M. Schneider

  $20,810  $—  $3,537  $265(f)  $194,925  $4,980  $5,046

(a)Represents the value attributable to personal use of Company-provided automobile benefits. The cost of automobile benefits is determined on an annual basis and includes, as applicable, annual car lease, automobile service fees, and other related miscellaneous expenses (such as fuel and maintenance). Mr. Fairbank does not participate in the Company-provided automotive benefit.

(b)Represents Company contributions under qualified andnon-qualified deferred compensation programs and other supplemental executive retirement benefits.

(c)Represents life insurance premiums paid on behalf of the executives.

(d)Represents contributions made by Capital One to charitable organizations chosen by CEO (up to $30,000) and the other NEOs (up to $5,000), incidental expenses incurred in connection with corporate events. Additionally for Mr. Crawford, the total value includes a cash amount paid to him in connection with entering into an Amended and RestatedNon-Competition Agreement with the Company in May 2016. For additional details regarding Mr. Crawford’s Amended and RestatedNon-Competition Agreement, see “Non-Competition Agreements” beginning on page 80.

(e)Represents costs attributable to personal use of a driver who operates Mr. Fairbank’s personal vehicle and also provides for Mr. Fairbank’s personal security ($76,529). Amount shown also includes aggregate cost to the Company for home security services ($76,936) for Mr. Fairbank. The percent of personal use of the driver’s services is tracked throughout the calendar year and then applied to the full expense amount for personal security.

(f)Represents aggregate cost to the Company for home security services provided to executives.

 

(3)The grant date fair value for each option awarded on January 30, 2014, was calculated using the Black-Scholes method and was based on the following assumptions:

  2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The Grants of Plan-Based Awards table provides details on equity incentive plan awards granted in 2016 including stock options, performance shares, cash-settled RSUs and stock-settled RSUs.

The columns reporting “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards,” “All Other Stock Awards” and “All Other Option Awards” relate to Capital One’s equity-based incentive awards to the named executive officers.

70  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

2016 Grants to CEO

For 2016, awards granted to the CEO are comprised of stock options, performance shares, and stock-settled RSUs granted in February 2016 as part of the CEO’s 2016 compensation program and cash-settled RSUs granted in February 2016 for 2015 performance.

Stock Options. The stock options become exercisable on February 15, 2019 and expire in ten years from the grant date.

Performance Shares.The performance shares will be issued based on the Company’s Adjusted ROA over the three-year period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018, relative to the KBW Bank Sector index, excluding custody banks. The total value delivered at vesting will be reduced if for any of the years in the three-year performance period the Company does not achieve positive Adjusted ROA, regardless of how well the Company compares to its peers in the KBW Bank Sector index over the performance period. See “2016 CEO Compensation Program” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 46 for more details on the performance share awards. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the performance shares at the same time as dividends are paid out to the Company’s other stockholders and are paid out as additional shares only on the performance shares that actually vest based on the results certified by the Compensation Committee.

Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units.The cash-settled RSUs and stock-settled RSUs vest in full on February 15, 2019. The cash-settled RSUs settle in cash based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 15 trading days preceding the vesting date. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the cash-settled and stock-settled RSUs at the same time as dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholders and are paid at the time of vesting, adjusted for performance-based vesting results.

2016 Grants to NEOs (other than the CEO)

For 2016, the awards granted to NEOs other than the CEO are comprised of stock options, performance shares, cash-settled RSUs, and stock-settled RSUs granted in January 2016 for the 2015 performance year and cash-settled RSUs granted in January 2016 as a portion of 2016 base salary (as described under “Base Salaries” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 57). Due to hismid-year promotion, Mr. Blackley did not receive stock options in 2016.

Stock Options. The stock options become exercisable in three equal annual installments, beginning on February 15 of the year after the date of grant, and expire in ten years from the grant date.

Performance Shares.The terms of the performance shares for the other NEOs are substantially the same as the terms of the CEO’s performance shares described above. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the performance shares at the same time as dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholders and are paid out as additional shares only on the performance shares that actually vest based on the results certified by the Compensation Committee.

Stock-Settled Restricted Stock Units.The stock-settled RSUs (excluding Mr. Blackley’s promotional award) vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 15 of the year after the date of grant. Mr. Blackley’s promotional award vests in four equal annual installments beginning one year after the date of grant. Dividend equivalents are accrued on the stock-settled RSUs at the same time as dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholders and are paid at the time of vesting, adjusted for performance-based vesting results.

Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units.The cash-settled RSUs representing a portion of base salary vested in full on January 1, 2017 and settled in cash on February 15, 2017 (“Payment Date”) based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 15 trading days preceding the payment date. The other cash-settled RSUs vest in three equal annual installments beginning on February 15 of the year after the date of grant and settle in cash based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 15 trading days preceding the vesting date. Dividend equivalents are paid on the cash-settled RSUs at the same rate and at approximately the same time as dividends are paid to the Company’s other stockholders.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  71


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The annual awards of stock-settled RSUs (as well as cash-settled RSUs for the CEO) and stock options reported below are also subject to performance-based vesting provisions that are associated with Core Earnings. As a result, the total number of shares delivered at vesting will be reduced if the Company does not achieve certain performance thresholds during the three-year vesting period. See “Additional Performance Conditions and Recovery Provisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 60 for more details on the performance-based vesting provisions.

  2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

  Name and Principal

  Position

   Award Type   Date of
Grant(1)
   Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
   All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
   

Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards (2)

($/Sh)

   Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
         Target   Maximum            

Richard D. Fairbank
Chair, CEO and President

  Performance Shares (3)  2/4/2016  137,298  205,947        $8,750,002
  Stock Options(4)  2/4/2016        106,973  $63.73  $1,750,003
  Cash-Settled RSUs(5)  2/4/2016      28,009      $1,785,014
  Stock-Settled RSUs(6)  2/4/2016      27,460      $1,750,026

R. Scott Blackley

Chief Financial Officer

  Performance Shares (3)  2/4/2016  3,423  5,135        $218,148
  Cash-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      4,934      $314,444
  Cash-Settled RSUs(7)  2/4/2016      6,434      $410,039
  Stock-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      10,268      $654,380
  Stock-Settled RSUs(8)  5/9/2016      14,368      $1,000,013

Stephen S. Crawford

Former CFO,

Head of Finance and Corporate Development

  Performance Shares (3)  2/4/2016  18,246  27,369        $1,162,818
  Stock Options(4)  2/4/2016        52,651  $63.73  $861,334
  Cash-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      18,265      $1,164,028
  Cash-Settled RSUs(7)  2/4/2016      18,814      $1,199,016
  Stock-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      30,410      $1,938,029

John G. Finneran, Jr.

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

  Performance Shares (3)  2/4/2016  11,647  17,471        $742,263
  Stock Options(4)  2/4/2016        30,246  $63.73  $494,803
  Cash-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      11,659      $743,028
  Cash-Settled RSUs(7)  2/4/2016      12,004      $765,015
  Stock-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      19,411      $1,237,063

Frank G. LaPrade, III
Chief Enterprise
Services Officer

  Performance Shares (3)  2/4/2016  11,235  16,853        $716,007
  Stock Options(4)  2/4/2016        32,420  $63.73  $530,369
  Cash-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      10,718      $683,058
  Cash-Settled RSUs(7)  2/4/2016      11,565      $737,037
  Stock-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      18,725      $1,193,344

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial
Services

  Performance Shares (3)  2/4/2016  11,025  16,538        $702,623
  Stock Options(4)  2/4/2016        28,633  $63.73  $468,416
  Cash-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      11,031      $703,006
  Cash-Settled RSUs(7)  2/4/2016      11,361      $724,037
  Stock-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      18,375      $1,171,039

Ryan M. Schneider

Former President,
Card

  Performance Shares (3)  2/4/2016  15,494  23,241        $987,433
  Stock Options(4)  2/4/2016        44,709  $63.73  $731,408
  Cash-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      13,495      $860,036
  Cash-Settled RSUs(7)  2/4/2016      14,358      $915,035
  Stock-Settled RSUs  2/4/2016      25,823      $1,645,700

(1)Date on which awards were approved by the Compensation Committee and independent directors and granted to the executives.

 

   
Volatility  Risk-Free Interest Rate  Dividend Yield  Expected Life

25.53%

  1.92%  1.74%  6.1 Years
(2)Equal to the fair market value of a share of Capital One’s common stock on the date of grant determined on the basis of the closing price as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape.

72  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

(3)The grant date fair values for the performance shares if the maximum level of performance is achieved are as follows: $13,125,010$13,125,002 for Mr. Fairbank, $1,530,394$327,254 for Mr. Blackley, $1,744,226 for Mr. Crawford, $1,233,959 for Mr. Schneider, $1,076,428$1,113,427 for Mr. Finneran, and $1,009,371$1,074,042 for Mr. Yajnik.LaPrade, $1,053,967 for Mr. Yajnik, and $1,481,149 for Mr. Schneider.

(4)Grant of cash-settled RSUs representing a portion of Mr. Fairbank’s 2013
(4)The grant date fair value for each option awarded on February 4, 2016, was calculated using the Black-Scholes method and was based on the following assumptions: (i) volatility of 30.00%; (ii) risk-free interest rate of 1.64%; (iii) dividend yield of 2.07% and (iv) expected life of 6.6 years.

(5)Grant of cash-settled RSUs representing a portion of Mr. Fairbank’s 2015year-end incentive opportunity.

(6)Grant of stock-settled RSUs representing 10% of the CEO’s 2016 total target compensation.

(7)Grant of cash-settled RSUs representing a portion of base salary for 2016.

(8)One-time grant of stock-settled RSUs awarded in connection with Mr. Blackley’s promotion to Chief Financial Officer in May 2016.

 

(5)Grant of stock-settled RSUs representing 10% of the CEO’s 2014 total target compensation, introduced in 2014 to account for the reduction of the stock option component of the CEO’s total target compensation.

  2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

    Option Awards   Stock Awards
  Name & Principal Position   Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
   Value Realized on
Exercise(1)
   Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
   Value Realized on
Vesting(2)

Richard D. Fairbank

Chair, CEO and President

  1,143,238  $14,643,006  287,031  $19,428,031

R. Scott Blackley

Chief Financial Officer

  0  $0  12,899  $806,045

Stephen S. Crawford

Former CFO, Head of Finance and Corporate Development

  0  $0  121,100  $7,669,453

John G. Finneran, Jr.

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

  88,510  $359,351  61,480  $3,960,573

Frank G. LaPrade, III

Chief Enterprise Services Officer

  20,000  $241,008  53,120  $3,420,099

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial Services

  23,560  $320,044  57,724  $3,718,400

Ryan M. Schneider

Former President, Card

  0  $0  65,432  $4,198,333

(1)The value realized is thepre-tax value of the shares (market price less the exercise price) received.

(2)The value realized for awards other than certain cash-settled RSUs and performance shares is the number of shares multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the vesting date, as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape. For Mr. Crawford, the value includes shares that were withheld by the Company to satisfy the tax obligation associated with his signing of an Amended and RestatedNon-Competition Agreement. For additional information regarding Mr. Crawford’s Amended and RestatedNon-Competition Agreement, see “Non-Competition Agreements” beginning on page 80. For performance shares, the value also reflects the accrued dividends paid out as additional shares on the date the performance share award results are certified by the Compensation Committee. Except for cash-settled RSUs that were vested and released in connection with tax withholding on February 4, 2016, the value realized for all other cash-settled RSUs and amount paid is the number of shares multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 20 trading days preceding the vesting date for grants made prior to 2014 and 15 trading days preceding the vesting date for grants made in or after 2014, in accordance with the terms of the applicable awards. The value included in the table above that was realized from cash-settled RSUs was as follows: $2,502,222 for Mr. Fairbank, $316,821 for Mr. Blackley, $1,880,333 for Mr. Crawford, $1,503,592 for Mr. Finneran, $1,297,104 for Mr. LaPrade, $1,414,747 for Mr. Yajnik, and $1,731,173 for Mr. Schneider.

 

(6)Grant of cash-settled RSUs representing a portion of base salary for 2014.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

 2014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

 

  Option AwardsStock Awards

Name & Principal Position

 

Number of Shares
   Acquired on Exercise    

Value Realized

   on Exercise (1)    

Number of Shares
   Acquired on Vesting    
Value Realized on
Vesting (2)

Richard D. Fairbank

Chairman, CEO and President

566,000$163,785303,979$22,912,886

Stephen S. Crawford

Chief Financial Officer

0$035,571$2,446,166

Ryan M. Schneider

President, Card

72,683$2,596,74165,192$4,757,336

John G. Finneran, Jr.

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

0$057,136$4,176,124

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial Services

7,630$28,69651,805$3,782,929

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

 

(1)The value realized is the pre-tax value of the shares (market price less the exercise price) received.  73


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

 

(2)The value realized for awards other than certain cash-settled RSUs and performance shares is the number of shares multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the vesting date, as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape. For performance shares, the value also reflects the accrued dividends paid out as additional shares on the date the performance share award results are certified by the Compensation Committee. Except for cash-settled RSUs that were vested and released in connection with tax withholding on January 30, 2014, the value realized for all other cash-settled RSUs and amount paid is the number of shares multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 15 trading days preceding the vesting date, in accordance with the terms of the applicable awards. The value included in the table above that was realized from cash-settled RSUs was as follows: $10,186,459 for Mr. Fairbank, $54,710 for Mr. Crawford, $1,710,848 for Mr. Schneider, $1,607,667 for Mr. Finneran, and $1,424,777 for Mr. Yajnik.

 2014 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal

  2016 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End Table

    Option Awards(1)    Stock Awards
  Name and Principal
  Position
   Grant Date   

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

   

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

   

Option

Exercise

Price(2)

   

Option

Expiration

Date

   

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested

   

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested(3)

   

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units, or

Other

Rights that

Have Not

Vested

   

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units,

or Other Rights

that Have Not

Vested(3)

Richard D. Fairbank Chair, CEO and President

  12/10/2007  1,113,393(4)  0  $50.99  12/09/2017        
  01/29/2009  970,403(4)  0  $18.28  01/28/2019        
  01/27/2010  559,333(4)  0  $36.55  01/26/2020        
  01/26/2011  608,366(4)  0  $48.28  01/25/2021        
  01/31/2012  360,009(4)  0  $45.75  01/30/2022        
  01/31/2013  325,985(4)  0  $56.32  01/30/2023        
  01/30/2014  0  108,944(5)  $70.96  01/29/2024        
  01/30/2014              184,964(7)  $16,136,259
  01/30/2014          38,935(6)  $3,396,689    
  01/30/2014          24,103(6)  $2,102,746    
  01/29/2015  0  115,812(5)  $74.96  01/28/2025        
  01/29/2015              175,094(8)  $15,275,201
  01/29/2015          38,777(6)  $3,382,905    
  01/29/2015          23,081(6)  $2,013,586    
  02/04/2016  0  106,973(5)  $63.73  02/03/2026        
  02/04/2016              205,947(8)  $17,966,816
  02/04/2016          28,009(6)  $2,443,505    
  02/04/2016              27,460(6)  $2,395,610      

R. Scott Blackley

Chief Financial Officer

  01/30/2014          2,713(9)  $236,682    
  01/29/2015              3,798(8)  $331,338
  01/29/2015          5,063(9)  $441,696    
  01/29/2015          2,690(10)  $234,676    
  02/04/2016              5,135(8)  $447,977
  02/04/2016          10,268(9)  $895,780    
  02/04/2016          4,712(10)  $411,075    
  02/04/2016          6,434(11)  $561,302    
  05/09/2016              14,368(12)  $1,253,464      

Stephen S. Crawford Former CFO, Head of Finance and Corporate Development

  02/04/2013          30,523(14)  $2,662,827    
  01/30/2014  31,363(13)  15,683(13)  $70.96  01/29/2024        
  01/30/2014              21,567(7)  $1,881,505
  01/30/2014          7,987(9)  $696,786    
  01/30/2014          6,931(10)  $604,660    
  01/29/2015  20,221(13)  40,443(13)  $74.96  01/28/2025        
  01/29/2015              24,764(8)  $2,160,411
  01/29/2015          18,343(9)  $1,600,243    
  01/29/2015          13,513(10)  $1,178,874    
  02/04/2016  0  52,651(13)  $63.73  02/03/2026        
  02/04/2016              27,369(8)  $2,387,672
  02/04/2016          30,410(9)  $2,652,968    
  02/04/2016          17,419(10)  $1,519,634    
  02/04/2016              18,814(11)  $1,641,333      

 

 Option Awards (1), (2)Stock Awards (2)

 

Name and Principal

Position

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable

 

Option
Exercise
Price (3)

 

Option
Expiration
Date

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested (4)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of Unearned
Shares, Units, or
Other Rights that
Have Not Vested
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units, or Other
Rights that Have Not
Vested (4)

Richard D. Fairbank

Chairman, CEO and President

260,957 (6)$21,542,000813,219 (7)$67,131,228
573,000 (5)0$87.2812/19/2015
594,851 (5)0$76.4512/10/2016
1,661,780 (5)0$50.9912/09/2017
970,403 (5)0$18.281/28/2019
559,333 (5)0$36.551/26/2020
608,366 (5)0$48.281/25/2021
0360,009 (5)$45.751/30/2022
0325,985 (5)$56.321/30/2023
0108,944 (5)$70.961/29/2024
         

Stephen S. Crawford

Chief Financial Officer

199,812 (9)$16,494,48121,567 (7)$1,780,356
047,046 (8)$70.961/29/2024
         

Ryan M. Schneider

President, Card

89,924 (10)$7,423,22670,480 (7)$5,818,083
15,650 (8)0$78.713/14/2015
17,890 (8)0$88.813/2/2016
26,250 (8)0$76.793/1/2017
63,700 (8)0$48.952/20/2018
32,451 (8)16,227 (8)$45.751/30/2022
11,756 (8)23,513 (8)$56.321/30/2023
037,934 (8)$70.961/29/2024
         

John G. Finneran, Jr.

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

82,749 (10)$6,830,93068,867 (7)$5,684,930
57,760 (8)0$78.713/14/2015
63,650 (8)0$88.813/2/2016
88,510 (8)0$76.793/1/2017
149,890 (8)0$48.952/20/2018
56,624 (8)0$48.281/25/2021
28,452 (8)14,227 (8)$45.751/30/2022
11,536 (8)23,075 (8)$56.321/30/2023
029,783 (8)$70.961/29/2024
         

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial Services

76,997 (10)$6,356,10263,334 (7)$5,228,222
11,670 (8)0$88.813/2/2016
23,560 (8)0$76.793/1/2017
37,204 (8)0$48.281/25/2021
25,676 (8)12,839 (8)$45.751/30/2022
10,816 (8)21,634 (8)$56.321/30/2023
027,928 (8)$70.961/29/2024
74  

 

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


(1)Stock options granted generally have time-based vesting schedules, are exercisable upon vesting and vest earlier upon the optionee’s termination of employment for death, disability, or upon a change of control of Capital One. Certain stock options, as noted in the footnotes below, are also subject to performance-based vesting requirements. They are transferable only to or for the benefit of immediate family members. For the treatment of stock options after the optionee’s retirement, see “Payments upon Retirement” in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” section on page 67 for details.
SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

(2)The following table details vesting dates for all outstanding equity awards; the date listed as the vesting date for performance shares

    Option Awards(1)    Stock Awards
  Name and Principal
  Position
   Grant Date   

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

   

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

   

Option

Exercise

Price(2)

   

Option

Expiration

Date

   

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested

   

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested(3)

   

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units, or

Other

Rights that

Have Not

Vested

   

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units,

or Other Rights

that Have Not

Vested(3)

John G. Finneran, Jr. General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

  01/26/2011  56,624(4)  0  $48.28  01/25/2021        
  01/31/2012  42,679(4)  0  $45.75  01/30/2022        
  01/31/2013  34,611(4)  0  $56.32  01/30/2023        
  01/30/2014  19,855(13)  9,928(13)  $70.96  01/29/2024        
  01/30/2014              15,170(7)  $1,323,431
  01/30/2014          5,618(9)  $490,114    
  01/30/2014          4,879(10)  $425,644    
  01/29/2015  10,553(13)  21,107(13)  $74.96  01/28/2025        
  01/29/2015              14,361(8)  $1,252,854
  01/29/2015          10,637(9)  $927,972    
  01/29/2015          8,604(10)  $750,613    
  02/04/2016  0  30,246(13)  $63.73  02/03/2026        
  02/04/2016              17,471(8)  $1,524,170
  02/04/2016          19,411(9)  $1,693,416    
  02/04/2016          11,260(10)  $982,322    
  02/04/2016              12,004(11)  $1,047,229      

Frank G. LaPrade, III
Chief Enterprise Services Officer

  02/21/2008  45,810(4)  0  $48.95  02/20/2018        
  01/29/2009  30,647(4)  0  $18.28  01/28/2019        
  01/26/2011  18,666(4)  0  $48.28  01/25/2021        
  01/26/2011  15,460(4)  0  $48.28  01/25/2021        
  01/31/2012  31,178(4)  0  $45.75  01/30/2022        
  01/31/2013  32,603(4)  0  $56.32  01/30/2023        
  01/30/2014  19,975(13)  9,989(13)  $70.96  01/29/2024        
  01/30/2014              13,736(7)  $1,198,329
  01/30/2014          5,087(9)  $443,790    
  01/30/2014          4,022(10)  $350,879    
  01/29/2015  10,634(13)  21,269(13)  $74.96  01/28/2025        
  01/29/2015              13,023(8)  $1,136,127
  01/29/2015          9,646(9)  $841,517    
  01/29/2015          7,442(10)  $649,240    
  02/04/2016  0  32,420(13)  $63.73  02/03/2026        
  02/04/2016              16,853(8)  $1,470,256
  02/04/2016          18,725(9)  $1,633,569    
  02/04/2016 ��        10,341(10)  $902,149    
  02/04/2016              11,565(11)  $1,008,931      

Sanjiv Yajnik President, Financial Services

  01/26/2011  37,204(4)  0  $48.28  01/25/2021        
  01/31/2012  38,515(4)  0  $45.75  01/30/2022        
  01/31/2013  32,450(4)  0  $56.32  01/30/2023        
  01/30/2014  18,618(13)  9,310(13)  $70.96  01/29/2024        
  01/30/2014              14,225(7)  $1,240,989
  01/30/2014          5,268(9)  $459,580    
  01/30/2014          4,593(10)  $400,693    
  01/29/2015  9,895(13)  19,793(13)  $74.96  01/28/2025        
  01/29/2015              13,466(8)  $1,174,774
  01/29/2015          9,974(9)  $870,132    

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  75


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

    Option Awards(1)    Stock Awards
  Name and Principal
  Position
   Grant Date   

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

   

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

   

Option

Exercise

Price(2)

   

Option

Expiration

Date

   

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested

   

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested(3)

   

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units, or

Other

Rights that

Have Not

Vested

   

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units,

or Other Rights

that Have Not

Vested(3)

  01/29/2015          8,097(10)  $706,382    
  02/04/2016  0  28,633(13)  $63.73  02/03/2026        
  02/04/2016              16,538(8)  $1,442,775
  02/04/2016          18,375(9)  $1,603,035    
  02/04/2016          10,696(10)  $933,119    
  02/04/2016              11,361(11)  $991,134      

Ryan M. Schneider
Former President, Card

  03/02/2007  26,250(4)  0  $76.79  03/01/2017        
  02/21/2008  100(4)  0  $48.95  02/20/2018        
  01/31/2013  35,269(4)  0  $56.32  01/30/2023        
  01/30/2014  25,289(13)  12,645(13)  $70.96  01/29/2024        
  01/30/2014              17,390(7)  $1,517,104
  01/30/2014          6,440(9)  $561,826    
  01/30/2014          5,592(10)  $487,846    
  01/29/2015  15,457(13)  30,917(13)  $74.96  01/28/2025        
  01/29/2015              18,930(8)  $1,651,453
  01/29/2015          14,022(9)  $1,223,279    
  01/29/2015          9,870(10)  $861,059    
  02/04/2016  0  44,709(13)  $63.73  02/03/2026        
  02/04/2016              23,241(8)  $2,027,545
  02/04/2016          25,823(9)  $2,252,799    
  02/04/2016          13,032(10)  $1,136,912    
  02/04/2016              14,358(11)  $1,252,592      

(1)Stock options granted generally have time-based vesting schedules, are exercisable upon vesting and vest earlier upon the optionee’s termination of employment for death, disability, or, beginning with awards granted in 2015, termination by Capital One without cause or by the individual for “good reason” within two years following (or in anticipation of) a change of control of Capital One. Certain stock options, as noted in the footnotes below, are also subject to performance-based vesting requirements. These options are transferable only to or for the benefit of immediate family members. For the treatment of stock options after the optionee’s retirement, see “Payments upon Retirement” in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” section on page 82 for details.

(2)For stock options granted before April 23, 2009, the exercise price is equal to the fair market value of common stock on the date of grant determined on the basis of the average high and low sales prices as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape. For stock options granted on or after April 23, 2009, the exercise price is equal to the closing price of common stock on the date of grant as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape.

(3)Market value based on the closing price of a share of Capital One’s common stock on the last trading day of 2016 as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape.

(4)Stock options granted to NEOs prior to 2014 are fully vested.

(5)Stock options granted to the CEO in 2014, 2015 and 2016 vest in full on February 15 after the third anniversary of the date of grant (subject to performance-based vesting provisions. See “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 60 for details.

(6)A portion of the award is subject to vest following the first and second anniversary of the grant date in connection with requiredtax-related withholdings made by which the Compensation Committee must certify the performance of the Company on behalf of the executive; the remaining shares vest in full on February 15 after the third anniversary of the date of grant. The awards are subject to performance-based vesting provisions (see “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 60 for details).

(7)Represents the number of shares expected to be issued for the January 30, 2014 performance share awards as of December 31, 2016. Shares were issued on March 8, 2017 with the following issuance date values (including accrued dividends paid out as additional shares): $17,956,092 for Mr. Fairbank; $2,093,784 for Mr. Crawford; $1,472,764 for Mr. Finneran; $1,333,517 for Mr. LaPrade; $1,381,010 for Mr. Yajnik; and $1,688,240 for Mr. Schneider. The number of shares an executive receives under a performance share award is dependent on the Company’s performance over the applicable three-year performance period.

 

      First VestingSecond VestingThird VestingFourth VestingFifth Vesting

 

Name

 

Grant
Date

 

Grant Type

 

 Vesting Date 

 

 # of Shares 

Vesting
Date
# of
 Shares 
Vesting
Date
# of
 Shares 
Vesting
Date
# of
 Shares 
Vesting
Date
# of
 Shares 

Richard D.

Fairbank

12/20/2005Option Award12/20/2010573,000
12/11/2006Option Award12/11/2011594,851
12/10/2007Option Award12/10/20101,661,780
1/29/2009Option Award1/29/2012970,403
1/27/2010Option Award1/27/2013559,333
1/26/2011Option Award1/26/2014608,366
1/31/2012Perf Share Award3/15/2015191,257
1/31/2012Restricted Stock Unit Award2/10/2015157,378
1/31/2012Option Award2/10/2015360,009
1/31/2013Perf Share Award3/15/2016155,363
1/31/2013Restricted Stock Unit Award2/10/201638,841
1/31/2013Option Award2/10/2016325,985
1/30/2014Perf Share Award3/15/2017123,309
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award2/15/201740,076
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award2/15/201724,662
1/30/2014Option Award2/15/2017108,944

Stephen S.

Crawford

2/4/2013Restricted Stock Award2/4/201434,8002/4/201534,8002/4/201634,8002/4/201734,8002/4/201834,800
1/30/2014Perf Share Award3/15/201714,378
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award2/15/20157,9882/15/20167,9872/15/20177,987
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award1/30/20147712/15/20156,9322/15/20166,9322/15/20176,931
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award1/1/201515,855
1/30/2014Option Award2/15/201515,6812/15/201615,6822/15/201715,683

Ryan M.

Schneider

3/15/2005Option Award3/15/20065,2163/15/20075,2173/15/20085,217
3/3/2006Option Award3/3/20075,9573/3/20085,9573/3/20095,976
3/2/2007Option Award3/2/20088,7493/2/20098,7503/2/20108,751
2/21/2008Option Award2/21/200921,2332/21/201021,2332/21/201121,234
1/31/2012Perf Share Award3/15/201517,456
1/31/2012Restricted Stock Award2/10/20139,6982/10/20149,6982/10/20159,697
1/31/2012Restricted Stock Unit Award2/10/20139,5212/10/20149,5212/10/20159,522
1/31/2012Option Award2/10/201316,2252/10/201416,2262/10/201516,227
1/31/2013Perf Share Award3/15/201611,346
1/31/2013Restricted Stock Award2/10/20146,3042/10/20156,3032/10/20166,303
1/31/2013Restricted Stock Unit Award2/10/20145,2002/10/20155,2002/10/20165,201
1/31/2013Option Award2/10/201411,7562/10/201511,7562/10/201611,757
1/30/2014Perf Share Award3/15/201711,593
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award2/15/20156,4412/15/20166,4402/15/20176,440
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award1/30/20146202/15/20155,5932/15/20165,5932/15/20175,592
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award1/1/201511,599
1/30/2014Option Award2/15/201512,6442/15/201612,6452/15/201712,645

John G.

Finneran, Jr.

3/15/2005Option Award3/15/200619,2533/15/200719,2533/15/200819,254
3/3/2006Option Award3/3/200721,1953/3/200821,1953/3/200921,260
3/2/2007Option Award3/2/200829,5033/2/200929,5033/2/201029,504
2/21/2008Option Award2/21/200949,9622/21/201049,9632/21/201149,965
1/26/2011Option Award1/26/201218,8741/26/201318,8741/26/201418,876
1/31/2012Perf Share Award3/15/201517,005
1/31/2012Restricted Stock Award2/10/20139,4482/10/20149,4482/10/20159,446
1/31/2012Restricted Stock Unit Award2/10/20138,8722/10/20148,8722/10/20158,873
1/31/2012Option Award2/10/201314,2262/10/201414,2262/10/201514,227
1/31/2013Perf Share Award3/15/201612,372
1/31/2013Restricted Stock Award2/10/20146,8732/10/20156,8722/10/20166,874
1/31/2013Restricted Stock Unit Award2/10/20144,5362/10/20154,5362/10/20164,537
1/31/2013Option Award2/10/201411,5362/10/201511,5372/10/201611,538
1/30/2014Perf Share Award3/15/201710,113
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award2/15/20155,6192/15/20165,6182/15/20175,618
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award1/30/20145412/15/20154,8792/15/20164,8792/15/20174,879
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award1/1/201510,119
1/30/2014Option Award2/15/20159,9272/15/20169,9282/15/20179,928

Sanjiv Yajnik

3/3/2006Option Award3/3/20073,8863/3/20083,8863/3/20093,898
3/2/2007Option Award3/2/20087,8533/2/20097,8533/2/20107,854
1/26/2011Option Award1/26/201218,6011/26/201318,6011/26/201418,603
1/31/2012Perf Share Award3/15/201515,346
1/31/2012Restricted Stock Award2/10/20138,5262/10/20148,5262/10/20158,525
1/31/2012Restricted Stock Unit Award2/10/20138,0062/10/20148,0072/10/20158,007
1/31/2012Option Award2/10/201312,8382/10/201412,8382/10/201512,839
1/31/2013Perf Share Award3/15/201611,599
1/31/2013Restricted Stock Award2/10/20146,4442/10/20156,4432/10/20166,445
1/31/2013Restricted Stock Unit Award2/10/20144,2522/10/20154,2532/10/20164,254
1/31/2013Option Award2/10/201410,8162/10/201510,8172/10/201610,817
1/30/2014Perf Share Award3/15/20179,483
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award2/15/20155,2692/15/20165,2682/15/20175,268
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award1/30/20144472/15/20154,5942/15/20164,5932/15/20174,593
1/30/2014Restricted Stock Unit Award1/1/20159,485
1/30/2014Option Award2/15/20159,3092/15/20169,3092/15/20179,310
76  

 

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


(3)For stock options granted before April 23, 2009, the exercise price is equal to the fair market value of common stock on the date of grant determined on the basis of the average high and low sales prices as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape. For stock options granted on or after April 23, 2009, the exercise price is equal to the closing price of common stock on the date of grant as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape.

(4)Market value based on the closing price of a share of Capital One’s common stock on the last trading day of 2014 as reported by the NYSE Composite Transaction Tape.
SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

 

(5)Stock options granted to the CEO prior to 2012 are fully vested. Stock options granted to the CEO in 2012-2013 vest in full on February 10 after the third anniversary of the date of grant (subject to performance-based vesting provisions), and the grant made in 2014 vests in full on February 15 after the third anniversary of the date of grant (subject to performance-based vesting provisions). See “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 44

(8)Represents the maximum number of shares the executive may receive under the performance share awards granted. The actual number of shares an executive receives under a performance share award is dependent on the Company’s performance over the applicable three-year performance period. The actual number of performance shares awarded may range from 0% to 150% of target and the value reported excludes dividend equivalents accrued with respect to performance shares which are paid in shares at the time the underlying performance shares are issued, and only with respect to the number of shares that actually vest. The Compensation Committee will certify the performance of the Company over the applicable performance period by March 15th after the third anniversary of the grant.

(9)Awards vest 33% annually beginning on February 15 after the first anniversary of the date of grant. Awards are subject to performance-based vesting provisions (see “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 60 for details).

(10)Awards vest 33% annually beginning on February 15 after the first anniversary of the date of grant. For awards granted on February 4, 2016, a portion of the award vested on the grant date in connection with requiredtax-related withholdings made by the Company on behalf of the individuals.

(11)Cash-settled RSUs representing a portion of 2016 base salary which vested in full on January 1, 2017, and were paid February 15, 2017.

(12)Vests 25% annually beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

(13)Stock options vest 33% annually beginning on February 15 after the first anniversary of the date of grant (subject to performance-based vesting provisions). See “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 60 for details.

(14)Award vests 20% annually beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant; a portion of the remaining award vested in June 2016 in connection with requiredtax-related withholdings made by the Company on behalf of the executive.

 

(6)For grants awarded prior to 2014, vest in full on February 10 after the third anniversary of the date of grant. For grants awarded after January 1, 2014, vest in full on February 15 after the third anniversary of the date of grant. All shares are subject to performance-based vesting provisions (see “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 44 for details).

(7)Represents the maximum number of shares the executive may receive under the performance share awards granted on January 31, 2013 and January 30, 2014, and the actual shares awarded (including accrued dividends paid out as additional shares) for the January 31, 2012 performance share awards, which were issued on March 10, 2015 with the following issuance date values: $30,715,799 for Mr. Fairbank; $2,803,438 for Mr. Schneider; $2,731,003 for Mr. Finneran; and $2,464,579 for Mr. Yajnik. The actual number of shares an executive receives under a performance share award is dependent on the Company’s performance over the applicable three-year performance period. For the grants made in 2013 and 2014, the actual number of performance shares awarded may range from 0% to 150% of target and the value reported excludes dividend equivalents accrued with respect to performance shares which are paid in shares at the time the underlying performance shares are issued, and only with respect to the number of performance shares that actually vest.

(8)Stock options granted to the NEOs prior to 2011 are fully vested. Stock options granted to the NEOs in 2012-2013 vest 33% annually beginning on February 10 after the first anniversary of the date of grant (subject to performance-based vesting provisions), and grants in 2014 vest 33% annually beginning on February 15 after the first anniversary of the date of grant (subject to performance-based vesting provisions). See “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 44 for details.

(9)For the award granted prior to 2014, vests 20% annually beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. For the awards granted after January 1, 2014, vest 33% annually beginning on February 15 after the first anniversary of the date of grant, except for the cash-settled RSUs representing a portion of 2014 base salary which vested in full on January 1, 2015, and were paid February 15, 2015. For the cash-settled RSUs granted on January 30, 2014 that vest 33% annually, a portion of the award vested on the grant date in connection with withholdings made by the Company on behalf of the individuals. The stock-settled RSU award is subject to performance-based vesting provisions (see “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 44 for details).

(10)For awards granted prior to 2014, vest 33% annually beginning on February 10 after the first anniversary of the date of grant. For awards granted after January 1, 2014, vest 33% annually beginning on February 15 after the first anniversary of the date of grant, except for the cash-settled RSUs representing a portion of 2014 base salary which vested in full on January 1, 2015, and were paid February 15, 2015. For the cash-settled RSUs granted on January 30, 2014 that vest 33% annually, a portion of the award vested on the grant date in connection with withholdings made by the Company on behalf of the individuals. Restricted stock grants and stock-settled RSU awards are subject to performance-based vesting provisions (see “Performance-Based Vesting Provisions” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 44 for details).

 Pension Benefits

  Pension Benefits

Capital One Programs

Prior to November 1995, Capital One offered a Cash Balance Pension Plan (“CBPP”) and an Excess Cash Balance Plan (“Excess CBPP”) to all full-time salaried associates and certain executive officers. Both of these programs were frozen in December 1995; however, interest credits continue to accrue on plan balances on a quarterly basis for the CBPP and on a monthly basis for the Excess CBPP. The CBPP crediting rate changes annually based on the average annual yield of5-year Treasury Securities for the preceding 12 months ending October of the prior year (1.04%(1.53% annual average for 2014)2016). The Excess CBPP interest crediting rate changes monthly based on the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (3.3%(3.56% annual average for 2014)2016).

Messrs. Fairbank and Finneran participated in these programs. The estimated annual payouts upon retirement in the CBPP and the Excess CBPP as of December 31, 2014,2016, are $1,950$2,114 and $5,996,$6,667, respectively, for Mr. Fairbank, and $1,371$1,545 and $945,$1,102, respectively, for Mr. Finneran. These projected benefits assume interest creditsAs of December 31, 2016, the “Value of Accumulated Benefit” for both plans is equal to the account balance for each participant. This is because they both have attained their normal retirement age of 65 and so are assumed to retire immediately under the CBPPactuarial valuation assumptions. Since both participants are assumed to be 2.65% credited quarterly and underretire as of the Excess CBPP to be 3.85% credited monthly.measurement date, the future interest-crediting rate does not apply. Accounts in either plan are distributed after separation from service. Distribution options from the CBPP plan are lump sum (eligible for rollover to another qualified plan or personal IRA) or an annuity option. The Excess CBPP will be distributed in the same form as the CBPP, as a lump sum (not eligible for rollover) or as an annuity. Since the CBPP and Excess CBPP are account-based defined benefit plans, years of service are not tracked.

 

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  77


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

 2014

  2016 Pension Benefits Table

Name and Principal Position

 

Plan Name (1)

 

Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit (2,3,4)

 

  Payments During Last  
Fiscal Year

 

   

Richard D. Fairbank

Chairman, CEO and President

Cash Balance Pension Plan

 

$26,485$0
Excess Cash Balance Plan$81,418$0
       
   

Stephen S. Crawford

Chief Financial Officer

---
       
   

Ryan M. Schneider

President, Card

---
       
   

John G. Finneran, Jr.

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Cash Balance Pension Plan

 

$19,036$0
Excess Cash Balance Plan$13,127$0
       
   

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial Services

---

 

Name and Principal PositionPlan Name(1)

Present Value of

Accumulated

Benefit (2)(3)

Payments During

Last Fiscal Year

Richard D. Fairbank

Chair, CEO and President

Cash Balance Pension Plan$27,572$—
Excess Cash Balance Plan$87,095$—

R. Scott Blackley

Chief Financial Officer

$0

Stephen S. Crawford

Former CFO,

Head of Finance and Corporate Development

$0
John G. Finneran, Jr.
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Cash Balance Pension Plan$19,684$—
Excess Cash Balance Plan$14,042
Frank G. LaPrade, III
Chief Enterprise Services Officer
$0

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial Services

$0
Ryan M. Schneider
Former President, Card
$0

(1)In November 1995, Capital One amended the CBPP and the Excess CBPP to eliminate furtherpay-based credits to participants as of December 31, 1995 and to provide that there would be no new participants in such plans on or after January 1, 1996. Interest continues to be credited on plan balances on a quarterly (CBPP) or monthly (Excess CBPP) basis.

 

(2)For the CBPP, the interest crediting rate changes annually basedBased on updated SEC guidance on the average annual yield of 5-year Treasury Securitiespreferred disclosure method to use for cash balance plans, the preceding 12 months ending October of the prior year. The average annual interest rate for 2014 was 1.04%. For the Excess Cash Balance Plan, the interest crediting rate changes monthly based on the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate. The average annual interest rate for 2014 was 3.3%.

(3)The amounts shown are the present value of the accrued benefit under the same actuarial assumptions and measurement date used for financial accounting purposes.

 

(4)(3)Consistent with the measurement date used for financial disclosure for the pension plans, the amounts for each year are determined as of a December 31, 20142016 measurement date.

  Capital One’s VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs

Capital One offers its VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“VNQDCP”) to eligible associates.

In 2014,2016, our NEOs excluding our CEO, could elect to contribute up to 50% of the cash portion of their respective base salaries and up to 100% of the restricted stock unit portion of their respective base salaries on atax-deferred basis. Messrs. Blackley, Crawford, Schneider, Finneran, LaPrade, Yajnik and YajnikSchneider participated in the program in 2014.

2016. In 2014,2016, 100% of the CEO’s deferred cash bonus was mandatorily deferred for three years under the VNQDCP and will pay outbe paid in lump sum in the first quarter of 2016. The CEO does not receive company contributions under the VNQDCP.

2019. In addition to participant deferrals, Capital One makes contributions under the VNQDCP. Company contributions vest immediately when posted to the VNQDCP.

Participants in the VNQDCP have the option to direct their individual deferrals among seventeen different investment offerings made available by the plan: Fidelity RetirementInstitutional Money Market Government Portfolio Blackrock– Institutional Class, BlackRock U.S. Total Bond Index Fund PIMCOK Shares, Prudential Total Return Bond Fund Institutional,Class Q, Dodge &and Cox Balanced Fund, Dodge &and Cox Stock Fund, T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Fund Cap Value Fund, Northern Small Cap Value Fund, Fidelity Spartan S&P 500 Index Fund – Institutional Premium Class, Blackrock Small Cap Index Fund Class K Shares, Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund – Class K, T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Growth Fund, The Hartford Mid Cap Fund, The Hartford Small Company Fund Class Y, Blackrock ACWI ex-USTotal International ex U.S. Index Fund Class K Shares, Dodge &and Cox International Stock Fund, Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund International Shares, and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity.Market Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares.

Individual investment returns experienced in 20142016 were as follows: Mr. Fairbank 4.95%7.8% or $182,199,$857,512.36, Mr. Blackley 9.6% or $45,102.46, Mr. Crawford 1.71% %13.6% or $5,743, Mr. Schneider 0.01% or $22,$97,435.64, Mr. Finneran 4.85%5.9% or $120,768$167,162.53, Mr. LaPrade 9.8% or $174,439.08 and Mr. Yajnik 7.22%10.4% or $64,323. $100,161.37 and Mr. Schneider 0.3% or $661.58.

Distributions under the VNQDCP may be made to participants according to their respective elected schedule for distribution in accordance with plan terms. The distribution schedules available under the plan include lump sum and 5, 10 or 15 year annual installments. Distributions occur based upon the following events: termination of employment, death, disability,in-service distribution election or change of control.

78  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Prior to December 31, 2005, Capital One offered its executives an Excess Savings Plan (“ESP”). The plan was frozen as of December 31, 2005; no additional participants are permitted to enter the plan, and no compensation

is taken into account after this date. Messrs. Fairbank, Schneider, Finneran, LaPrade, Yajnik and YajnikSchneider participated in the ESP and, as such, returns on these investments are reported for 2014.2016. Effective January 1, 2008, the ESP was merged into the VNQDCP, and participants in the ESP have the option to direct their individual investments among the same offerings as the VNQDCP. Individual investment returns associated with the ESP experienced in 20142016 were as follows: Mr. Fairbank 13.66%12% or $51,878,$52,386.18, Mr. Finneran 12% or $159,614.73, Mr. LaPrade 12% or $39,956.93, Mr. Yajnik 4.8% or $14,150.47 and Mr. Schneider 0.01%0.3% or $13, Mr. Finneran 13.66% or $158,066, and Mr. Yajnik 4.69% or $13,088.

$374.13.

 2014   2016Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

 

Name and Principal
Position
Plan NameExecutive
Contributions
in Last FY (1)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY (2)
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY (3)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE (4)
 
Richard D. Fairbank Chairman, CEO and PresidentVoluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan$2,843,750$0$182,199$0 $5,284,955  
Excess Saving Plan$0$0$51,878$0 $431,724  
2003 Performance Share Award (5)$0$0$1,435,579$0 $19,950,684  
              
Stephen S. Crawford Chief Financial OfficerVoluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan$15,265$218,100$5,743$0 $457,076  
Excess Saving Plan---- -  
              
Ryan M. Schneider President, CardVoluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan$11,165$157,410$22$162,286 $336,843  
Excess Saving Plan$0$0$13$0 $129,346  
              
John G. Finneran, Jr. General Counsel and Corporate SecretaryVoluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan$9,747$136,350$120,768$0 $2,682,913  
Excess Saving Plan$0$0$158,066$0 $1,315,417  
              

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial Services

Voluntary Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan$9,129$127,320$64,323$0 $1,023,100  
Excess Saving Plan$0$0$13,088$0 $292,188  

  Name and Principal

 Position

   Plan Name   

Executive

Contributions
in Last FY (1)

   

Registrant

Contributions

in Last FY (2)

   

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last FY (3)

   

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

   

Aggregate

Balance at

Last FYE (4)

Richard D. Fairbank

Chair, CEO and

President

  VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan  $2,677,500  $0  $857,512  $(2,344,378)  $10,954,141
  Excess Saving Plan  $0  $0  $52,386  $0  $490,089
  2003 Performance Share Award(5)  $0  $0  $3,639,701  $0  $21,084,163

R. Scott Blackley

Chief Financial Officer

  VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan  $72,704  $80,763  $45,102  $—  $565,435
  Excess Saving Plan          

Stephen S. Crawford Former CFO,
Head of Finance and Corporate Development

  VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan  

$15,927

 

  

$231,720

 

  

$97,436

 

  

$—

 

  

$945,912

 

  Excess Saving Plan          

John G. Finneran, Jr.

General Counsel and

Corporate Secretary

  VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan  $10,165  $145,020  $167,163  $0  $3,128,459
  Excess Saving Plan  $0  $0  $159,615  $0  $1,493,248

Frank G. LaPrade, III

Chief Enterprise Services

Officer

  VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan  $9,746  $139,440  $174,439  $0  $2,012,143
  Excess Saving Plan  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial

Services

  VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan  $9,627  $136,830  $100,161  $(116,979)  $1,227,254
  Excess Saving Plan  $0  $0  $14,150  $0  $307,394

Ryan M. Schneider

Former President, Card

  VoluntaryNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan  $12,115  $175,050  $662  $(168,628)  $320,187
  Excess Saving Plan  $0  $0  $374  $0  $129,746

 

(1)Reflects executive contributions made for 2014.2016. Mr. Fairbank’s executive contribution under the VNQDCP was a mandatory deferral of the deferred cash bonus awarded in January 2014February 2016 for 20132015 performance, which was reported in the 20132015 Summary Compensation Table. For Messrs. Blackley, Crawford, Schneider, Finneran, LaPrade, Yajnik and Yajnik,Schneider, all executive contributions under the VNQDCP were made in the form of base salary deferrals, and are reported in the 20142016 Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2)RegistrantCompany contributions are also included in the amounts reported as “Company Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans” in footnote 8 to the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(3)Includes earnings on total assets in the VNQDCP and the ESP.

 

(4)All the amounts shown in this column, other than earnings on deferred compensation, were included in compensation amounts reported in prior years for those executives that were NEOs in such prior years and in the amounts required to be reported pursuant to the then applicable rules. Of these balances, the following amounts were included in compensation amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Tables in prior year proxy statements beginning with(to the 2007 proxy statement:extent that the named executive officer was a named executive officer in the applicable year): Mr. Fairbank $2,187,500;$9,441,250; Mr. Crawford $210,138;$683,728; Mr. Finneran $1,938,995; and Mr. Yajnik $278,394 and Mr. Schneider $617,715; and Mr. Finneran $1,642,463.$961,909.

 

(5)Includes the value of restricted stock units that were granted to Mr. Fairbank in December 2003, subject to Capital One’s earnings per share performance relative to its comparator group over a three-year period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2006 (the “Performance(“Performance Period”). On March 2, 2007, the independent directors of the Board certified, following the end of the Performance Period, the achievement of the performance target. Because the Company ranked in the 76th percentile for the Performance Period relative to the comparator group, Mr. Fairbank acquired the right to receive 241,680 shares of Capital One’s common stock on March 31, 2007. Delivery of these shares is deferred until the end of Mr. Fairbank’s employment with the Company. Similar to other deferred compensation, Mr. Fairbank neither acquired these shares nor realized any value from these shares in 2014.2016.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  79


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

  Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

Overview

The disclosure in the table below illustrates payouts that the named executive officers could receive under certain hypothetical termination scenarios. Actual circumstances resulting in the departure of a named executive officer cannot be predicted and may differ from the assumptions used in the information outlined below. The Company has adopted plans providing certain standards governing named executive officer separation payments (reflected in the table below) in order to protect the Company’s interests in the event of an acquisition as well as to provide competitive benefits to senior executives.

The Compensation Committee reviews each executive officer’s separation on a case by case basis and exercises its business judgment, with the approval of the independent directors, to customize the terms of such separations in consideration of the relevant circumstances, including:

 

The reasons for the separation;
Market competitive practices for comparable separation scenarios;
Potential benefits to the Company, such as retaining its competitive advantage, maintaining a positive reputation internally and externally, and preserving its ability to recruit highly talented executives;
The executive’s tenure and contributions to the Company’s success;
The executive’s willingness to provide legal waivers and/or enter into agreements not to compete with the Company or to solicit the Company’s employees or customers; and
The resulting impact of the separation terms on the Company and its stockholders.
The reasons for the separation;

Market competitive practices for comparable separation scenarios;

Potential benefits to the Company, such as retaining its competitive advantage, maintaining a positive reputation internally and externally, and preserving its ability to recruit highly talented executives;

The executive’s tenure and contributions to the Company’s success;

The executive’s willingness to provide legal waivers and/or enter into agreements not to compete with the Company or to solicit the Company’s employees or customers; and

The resulting impact of the separation terms on the Company and its stockholders.

Restrictive Covenants

Capital One maintains a competitive advantage in part through the intellectual property developed and utilized by our senior executives. Capital One has asked certain NEOs to enter into various agreements that contain restrictive covenants related to confidentiality,non-competition,non-solicitation and ownership of work product, as described below.

Standard Non-Competition Agreement Agreements

Under Capital One’s standard Certain NEOs have entered intonon-competition agreement program, NEOs agreements with the Company pursuant to which they may be restricted as to what competitive services they may provide to an entity following separation from Capital One, typicallyOne. Messrs. Blackley, Schneider, and Yajnik have entered intonon-competition agreements with the Company which provide for a period ofthe following in exchange for the NEO complying withnon-competition restrictions for up to two years. In recognition of these restrictions, the agreement callsyears following an involuntary termination, other than for paymentscause, death or disability: payment equal to be made to the NEO during periods of enforcement of the non-competition restrictions, subject to certain circumstances and conditions. Messrs. Crawford, Schneider, and Yajnik are parties to standard non-competition agreements.

For 2014, potential payments following termination under the standard non-competition agreement are 15% of the NEO’s target total compensation for each year of enforcement and up to eighteen months of subsidized health insurance premiums and administrative fees under COBRA if the NEO is eligible and elects such coverage, subject to certain terms and conditions. For voluntary terminations, the previously described payments are only made for the second year of enforcement. In the case of the NEO’s involuntary termination for any reason other than death, disability or cause, theThe payments are made in two lump sums, the first following termination and the second upon completion of the enforcement period. However,In the event of a voluntary termination, the previously described payments are typically made for the second year of enforcement only for agreements with a two year enforcement period; and no payments are made for agreements with a one year enforcement period.

In May 2016, Mr. Crawford entered into an Amended and RestatedNon-Competition Agreement with the Company in connection with his appointment to Head of Finance and Corporate Development which provides for the following in exchange for Mr. Crawford complying withnon-competition restrictions for up to three years following a termination without cause: 15% of total target compensation for each year of enforcement, and certain continued benefits during each year of thenon-competition restriction, subject to certain terms and conditions. The payments are made in two lump sums, the first following termination and the second upon completion of the enforcement period. In addition, pursuant to thenon-competition agreement and the terms of his equity awards, Mr. Crawford’s unvested equity awards, other than the restricted stock units granted as part of his base salary (which will vest in accordance with the terms of their respective agreements), will continue to vest in full through

80  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

the original vesting schedule upon a voluntary or involuntary termination for any reason other than cause. All vested unexercised options will remain exercisable through original expiration date.

For allnon-competition agreements entered into between the Company and the NEOs, there are no payments under the non-competition agreement if benefits are payable under a change of control agreement. PaymentsIn addition, payments related to thenon-competition agreement are separate from any severance payments that may be made upon the NEO’s departure. However, severance payments are typically offset in part by payments related to thenon-competition agreement so that total payment amounts are consistent with the severance program’s intent.

Confidentiality, Work Product andNon-Solicitation of Employee Agreement

Messrs. Blackley, Crawford, Schneider, and Yajnik are parties to confidentiality, work product andnon-solicitation of employee agreements. The confidentiality provisions of these agreements generally provide that at all times during and following employment with the Company, the NEO may not use for personal benefit or the benefit of others, or divulge to others, any of Capital One’s confidential information, except as expressly authorized by Capital One or required by legal process.

Further, the NEO, upon separation from Capital One, shall return any and all of Capital One’s confidential information to Capital One.

Generally, under the non-solicitation of employee provisions of these These agreements also provide that for a period of two yearstwo-years following separation from Capital One, the NEO shall not directly or indirectly solicit or induce any associate of Capital One to become employed by any person or entity engaged in competition with Capital One, hire or engage any associate of Capital One to provide services to a competitor or directlydirector or indirectly solicit or induce any associateemployee of Capital One to end his or her employment based on confidential information the NEO learned about the employee while they were employed by Capital One.

Payments underUnder Certain Termination Scenarios

Upon separation from the Company, the named executive officers, regardless of the reason for termination, receive certain earned, but previously unpaid, payments, such as accrued but unused vacation pay and amounts earned and vested under the Company’s qualified andnon-qualified retirement programs. In addition, cash-settled RSUs granted to NEOs other than the CEO after the end of a performance year continue to vest according to the original provisions upon separation for any reason other than cause or as soon as practicable following a “double trigger” change of control (as discussed in further detail below), because these are deferred awards attributable to prior performance and are intended to replace cash bonuses, which would otherwise already have been paid to an executive.

Voluntary Termination

An NEO, other than the CEO, who voluntarily terminates employment with Capital One may receive payments related tonon-competition covenants (described above, if applicable) and any contractual payments to which the NEO may otherwise be entitled. Cash-settled RSUs granted to NEOs at the beginning of a performance year representing a portion of base salary arepro-rated and continue to vest according to their original terms upon voluntary termination. In addition, an NEO has the ability following separation to exercise vested but unexercised options for 3three months following voluntary termination.

Involuntary Termination Without Cause

An NEO, other than the CEO, whose employment with Capital One is terminated involuntarily, for performance or job elimination, is entitled to receive the amounts set forth in the Company’s Executive Severance Plan.Plan in exchange for executing a release of claims against the Company. For 2014,2016, potential payments under the Executive Severance Plan were 30% of total target compensation. If an NEO’s Non-Competition Agreement is enforced, paymentscompensation, healthcare continuation subsidy under the Executive Severance Plan will be offset by any amounts paid under the Non-Competition Agreement and the NEO will be eligible for (i) an additional payment of up to 90% of the severance payments in exchange for executing a release of claims against the Company, as well as (ii)COBRA, continued coverage through broad-based and executive life insurance programs, outplacement services and any contractual payments to which the NEO may otherwise have been entitled. If an NEO’sNon-Competition Agreement is enforced, cash payments under the Executive Severance Plan will be offset by any cash amounts paid under theNon-Competition Agreement and the NEO will be eligible for an additional payment of up to 90% of the severance payments in exchange for executing a release of claims against the Company. Cash-settled RSUs granted to NEOs at the beginning of the performance year representing a portion of base salary arepro-rated and continue to vest according to their original terms upon an involuntary termination. PerformanceGenerally, performance shares

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  81


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

granted to NEOs will vest on apro-rata basis based on actual Company performance during the performance period if an involuntary termination without cause occurs during the performance period. Stock-settled restricted stock units granted to NEOs in 2015 and 2016 will continue to vest if an involuntary termination without cause occurs, subject to the NEO executing a release of claims against the Company. In addition, named executive officers have the ability following separation to exercise vested but unexercised options for two years. If a named executive officer’s employment with Capital One is terminated as a result of death or disability, histhe named executive officer’s unvested stock options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units and performance shares granted in 2016, based on target Company performance, will vest in full, and his performance shares granted prior to 2016 will vest on apro-rata basis based on actualtarget Company performance during the performance period.performance.

Termination for Cause

Generally, an NEO whose employment with Capital One is terminated for cause receives no additional benefits but is required to comply with any applicable restrictive covenants related to confidentiality,non-competition,non-solicitation of employees or customers, and ownership of work product, as described above. Cash-settled RSUs granted to NEOs at the beginning of the performance year representing a portion of base-salary arepro-rated and continue to vest according to their original terms upon a termination for cause because these are deferred awards representing base salary that would otherwise already have been paid to an executive. In addition, if terminated for cause, named executive officers have the ability following separation to exercise vested but unexercised options for 3three months.

Payments uponUpon Retirement

As with all executives who are eligible for retirement, named executive officers who retire from Capital One may receive the following amounts: payments related tonon-competition covenants as if they had terminated voluntarily (described above); partially subsidized participation in retiree medical coverage (including dependents as applicable), provided that the executivefor Messrs. Fairbank, Finneran, and Yajnik, who became eligible to retire on or before December 31, 2012; coverage through the executive life insurance program (at a reduced benefit); and any contractual payments to which he or she may otherwise be entitled.

Upon retirement, shares of restricted stock, all restricted stock units (other than cash-settled RSUs representing a portion of base-salary, which vestpro-rata) and stock options continue to vest according to their original terms, which, for shares of restricted stock, stock-settled restricted stock units (all restricted stock units for the CEO) and stock options granted on or after 2012, also includes performance-based vesting provisions.provisions, which vest based on actual performance. In addition, performance shares granted to named executive officers will continue to vest after retirement, except the 20142016 performance share grant to the CEO which would be forfeited if he retired on or before December 31, 2014. For stock options granted on or before December 1, 2005, the executive has one year from the date of retirement to exercise vested but unexercised options.2016. For stock options granted after December 1, 2005 and prior to January 1, 2010 the executive has the earlier of five years from the date of retirement or the expiration of the option term to exercise vested but unexercised options. For stock options granted on or after January 1, 2010 the executive has until the expiration of the option term to exercise vested but unexercised options.

Change of Control

Each named executive officer is a party to an agreement (a “Change of Control Agreement”) that provides for certain payments in the event his or her employment is terminated within two years following (or in anticipation of) a change of control, either involuntarily without cause or voluntarily for good reason. Amounts payable in each of these scenarios are outlined below.

In the agreements, a change of control occurs if one or more of the following events take place: (i) an acquisition of 20% or more of Capital One’s common stock or the combined voting power of the voting securities by a person or group, (ii) certain changes in the majority of the Board of Directors, (iii) consummation of a reorganization, merger, share exchange or consolidation or similar transaction, sale of all assets or the acquisition of another company, except where all or substantially all of Capital One’s stockholders receive 50% or more of the stock of the resulting company, at least a majority of the board of directors of the resulting company were incumbent board members, and no person owns 20% or more of the resulting company who did not own such stock immediately before the business combination or (iv) approval by stockholders of a complete liquidation or dissolution of Capital One.

All named executive officer Change of Control Agreements providing for a potential excise tax gross-up after a change of control have expired and have been replaced with new Change of Control Agreements that

82  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

We do not provide for an excise tax gross-up.gross up payments.

Involuntary Termination Forfor Cause

Named executive officers terminated involuntarily for cause following a change of control receive no additional benefits.benefits except in regards to options, which allow named executive officers to exercise vested but unexercised options for three months following a termination for cause.

Voluntary Termination Withwith Good Reason or Involuntary Termination Without Cause

For 2014, theThe potential payments that the named executive officers could receive under certain termination scenarios are based on a percentage of target total compensation. For the CEO, the potential payments are based on a multiple of his notional salary and cash bonus (as described below).bonus. As of December 31, 2014,2016, if a change of control of Capital One occurs, then following a voluntary termination with good reason or involuntary termination without cause, a named executive officer may receive certain benefits as outlined below:

The CEO will be entitled to receive:

 

 ¡ 

Alump-sum payment of 2.5 times the sum of his current notional salary and the “Highest Annual Bonus,” which is the highest of (i) the target annual bonus for the year in which the change of

control occurs (or themid-point if no target is established), (ii) the target annual bonus for the year immediately before the year the change of control occurs (or midpoint if no target is established), or (iii) the annual bonus paid or payable for the most recently completed fiscal year; and

 

 ¡ The cash value, prorated through the date of termination, of the Highest Annual Bonus.

An NEO will be entitled to receive:

 

 ¡ The cash value, prorated through the date of termination, of the current year’s target annual incentive award, whether in the form of cash or equity-based compensation; and

¡Between 110% to 112.5% of the highest of (i) the NEO’s current target total compensation, (ii) the NEO’s target total compensation for the prior year, or (iii) the NEO’s actual total compensation for the prior year.

 

The CEO or an NEO will also be entitled to receive:
The cash value, prorated through the date of termination, of the current year’s target annual incentive award, whether in the form of cash or equity-based compensation; and

 

 ¡ The CEO or an NEO will also be entitled to receive:

An amount equal to the employer contributions under the Company’s qualified andnon-qualified retirement, healthcare and life insurance programs for 2 to 2.5 years as well as access to such healthcare and life insurance plans for the named executive officer (and dependents as applicable);

 

 ¡ Service credit offrom 2 to 2.5 years for purposes of determining vesting under any supplemental or excess defined contribution plan and eligibility under any applicable retiree medical plan;

 

 ¡ Outplacement services of up to $30,000 for one full year (the named executive officer must begin to take advantage of the services within one year of the date of termination);$30,000; and

 

 ¡ Any contractual payments to which the named executive officer may otherwise have been entitled.

Beginning in January 2015, allAll equity awards granted to named executive officers in or after January 2015 will require aso-called “double trigger” for accelerated vesting in connection with a change of control. Upon a change of control, all equity awards continue to vest according to their original schedule. The vesting of such awards will only accelerate if a named executive officer is involuntarily terminated without cause or voluntarily terminates for good reason within the two years following a change of control. All outstanding equity grants awarded prior to January 2015 vest in full immediately upon a change of control.

Richard D. Fairbank

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  83

Mr. Fairbank receives no regular base salary. In light of this, for 2014, Mr. Fairbank’s payment in the event of a termination following a change of control was based on a notional salary of $1 million and his Highest Annual Bonus. The Committee reviews and establishes the notional salary amount on an annual basis, based on market trends related to CEO compensation and recommendations provided by F.W. Cook. Mr. Fairbank is a party to a Change of Control Agreement.


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Stephen S. Crawford, Ryan M. Schneider, John G. Finneran, Jr., and Sanjiv Yajnik

Messrs. Crawford, Schneider, Finneran, and Yajnik are generally eligible for the same payments upon termination, and are all party to a Change of Control Agreement. For 2014, these payments were calculated based on their 2014 target total compensation values. Messrs. Crawford, Schneider and Yajnik are party to a standard Non-Competition Agreement and a Confidentiality, Work Product and Non-Solicitation of Employee Agreement.

20142016 Potential Payments and Benefits Upon Termination or Change of Control Tables by Named Executive OfficerTable

 

Name and
Principal Position
SituationCash
Severance (1)
Retirement Plan
Contributions
(2)

Acceleration and
Continuation of
Equity

Awards (3)

Continuation of
Medical/Welfare
Benefits (4)

Excise Tax

    Gross

    Up (5)

 Total

Richard D. Fairbank

Chairman, CEO and

President

Voluntary TerminationNANANANANANA
Involuntary TerminationNANANANANANA
Retirement$0$0$73,217,060$462,000NA$73,679,060
For Cause Termination$0$0$0$0NA$0
CIC*$12,253,417$0$83,396,218 (6)$242,267NA$95,891,902
        

Stephen S. Crawford

Chief Financial

Officer

Voluntary Termination$1,129,500$0$3,025,458$0NA$4,154,958
Involuntary Termination$4,292,100$0$14,911,691$17,433NA$19,221,224
RetirementNANANANANANA
For Cause Termination$0$0$1,308,830$0NA$1,308,830
CIC*$9,611,826$595,012$18,226,648 (6)$180,685NA$28,614,171
        

Ryan M. Schneider

President, Card

Voluntary Termination$826,050$0$3,987,165$0NA$4,813,215
Involuntary Termination$3,138,990$0$6,371,276$14,640NA$9,524,906
RetirementNANANANANANA
For Cause Termination$0$0$957,497$0NA$957,497
CIC*$7,350,212$442,628$12,411,388 (6)$84,984NA$20,289,212
        

John G. Finneran, Jr.

General Counsel and

Corporate Secretary

Voluntary Termination$0$0$11,564,825$0NA$11,564,825
Involuntary Termination$1,441,500$0$11,564,825$10,000NA$13,016,325
Retirement$0$0$11,564,825$450,000NA$12,014,825
For Cause Termination$0$0$835,323$0NA$835,323
CIC*$6,515,721$390,289$11,564,825 (6)$196,372NA$18,667,207
        

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial

Services

Voluntary Termination$675,600$0$10,726,854$0NA$11,402,454
Involuntary Termination$2,567,280$0$10,726,854$10,000NA$13,304,134
Retirement$675,600$0$10,726,854$313,000NA$11,715,454
For Cause Termination$0$0$782,987$0NA$782,987
CIC*$4,033,306$367,675$10,726,854 (6)$154,392NA$15,282,227

 Name and Principal

 Position

   Situation   

Cash

Severance (1)

   

Retirement

Plan

Contributions (2)

   

Acceleration

and

Continuation

of Equity

Awards(3)

   

Continuation

of Medical/

Welfare

Benefits (4)

   

Excise

Tax

Gross

Up(5)

   Total

Richard D. Fairbank

Chair, CEO and

President(6)

  Voluntary Termination            
  Involuntary Termination            
  Retirement  $—  $—  $42,386,673  $479,000    $42,865,673
  For Cause Termination  $—  $—  $—  $—    $—
  Change of Control(7)  $3,089,201  $—  $54,364,550(8)  $270,406    $57,724,317

R. Scott

Blackley

Chief Financial Officer

  Voluntary Termination  $—  $—  $1,207,053  $—    $1,207,053
  Involuntary Termination  $825,000  $—  $3,971,007  $13,635    $4,809,645
  Retirement            
  For Cause Termination  $—  $—  $561,302  $—    $561,302
  Change of Control(7)  $3,451,096  $202,021  $4,554,190(8)  $125,607    $8,332,914

Stephen S. Crawford

Former CFO, Head of

Finance and

Corporate

Development

  Voluntary Termination  $—  $—  $18,833,473  $—    $18,833,473
  Involuntary Termination  $5,752,080  $—  $18,833,473  $17,046    $24,602,599
  Retirement            
  For Cause Termination  $—  $—  $1,641,333  $—    $1,641,333
  Change of Control(7)  $10,226,211  $631,320  $18,833,473(8)  $187,384    $29,878,388

John G. Finneran, Jr.

General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary

  Voluntary Termination  $—  $—  $10,182,794  $—    $10,182,794
  Involuntary Termination  $1,529,700  $—  $10,182,794  $10,000    $11,722,494
  Retirement  $—  $—  $10,182,794  $371,000    $10,553,794
  For Cause Termination  $—  $—  $1,047,229  $—    $1,047,229
  Change of Control(7)  $6,526,905  $413,766  $10,182,794(8)  $179,336    $17,302,801

Frank G. LaPrade, III Chief Enterprise

Services Officer

  Voluntary Termination  $—  $—  $2,911,199  $—    $2,911,199
  Involuntary Termination  $1,473,900  $—  $6,497,028  $15,827    $7,986,755
  Retirement            
  For Cause Termination  $—  $—  $1,008,931  $—    $1,008,931
   Change of Control(7)   $4,854,788   $399,764   $9,552,489(8)   $147,475      $14,954,516

Sanjiv Yajnik

President, Financial

Services

  Voluntary Termination  $723,900  $—  $9,604,133  $—    $10,328,033
  Involuntary Termination  $2,750,820  $—  $9,604,133  $10,000    $12,364,953
  Retirement  $723,900  $—  $9,604,133  $297,000    $10,625,033
  For Cause Termination  $—  $—  $991,134  $—    $991,134
   Change of Control(7)   $6,177,456   $393,215   $9,604,133(8)   $162,220      $16,337,024

Ryan M. Schneider

President, Card

  Voluntary Termination  $915,000  $—  $3,738,408  $—    $4,653,408
  Involuntary Termination  $3,477,000  $—  $8,704,929  $14,956    $12,196,889
  Retirement        $—    
  For Cause Termination  $—  $—  $1,252,592  $—    $1,252,592
   Change of Control(7)   $7,869,578   $489,120   $12,876,981(8)   $86,799      $21,322,478

 

*Represents potential payments and benefits upon change of control for involuntary termination without cause or voluntary for good reason. “Acceleration and Continuation of Equity Awards” represents the value of equity where vesting is accelerated upon change of control, assuming, where applicable, that all performance metrics have been achieved at their target level.

The table above is intended to reflect potential payments to named executive officers across a range of potential separation scenarios, assuming the change of control or separation occurred on December 31, 2014.

The amounts shown in the table above do not include payments and benefits that are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment. The named executive officers also are eligible to receive certain pension benefits and certain qualified and non-qualified deferred compensation amounts upon termination. These amounts are outlined in the 2014 Pension Benefits Table on page 62 and the 2014 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 64, respectively, and are not included in the table above.

Other amounts not included in the table above are the following:

Accrued salary, bonus and vacation pay as of the date of termination; and
Welfare benefits generally available to all retirees, including retiree medical programs.

(1)Represents cash amounts paid for severance or in relation to enforcement ofnon-competition covenants as described under “Restrictive Covenants” beginning on page 65.80. In cases where the executive is eligible for both types of payments,non-competition amounts typically offset severance amounts in whole or in part. Cash-settled restricted stock unit awards granted after the end of a performance year are included in the “Acceleration and Continuation of Equity Awards” column. Messrs. SchneiderFairbank and YajnikLaPrade would receive a reduction in CICchange of control severance payments in order to meet safe harbor limitations, which is reflected in the cash severance amounts reported above.

 

(2)Represents the value of projected contributions to retirement plans during the severance period.

(3)Represents the value of equity where vesting is accelerated or continued by the triggering event. For stock options, this represents thein-the-money value. value on December 31, 2016. For stock awards, this represents the fair market value of the shares on December 31, 2014.2016. Most currently unvested equity awards held by our retirement eligible executives will continue to vest according to their original terms following retirement, which includes a voluntary or involuntary termination not for cause after a named executive officer becomes eligible for retirement. Messrs. Fairbank, Finneran, and Yajnik were the only named executive officers eligible for retirement as of December 31, 2014.2016.

 

84  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION VI – NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

(4)Represents the value of potential payments made on the executive’s behalf for continuation of medical and welfare benefits during thenon-competition or severance period.period, as applicable. Includes programs such as medical, dental, insurance, outplacement services and related benefits. Only includes programs that are specific to the named executive officers; does not include the value of programs generally available to all employees upon separation from the Company.

 

(5)Named executive officers are not eligible for excise taxgross-ups.

 

(6)Mr. Fairbank receives no regular base salary. In light of this, for 2016, Mr. Fairbank’s payment in the event of a termination following a change of control was based on a notional salary of $1 million and his Highest Annual Bonus. The Committee reviews and establishes the notional salary amount on an annual basis, based on market trends related to CEO compensation and recommendations provided by FW Cook. Mr. Fairbank is a party to a Change of Control Agreement.

(7)Represents potential payments and benefits upon change of control for involuntary termination without cause or voluntary termination for good reason. “Acceleration and Continuation of Equity Awards” represents the value of equity where vesting is accelerated upon change of control, assuming, where applicable, that all performance metrics have been achieved at their target level.

(8)Most currently unvested equity awards will be treated in a similar manner following a named executive officer’s termination of employment for death or disability. Due to differences in the vesting provisions of performance shares, the value

The table above is intended to reflect potential payments to named executive officers across a range of potential separation scenarios, assuming the change of control or separation occurred on December 31, 2016. The amounts shown in the table do not include payments and benefits that are provided on anon-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment. The NEOs also are eligible to receive certain pension benefits and certain qualified andnon-qualified deferred compensation amounts upon termination. These amounts are outlined in the 2016 Pension Benefits Table on page 78 and the 2016Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 79, respectively, and are not included in the table above.

Other amounts not included in the table above are the following:

Accrued salary, bonus and vacation pay as of the accelerationdate of termination; and continuation of unvested equity awards for each named executive officer following the termination of his employment for death or disability on December 31, 2014 would have been: $72,331,945 for Mr. Fairbank, $17,435,017 for Mr. Crawford, $11,460,892 for Mr. Schneider, $10,667,583 for Mr. Finneran, and $9,885,569 for Mr. Yajnik.

Welfare benefits generally available to all retirees, including retiree medical programs.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  85


SECTIONSection VII – EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANSEquity Compensation Plans

 

  Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2014,2016, with respect to shares of Capital One common stock that may be issued under our existing compensation plans.

 

Plan Category Number of Securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants  and rights (3)
 Number of securities remaining available
for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
   (a) (b) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) 14,011,073 (4) $55.75 29,787,036 (6)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (2) 201,568 (5) $64.41 0 (7)

Total

 14,212,641 $55.87 29,787,036
      

Number of Securities

to be issued upon

exercise

of outstanding options,

warrants and rights

    

Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights (1)

    

Number of securities

remaining available

for future issuance

under equity

compensation

plans (excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

  Plan Category   (a)   (b)   (c)
  Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(2)  12,643,688(4)  $47.99  22,024,754(6)
  Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders(3)
  94,831(5)  55.17  0(7)
  Total  12,738,519  48.03  22,024,754

 

(1)The following plans have been approved by Capital One stockholders and are currently in effect: the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan.

 

(2)The 1999 Directors Plan, which is described below, was terminated in April 2009 and haswas not been approved by Capital One stockholders. In conjunction with the acquisition of Hibernia National Bank (“Hibernia”) in November 2005, Capital One assumed three existing Hibernia stock incentive plans. In conjunction with the acquisition of North Fork Bancorporation (“North Fork”) in December 2006, Capital One assumed fifteen existing North Fork stock incentive plans. Options outstanding under these plans were converted to Capital One options outstanding and are included in the amounts reported in this row. As of December 31, 2014, one Hibernia plan had options outstanding and two North Fork plans had options outstanding. All remaining Hibernia and North Fork options will expire by December 2015. There are no shares available for future issuance under the Hibernia or North Fork plans.

 

(3)Does not reflect restricted stock units and performance shares because they have no exercise price.

 

(4)Excludes purchase rights accruing under the 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan and 1,382,22972,258 issued and unvested outstanding shares of restricted stock under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. Includes 2,189,4431,259,323 shares, representing the maximum number of shares issuable pursuant to outstanding performance share awards under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and 1,431,0664,439,890 shares subject to outstanding restricted stock units, including outstanding restricted stock units subject to performance-based vesting provisions, under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. Excludes shares of restricted stock units, to be settled in cash, under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. Also excludes dividend equivalents accrued with respect to performance shares which are paid in shares at the time the underlying performance shares are issued, and only with respect to the number of performance shares that actually vest.

 

(5)Includes 54,456 outstanding restricted stock units under the 1999 Directors Plan.

 

(6)Represents 21,529,28917,086,362 shares available for future issuance under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan; and 8,257,7474,938,392 shares available for future issuance under the 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan as shares purchased voluntarily by Capital One associates through regular payroll deductions and a companyCompany match.

 

(7)There are no shares available for future issuance under the equity compensation plans not approved by security holders.

 

 Description of Non-Security Holder Approved Equity Compensation Plans

Set forth below is a brief description of the material features of each Capital One equity compensation plan that was adopted without the approval of Capital One’s security holders and that had grants outstanding or shares available for issuance as of December 31, 2014.

  1999 Directors Plan

The 1999 Directors Plan was adopted by the Board on April 29, 1999, and terminated on April 28, 2009. The plan authorized a maximum of 825,000 shares of Capital One’s common stock for the grant ofnon-qualified stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units to members of the Board who were not otherwise employed by Capital One or any subsidiary of Capital One at the time an award was granted. The number of shares available for issuance under the plan included shares granted under the plan subject to options that expired or otherwise terminated unexercised and shares forfeited pursuant to restrictions on restricted stock or deferred stock. The plan is administered by the Board.

The exercise price of stock options granted under the plan could not be less than the fair market value, as defined in the 1999 Directors Plan, of Capital One common stock on the date of grant. The maximum term of each stock option was ten years, and vesting schedules were determined at the time of grant. The Board could, in its discretion, grant options that by their terms became fully exercisable upon a change of control, as defined in the 1999 Directors Plan.

The Board could award restricted stock to eligible directors. During the restricted period, a director cannot dispose of any restricted shares and must forfeit any restricted shares granted to such director if he or she ceases to be a member of the Board. The Board had the authority to establish the terms and conditions upon which these

86  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION VII – EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

restrictions will lapse. The Board could also, at any time, accelerate the time at which any or all restrictions would lapse or remove any and all such restrictions. Subject to any applicable restrictions, a participant who received an award of restricted stock would have all of the rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares subject to the award, including but not limited to the right to vote the shares and the right to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to the shares.

The Board could award restricted stock units to eligible directors under the plan. The Board has the authority to establish, in its discretion, the length of the vesting period; any restrictions with respect to an award of restricted stock units and the terms and conditions upon which restrictions, if any, shall lapse.

The Board has retained the right to cancel any awards outstanding under the plan in exchange for a cash payment equal to any such award’s value as of the date of cancellation.

Currently, no shares are available for issuance under this plan other than shares subject to outstanding equity awards under the plan.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  87


SECTIONSection VIII – COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTCompensation Committee Report

All members of the Compensation Committee participated in the review and discussion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) with management. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement.

 

The Compensation Committee

Mayo A. Shattuck III (Chair)

Patrick W. Gross

Ann Fritz Hackett

Lewis Hay, III

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

Peter Thomas Killalea

Pierre E. Leroy

The foregoing Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference into any of Capital One’s previous or future filings with the SEC, except as otherwise explicitly specified by Capital One in any such filing.

88  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTIONSection IX – AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTAudit Committee Report

The charter of the Audit Committee was most recently approved by the Committee on February 1, 2017 and the full Board of Directors on January 28, 2015.February 3, 2017.

In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in the oversight of:

 

The integrity of Capital One’s financial statements and internal controls;
The qualifications, independence and performance of Capital One’s independent auditor;
The performance of Capital One’s internal auditor; and
Capital One’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
The integrity of Capital One’s financial statements and internal controls;

The qualifications, independence and performance of Capital One’s independent auditor;

The performance of Capital One’s internal auditor; and

Capital One’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Audit Committee has implemented procedures to enable it to devote the attention it deems appropriate to each of the matters assigned to it under its charter. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met a total of twelvethirteen times during 2014.2016. Pursuant to Capital One’s Corporate Governance PrinciplesGuidelines and applicable law, the Audit Committee is comprised solely of independent directors.

In discharging its oversight responsibility, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed Capital One’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2016, and the assessment of the effectiveness of Capital One’s internal control over financial reporting, with management and Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”), Capital One’s independent auditors. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young the matters required to be discussed under the rules adopted byapplicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Ernst & Young’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Ernst & Young their independence from Capital One. Based on its review and discussions with management and Ernst & Young, and pursuant to a delegation of authority from the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee has approved the inclusion of the audited financial statements in Capital One’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014,2016, for filing with the SEC.

 

The Audit Committee:

Bradford H. Warner (Chair and “Audit Committee Financial Expert”)

Benjamin P. Jenkins, III

Pierre E. Leroy

Peter E. Raskind (“Audit Committee Financial Expert”)

Catherine G. West

The foregoing Report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference into any of Capital One’s previous or future filings with the SEC, except as otherwise explicitly specified by Capital One in any such filing.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  89


SECTIONSection X – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (ITEMElection of Directors(Item 1 ON PROXY CARD)on Proxy Card)

All of Capital One’s directors are elected at each annual meeting of stockholders and hold such office until the next annual meeting of stockholders, and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each nominee has consented to serve aone-year term. Information about the proposed nominees for election as directors is set forth under “Information about our Directors and Executive Officers”“Director Nominees” in the “Corporate Governance at Capital One” section beginning on page 1613 of this proxy statement.

In the event a nominee ceases to be available for election, the Board of Directors may designate a substitute as a nominee or reduce the size of the Board. If the Board designates a substitute nominee, proxies will be voted for the election of such substitute. As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director.

Capital One’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that anon-management director shall not be eligible for election to the Board upon reaching the age of 72. The Board may waive this prohibition of eligibility if it determines that, in light of all the circumstances, doing so is in the best interests of Capital One and its stockholders. The Board has waived this requirement in respect of Mr. Jenkins, in light of his experience and performance during his tenure as a member of the Board, his relatively short tenure with Capital One, the quantity and quality of his experience in corporate banking, banking operations, investment banking, and management of customer relationships, spanning over 38 years, during which time he saw the industry undergo significant and rapid change, and his continuing value to Capital One and our stockholders as Capital One continues to evolve to match the pace of change in the banking industry.

The nominees for election this year are:

 

Richard D. FairbankPierre E. Leroy
Ann Fritz HackettPatrick W. GrossPeter E. Raskind
Lewis Hay, IIIAnn Fritz HackettMayo A. Shattuck III
Lewis Hay, IIIBradford H. Warner
Benjamin P. Jenkins, IIIBradford H. Warner
Peter Thomas KillaleaCatherine G. West

***

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR“FOR” each of these director nominees.

90  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTIONSection XI – RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORSRatification of Selection of Independent Auditors(Item 2 on Proxy Card)

(ITEM 2 ON PROXY CARD)

The Audit Committee, pursuant to authority granted to it by the Board of Directors, is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of Capital One’s independent auditors. The Audit Committee evaluates the independent auditors’ qualifications, performance and independence at least annually and periodically considers whether to continue to retain our current independent auditor or engage another firm. In connection with applicable partner rotation requirements, the Audit Committee and its Chair are involved in considering the selection of Ernst & Young’sthe independent auditor’s new lead engagement partner.

For 2015,2017, the Audit Committee has appointed the firm of Ernst & Young as independent auditors. Ernst & Young has served as Capital One’s independent auditors since 1994. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young as Capital One’s independent auditors is in the best interests of Capital One and its stockholders.

The Board of Directors is submitting this proposal to the vote of the stockholders as a matter of good corporate governance. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of Ernst & Young, the Audit Committee will reconsider their appointment as our independent auditors.

The fees billed for professional services provided by Ernst & Young for fiscal years 20142016 and 20132015 are shown in the following table:

 

  Fees (dollars in millions)20142013

  Audit Fees

$10.14$10.22

  Audit-Related Fees

$1.22$1.49

  Tax Fees

$0.26$0.32

  All Other Fees

$0.00$0.00
  Fees (dollars in millions)   2016   2015
 

Audit Fees

  $11.38  $11.12
 

Audit-Related Fees

  $1.23  $1.26
 

Tax Fees

  $0.00  $0.00
 

All Other Fees

  $0.00  $0.00

Audit fees include fees for the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form10-Q and services that normally would be provided by the auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and that generally only the independent auditor can provide. In addition to fees for an audit or review in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, this category contains fees for comfort letters, statutory audits, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC. Audit-related fees are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and traditionally are performed by the independent auditor, such as: employee benefit plan audits; due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions; internal control reviews; attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation; and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. Tax fees would include corporate and subsidiary compliance, consulting, international and employee benefit services. All other fees would include fees for services that are not defined as Audit, Audit-related or Tax and are not specifically prohibited by the SEC.

The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the amount of Audit fees paid to Ernst & Young. The Audit Committee has reviewed the fees paid to Ernst & Young and has considered whether the fees paid fornon-Audit services are compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young’s independence. The Audit Committee also adopted policies and procedures to approve services provided by Ernst & Young in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and rules of the SEC promulgated thereunder. These policies and procedures involve annualpre-approval by the Audit Committee of the types of services to be provided by Capital One’s independent auditor and fee limits for each type of service on both a per engagement and aggregate level. AdditionalAny service engagements that exceed thesepre-approved limits must be submitted to the Audit Committee for further specificpre-approval. Under the policy adopted by the Audit Committee, Tax fees are limited to 25% of combined Audit and Audit-related fees, and services that would fall under the category “All Other Fees” are prohibited. Capital One’s policy, for administrative ease, allows for a $25,000de minimis exceptionIn

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  91


SECTION XI – RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS (ITEM 2 ON PROXY CARD)

2016, all of the Audit and Audit-related services and related fees werepre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the pre-approval procedures; however, any services provided pursuant to this exception must be approved at the next meeting of the Audit

Committee.policies and procedures described above. Additionally, Capital One has established policies to provide for adherence to Sarbanes-Oxley Act requirements relating to the rotation of partners engaged in Capital One’s audit by the independent auditors.

Representatives of Ernst & Young are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

***

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote“FOR” “FOR” the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Capital One’s independent auditors for 2015.2017.

92  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTIONSection XII – ADVISORY APPROVAL OF CAPITAL ONE’S 2014 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATIONAdvisory Approval of Capital One’s 2016 Named Executive Officer Compensation(Item 3 on Proxy Card)

(ITEM 3 ON PROXY CARD)

We are offering to our stockholders anon-binding advisory vote onto approve our 2014 Named Executive Officer2016 named executive officer compensation, including the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.Act. While the vote isnon-binding, the Board of Directors values the opinions that stockholders express through their votes and in any additional dialogue. The Board of Directors will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions.

As discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 31,40, our Board of Directors generally has provided compensation programs for the CEO and the other NEOs that are competitive with the market, performance-based and transparent and that align with our stockholders’ interests over multiple time horizons. Our CEO and NEOother NEOs compensation programs generally have consisted primarily of performance-based incentive opportunities, including multiple types of equity instruments with multi-year vesting schedules. The ultimate value of the equity-based awards made to our CEO and the NEOsnamed executive officers is subject to Capital One’s sustained performance over time, both on an absolute basis and relative to our peers.

For 2014,2016, approximately 78%84% of the CEO’s total compensation is equity-based andat-risk to the performance of the Company’s stock price, and 100% of his compensation is deferred for a three-year period. As discussed under “NEO Compensation” on page 34,54, under the 20142016 NEO compensation program applicable to our other NEOs approximately 80% of total target compensation was provided through equity-based vehicles which were allat-risk based on the performance of the Company’s stock price and subject to vesting over multiple time horizons.

Additional information relevant to your vote can be found in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement on pages 3140 to 5167 and in the “Named Executive Officer Compensation” section on pages 5268 to 70.85.

We ask for your advisory vote onto approve the following resolution:

Resolved, that Capital One’s stockholders hereby provide their advisory approval of the 20142016 Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed pursuant to the rules of the SEC in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, the other compensation tables and the related notes and narratives in this proxy statement.”

***

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote“FOR” advisory approval of our 2014 Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement.

The Board of Directors has resolved to hold annual advisory votes onto approve executive compensation. Accordingly, the next advisory vote onto approve executive compensation will occur at the 20162018 Annual Meeting, unless the Board of Directors modifies its policy on the frequency of holding such advisory votes.

SECTION XIII – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO CAPITAL ONE’S RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ALLOW STOCKHOLDERS TO REQUEST SPECIAL MEETINGS OF THE STOCKHOLDERS

(ITEM 4 ON PROXY CARD)

Overview

The Board of Directors recommends that Capital One’s stockholders approve an amendment to Capital One’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate”) to allow one or more stockholders who own at least 25% of the Company’s common stock and who satisfy certain procedures to require that the Company call a special meeting of the stockholders (the “Proposed Certificate Amendment”). Stockholders do not presently have the ability to require that the Company call a special meeting of the stockholders.

The Proposed Certificate Amendment

If the Proposed Certificate Amendment is approved by stockholders, the Certificate will provide that the Company is required to call a special meeting of the stockholders upon the written request of one or more stockholders who:

own shares representing 25% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock1 entitled to vote on the matter or matters to be brought before the proposed special meeting,

continue to satisfy that level of stock ownership for such period as set forth in the Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), as amended from time to time, and

provide the information regarding the stockholder(s) requesting the special meeting and the proposed special meeting, and satisfy such additional procedures, as provided for in the Bylaws from time to time.

As discussed further below, the Proposed Certificate Amendment utilizes a “net long” definition of stock ownership for purposes of determining whether stockholders requesting a special meeting satisfy the 25% ownership threshold. Under the “net long” definition, a person will be deemed to “own” only those shares of outstanding Voting Stock as to which the person possesses both (i) full voting and investment rights pertaining to the shares and (ii) the full economic interest in (including the opportunity for profit and risk of loss on) such shares, which terms may be further defined in the Bylaws from time to time.***

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” advisory approval of our 2016 Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  93


“FOR”Section XIII – Advisory Vote on Frequency of Holding an Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

(Item 4 on Proxy Card)

Pursuant to the Proposed Certificate Amendment.

PurposeDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and EffectConsumer Protection Act and Section 14A of the Proposed Certificate AmendmentExchange Act, we are submitting to our stockholders an advisory vote as to whether future advisory votes to approve our named executive officer compensation should occur every one, two or three years or abstain from voting on this proposal.

The Proposed Certificate Amendment is a result of the Board of Directors’ ongoing review of our corporate governance principles andAfter careful consideration, of the stockholder proposal discussed below. In developing the Proposed Certificate Amendment, the Board of Directors (including all members ofrecommends that stockholders vote for future advisory votes to approve executive compensation every year. Our Board believes that holding a vote every year is the Governance and Nominating Committee) carefully consideredmost appropriate policy for Capital One at this time. While Capital One’s executive compensation programs are designed to reward performance over multiple time horizons, the implications of amending our Certificate to allow stockholders to request that the Company call a special meeting.

The Board of Directors recognizes that providing stockholders the ability to require that the Company call special meetings is viewed by some stockholders asexecutive compensation disclosures are an important corporate governance practice. However, special meetingsconsideration for stockholders on an annual basis. Although it may not be feasible to change the compensation program in consideration of any one year’s advisory vote on compensation, holding an annual advisory vote on executive compensation provides Capital One with more immediate feedback on our compensation practices to advance our goal of aligning our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders.

Stockholders will be able to specify one of four choices for this proposal on the proxy card: one year, two years, three years or abstain. Stockholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation. This advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes to approve executive compensation isnon-binding on the Board of Directors. Notwithstanding the Board’s recommendation and the outcome of the stockholders can cause the Company to incur substantial expenses and can be potentially disruptive to its business operations and to long-term stockholder interests. Accordingly,vote, the Board of Directors believes that special meetings of the stockholders should be extraordinary events that should not be held in close proximity to an annual meeting or when the matters to be addressed have been recently considered or are planned to be considered at another meeting. The Board of Directors would continue to have the ability to call special meetings of the stockholders in other instances when,may in the exercise of their fiduciary obligations, they determine appropriate.

In light of these considerations, the Board of Directors believes that it strikes an appropriate balance between enhancing stockholder rightsfuture decide to conduct advisory votes on a more or less frequent basis and adequately protecting stockholder interests to provide thatmay vary its practice based on factors such as discussions with stockholders who

1References in this discussion to votes of the outstanding shares and to the “Voting Stock” mean the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. Currently, Capital One common stock is the only class or series of Voting Stock outstanding.

satisfy a 25% “net long” ownership threshold and comply with certain additional procedures and limitations have the ability to request that the Company call a special meeting.

In determining to utilize a 25% ownership threshold, the Board of Directors noted that the 25% ownership standard is the most prevalent standard among its peer companies that allow stockholders to call special meetings, and that a number of the Company’s institutional stockholders have in the past expressed support for a 25% ownership standard for stockholders to be able to request a special meeting of the stockholders. The Board of Directors determined to adopt a “net long” definition of ownership because it believes that only stockholders with full and continuing economic interest and voting rights in our Voting Stock should be entitled to request that the Company call a special meeting.

As a result, the Board of Directors has considered the matter, and upon recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, adopted resolutions setting forth the Proposed Certificate Amendment, declared such amendment advisable and unanimously resolved to submit such amendment to our stockholders for consideration and to recommend that stockholders vote“FOR” the Proposed Certificate Amendment.

Related Changes to the Bylaws

The Proposed Certificate Amendment authorizes the Bylaws (1) to specify the information required to be provided in connection with a stockholder’s request to call a special meeting, (2) to set forth continuing ownership requirements and additional procedures and conditions applicable to stockholders’ ability to request that the Company call a special meeting, and (3) to define ownership for purposes of the “net long” ownership standard under the Proposed Certificate Amendment. Accordingly, the Board of Directors has amended Article II of our Bylaws, contingent upon stockholder approval and implementation of the Proposed Certificate Amendment, to address these provisions.

Information Provisions.

The Bylaw amendment requires any special meeting request to set forth the same information regarding the business to be conducted at the meeting and regarding any director candidate to be nominated at the meeting that is required to be provided by a stockholder who proposes to introduce such business or to make director nominations at an annual meeting of stockholders. Any stockholder or beneficial owner who is seeking to call the special meeting or who solicits other stockholders to support calling the special meeting also must provide the same information as to its ownership of the Company’s stock and its interest in the matters proposed to be voted on at the special meeting that is required of a stockholder who proposes to introduce such business or to make director nominations at an annual meeting of stockholders. Each stockholder supporting the special meeting request must provide information as to the number of shares of the Company’s stock that it owns.

Ownership Provisions.

The Bylaw amendment elaborates on the “net long” ownership definition included in the Proposed Certificate Amendment by providing that borrowed or hedged shares do not count toward the 25% ownership threshold. However, holding shares through a nominee and the practiceadoption of share lending will not be deemedmaterial changes to interrupt ownership of shares that otherwise are deemed to be “owned” under this standard. Stockholders requesting a special meeting must hold the requisite number of shares through the date of the special meeting and provide updated ownership information at the record date and shortly before the date of the special meeting of stockholders.

Additional Provisions.

The Bylaw amendment sets forth certain procedural requirements that the Board believes are appropriate to avoid duplicative or unnecessary special meetings. Under these provisions, a special meeting request is not valid if:

the proposed meeting relates to an item of business that is not a matter on which stockholders are authorized to act under, or that involves a violation of, applicable law;
the proposed meeting relates to an item of business that is the same or substantially similar to any item of business that was voted on at a meeting of stockholders occurring within 90 days preceding the earliest dated request for a special meeting; or

an otherwise valid special meeting request is submitted within the 90 days preceding the anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting.

Under the Bylaw amendment, if stockholders who requested a special meeting revoke the request or cease to own 25% of the Voting Stock, the Company is not required to hold the special meeting of the stockholders.

The Stockholder Proposal

As described below in Section XIV, Capital One has been notified that a stockholder intends to present a proposal for consideration at the Annual Meeting (the “Stockholder Proposal”) that also addresses stockholders’ ability to call special meetings of the stockholders. Although the Proposed Certificate Amendment and the Stockholder Proposal concern the same subject matter, the terms and effects of each proposal differ. Stockholders may vote on both the Proposed Certificate Amendment and the Stockholder Proposal, and approval of the Proposed Certificate Amendment is not conditioned on approval or disapproval of the Stockholder Proposal. Among the differences between the Proposed Certificate Amendment and the Stockholder Proposal are the following:

The Proposed Certificate Amendment is binding. If the Proposed Certificate Amendment is approved, our Certificate and Bylaws will be amended, thereby providing stockholders the ability to have the Company call a special meeting of the stockholders. In contrast, the Stockholder Proposal is not binding; approval of the Stockholder Proposal requests that the Board consider the matter but does not amend either the Certificate or the Bylaws.
For the reasons discussed above, the Board provided in the Proposed Certificate Amendment that one or more stockholders who hold in the aggregate at least 25% of the Company’s Voting Stock can request that the Company call a special meeting of the stockholders. The Stockholder Proposal requests that holders in the aggregate of 20% of our outstanding common stock be given the power to call a special meeting of the stockholders, but does not specifically address why it believes that a 20% threshold is appropriate.
The Proposed Certificate Amendment sets forth procedures for stockholders to request a special meeting of the stockholders which, as explained above, the Board has determined are in the interests of our stockholders. The Stockholder Proposal does not address such terms.

Neither the Proposed Certificate Amendment nor the Stockholder Proposal affect the Board of Directors’ existing authority to call special meetings of stockholders.

You should carefully read the descriptions of each proposal, and Capital One’s statement in opposition to the Stockholder Proposal, in considering the Proposed Certificate Amendment and the Stockholder Proposal.

Additional Information

The general description of the Proposed Certificate Amendment set forth above is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Proposed Certificate Amendment, which is attached as Appendix A to these proxy materials. In addition, the text of the Bylaw amendment, which can be amended from time to time, is attached as Appendix B to these proxy materials. Additions to the Certificate and the Bylaws are indicated by double underlining and deletions to the Certificate and the Bylaws are indicated by strike outs. Complete copies of the current Certificate and Bylaws are available on the Corporate Governance page of Capital One’s Internet site at www.capitalone.com under “About Us/Investors.”

The Proposed Certificate Amendment is binding. If the Proposed Certificate Amendment is approved, the Company intends to file the Certificate of Amendment to Capital One’s Certificate with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, and the Proposed Certificate Amendment will become effective at the time of that filing. If the Proposed Certificate Amendment is not approved by the requisite vote, then the Proposed Certificate Amendment will not be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, the Bylaw amendment will not become effective and our stockholders will not have the ability to request that the Company call a special meeting of stockholders. Approval of the Proposed Certificate Amendment is not conditioned on approval or disapproval of the Stockholder Proposal, which means that the foregoing effects of approval or disapproval of the Proposed Certificate Amendment are not affected by approval or disapproval of the Stockholder Proposal.compensation programs.

***

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the Proposed Certificate Amendment in order to amend ourconduct future advisory votes to approve executive compensation “EVERY YEAR.”

94  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


Section XIV – Approval and Adoption of Capital One’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow one or more stockholders who own at least 25%Associate Stock Purchase Plan

(Item 5 on Proxy Card)

The purpose of the Capital One 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan (the “ASPP”) is to secure for the Company and its stockholders the benefits of the incentive inherent in the ownership of Capital One’s common stock by its employees. The following description of the ASPP is not intended to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the complete text of the ASPP, which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. Stockholders are urged to read the ASPP in its entirety.

The Company maintains the ASPP. Under the ASPP, which was initially adopted by the Board effective on September 19, 2002, the Company reserved 3,000,000 shares of Capital One common stock for employee purchases. In February 2008, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the number of reserved shares to 8,000,000 shares in February 2008, which was approved by stockholders in April 2008. The Plan was most recently approved by the Company’s Voting Stockstockholders on May 8, 2012, at which time the Board of Directors and stockholders approved an increase in the number of shares to 18,000,000, and has been amended by the Board of Directors since then to address certain ministerial matters. The Board of Directors is recommending an amendment and restatement to the ASPP, as amended, to request approval of an additional 15,000,000 shares to be reserved under the ASPP, for a total of 33,000,000 reserve shares (the “Amended and Restated ASPP”). These shares may consist of newly issued shares, treasury shares, shares acquired on the open market or any combination thereof.

Summary of Material Provisions of the ASPP

Administration

The ASPP is administered by the Compensation Committee, which must consist of not less than two members appointed by the Board, unless the Board appoints another committee to administer the plan. Such committee has the authority to take any and all actions necessary to implement the ASPP and to interpret the ASPP, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the ASPP, and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable in administering the ASPP. All of such actions, interpretations and determinations shall be final and binding upon all persons.

Eligibility

All individuals who satisfy certain proceduresare actively employed by the Company or a subsidiary and are customarily paid through the Company’s regular payroll are eligible to requireparticipate in the ASPP.

Purchase of Shares

Each eligible employee may elect regular, monthly payroll deductions of up to 15% of the employee’s base compensation to be used to purchase shares of common stock at monthly intervals (or at such other times as determined by the plan administrator). Eligible employees may also elect to make alump-sum cash contribution (provided that the Company call a special meetingtotal of the stockholderspayroll deductions and such contributions for any calendar quarter do not exceed 15% of an employee’s base compensation for such period) to be used to purchase shares. The total amount of monthly payroll deductions and quarterlylump-sum cash contributions may not exceed $75,000 in any calendar year. A participating employee may elect once each calendar quarter to increase, decrease, or eliminate his or her regular payroll deduction. Shares of common stock are purchased under the ASPP at the end of each month (a “purchase date”), or at such other times as determined by the plan administrator.

Matching Contribution; Purchase Price

Each employee who participates in the ASPP will receive a matching contribution from the Company equal to 17.65% of the amount of such employee’s matching andlump-sum contributions to the ASPP. This matching contribution is combined with the employee’s contributions and used to purchase common stock under the ASPP

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  95


SECTION XIV – APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF CAPITAL ONE’S AMENDED AND RESTATED ASSOCIATE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

at a purchase price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the applicable purchase date. Taking in account the matching contributions, participants effectively purchase common stock under the ASPP at a 15% discount to the fair market value of the shares on the purchase date.

Effect of Termination of Employment

If an eligible employee’s employment is terminated for any reason (including death), any amount withheld prior to such termination will be used to purchase shares on the next purchase date.

Change in Capital Structure

In the event of a stock dividend,spin-off, stock split or combination of shares, recapitalization or merger in which the Company is the surviving corporation or other change in the common stock (including, but not limited to, the creation or issuance to shareholders generally of rights, options or warrants for the purchase of common stock or preferred stock of the Company), the number and kind of shares of stock or securities of the Company to be subject to the ASPP, the maximum number of shares or securities that may be delivered under the ASPP, the purchase price and other relevant provisions shall be appropriately adjusted by the Committee, whose determination shall be binding on all persons.

Amendment and Termination

The Board of Directors in its sole discretion may at any time amend the ASPP in any respect provided that such amendment is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and the requirements of any national securities exchange on which shares of common stock are then traded.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following tax discussion is a brief summary of current U.S. federal income tax law. The discussion is intended solely for general information and does not make specific representations to any employee participating in the ASPP. The discussion does not address state, local or foreign income tax rules or other U.S. tax provisions, such as estate or gift taxes. An employee’s particular situation may be such that some variation of the basic rules is applicable to him or her. In addition, the federal income tax laws and regulations frequently have been revised and may be changed again at any time. Therefore, each recipient is urged to consult a tax advisor before exercising any award or before disposing of any shares acquired under the plan both with respect to federal income tax consequences as well as any foreign, state or local tax consequences.

On the date of each payroll contribution, an associate will have ordinary income equal to amount of the Company-paid match described above. The employee’s tax capital gains holding period will commence on that date. We are entitled to a deduction for amounts taxed as ordinary income to an employee.

ASPP Benefits

Future benefits available under the ASPP are subject to the participation level of our employees and to the Company’s stock price at the time of any purchases and therefore are not determinable at this time. During the year ended December 31, 2016, 1,813,480 shares of Company common stock were purchased by employees under the ASPP. As of March 13, 2017, the closing price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $91.79.

***

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to approve and adopt the Amended and Restated ASPP.

96  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION XIVSection XVSTOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL MEETINGS OF THE STOCKHOLDERSStockholder Proposal Requesting Stockholders’ Right to Act by Written Consent(Item 6 on Proxy Card)

(ITEM 5 ON PROXY CARD)

Capital One has been notified that John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, intends to present a proposal for consideration at the Annual Meeting (the “Stockholder Proposal”) that addresses stockholders’ ability to call special meetings of the stockholders.act by written consent. Mr. Chevedden has submitted documentation indicating that he is the beneficial owner of no fewer than 100 shares of Capital One common stock. The Stockholder Proposal will be voted on atresolution being submitted by Mr. Chevedden to the Annual Meeting onlystockholders for approval, if properly presented, is as follows:

Proposal 6 – Right to Act by or on behalf of Mr. Chevedden.

In a different proposal that is described above in Section XIII, the Board of Directors is recommending that Capital One’s stockholders approve an amendment to Capital One’s Certificate to allow one or more stockholders owning at least 25% of the Company’s Voting Stock to require that the Company call a special meeting of the stockholders, which we refer to as the Proposed Certificate Amendment.Although the Proposed Certificate Amendment and the Stockholder Proposal concern the same subject matter, the terms and effects of each proposal differ.

You should carefully read the descriptions of each proposal, and Capital One’s statement in opposition to the Stockholder Proposal, in considering the Proposed Certificate Amendment and the Stockholder Proposal.
Stockholders may vote on both the Proposed Certificate Amendment and the Stockholder Proposal, and approval of the Proposed Certificate Amendment is not conditioned on approval or disapproval of the Stockholder Proposal.
Although the Stockholder Proposal is not binding, as a matter of good corporate governance, if the Stockholder Proposal is approved, the Board expects to consider and to direct the Company to engage with stockholders regarding the Stockholder Proposal, regardless of whether the Proposed Certificate Amendment is approved by the stockholders.
The Board of Directors is recommending a vote FOR the Proposed Certificate Amendment (Item 4) and AGAINST the Stockholder Proposal described below (Item 5).

Mr. Chevedden has submitted the following resolution:

Special Shareowner MeetingsWritten Consent

Resolved, Shareowners askShareholders request that our board of directors undertake such steps as may be necessary to takepermit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the stepsminimum number of votes that would be necessary (unilaterally if possible) to amend our bylawsauthorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and each appropriate governing documentvoting. This written consent is to give holdersbe consistent with applicable law and consistent with giving shareholders the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any topic for written consent consistent with applicable law.

This proposal topic won majority shareholder support at 13 major companies in a single year. This included 67%-support at both Allstate and Sprint. Hundreds of major companies enable shareholder action by written consent.

Taking action by written consent in lieu of a meeting is a means shareholders can use to raise important matters outside the aggregate of 20% of our outstanding common stock the powernormal annual meeting cycle. A shareholder right to act by written consent and to call a special shareowner meeting. This proposal does not impact our board’s current power to call a special meeting.

Special meetings allow shareowners to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors that can arise between annual meetings. Shareowner input on the timing of shareowner meetings is especially important when events unfold quickly and issues may become moot by the next annual meeting. This proposal topic won more than 70% support at Edwards Lifesciences and SunEdison in 2013. Vanguard sent letters to 350 of its portfolio companies asking them to consider providing the right for shareholders to call a special meeting.

A shareholder right to call a special meeting and to act by written consent are 2 complimentary ways to bring an important matter to the attention of both management and shareholders outside the annual meeting cycle. This is important because there could be 15 months between annual meetings. ATaking action by written consent saves the expense of holding a special shareholder rightmeeting. Also our company requires 25% of shareholders to aggregate their shares to call a special meeting is one method– a much higher hill to equalizeclimb than the absence10% of a shareholder right to actshareholders permitted by written consent at Capital One.Delaware law.

An added incentive to vote for this proposal is our clearly improvable corporate governance and performance as summarized in 2014:

GMI Ratings, an independent investment research firm, said Richard Fairbank received $26 million in 2013 Total Realized Pay. GM said Capital One had not disclosed specific, quantifiable performance target objectives for Mr. Fairbank. Capital One paid long-term incentives to executives without requiring the company to perform above the median of its peer group. GMI rated Capital One D for accounting. GMI said multiple related party transactions and other potential conflicts of interest involving our company’s board or senior managers should be reviewed in greater depth, as such practices raise concerns regarding potential self-dealing or abuse.

Director Patrick Gross received our highest negative votes again. Mr. Gross had 19-years long tenure which can result in low independence and served on 5 public boards which can be a sign of over-extension. Nonetheless Mr. Gross was on our executive pay and nomination committees. In August 2014, Capital One said it received subpoenas from the New York District Attorney’s Office as part of a money-laundering probe.

Returning to the core topic of this proposal from the context of our clearly improvable corporate governance, pleasePlease vote to protectenhance shareholder value:

Special Shareowner MeetingsRight to Act by Written Consent – Proposal 56

Statement in Opposition to the Stockholder Proposal

TheCapital One already provides stockholders with the ability to act in between annual meetings, and accordingly the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote“AGAINST” “AGAINST” the Stockholder Proposal. The Board believes the proposed change requested by the Stockholder Proposal is not necessary in lightCapital One’s circumstances given our current governance practices and structures – including the ability of stockholders to call special meetings, our strong stockholder engagement practices year-around and our prior adoption of proxy access – and is not in the best interests of our stockholders. Capital One’s stockholder engagement program provides an open, transparent, and constructive forum for our stockholders to have atwo-way dialogue with us, including as to concerns they may have, and ensures that management and our Board of Directors understand and consider the issues that matter most to our stockholders.

Capital One’s existing stockholder-friendly governance practices and structures make implementation of this Stockholder Proposal unnecessary.Capital One’s robust corporate governance structures empower our stockholders, promote accountability and oversight and provide stockholders with an opportunity to express their views. These features include an annually elected Board; a majority voting standard for election of directors in uncontested elections; and independent Board leadership through a strong and active Lead Independent Director and independent committee chairs for key committees. In addition, in 2015, the Company proactively adopted proxy access bylaws that permit a stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders who have owned at least 3% of the Proposed Certificate AmendmentCompany’s outstanding common shares or voting stock continuously for at least 3 years to nominate and

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  97


SECTION XV – STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING STOCKHOLDERS’ RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT (ITEM 6 ON PROXY CARD)

include in the Company’s proxy materials a number of director candidates equal to the greater of two or 20% of the total Board.

With respect to matters requiring stockholder action, either Capital One or its stockholders may present items for consideration at an annual or special meeting of the stockholders. Under our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, stockholders may propose business for a stockholder vote at our annual meeting by following the procedures set forth in Section XIII. The Boardour governing documents and stockholders owning at least 25% of Directors recognizes that providing stockholders the ability to request thatCompany’s Voting Stock may require the Company to call a special meetings is viewed by some stockholders as an important corporate governance practice. However, special meetingsmeeting of the stockholders can cause thein between annual meetings. The 25% threshold required to call a special meeting allows for stockholders who represent a significant financial stake in our Company to incur substantial expensescall a special meeting and can be potentially disruptive to the Company’s business operations and to long-term stockholder interests. Accordingly, the Board of Directors believes that special meetings of the stockholders should be extraordinary events. In addition, the Board of Directors believes thatprotects against a small minority of stockholders should not be entitled to utilizeutilizing the mechanism of a special meetingsmeeting for their own special interests, which may not be shared more broadly by stockholders of the Company. Likewise,

In the Board’s view, action at a stockholder meeting (whether annual or special), supports stockholders’ interests more than action by written consent. The Board believes matters sufficiently important to require a stockholder vote should be the subject of a stockholder meeting, which provides all stockholders with advance notice, the benefits of a well-structured process and publicly filed proxy materials and the opportunity to consider and discuss the merits of a proposed action prior to a vote. Our governing documents ensure that all stockholders are provided with minimum advance notice and an opportunity to participate in determining any action subject to a stockholder vote. The Stockholder Proposal, however, does not provide for any of the protections that are provided stockholders in the context of an annual or special meeting of stockholders, meaning that short-term or special interest stockholders could use the written consent procedure without providing advance notice or information to all stockholders on important pending stockholder actions, depriving many stockholders of the opportunity to engage in a transparent discussion and to exchange views with the Board of Directors believes that only stockholdersand each other before stockholder action is taken. Further, actions by written consent can cause confusion with full and continuing economic interest in our Voting Stock and full voting rights shouldmultiple written consents being circulated which may be entitled to request that the Company call a special meeting.duplicative or contradictory.

Capital One is dedicated to strong and effective corporate governance principles that promote the long-term interests of our stockholders, allow for responsible decision-making and accountability, and foster a culture that reflects the Company’s high standards of independence, transparency and stockholder rights. In recommending votes against the Stockholder Proposal, theThe Board believes that it is important to consider not only the Proposed Certificate Amendment but also the Company’s current governance practices including that:

A majority voting standard applies for the election of directors in uncontested elections;
All directors stand for election annually;
The Board of Directors has empowered and elected a strong and active Lead Independent Director; and
Key governance committees of the Board of Directors are chaired by and comprised solely of independent directors.

In addition, in 2014,structures described above reflect our stockholders approved amendments to Capital One’s Certificate that had been recommended by the Board of Directors to adopt a majority voting standard in place of the supermajority voting standards applicable to certain stockholder actions. These practices reflect the Board of Directors’ commitment to carefully considered corporate governance standards that operate for the benefit of all stockholders.

InCapital One’s ongoing dialogue with stockholders provides an open, transparent, and constructive forum for our stockholders to raise their concerns.As described more fully in this proxy statement under “Stockholder Engagement Program” on page 31, we proactively engage with our investors, including their corporate governance representatives, who collectively own a significant percentage of our outstanding stock to ensure we are receiving feedback focused on important corporate governance matters and issues. This is in addition to our year-round engagement practices with our investors on business-related matters. Capital One values the Proposed Certificate Amendment,input and insights of our stockholders and is committed to continued engagement with our investors. The wide breadth of our stockholder engagement activities gives our stockholders a variety of methods for communicating with management and the Board, of Directors is recommendingand enables management and our Board to consider and effectively address the issues that matter most to our stockholders.

In sum, we believe that Capital One’s existing governance practices and structures combined with our ongoing dialogue with our stockholders approve an amendment to Capital One’s Certificate to allow one or more stockholders owning at least 25%make implementation of the Company’s Voting Stock to require that the Company call a special meeting of the stockholders. In determining to utilize a 25% ownership threshold in the Proposed Certificate Amendment, the Board noted that the 25% ownership standard is the most prevalent standard among its peer companies, and that a number of the Company’s institutional stockholders have in the past expressed support for a 25% ownership standard for stockholders to be able to request a special meeting of the stockholders. In light of these considerations, the Board of Directors believes that it strikes an appropriate balance between enhancing stockholder rights and adequately protecting stockholder interests to provide that stockholders who satisfy a 25% “net long” ownership standard and comply with certain additional procedures and limitations have the ability to request that the Company call a special meeting.this Stockholder Proposal unnecessary.

***

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the Stockholder Proposal Regarding Special Meetings ofRequesting the StockholdersStockholders’ Right to Act by Written Consent.

98  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


SECTION XVSection XVIOTHER BUSINESSOther Business

 

Other Business

As of the date of this proxy statement, we know of no business that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than the items referred to above. If other matters are properly brought before the meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy card will vote such proxy at their discretion.

 

Annual Report to Stockholders

Capital One’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2016, including consolidated financial statements, is being furnished along with this proxy statement to Capital One’s stockholders of record. The Annual Report to Stockholders does not constitute a part of the proxy soliciting material. A copy of the Annual Report as well as Capital One’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2016 (“Form10-K”) may be obtained at the Annual Meeting, at our website atwww.capitalone.com under “About Us/Investors”Investors,” or by contacting our Investor Relations department at Capital One’s address set forth on the Notice of Annual Stockholder Meeting.Notice. The Form10-K, which is filed with the SEC, may also be obtained at the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.

 

Stockholder Proposals for 20162018 Annual Stockholder Meeting

Stockholders interested in submitting a proposalTo be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials atfor Capital One’s 20162018 Annual Stockholder Meeting (“Capital One’s 20162018 Annual Meeting”) may do so by following the rules prescribed in, stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act and stockholder director nominations submitted pursuant to the proxy access provisions of 1934. To be eligible for inclusion, stockholder proposalsour Bylaws must be received by Capital One’s Corporate Secretary at the address on the Notice of Annual Stockholder Meeting no later than November 21, 2017 (and in the closecase of business on November 18, 2015.proxy access no earlier than October 22, 2017). Stockholders submitting proposals pursuant to Rule14a-8 or submitting proxy access director candidates must also satisfy other procedural and qualification requirements set forth in Rule14a-8 and our Bylaws, respectively. The submission of a stockholder proposal or proxy access nomination does not guarantee that it will be included in our proxy statement.

Under our Bylaws, if you wish to present a stockholder proposal other business before the stockholders at Capital One’s 2016 Annual Meetingthan pursuant to Rule14a-8 or nominate a director candidate other than pursuant to our proxy access Bylaw provision, then to be timely for consideration at Capital One’s 2018 Annual Meeting, you must give proper written notice of any such businessproposal and of such nomination to the Corporate Secretary not beforeno earlier than January 1, 2016,4, 2018, and not after January 31, 2016.no later than February 3, 2018. If Capital One’s 20162018 Annual Meeting is held on a date that is not within thirty days before or sixty days after April 30, 2016,May 4, 2018, the anniversary date of this year’s Annual Meeting, notice must be delivered no earlier than the one hundred twentieth day prior to such annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth day prior to such meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Your notice must include the information specified in our Bylaws concerning the businessproposal or nominee. Our Bylaws set forth the information that must be furnished to the Corporate Secretary in order for any such notice to be proper. A copy of our Bylaws may be obtained from the Corporate Secretary at Capital One’s address on the Notice of Annual Stockholder Meeting.

On behalf of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGO

John G. Finneran, Jr.

Corporate Secretary

March 17, 201521, 2017

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  99


APPENDIXAppendix A – PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO Amended and Restated Capital One Financial Corporation 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan

CAPITAL ONE’SONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2002 ASSOCIATE

STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATEAS OF INCORPORATION TO ALLOW STOCKHOLDERS TO REQUEST SPECIAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERSMAY 8, 2012MAY 4, 2017

Set forth below1. Purpose and Effect of Plan

The purpose of the Plan is to secure for the textCompany and its stockholders the benefits of the incentive inherent in the ownership of Common Stock by present and future employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries. The Plan is hereby amended and restated effective as ofFebruary 23, 201 2May 4, 2017, subject to the approval of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation proposed to be amended by Item 4. Proposed additions are indicated by double underlining, and proposed deletions are indicated by strike-outs.stockholders at the Company’s20122017 annual meeting.

Proposed Amendments to Article IV:2. Shares Reserved for the Plan

(A)        Authorized Stock. The CorporationThere shall be authorized to issue 1,050,000,000 sharesreserved for issuance and purchase by Participating Associates under the Plan an aggregate of capital stock, of which 1,000,000,000 shares shall be18,000,00033,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value (“Common Stock”), and 50,000,000subject to adjustment as provided in Section 12. Shares issued under the Plan may consist of newly issued shares acquired from the Company, treasury shares held by the Company, shares acquired on the open market or a combination of the above.

3. Definitions

Where indicated by initial capital letters, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

a.Act: The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

b.Base Compensation: The base salary and/or com missions of an Eligible Associate received from the Employer, including salary reduction contributions pursuant to elections under a plan subject to Code section 125 or 40l(k), but excluding all other compensation such as overtime, bonuses, profit sharing awards and credits received under a plan subject to Code section 125.

c.Beneficiary: The beneficiary designated by the Participating Associate in the beneficiary designation in effect under the Company’s group life insurance plan, or if no beneficiary designation is in effect under such plan, the beneficiary designated by the Participating Associate in the beneficiary designation in effect under the Company’s Executive Life Insurance Plan, provided that if the Participating Associate has no beneficiary designation in effect under either of the foregoing plans or if the Participating Associate’s designated beneficiary predeceases him, the Participating Associate’s beneficiary shall be his estate.

d.Board: The Board of Directors of the Company.

e.Business Day: A day on which the New York Stock Exchange is open for trading in Common Stock or, if trading in Common Stock is suspended, the next following day on which the New York Stock Exchange is open for trading and on which trading in Common Stock is no longer suspended.

f.Code: The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

g.Committee: The committee established pursuant to Section 4 to be responsible for the general administration of the Plan.

h.Common Stock: The Company’s common stock, $.01 par value per share.

i.Company: Capital One Financial Corporation and any successor by merger, consolidation or otherwise.

j.Eligible Associate: Any employee of the Company or any of its Subsid iaries who meets the eligibility requirements of Section 5.

100  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


APPENDIX A – AMENDED AND RESTATED CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2002 ASSOCIATE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

k.Employer: For purposes of Section 5, the Company or Subsidiary employing an Eligible Associate.

l.Enrollment Form: The form filed with the Company’s Human Resources Department authorizing payroll deductions pursuant to Section 6.

m.Fair Market Value: With respect to Common Stock acquired from the Company, the closing price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape on the date in question, or, if the Common Stock shall not have been so quoted on such date, the closing price on the last day prior thereto on which the Common Stock was so quoted. With respect to Common Stock acquired in respect of the Plan on the open market, the weighted average purchase price (computed to four decimal places) of all shares purchased on the date in question.

n.Investment Account: The account established for each Participating Associate pursuant to Section 9 to account for Common Stock purchased under the Plan.

o.Investment Date: The last Business Day of each calendar month, or such other date(s) as determined by the Committee.

p.Participating Associate: An Eligible Associate who elects to participate in the Plan by filing an Enrollment Form pursuant to Section 6.

q.Payroll Deduction Account: The account established for a Participating Associate to reflect payroll deductions pursuant to Section 6.

r.Plan: The “Capital One Financial Corporation 2002 Associate Stock Purchase Plan,” as set forth herein and as. amended from time to time.

s.Purchase Price: The price for each whole and fractional share of Common Stock purchased under the Plan (after taking into account matching contributions pursuant to Section 7), other than those purchased by dividend reinvestment, shall be the Fair Market Value on the date in question. The price for each whole and fractional share of Common Stock purchased by dividend reinvestment shall be 85% (or such greater percentage determined by the Committee) of the Fair Market Value on the date in question. In the event matching contributions pursuant to Section 7 are eliminated, the price for each whole and fractional share of Common Stock purchased under the Plan shall be 85% (or such greater percentage determined by the Committee) of the Fair Market Value on the date in question.

t.Section: A section of the Plan, unless otherwise required by the context.

u.Subsidiary or Subsidiaries: Any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if, as of an Investment Date, each of the corporations other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.

4. Administration of the Plan

The Plan shall be sharesadministered by a committee, consisting of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value (“Preferred Stock”).

(B)        Preferred Stock. Sharesnot less than two members appointed by the Board. The Committee shall be the Compensation Committee of Preferred Stock may be issuedthe Board unless the Board shall appoint another committee to administer the Plan. The Board from time to time may remove members previously appointed and may fill vacancies, however caused, in the Committee.

Subject to the express provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have the authority to take any and all actions necessary to implement the Plan and to interpret the Plan, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable in administering the Plan. All of such actions, interpretations and determinations shall be final and binding upon all persons.

A quorum of the Committee shall consist of a majority of its members and the Committee may act by vote of a majority of its members at a meeting at which a quorum is present, or without a meeting by a written consent to its actions signed by all members of the Committee. The Committee may delegate all matters relating to the administration of the Plan to one or more series. Theof the Company’s officers. In addition, the Committee may request advice or assistance and employ such other persons as arc necessary for proper administration of the Plan.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  101


APPENDIX A – AMENDED AND RESTATED CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2002 ASSOCIATE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

No member of the Committee or the Board of Directors is hereby authorized to create and provideshall be liable for the issuance of shares of Preferred Stock in series and, by filing a certificate pursuantany action, omission, or determination relating to the applicable lawPlan, and the Company shall indemnify and hold harm less each member of the StateCommittee and each other director, employee or consultant of Delaware (hereinafter referredthe Company to whom any duty or power relating to the administration or interpretation of the Plan has been delegated against any cost or expense (including counsel fees) or liability arising out of any action, omission or determination relating to the Plan, to the maximum extent permitted by law.

5. Eligible Associates

Subject to the limitations of this Section, all employees of the Company or its Subsidiaries shall be eligible to participate in the Plan. To be an employee eligible to participate in the Plan, a person must be actively employed by the Employer and customarily paid through the Employer’s regular payroll. Any person who is excluded by the terms and conditions of his employment from participation in the Plan, any person acting as a “Preferred Stock Designation”),non-employee director of the Employer, any person designated by the Employer as an independent contractor, and any person who is a “leased employee” within the meaning of Section 414(n) of the Code, shall not be considered an employee for purposes of this Section 5. It is expressly intended that persons acting asnon-employee directors of the Employer, persons designated as independent contractors by the Employer and “leased employees” within the meaning of Section 414(n) of the Code are to establishbe excluded from Plan participation even if a court or administrative agency determines that such persons are common law employees and not persons acting asnon-employee directors, independent contractors or “1eased employees” of the Employer.

Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary stated herein, while employees of the Company or its Subsidiaries who are located in the United Kingdom from time to time are eligible to participate in the Plan, their eligibility is limited to the extent determined by the Committee from time to time which shall have the authority to: (i) impose a limitation on the number of sharessuch employees who may participate in the Plan; (ii) restrict eligibility to certain named employees; (iii) impose a limit on the value such employees may elect to have deducted from their payroll in order to purchase Common Stock in addition to the limits set out in Section 6; (iv) impose a fixed period during which such employees may elect for deductions from payroll to be includedmade; and (v) restrict the eligibility of any such employees to participate in each such series, andthe Plan.

6. Election to fixParticipate

Each Eligible Associate may elect to become a Participating Associate by filing with the designations, powers, preferences and rightsCompany’s Human Resources Department (or third party plan administrator designated by the Company’s Human Resources Department) an Enrollment Fonn authorizing specified regular payroll deductions from his Base Compensation; provided however that, for purposes of this Section 6, the last Enrollment Form filed by a Participating Associate pursuant to the Company’s 1994 Associate Stock Purchase Plan prior to the initial adoption of the Plan shall be deemed to be filed and effective with respect to the Plan as if actually filed hereunder. Such regular payroll deductions shall be subject to a minimum deduction of l% and a maximum deduction of 15% (or such lower percentage determined by the Committee) of Base Compensation for that payroll period. For purposes of the preceding sentence, a Participating Associate’s Base Compensation for any calendar quarter shall be the actual Base Compensation paid to the Participating Associate during such calendar quarter taking into account only the Base Compensation paid with respect to payroll periods during which payroll deductions were being made under the Plan. In addition, the total of regular payroll deductions in any calendar year shall not exceed $75,000. All regular payroll deductions shall be credited as soon as practicable to the Payroll Deduction Account that the Company has established with respect to the Participating Associate. A Participating Associate may elect at any time to increase, decrease, or eliminate his regular payroll deduction by filing a new Enrollment Form, subject to any restrictions that may be imposed by the Company.

6A. Limitation on Consideration Payable in EU Member States and European Economic Area Treaty Adherent States

(a)

Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan, in no event shall the total consideration payable through payroll deductions or other contributions authorized by Participating Associates resident in or otherwise located in the United Kingdom and other EU Member States and European Economic Area (“EEA”) treaty

102  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


APPENDIX A – AMENDED AND RESTATED CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2002 ASSOCIATE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

adherent states for the purchase of Common Stock pursuant to an offer under this Plan, when combined with the total consideration of all other offers to the public by the Company of its Common Stock within the United Kingdom, any other EU Member State or EEA treaty adherent state exceed the amount of 4,999,999 in a12-month period.

(b)In calculating the limit set out in (a) above at any particular time (the “Relevant Date”), there shall be included:

(i)any payroll deductions or other contributions that can be made pursuant to any offer of participation in the Plan in the 12 months following the Relevant Date;

(ii)any payroll deductions or other contributions that could be made pursuant to any offer of participation in the Plan within the period of 12 months ending with the Relevant Date;

(iii)the consideration for any other offer of shares of Common Stock made by the Company within the period of 12 months ending with the Relevant Date, which constitutes an offer to the public.

(c)A reference to an offer in this Section 6A is an offer of shares of Common Stock to persons resident in or otherwise located in the United Kingdom and other EU Member States and EEA treaty adherent states. Without limitation, an offer shall be considered to be made where an Eligible Associate is able to enroll into the Plan.

(d)Application of the limit set out in (a) above may result in a reduction in the number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by Participating Associates.

(e)Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the limit imposed under this Plan will be applied to all Participating Associates on similar terms and on apro-rata basis. The Committee may, in its absolute discretion, determine to scale back any participation in any other manner that it so chooses. For instance, the Committee may scale back contributions over a threshold it chooses.

(f)Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Section 6A shall automatically terminate without further action by the Board or the Committee if and when the Company can rely on another exemption under the EU Prospectus Directive 2003/71/ EC, as amended, that does not require the restrictions set forth in this section, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

7. Method of Purchase and Investment Accounts

Subject to Section 13, each Participating Associate shall receive a matching contribution to his Payroll Deduction Account as and when payroll deductions are made by the Participating Associate to his Payroll Deduction Account pursuant to Section 6 equal to 17.65% of the amount of such deductions and/or contributions. In addition, subject to Sections 6, 6A and 13, each Participating Associate having eligible funds in his Payroll Deduction Account on an Investment Date shall be deemed, without any further action, to have purchased the number of whole and fractional shares that the eligible funds in his Payroll Deduction Account could purchase at the applicable Purchase Price on that Investment Date. All whole and fractional shares purchased (rounded to the nearest ten thousandth) shall be maintained in a separate Investment Account for each Participating Associate. All cash dividends paid with respect to the whole and fractional shares of eachCommon Stock held in a Participating Associate’s Investment Account shall be used as soon as practicable to purchase additional shares of Common Stock at the applicable Purchase Price. All such seriesadditional shares, along with any dividends paid in shares of Common Stock, shall be added to the shares held for the Participating Associate in his Investment Account. Expenses incurred in the purchase of such shares of Common Stock shall be paid by the Company. Any distribution of shares or other property with respect to whole or fractional shares of Common Stock held in a Participating Associate’s Investment Account, other than a cash dividend or dividend of Common Stock, shall be distributed to the Participating Associate as soon as practicable. In the event of such a distribution, certificates for whole shares shall be issued and fractional shares shall be sold and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.proceeds of sale, less selling expenses and other applicable charges, distributed to the Participating Associate.

8. Stock Purchases

The authorityCompany shall issue (or direct the issuance of or the purchase on the open market of) shares of Common Stock to be credited to the Investment Accounts of the BoardParticipating Associates as of Directorseach Investment Date (or as

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  103


APPENDIX A – AMENDED AND RESTATED CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2002 ASSOCIATE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

soon as practicable thereafter) and each date as of which shares of Common Stock are purchased with reinvested cash dividends (or as soon as practicable thereafter).

9. Title of Accounts

The Company’s Human Resources Department or its delegate shall establish and maintain an Investment Account with respect to each seriesParticipating Associate. Each Investment Account shall include,be in the name of the Participating Associate.

10. Rights as a Shareholder

From and after the Investment date on which shares of Common Stock are purchased by a Participating Associate under the Plan, such Participating Associate shall have all of the rights and privileges of a shareholder of the Company with respect to such shares of Common Stock. Subject to Section 18 herein, a Participating Associate shall have the right at any time (i) to obtain a certificate for the whole shares of Common Stock credited to his Investment Account or (ii) to direct that any whole shares in his Investment Account be sold and that the proceeds, less expenses of sale, be remitted to him.

Prior to the Investment Date on which shares of Common Stock are to be purchased by a Participating Associate, such Participating Associate shall not have any rights as a shareholder of the Company with respect to such shares of Common Stock. Each Participating Associate shall be a general unsecured creditor of the Company to the extent of any amounts deducted under the Plan from such Participating Associate’s Base Compensation during the period prior to the Investment Date on which such amounts are applied to the purchase of Common Stock for the Participating Associate.

11. Rights Not Transferable

Rights under the Plan, except as set forth in Section 13(b) herein, are not transferable by a Participating Associate.

12. Change in Capital Structure

In the event of a stock dividend,spin-off, stock split or combination of shares, recapitalization or merger in which the Company is the surviving corporation or other change in the Company’s capital stock (including, but not be limited to, determinationthe creation or issuance to shareholders generally of rights, options or warrants for the purchase of common stock or preferred stock of the following:

(i)        The designation ofCompany), the series, which may be by distinguishing number letter or title.

(ii)        The numberand kind of shares of the series, which number the Board of Directors may thereafter (except where otherwise provided in the Preferred Stock Designation) increasestock or decrease (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding).

(iii)        Whether dividends, if any, shall be cumulative or noncumulative and the dividend ratesecurities of the series.

(iv)        Dates at which dividends, if any, shall be payable.

(v)        The redemption rights and price or prices, if any, for shares of the series.

(vi)        The terms and amount of any sinking fund provided for the purchase or redemption of shares of the series.

(vii)        The amounts payable on, and the preferences, if any, of shares of the series in the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Corporation.

(viii)        Whether the shares of the series shall be convertible into shares of any other class or series, or any other security, of the Corporation or any other corporation, and, if so, the specification of such other class or series of such other security, the conversion price or prices or rate or rates, any adjustments thereof, the date or dates at which such shares shall be convertible and all other terms and conditions upon which such conversion may be made.

(ix)        Restrictions on the issuance of shares of the same series or of any other class or series.

(x)        The voting rights, if any, of the holders of shares of the series.

(xi)        Such other powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special rights, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof as the Board of Directors shall determine.

PursuantCompany to the authority conferred by this Article IV, Paragraph (B),athe followingseries of Preferred Stock has been designated as Fixed Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B, and is attached as Exhibit 1 hereto and incorporated herein by reference.series of Preferred Stock are hereby

provided for, with the number of shares to be included in each such series, and the designation, powers, preference and rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof fixed as stated and expressed with respect to each such series in the respective exhibits specified below, which exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference:

Exhibit 1 Fixed Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B

Exhibit 2 Fixed Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C

Exhibit 3 Fixed Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D

(C)        The Common Stock. The Common Stock shall be subject to the express termsPlan, the maximum number of shares or securities that may be delivered under the Preferred StockPlan, the Purchase Price and any series thereof. Each share of Common Stockother relevant provisions shall havebe appropriately adjusted by the right to cast one vote for each share for the election of Directors andCommittee, whose determination shall be binding on all other matters uponpersons.

If the Company is a party to a consolidation or a merger in which stockholders are entitled to vote.

(D)        Vote. Except as otherwise provided in this Certificate of Incorporation or in a Preferred Stock Designation, or as may be required by applicable law, the Common Stock shall have the exclusive right to vote for the election of directors and for all other purposes and holders of shares of Preferred Stock shall not be entitled to receive notice of any meeting of shareholders at which they are not entitled to vote. Each share of Common Stock shall have one vote, and the Common Stock shall vote together as a single class.

(E)        Record Holders. The Corporation shall be entitled to treat the person in whose name any share of its stockCompany is registered as the owner thereof for all purposes and shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to, or interest in, such share on the part of any other person, whether or not the Corporation shall have notice thereof, except as expressly provided by applicable law.

Proposed Amendments to Article VI:

Section 2.2. Special Meeting.

(A)        In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by law, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized and empowered:

(i)        to adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws of the Corporation,provided,however,surviving corporation, a transaction that the Bylaws adopted by the Board of Directors under the powers hereby conferred may be altered, amended or repealed by the Board of Directors or by the stockholders having voting power with respect thereto,provided further thanresults in the caseacquisition of amendments by stockholders, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal, the Bylaws; and

(ii)        from time to time to determine whether and to what extent, and at what times and places, and under what conditions and regulations, the accounts and books of the Corporation, or any of them, shall be open to inspection of stockholders; and, except as so determined, or as expressly provided in this Certificate of Incorporation or in any Preferred Stock Designation, no stockholder shall have any right to inspect any account, book or document of the Corporation other than such rights as may be conferred by law.

(B)        The Corporation may in its Bylaws confer powers upon the Board of Directors in addition to the foregoing and in addition to the powers and authorities expressly conferred upon the Board of Directors by law.

(C)        A special meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation: (a) may be called at any time by the Chair of the Board of Directors or by the Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of directors which the Corporation would have if there were no vacancies; and (b) shall be called by the Chair of the Board of Directors or the Secretary of the Corporation upon the written request of one or more stockholders of record that (i) Own, or who are acting on behalf of persons who Own, shares representing 25% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding Voting

Stock entitled to vote on the matter or matters to be brought before the proposed special meeting, (ii) provide the information regarding such stockholder(s) (and the persons for whom the stockholders are acting, as applicable) and the proposed special meeting and comply with such procedures as shall be set forth in the Bylaws of the Corporation from time to time, (iii) continue to Own, or are acting on behalf of persons who continue to Own, shares representing 25% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock entitled to vote on the matter or matters to be brought before the proposed special meeting for such period as shall be set forth in the Bylaws, as amended from time to time, and (iv) satisfy such additional terms, conditions and limitations as may be set forth in the Bylaws of the Corporation from time to time. Except as provided for in the preceding sentence of this Article VI(C) or in the terms of any series of Preferred Stock, special meetings of the stockholders of the Corporation may not be called by any other person or persons. For purposes of this Article VI(C), a person shall be deemed to “Own” only those shares of outstanding Voting Stock as to which the person possesses both (i) full voting and investment rights pertaining to the shares and (ii) the full economic interest in (including the opportunity for profit and risk of loss on) such shares, which terms may be further defined in the Bylaws of the Corporation adopted from time to time. Only such business shall be conducted at a special meeting of stockholders as shall have been brought before the meeting pursuant to the Corporation’s notice of meeting (or, in the case of nominations for directors to be elected at a special meeting, if such nominations are brought in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Bylaws from time to time).

(C)(D) For purposes of this Certificate of Incorporation, “Voting Stock” shall mean the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of Directors.

APPENDIX B – PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CAPITAL ONE’S AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS TO ALLOW STOCKHOLDERS TO REQUEST SPECIAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS

Set forth below is the textsubstantially all of the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws proposed to be amendedoutstanding stock by Item 4. Proposed additions are indicated by double underlining, and proposed deletions are indicated by strike-outs.

Proposed Amendments to Article II:

Section 2.1. Annual Meeting. The annual meetingsa single person or entity, or a sale or transfer of stockholderssubstantially all of the Corporation shall be held atCompany’s assets, the Committee may take such place, either within or without the State of Delaware, and at such time and date as the Board of Directors, by resolution, shall determine and set forth in the notice of the meeting. If the Board of Directors fails so to determine the time, date and place of meeting, the annual meeting of stockholders shall be held at the Corporation’s principal executive offices on the first Tuesday in May. If the date of the annual meeting shall fall upon a legal holiday, the meeting shall be held on the next succeeding business day.

Section 2.2. Special Meeting.

(A)Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Corporation (the “Preferred Stock”) to elect additional directors under specified circumstances,aspecial meetings of the stockholdersof the Corporation: (i) may be called only by the Chair of the Board or by the Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of directors which the Corporation would have if there were no vacancies (the “Whole Board”) and shall be held at such place, on such date, and at such time as the Chair of the Board or Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Whole Board, as the case may be, shall fix.; and (ii) shall be called by the Chair of the Board of Directors or the Secretary of the Corporation upon the written request of one or more stockholders of record that at the time a request is delivered, Own, or who are acting on behalf of persons who Own, shares representing 25% (the “Requisite Percent”) or more of the voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock entitled to vote on the matter or matters to be brought before the proposed special meeting, provided that a special meeting called at the request of one or more stockholders (a “Stockholder Requested Special Meeting”) shall be called by the Chair of the Board or the Secretary of the Corporation only if the stockholder(s) requesting such meeting provide the information regarding such stockholder(s) (and regarding the persons for whom such stockholders are acting, as applicable) and the proposed special meeting and comply with such procedures set forth in Section 2.2(B) of these Bylaws. For the purposes of this Section 2.2 of these Bylaw, a person shall be deemed to “Own” only those shares of outstanding Voting Stock as to which the person possesses both (a) full voting and investment rights pertaining to the shares and (b) the full economic interest in (including the opportunity for profit and risk of loss on) such shares; provided that the number of shares calculated in accordance with clauses (a) and (b) shall not include any shares (x) sold by such person or any of its affiliates in any transaction that has not been settled or closed, (y) borrowed by such person or any of its affiliates for any purposes or purchased by such person or any of its affiliates pursuant to an agreement to resell or (z) subject to any option, warrant, forward contract, swap, contract of sale, other derivative or similar agreement entered into by such person or any of its affiliates, whether any such instrument or agreement is to be settled with shares or with cash based on the notional amount or value of shares of outstanding Voting Stock of the Corporation, in any such case which instrument or agreement has, or is intended to have, the purpose or effect of (1) reducing in any manner, to any extent or at any time in the future, such person’s or affiliates’ full right to vote or direct the voting of any such shares, and/or (2) hedging, offsetting or altering to any degree gain or loss arising from the full economic ownership of such shares by such person or affiliate. A person shall “own” shares held in the name of a nominee or other intermediary so long as the person retains the right to instruct how the shares are votedactions with respect to the election of directors and possessesPlan as the full economic interestCommittee deems appropriate.

Notwithstanding anything in the shares. A person’s ownershipPlan to the contrary, the Committee may take the foregoing actions without the consent of shares shall be deemed to continue during any period in whichParticipating Associate, and the person has loaned such shares provided that the person has the power to recall such loaned shares on less than three (3) business days’ notice and during any period in which the person has delegated any voting power by means of a proxy, power of attorney or other instrument or arrangement which is revocable at any time by the person. The determination of the extent to which a person “Owns” any shares of Voting Stock for these purposes shall be made in good faith by the Board of Directors, whichCommittee’s determination shall be conclusive and binding on the Corporationall persons for all purposes.

13. Termination of Employment and the stockholders.Death

(a)

If a Participating Associate’s employment is terminated for any reason other than death: (i) certificates with respect to the whole shares in his Investment Account shall be issued to him as soon as practicable following the next Investment Date, provided that the Participating Associate may elect to have such shares sold and the proceeds of the sale, less selling expenses, remitted to him; (ii) any fractional shares in his Investment Account shall be sold as soon as practicable following the next Investment Date, and the

104  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


APPENDIX A – AMENDED AND RESTATED CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2002 ASSOCIATE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

proceeds of the sale, less selling expenses, shall be remitted to the Participating Associate; and (iii) any amount in his Payroll Deduction Account shall be used to purchase shares as of the next following Investment Date, and such shares shall be distributed as soon as practicable thereafter in accordance with (a)(i) and (a)(ii) above; provided that, following the termination of his employment for any reason other than death, a Participating Associate may elect to receive a cash distribution from his Payroll Deduction Account before the next following Investment Date, if practicable.

(B) In order

(b)If a Participating Associate dies: (i) certificates with respect to any whole shares in his Investment Account shall be delivered to his Beneficiary as soon as practicable following the next Investment Date; (ii) any fractional shares in his Investment Account shall be sold as soon as practicable following the next Investment Date, and the proceeds of the sale, less selling expenses, shall be remitted to his Beneficiary; and (iii) any amount in his Payroll Deduction Account shall be used to purchase shares as of the next following Investment Date, and such shares shall be distributed to his Beneficiary as soon as practicable thereafter in accordance with (b)(i) and (b)(ii) above; provided that a Beneficiary may elect to receive the distributions from the Participating Associate’s Investment Account (as described in (b)(i) and (b)(ii), above) before the Investment Date next following the Participating Associate’s death, if practicable.

14. Tax Withholding

Each Participating Associate must make adequate provision for federal, state, or other tax withholding obligations, if any, which arise in connection with participation in the Plan. By electing to participate in the Plan, a Stockholder Requested Special MeetingParticipating Associate authorizes the Company to withhold from the Participating Associate’s compensation the amounts necessary to satisfy any such applicable tax withholding obligations. At any time, the Company may, but shall not be called byobligated to, withhold from the ChairParticipating Associate’s compensation the amount necessary for the Company to satisfy any applicable tax withholding obligations.

15. Amendment of the Plan

The Board or the Secretary of the Corporation, one or more written requests for a special meeting (individually or collectively, a “Special Meeting Request”) signed and dated by the stockholders of record that Own, or who are acting on behalf of persons who Own, the Requisite Percent of Voting Stock of the Corporation (or their duly authorized agents), must be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation and must be accompanied by:

(1) in the case of any Stockholder Requested Special Meeting at which director nominations are proposed to be presented, the information required by Section 2.7(A)(4) and (5), including as to the person(s) seeking to propose such nominations at such meeting, the information required under Section 2.7(A)(4)(b), which notice shall be further updated and supplemented, if necessary, so that the information provided or required to be provided in such notice shall be true and correct, as provided in the last sentence of Section 2.7(A)(2); and/or

(2) in the case of any Stockholder Requested Special Meeting at which any business other than nominations of persons for election to the Corporation’s Board of Directors is proposed to be presented, the information required by Section 2.7(B)(3) (which shall be in addition to the information required by Section 2.2(B)(1) if director nominations also are proposed to be considered), including as to the person(s) seeking to propose such business at such meeting, the information required under Section 2.7(B)(3)(d), which notice shall be further updated and supplemented, if necessary, so that the information provided or required to be provided in such notice shall be true and correct, as provided in the last sentence of Section 2.7(B)(2); and

(3) as to each stockholder of the Corporation signing such request, or if such stockholder is a nominee or custodian, the beneficial owner(s) on whose behalf such request is signed, (i) an affidavit by each such person stating the number of shares of Voting Stock of the Corporation that it Owns (as defined in Section 2.2(A)) as of the date such request was signed and agreeing to continue to Own such number of shares of Voting Stock through the date of the Stockholder Requested Special Meeting and an agreement by such person to update and supplement such affidavit, if necessary, so that the information provided in such affidavit regarding the number of shares of Voting Stock of the Corporation that such person Owns shall be true and correct as of the record date for the Stockholder Requested Special Meeting and as of the date that is ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, and such update and supplement shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than five (5) business days after the record date for the meeting in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of the record date, and not later than eight (8) business days prior to the date for the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof; provided that in the event of any decrease in the number of shares of Voting Stock of the Corporation Owned by such personits sole discretion may at any time beforeamend the Stockholder Requested Special Meeting,Plan in any respect; provided that such person’s Special Meeting Requestamendment is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and the requirements of any national securities exchange on which shares of Common Stock are then traded. Any such amendment shall be deemedsubject to have been revoked with respect to such shares of Voting Stockthe approval of the Corporation comprising such reduction and shall not be counted towards the calculation of the Requisite Percent, and (ii) asCompany’s stockholders to the stockholder seeking to call the special meeting (or the person on whose behalf the stockholder is acting, as applicable) or any stockholder or beneficial owner who has solicited other stockholders to request the special meeting, the information as to such stockholder or beneficial ownerextent required under Section 2.7(A)(4)(b).

One or more written requests for a special meeting delivered to the Secretary shall constitute a valid Special Meeting Request only if each such written request satisfies the requirements set forth above and has been dated and delivered to the Secretary within sixty (60) days of the earliest dated of such requests. If the record holder is not the signatory to the Special Meeting Request, such Special Meeting Request will not be valid unless documentary evidence from the record holder is supplied to the Secretary at the time of delivery of such Special Meeting Request (or within ten (10) business days thereafter) of such signatory’s authority to execute the Special Meeting Request on behalf of the record holder. The determination of the validity of a Special Meeting Request

shall be made in good faith by the Board of Directors, which determination shall be conclusive and binding on the Corporation, and the stockholders and the date of such determination is referred to herein as the “Request Receipt Date.” A Special Meeting Request shall not be valid if: (i) such Special Meeting Request relates to an item of business that is not a matter on which stockholders are authorized to act under, or that involves a violation of, applicable law or (ii) such Special Meeting Request relates to an itemthe requirements of business that is the same or substantially similar to any itemnational securities exchange on which shares of business that was voted on at a meeting of stockholders occurring within ninety (90) days preceding the earliest dated request for a special meeting, or (iii) the Request Receipt Date occurs during the period commencing ninety (90) days prior to the first anniversaryCommon Stock are then traded.

16. Termination of the datePlan

The Plan and all rights of the most recent annual meeting of stockholders and ending on the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders.Eligible Associates hereunder shall terminate:

(C) Any special meeting of stockholders shall be held at such date and time as may be fixed by the Board of Directors in accordance with these Bylaws; provided, however, that a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting shall be called for a date not later than the date that is (i) ninety (90) days after the Request Receipt Date (or, in the case of any litigation related to the validity of the requests for a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting, ninety (90) days after the resolution of such litigation), or (ii) fifty (50) days after the date the Corporation files definitive soliciting materials with respect to such meeting pursuant to Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), whichever is latest.

(a)on the Investment Date that Participating Associates become entitled to purchase a number of shares greater than the number of reserved shares remaining available for purchase; or

(D) Business transacted at a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting shall be limited to (i) the business stated in the valid Special Meeting Request(s) received from the Requisite Percent of stockholders, (ii) any additional business that the Board of Directors determines to include in the Corporation’s notice of meeting. and (iii) in the case of nominees for director nominated by a stockholder who has not delivered, and has not directed the delivery of, a Special Meeting Request with respect to the Stockholder Requested Special Meeting, in accordance with Section 2.7(C). If none of the stockholders who submitted the Special Meeting Request(s) (or their qualified representatives, as defined in Section 2.7(D)(1)) appears at the Stockholder Requested Special Meeting to present the matter or matters to be brought before the special meeting that were specified in the Special Meeting Request(s), the Corporation need not present the matter or matters for a vote at the meeting, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Corporation.

(b)at any earlier date determined by the Board in its sole discretion.

(E) The stockholder seeking to call the special meeting may revoke a Special Meeting Request by written revocation delivered to, or mailed and received by, the Secretary at any time prior to the special meeting and any stockholder signing a Special Meeting Request may revoke such request as to the shares that such person Owns (or Owned by the person on whose behalf the stockholder is acting, as applicable) and shall be deemed to revoke a Special Meeting Request as and to the extent provided in Section 2.2(B)(3); provided that if as a result of such revocation(s), there no longer are valid unrevoked Special Meeting Request(s) from stockholders who Own the Requisite Percent of the voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock entitled to vote on the matter or matters to be brought before the proposed special meeting, there shall be no requirement to call a special meeting or to hold a special meeting regardless of whether notice of such special meeting has been sent and/or proxies solicited for such special meeting. Further, inIn the event that the stockholder requestingPlan terminates under circumstances described in (a) above reserved shares remaining as of the Stockholder Requested Special Meeting withdraws such Special Meeting Request, theretermination date shall be no requirementsold to call or hold such special meeting.

Section 2.3. Place of Meeting. The Board of Directors orParticipating Associates at the Chairapplicable Purchase Price on a pro rata basis. Upon termination of the Plan, all amounts in a Participating Associate’s Payroll Deduction Account that are not used to purchase Common Stock shall be refunded to the Participating Associate.

17. Effective Date of Plan

The Plan originally was adopted by the Board as the case may be, may designate the place of meeting for any meetingand became effective on September 19, 2002. This amendment and restatement of the stockholders. If no designationPlan was adopted by the Boardon February 23, 2012effective May 4, 2017 and is so made,subject to the placeapproval of meetingthe Company’s stockholders at the Company’s20122017 annual meeting.

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT  

  105


APPENDIX A – AMENDED AND RESTATED CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2002 ASSOCIATE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

18. Government and Other Regulations

The Plan, and the grant and exercise of the rights to purchase shares hereunder, and the obligation to sell and deliver shares upon the exercise of rights to purchase shares, shall be the Corporation’s principal executive offices.

Section 2.4. Notice of Meeting. Writtensubject to all applicable federal, state and foreign laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals by any regulatory or printed notice, stating the place, day and hour of the meeting, the means of remote communications, if any, by which stockholders and proxy holders may be deemed to be present in person and vote at such meeting, and, in the case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called, shall be prepared and delivered by the Corporation not less than ten (10) days nor more than sixty (60) days before the date of the meeting, either personally, or by mail, or otherwise sent electronically as permitted by law, including via electronic mail or the Internet to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at such meeting.In the case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called also shall be set forth in the notice.If mailed, such notice shall be deemed to be delivered when deposited in the United States mail with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the stockholder at such stockholder’s address as it appears

on the stock transfer books of the Corporation. If sent electronically, such notice shall be deemed to be delivered at the times provided in the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. Such further notice shall be givengovernment agency as may be required by law. Meetings may be held without notice if all stockholders entitled to vote are present, or if notice is waived by those not present. Any previously scheduled meeting of the stockholders may be postponed, and any special meeting of the stockholders may be cancelled, by resolution of the Board of Directors or by the Chair of the Board (in the case of a special meeting called by the Chair), in each case upon public notice given prior to the time previously scheduled for such meeting of stockholders.

Section 2.5. Quorum and Adjournment. Except as otherwise provided by law or by the Certificate of Incorporation, the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the electionopinion of directors (the “Voting Stock”), represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of stockholders, except that when specified business is to be voted on by a class or series voting as a class, the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of such class or series shall constitute a quorumcounsel for the transaction of such business.Company.

19. Gender and Number

Masculine pronouns shall refer to both males and females. The chair ofsingular form shall include the meeting or a majority of the shares of Voting Stock so represented may adjourn the meeting from time to time, whether or not there is such a quorum (or, in the case of specified business to be voted on by a class or series, the chair or a majority of the shares of such class or series so represented may adjourn the meeting with respect to such specified business). No notice of the time and place of adjourned meetings need be given except as required by law. The Voting Stock (or, in the case of specified business to be voted on by a class or series, the shares of such class or series) present at a duly called meeting at which a quorum is present may continue to transact business until adjournment, notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough stockholders to leave less than a quorum.plural.

Section 2.6. Proxies. At all meetings of stockholders, a stockholder may vote by proxy executed in writing by the stockholder or as may be permitted by law, or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in-fact. Such proxy must be filed with the Secretary of the Corporation or his or her representative at or before the time of the meeting.

Section 2.7. Notice of Stockholder Business and Nominations.

(A)Notice of Director Nominations atAnnualMeetings of Stockholders.

(1) At any annual meeting or Stockholder Requested Special Meeting of the stockholders, only such nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors shall be made as shall have been properly brought before the meeting. For nominations to be properly made at an annual meeting, nominations must be (a) specified in the Corporation’s notice of meeting given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors delivered pursuant to Section 2.4 of these Bylaws, (b) otherwiseproperlymade at the annual meeting by or at the direction of the Chair of the Board or the Board of Directors or (c) otherwise properly requested to be brought before the annual meeting by any stockholder of the Corporation in accordance with this Section 2.7(A) of these Bylaws.For nominations to be properly made at a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting, nominations must be (a) specified in the Corporation’s notice of meeting given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors delivered pursuant to Section 2.4 of these Bylaws, (b) otherwise made at the special meeting by or at the direction of the Chair of the Board or the Board of Directors or (c) otherwise have been properly requested to be brought before the special meeting by the stockholder in accordance with this Section 2.2(B)(1) of these Bylaws or Section 2.7(C) of these Bylaws.For nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors to be properly requested by a stockholder to be made at an annual meeting of stockholders, a stockholder must (i) be entitled to vote at the meeting, (ii) comply with the notice and other procedures set forth in this Bylaw as to such nomination and (iii) be a stockholder of record at the time such stockholder’s notice pursuant to this Bylaw is delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation and at the time of the annual meeting. The immediately preceding sentence shall be the exclusive means for a stockholder to make nominations before an annual meeting of stockholders.

(2) For nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors of the Corporation to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder pursuant to clause (c) of paragraph (A)(1) of this Bylaw, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation (including the completed and signed questionnaire, representation and agreement required

by paragraph (A)(5) of this Bylaw), and timely updates and supplements thereof as required by this Bylaw, in writing to the Secretary. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice (including the questionnaire, representation and agreement) shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than ninety (90) days nor more than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting;provided, however, that in the event that the date of an annual meeting is more than thirty(30) days before or more than sixty (60) days after such first anniversary date of the previous year’s annual meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to the date of such annual meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. In no event shall any adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting or the announcement thereof commence a new time period for the giving of a stockholder’s notice as described above. In addition, to be considered timely, a stockholder’s notice (including the questionnaire, representation and agreement) shall further be updated and supplemented, if necessary, so that the information provided or required to be provided in such notice (including the questionnaire, representation and agreement) shall be true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, and such update and supplement shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than five (5) business days after the record date for the meeting in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of the record date, and not later than eight (8) business days prior to the date for the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

(3) Notwithstanding anything in the second sentence of paragraph (A)(2) of this Bylaw to the contrary, in the event that the number of directors to be elected to the Board of Directors of the Corporation is increased by the Board of Directors and there is no public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size of the increased Board of Directors made by the Corporation at least one hundred (100) days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, a stockholder’s notice required by this Bylaw shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which such public announcement is first made by the Corporation.

(4) To be in proper form, a stockholder’s notice to the Secretary with respect to the nomination of directors (whether given pursuant to paragraph (A)(1) of this Bylaw with respect to an annual meeting, or Section 2.2(B)(1) of these Bylaws or paragraph (C) of this Bylaw with respect to a special meeting) shall set forth (a) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director (i) all information relating to such person that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors in a contested election, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under theSecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected, (ii) a description of all direct and indirect compensation and other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during the past three years, and any other material relationships, between or among such stockholder and beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination is made, if any, and their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, on the one hand, and each proposed nominee, and his or her respective affiliates and associates, or others acting in concert therewith, on the other hand, including, without limitation all information that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Rule 404 promulgated under Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act if the stockholder making the nomination and any beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination is made, if any, or any affiliate or associate thereof or person acting in concert therewith, were the “registrant” for purposes of such rule and the nominee were a director or executive officer of such registrant; (b) as to

the stockholder giving the notice and any beneficial owner of the Corporation’scommon stockVoting Stock on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made (i) the name and address of such stockholder, and of any such beneficial owner, as they appear on the Corporation’s books and of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, (ii) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are, directly or indirectly, owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder, any such beneficial owner and any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, (iii) any option, warrant, convertible security, stock appreciation right, or similar right with an exercise or conversion privilege or a settlement payment or mechanism at a price related to any class of shares of the Corporation or with a value derived in whole or in part from the value of any class of shares of the Corporation and any other derivative positions or synthetic arrangements (including any position resulting from hedging, swap, securities lending or other similar transaction relating to the Corporation’s capital stock), whether or not such instrument or right shall be subject to settlement in the underlying class of capital stock of the Corporation or otherwise, (any of the foregoing, a “Derivative Position”) held or beneficially held by the stockholder, any such beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, including a description of the substantive terms thereof including the amount, value and/or number so held and the extent to which any such Derivative Position is intended to or has the effect of increasing or decreasing the actual or apparent voting power of such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith with respect to the Corporation’s securities, (iv) any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship pursuant to which such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith has the sole or shared right to vote any class of shares of the Corporation, (v) any short interest in any security of the Corporation (for purposes of this Bylaw, a person shall be deemed to have a short interest in a security if such person directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise, has the opportunity to profit or share in any profit derived from, or avoid, mitigate or offset in whole or in part any loss related to, any decrease in the value of the subject security), (a “Short Interest”) held by such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, (vi) any rights to dividends on the shares of the Corporation owned beneficially by such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith that are separated or separable from the underlying shares of the Corporation, (vii) any proportionate interest in securities of the Corporation or Derivative Positions held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith is a general partner, or directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner, (viii) any performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) that such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of securities of the Corporation or Derivative Positions, if any, including without limitation any such interests held by members of such person’s immediate family sharing the same household, and (ix) any other information relating to such stockholder, beneficial owner and their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, if any, that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement and form or proxy or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for the election of directors in a contested election pursuant to Regulation 14(A) of the Exchange Act.

(5) A stockholder’s notice to the Secretary with respect to the nomination of directors (whether given pursuant to paragraph (A)(1) of this Bylaw with respect to an annual meeting, or Section 2.2(B)(1) of these Bylaws or paragraph (C) of this Bylaw with respect to a special meeting) must also include a completed and signed written response to a questionnaire with respect to the background and qualification of the nominee for director and the background of any other person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made or who is reasonably expected to participate in the solicitation of proxies with respect to the election of such person (which questionnaire shall be provided by the Secretary of the Corporation upon written request) and a signed written representation and agreement

(in the form provided by the Secretary of the Corporation upon written request) that such nominee for director (A) is not and will not become a party to (1) any agreement, arrangement or understanding with, and has not given any commitment or assurance to, any person or entity as to how such person, if elected as a director of the Corporation, will act or vote on any issue or question (a “Voting Commitment”) that has not been disclosed to the Corporation or (2) any Voting Commitment that could limit or interfere with such person’s ability to comply, if elected as a director of the Corporation, with such person’s fiduciary duties under applicable law, (B) is not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding with any person or entity other than the Corporation with respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement or indemnification in connection with service or action as a director that has not been disclosedtherein,to the Corporation,and (C) in such person’s individual capacity and on behalf of any person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, would be in compliance, if elected as a director of the Corporation, and will comply with all applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines of the Corporation. The Corporation may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may reasonably be required by the Corporation to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as an independent director of the Corporation or that could be material to a reasonable stockholder’s understanding of the independence, or lack thereof, of such nominee.

(6) For nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors of the Corporation pursuant to Section 2.7(A)(1)(a) or (b) of this Bylaw or paragraph (C) of this Bylaw with respect to a special meeting, the nominee must also provide a completed and signed questionnaire, representation and agreement with the same information, and delivered in accordance with the same time period that applies to nominations to be brought by a stockholder of the Corporation, required by Section 2.7(A)(5) of this Bylaw.

(B)Notice of Other Business atAnnual Meetings of Stockholders.

(1) At any annual meeting or Stockholder Requested Special Meeting of the stockholders, only such business to be considered by the stockholders, other than nominations of persons for election to the Corporation’s Board of Directors which is addressed by paragraph (A) of this Bylaw, (“Other Business”) shall be made at such annual meeting of stockholders as shall have been properly brought before the meeting. For proposals of Other Business to be properly brought before an annual meeting, proposals of Other Business must be: (a) specified in the Corporation’s notice of meeting given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors delivered pursuant to Section 2.4 of these Bylaws, (b) otherwise properly made at the annual meeting, by or at the direction of the Chair of the Board or the Board of Directors or (c) otherwise properly requested to be brought before the annual meeting by any stockholder of the Corporation in accordance with Section 2.7(B) of these Bylaws.For proposals of Other Business to be properly brought before a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting, proposals of Other Business must be: (a) specified in the Corporation’s notice of meeting given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors delivered pursuant to Section 2.4 of these Bylaws, (b) otherwise properly made at the Stockholder Requested Special Meeting, by or at the direction of the Chair of the Board or the Board of Directors or (c) otherwise have been properly requested to be brought before the Stockholder Requested Special Meeting by the stockholder in accordance with this Section 2.2(B)(2) of these Bylaws.For proposals of Other Business to be properly requested by a stockholder to be made at an annual meeting of stockholders, a stockholder must (i) be entitled to vote at the meeting, (ii) comply with the notice procedures and other procedures set forth in this Bylaw as to such proposal and (iii) be a stockholder of record at the time such stockholder’s notice pursuant to this Bylaw is delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation and at the time of the annual meeting. The immediately preceding sentence shall be the exclusive means for a stockholder to submit proposals for Other Business (other than matters properly brought under Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and included in the Corporation’s notice of meeting) to be considered at an annual meeting of stockholders.

(2) For a proposal of Other Business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder pursuant to clause (c) of paragraph (B)(1) of this Bylaw, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation and such Other Business must otherwise be a proper matter for stockholder action. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than ninety (90) days nor more than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting;provided, however, that in the event that the date of an annual meeting is more than thirty(30) days before or more than sixty (60) days after such first anniversary date of the previous year’s annual meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to the date of such annual meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. In no event shall any adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting or the announcement thereof commence a new time period for the giving of a stockholder’s notice as described above. In addition, to be considered timely, a stockholder’s notice shall further be updated and supplemented, if necessary, so that the information provided or required to be provided in such notice shall be true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, and such update and supplement shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than five (5) business days after the record date for the meeting in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of the record date, and not later than eight (8) business days prior to the date for the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

(3)Such stockholder’s noticeTo be in proper form, a stockholder’s notice to the Secretary with respect to the Other Business (whether given pursuant to paragraph (B)(1) of this Bylaw with respect to an annual meeting, or Section 2.2(B)(2) of these Bylaws with respect to a special meeting) shall set forth (a) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting and any material interest in such business of such stockholder and any beneficial owner on whose behalf the proposal is made; (b) the text of the proposal of business (including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and, in the event that such proposal or business includes a proposal to amend the Bylaws, the text of the proposed amendment), (c) a description of all agreements, arrangements and understandings between such stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, and any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith and (d) as to the stockholder giving the notice and any beneficial owner of the Corporation’scapital stockVoting Stock on whose behalf the proposal is made (i) the name and address of such stockholder, and of such beneficial owner, as they appear on the Corporation’s books and of any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, (ii) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are, directly or indirectly, owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder, any such beneficial owner and any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, (iii) any Derivative Position held or beneficially held by the stockholder, any such beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, including a description of the substantive terms thereof including the amount, value and/or number so held and the extent to which any such Derivative Position is intended to or has the effect of increasing or decreasing the actual or apparent voting power of such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith with respect to the Corporation’s securities, (iv) any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship pursuant to which such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith has the sole or shared right to vote any class of shares of the Corporation, (v) any Short Interest held by such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, (vi) any rights to dividends on the shares of the Corporation owned beneficially by such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective

affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith that are separated or separable from the underlying shares of the Corporation, (vii) any proportionate interest in securities of the Corporation or Derivative Positions held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith is a general partner, or directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner, (viii) any performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) that such stockholder, beneficial owner or any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of securities of the Corporation or Derivative Positions, if any, including without limitation any such interests held by members of such stockholder’s immediate family sharing the same household, and (ix) any other information relating to such stockholder, beneficial owner and any of their respective affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, if any, that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement and form or proxy or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for, as applicable, the proposal pursuant to Regulation 14(A) of the Exchange Act.

(C)Special Meetings of Stockholders. At any special meeting of the stockholders, only such business shall be conducted or considered as shall have been properly brought before the meetingby the Board of Directorspursuant to the Corporation’s notice of meeting pursuant to Section 2.4 of these Bylaws. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors may be made at a special meeting of stockholders at whichthe Board of Directors has determined thatdirectors are to be elected, as reflected in the Corporation’s notice of meeting pursuant to Section 2.4 of these Bylaws, (a) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or (b) in the case of a special meeting other than a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting, or in the case of a special meeting that is a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting and the person wishing to make such nominations did not deliver, and did not otherwise direct the delivery of, a Special Meeting Request with request to such meeting,by any stockholder of the Corporation who (i) is entitled to vote at the meeting, (ii) complies with the notice and other procedures set forth in this Bylaw as to such nomination and (iii) is a stockholder of record at the time such stockholder’s notice is delivered pursuant to this Bylaw to the Secretary of the Corporation and at the time of the special meeting. The immediately preceding sentence shall be or (c) in theexclusive means forcase ofaStockholder Requested Special Meeting, by anystockholderof the Corporation pursuanttomake nominations before a special meeting of stockholdersSection 2.2.

(1)For any nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors ofIn the event the Corporationto be properly brought beforecalls a special meetingbyof stockholders for the purpose of electing one or more directors to the Board of Directors, any stockholder entitled to vote in such election of directors (other thana stockholderpursuantwho has delivered, or who is acting on behalf of a person who directed the delivery of, a written request with respect toparagraph (C) of this Bylaw,such special meeting, in the case of a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting (an “Excluded Stockholder”)) may nominate a person or persons, as the case may be, for election to the Board of Directors of the Corporation as specified in the Corporation’s notice of meeting, by delivering the stockholder’s notice in the form required by paragraphs (A)(4) and (A)(5) of this Bylaw (including the completed and signed questionnaire, representation and agreement required by paragraph (A)(56) of this Bylaw), and timely updates and supplements thereof as required by this Bylaw,shall be deliveredto the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not earlier than the one hundred twentieth (120th) prior to such special meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such special meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the special meeting and of the nominees proposed by the Board of Directors to be elected at such meeting. In no event shall any adjournment or postponement of a special meeting or the announcement thereof commence a new time period for the giving of a stockholder’s notice as described above. In addition, to be considered timely, a stockholder’s notice (including the questionnaire, representation and agreement) shall further be updated and supplemented, if necessary, so that the information provided or required to be provided in such notice (including the questionnaire, representation and agreement) shall be true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof,

and such update and supplement shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than five (5) business days after the record date for the meeting in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of the record date, and not later than eight (8) business days prior to the date for the meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.Notwithstanding any other provision of these Bylaws, in the case of a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting, no Excluded Stockholder may nominate a person for election to the Board of Directors at the meeting, except pursuant to the written request(s) delivered for such special meeting pursuant to Section 2.2(A). Notwithstanding any other provision of these Bylaws, in the case of a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting, no stockholder may propose any other business to be considered at the meeting, except pursuant to the written request(s) delivered for such special meeting pursuant to Section 2.2(A).

(D)General.

(1)OnlyExcept as otherwise required by law, only such persons who are nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Bylaw and Section 2.2 (as applicable) shall be eligible to serve as director and only such Other Business shall be conducted at a meeting of stockholders as shall have been brought before the meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Bylawand Section 2.2 (as applicable). Except as otherwise provided by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, the chair of the meeting shall have the power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any Other Business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Bylaw and, if any proposed nomination or Other Business is not in compliance with this Bylaw, to declare that such defective proposal or nomination shall be disregarded.Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.7, unless otherwise required by law, if the stockholder does not provide the information required under Section 2.2(B) and/or this Section 2.7 to the Corporation within the time frames specified herein, or if the stockholder (or a qualified representative of the stockholder) does not appear at the annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Corporation to present a nomination or Other Business, such nomination shall be disregarded and such Other Business shall not be transacted, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Corporation. For purposes of Section 2.2(B) and this Section 2.7, to be considered a qualified representative of a stockholder, a person must be a duly authorized officer, manager or partner of such stockholder or authorized by a writing executed by such stockholder (or a reliable reproduction or electronic transmission of the writing) delivered to the Corporation prior to the making of such nomination or proposal at such meeting by such stockholder stating that such person is authorized to act for such stockholder as proxy at the meeting of stockholders.

(2) For purposes of this Bylaw, “public announcement” shall mean disclosure in a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service, Associated Press or comparable national news service or in a document publicly filed by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

(3) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Bylaw, a stockholder shall also comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to the matters set forth in this Bylaw;provided,however, that any references in these Bylaws to the Exchange Act or the rules promulgated thereunder are not intended to and shall not limit the separate and additional requirements set forth in these Bylaws with respect to nominations or proposals as to any Other Business to be considered pursuant to this Bylaw.

(4) Nothing in this Bylaw shall be deemed to affect any rights (i) of stockholders to request inclusion of proposals in the Corporation’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act or (ii) of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock if and to the extent provided for under law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws. Subject to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, nothing in these Bylaws shall be construed to permit any stockholder, or give any stockholder the right, to include or have disseminated or described in the Corporation’s proxy statement any nomination of director or directors or any Other Business proposal.

Section 2.8. Procedures; Required Vote.

(A)Procedures and Required Vote for Election of Directors. Election of directors at all meetings of stockholders at which directors are to be elected shall be by written ballot, and, except as otherwise set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation with respect to the right of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock to elect additional directors under specified circumstances, each director shall be elected by a majority of the votes cast at any meeting for the election of directors at which a quorum is present with respect to such director’s election in elections of directors in which the number of nominees is equal to the number of positions available;provided, however, that directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at any meeting of stockholders for the election of directors at which a quorum is present for which (i) the Secretary of the Corporation receives a notice that a stockholder has or expects to nominate a person for election to the Board of Directors in compliance with the requirements set forth in Section 2.7 of these Bylaws, and (ii) such nomination has not been withdrawn by such stockholder on or prior to the business day next preceding the date the Corporation first mails its notice of meeting for such meeting to the stockholders. If directors are to be elected by a plurality vote, stockholders shall be provided with the option to withhold votes with respect to a nominee in lieu of the option to cast a vote against such nominee. The Board of Directors shall establish such procedures as it deems appropriate and advisable for the submission and consideration of resignations from the Board by incumbent directors who do not receive a majority of the votes cast for such director at any meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected and the number of nominees is equal to the number of positions available.

(B)Required Vote for Other Business. Except as otherwise provided by law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, all matters submitted to the stockholders at any meeting other than election of directors (which is addressed in paragraph (A) of this Bylaw) shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast with respect thereto.

Section 2.9. Inspectors of Elections; Opening and Closing the Polls; Rules of Conduct.

(A) The Board of Directors by resolution shall appoint one or more inspectors, which inspector or inspectors may include individuals who serve the Corporation in other capacities, including, without limitation, as officers, employees, agents or representatives of the Corporation, to act at the meetings of stockholders and make a written report thereof. One or more persons may be designated as alternate inspectors to replace any inspector who fails to act. If no inspector or alternate has been appointed to act, or if all inspectors or alternates who have been appointed are unable to act at a meeting of stockholders, the chair of the meeting shall appoint one or more inspectors to act at the meeting. Each inspector, before discharging his or her duties, shall take and sign an oath faithfully to execute the duties of inspector with strict impartiality and according to the best of his or her ability. The inspectors shall have the duties prescribed by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

(B) The chair of the meeting shall fix and announce at the meeting the date and time of the opening and the closing of the polls for each matter upon which the stockholders will vote at a meeting.

(C) The Board of Directors and the chair of the meeting each shall have the authority to adopt and enforce such rules or regulations for the conduct of meetings of stockholders as they shall deem necessary or appropriate.

Section 2.10. No Stockholder Action by Written Consent. Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock to elect additional directors under specific circumstances, any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of the Corporation must be effected at an annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Corporation and may not be affected by any consent in writing by such stockholders.

 

LOGO

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 1680 CAPITAL ONE DR.
MCLEAN, VA 22102-3491
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on April 29, 2015. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ElEcTRONIc DElIVERY OF FuTuRE PROXY MATERIAlS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Capital One in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on April 29, 2015. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIl
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge,
51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
M83952-P60101-Z64838 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
cAPITAl ONE FINANcIAl cORPORATION
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
1. Election of Directors
Nominees: For Against Abstain
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR
1a. Richard D. Fairbank proposals 2, 3 and 4. For Against Abstain
1b. Patrick W. Gross 2. Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young LLP as
independent auditors of Capital One for 2015.
3. Advisory approval of Capital One’s 2014 Named Executive
1c. Ann Fritz Hackett Of?cer compensation.
4. Approval of amendments to Capital One’s Restated
1d. Lewis Hay, III Certi?cate of Incorporation to allow stockholders to
request special meetings of the stockholders.
1e. Benjamin P. Jenkins III The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST For Against Abstain
proposal 5.
1f. Pierre E. Leroy 5. Stockholder proposal regarding special meetings of the
stockholders, if presented at the meeting.
1g. Peter E. Raskind NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any adjournment thereof.
1h. Mayo A. Shattuck III
1i. Bradford H. Warner ! ! !
1j. Catherine G. West
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other ?duciary, please give full title as such. Joint
owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized of?cer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

106  

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  

  2017 PROXY STATEMENT


 

LOGOLOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on April 30, 2015:
The Notice & Proxy Statement and Annual Report/10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.
M83953-P60101-Z64838
cAPITAl ONE FINANcIAl cORPORATION
Annual Stockholder Meeting
Thursday, April 30, 2015 10:00 a.m.
capital One’s Headquarters
1680 capital One Drive
Mclean, Virginia 22102
THIS PROXY IS SOlIcITED ON BEHAlF OF THE BOARD OF DIREcTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Richard D. Fairbank and John G. Finneran, Jr., and either of them, proxies of the
undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote all the shares of Common Stock of Capital One Financial Corporation,
a Delaware corporation, held of record by the undersigned on March 5, 2015, at the Annual Stockholder Meeting to be
held on April 30, 2015 and at any postponement or adjournment thereof.
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERlY EXEcuTED, WIll BE VOTED AS SPEcIFIED BY THE uNDERSIGNED STOcKHOlDER.
IF NO cHOIcE IS SPEcIFIED BY THE STOcKHOlDER, THIS PROXY WIll BE VOTED “FOR” All PORTIONS OF
ITEMS (1), (2), (3) AND (4), “AGAINST” ITEM (5), AND IN THE PROXIES’ DIScRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTERS
cOMING BEFORE THE MEETING.
continued and to be signed on reverse side